VIEW THIS AS

Auto mode follows the Route Engine until you choose a viewpoint.

YOU ARE HERE

ROUTE CHECK

CONNECTED TO

WHAT NEXT

Use the canonical route for this room, or HELP if you are unsure.

GP Vocabulary for Cross-Passage Comparison: How JC2 Students Compare Ideas, Not Just Topics

The one-sentence truth: Two writers are not meaningfully compared because they discuss the same topic; comparison begins when you identify where their reasoning converges and diverges.

JC2 comparison needs relational vocabulary. Writers may agree on facts but disagree on causes, share a goal but differ on methods, or use similar evidence while assigning it different significance.

Core comparison vocabulary

Converge: move towards similar conclusions. Diverge: differ in position or reasoning. Corroborate: independently support. Contradict: assert incompatible claims. Qualify: narrow another claim. Complement: add a different but compatible dimension.

Compare claims

What does each writer want the reader to accept? Agreement may be broad while the exact scope differs.

Compare mechanisms

Two writers may agree that inequality is harmful but disagree about why: one may emphasise material deprivation, another social trust. That is a deeper comparison than “both dislike inequality”.

Compare assumptions

One writer may assume individuals respond strongly to incentives; another may emphasise norms and institutions. Assumptions explain why similar evidence produces different conclusions.

Compare values

Liberty, equality, security, efficiency and dignity can be weighted differently. Many apparent factual disputes are ultimately evaluative.

Compare evidence

One passage may rely on anecdotes and another on broad data. One may use historical analogy, another current research. Compare evidential type and weight, not only quantity.

Compare tone

A measured writer and a dismissive writer may make similar claims but position the reader differently. Tone can affect credibility and rhetorical force.

Comparison frame

“Both writers accept X, but they diverge on Y because A assumes…, whereas B prioritises…” is useful because it identifies shared ground and the source of difference.

Seven-day drill

  • Compare claims.
  • Compare causal mechanisms.
  • Compare assumptions.
  • Compare values.
  • Compare evidence.
  • Compare tone.
  • Write one synthesis paragraph joining all six.

Continue the JC2 GP vocabulary system

Return to General Paper Vocabulary Year 2 (JC2) and Vocabulary for Junior College (JC1–JC2).

Final thought

The best comparison identifies not only that writers disagree, but the intellectual hinge on which the disagreement turns.

Discover more from eduKate Singapore

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading