Find your next learning step
Choose the question closest to what you need today, or read the guide from the beginning.
Understand the idea · Compare the examples · See a full solution · Practise and check · Choose the next step
Swapping the two sides of an inequality rewrites the same comparison in the opposite reading order: 2 < 5 becomes 5 > 2. Negating both sides changes both numbers: 2 < 5 becomes −2 > −5. Both steps may reverse the written inequality symbol, but they do so for different reasons. Naming the operation prevents a sign rule from becoming a guess.
For G2 Mathematics, keep a short reason beside any unfamiliar inequality step. Adding or subtracting the same expression preserves order. Multiplying or dividing by a known negative number reverses order. Simply exchanging left and right rewrites the comparison from the other side. Check the final set of values in the original inequality, including whether its boundary is allowed.
Contents
Sections 1–5
Sections 6–10
Sections 11–15
Sections 16–20
Sections 21–25
The statements x < 3 and 3 > x mean exactly the same thing. No value has changed sign. The sides have exchanged positions, so the comparison symbol must point the other way to preserve the meaning.
The statements −x > −3 and x < 3 are also equivalent, but the operation is different: multiply both sides by −1. The numerical order reverses because a reflection across zero reverses left-to-right order on the number line.
Do not use the instruction flip the sign without identifying which sign is meant and what operation caused it. A minus sign attached to a term and an inequality symbol describe different features of the statement.
This focused guide complements why students treat inequalities like equations. The broader guide establishes solution sets; here we compare two operations that can look similar on the page while changing different parts of the notation.
The SEAB G2 Mathematics syllabus for 2027 includes simple inequalities with integer coefficients. Reliable manipulation depends on knowing which operations preserve the set of values that make the comparison true.
The core worked examples here use linear inequalities. Some sections explain why zero divisors or unknown signs require caution; those are guardrails for interpreting operations, not a claim that every advanced inequality form belongs in the same school exercise.
An equation asserts equality, which looks the same when its sides are exchanged. An inequality asserts an order, so its symbol has a direction. That direction must stay attached to which expression is larger, rather than to a habitual visual pattern.
For the subject labels and wider route, see what G1, G2 and G3 Mathematics mean. The purpose of this article is to make the rules understandable enough to transfer when a question places the unknown on an unfamiliar side.
Begin with numerical comparisons that can be checked immediately. Once the learner can explain 2 < 5 and −2 > −5, connect the same order behaviour to expressions containing an unknown.
Contents · Previous section · Next section
In 2 < 5, the left number is smaller than the right number. In 5 > 2, the left number is larger than the right number. Both statements describe the same pair and the same order.
Read a variable comparison in words too. The statement x < 3 says x is less than 3. The statement 3 > x says 3 is greater than x. Each describes the set of real numbers below 3.
By contrast, 3 < x says x is greater than 3. Swapping sides without changing the comparison symbol would therefore change the solution set. It would not be a harmless rearrangement.
The open side of the familiar inequality symbol faces the larger expression, but do not rely only on a picture mnemonic. Read one complete sentence so the direction has a meaning. This is especially useful when negative expressions occur on both sides.
For example, −2 > −5 is true because −2 lies to the right of −5 on the number line. The number with the larger absolute value is not necessarily the larger signed number. Order and distance from zero are different quantities.
Contents · Previous section · Next section
Start with a < b. Exchanging the two sides gives b > a. The numbers or expressions have not been multiplied, divided or negated. Only their positions in the written comparison have changed.
The same applies to non-strict inequalities: a ≤ b can be written b ≥ a. Equality remains allowed. Swapping sides changes neither a strict endpoint into an included endpoint nor an included endpoint into a strict one.
For example, x ≤ 7 and 7 ≥ x both allow x = 7. They both allow 6 and both reject 8. Testing the same values makes their equivalence visible.
This operation is often useful at the final line. A solution such as 4 > x may be rewritten x < 4 to put the unknown first. That is a presentation choice, not another algebraic transformation of its value.
A useful note is swapped sides. It distinguishes this change from division by a negative coefficient, which may have happened on the preceding line. Two consecutive reversals of the written symbol can be correct when two different justified operations occur; count the operations rather than reacting to the number of symbol changes.
Contents · Previous section · Next section
Negating a number means multiplying it by −1. For 2 and 5, the new numbers are −2 and −5. Their order is reversed: although 2 < 5, it is true that −2 > −5.
The number line explains why. Negation reflects every point across zero. A point farther right before reflection ends farther left afterwards. Thus multiplying both sides of an inequality by −1 reverses the order.
For −x > −3, multiplying by −1 gives x < 3. Both expressions change sign, and the inequality reverses. Writing x > 3 would preserve the wrong order after the reflection.
Do not confuse this with moving the unknown from right to left. The unknown may already be on the left when negation is applied. What matters is the operation on the expressions, not which side contains x.
Check with an allowed value. In −x > −3, x = 2 gives −2 > −3, which is true. The result x < 3 includes 2, while the incorrect x > 3 excludes it. One substitution can expose that particular reversal error, though a full equivalence argument comes from the valid operation.
Contents · Previous section · Next section
Start with 2 < 5 and add 4 to both sides. The result is 6 < 9. Both numbers move the same distance in the same direction on the number line, so their order remains unchanged.
Subtracting the same amount works similarly. From 2 < 5, subtracting 8 gives −6 < −3. Crossing zero does not itself reverse the inequality. The relative positions remain in the same order.
For x + 3 < 7, subtract 3 from both sides to obtain x < 4. No inequality reversal is needed. The subtraction isolates the unknown while preserving which side is smaller.
A learner may say that moving the positive 3 across changes a sign, then incorrectly reverse the inequality as well. Replace that shorthand with the actual operation: subtract 3 from both sides. The term’s new form and the comparison direction are separate decisions.
The guide to a letter’s consistent meaning supports this precision. The same x is being tested throughout the solution. Each valid step should preserve exactly which values make the original comparison true.
Contents · Previous section · Next section
From x + 5 > 2, adding −5 to both sides gives x > −3. The fact that the added number is negative does not trigger an inequality reversal. Addition and multiplication have different effects on order.
This is why the shortcut reverse when there is a negative is unreliable. Negative values can appear in many roles: as an added constant, as a coefficient, as a candidate input, or as part of a denominator. The operation determines the order rule.
Compare x + 5 > 2 with −5x > 2. In the first, subtracting 5 preserves >. In the second, dividing by −5 reverses > to <. The same visible numeral 5 with a minus sign leads to different decisions because it participates in a different operation.
Before changing a comparison symbol, name the action in a short phrase: subtract five, divide by negative five, or exchange sides. That phrase can prevent several different rules from collapsing into one vague response to a minus sign.
Once the learner is fluent, the annotation can disappear. The goal is not permanently lengthy working; it is a stable internal distinction between shifting both values and reversing their order through negative scaling.
Contents · Previous section · Next section
Multiplying 2 < 5 by 3 gives 6 < 15. Both values are stretched away from zero by the same positive factor, preserving their order. Dividing by a positive number similarly preserves the comparison direction.
For 3x ≤ 12, dividing by 3 gives x ≤ 4. The boundary remains included because the original inequality allowed equality. There is no reversal and no change from ≤ to <.
Check values on both sides of the proposed boundary. At x = 4, the original gives 12 ≤ 12, true. At x = 5, it gives 15 ≤ 12, false. At x = 3, it gives 9 ≤ 12, true.
These checks illustrate the accepted region and endpoint. They do not replace the reason that division by positive 3 preserves order for every candidate x. Use them to make the solution set understandable and to catch a copying error.
The estimation-and-checking guide explains the scope of individual checks. One successful substitution does not prove that an entire proposed set is correct; the valid algebra establishes the general relationship.
Contents · Previous section · Next section
Multiplying 2 < 5 by −3 gives −6 > −15. The positive stretching changes distances, while the negative sign reflects the order. The reversal is necessary because −6 is greater than −15.
For −3x ≤ 12, division by −3 gives x ≥ −4. Equality remains allowed, but the direction reverses. The correct result includes numbers at least −4.
Check x = 0: the original gives 0 ≤ 12, true, and the result includes zero. The incorrect answer x ≤ −4 would reject zero and therefore cannot be equivalent to the original.
Check the boundary x = −4: the original gives 12 ≤ 12, true. A value just below the boundary, such as −5, gives 15 ≤ 12, false. These checks confirm the direction and inclusion in concrete cases.
Do not change the inequality direction merely because the final boundary is negative. The reversal happened because of division by a negative coefficient. A boundary of −4 can appear in many correctly oriented solution sets; its sign alone does not tell you whether to use ≥ or ≤.
Contents · Previous section · Next section
Begin with the true statement 3 < 8. Swapping sides gives 8 > 3. Negating both sides of the original gives −3 > −8. These results both use >, but they contain different numbers and arise from different actions.
Now negate the swapped statement 8 > 3. You obtain −8 < −3. This is the same comparison as −3 > −8 written with the sides exchanged. The operations remain consistent when their effects are tracked separately.
| Starting statement | Operation | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 3 < 8 | Multiply both sides by −1 | −3 > −8 |
| 8 > 3 | Multiply both sides by −1 | −8 < −3 |
The table is useful because a rule such as flip cannot explain which expressions should also change. Swapping moves them; negating changes their signs. The correct resulting statement records both the expression action and the comparison action.
If a learner changes only the symbol after multiplying by −1, the expressions remain wrong. If they change only the signs of the expressions, the order remains wrong. A valid step must carry the whole operation through.
Contents · Previous section · Next section
Solve 7 − 2x ≤ 15. One route subtracts 7 from both sides: −2x ≤ 8. Dividing by −2 reverses the inequality, giving x ≥ −4.
A second route avoids negative division by adding 2x to both sides first: 7 ≤ 15 + 2x. Subtract 15 to get −8 ≤ 2x, then divide by positive 2 to obtain −4 ≤ x. Swapping sides gives x ≥ −4.
The routes agree. In the first, the comparison symbol reverses during negative division. In the second, it stays oriented during positive division and reverses only when the sides are exchanged for presentation.
This contrast explains why counting visual reversals without reading the operations is unreliable. Different valid routes can display different intermediate symbols while preserving the same solution set.
Substitute x = −4, x = 0 and x = −5 into the original. The first two satisfy it, while −5 does not. The final set x ≥ −4 has the correct endpoint and direction. A route that produces x ≤ −4 would fail the zero check even if its final boundary number matched.
Contents · Previous section · Next section
SECTION 12 OF 25
11. Starting with the unknown on the right is not a new problem type
Consider 15 ≥ 7 − 2x. This is the original example with the sides exchanged. It describes the same comparison as 7 − 2x ≤ 15.
Subtracting 7 gives 8 ≥ −2x. Dividing by −2 reverses the comparison to −4 ≤ x. If desired, swap sides to write x ≥ −4. The unknown’s position does not change which values solve the inequality.
A learner who is comfortable only with x on the left may introduce an unnecessary early rearrangement. Swapping at the start is allowed, but it should preserve the comparison direction correctly. Alternatively, work with the right-side unknown until the end.
The algebra-instruction guide helps keep the task clear: solve means identify the values that satisfy the statement, not force the symbols into one memorised visual arrangement before reasoning begins.
For practice, present the same inequality in both orientations and ask the learner to compare the final sets. This builds recognition that 4 > x and x < 4 are the same answer, while 4 < x is a different set.
Contents · Previous section · Next section
The symbols < and > exclude equality. The symbols ≤ and ≥ include it. A reversal caused by negative multiplication changes the direction but preserves whether equality is allowed.
For −2x < 6, division by −2 gives x > −3. For −2x ≤ 6, it gives x ≥ −3. The boundary number matches, but the first rejects x = −3 and the second accepts it.
Swapping sides follows the same distinction: x > −3 becomes −3 < x, while x ≥ −3 becomes −3 ≤ x. Do not replace a strict symbol with an included one just because the unknown changes sides.
A boundary test is particularly useful here. Substitute x = −3 into the original and compare the two sides. Equality occurs, so the original symbol determines whether that value is permitted.
The broader inequality guide connects this to number-line representations. An open or closed endpoint records inclusion, while the shaded direction records which side of the boundary is accepted. Those two decisions should both be justified.
Contents · Previous section · Next section
Multiplying both sides of 2 < 5 by zero would give 0 < 0, which is false. There is no valid rule saying that every multiplication preserves or simply reverses a comparison. Zero is a separate case.
For non-strict inequalities, multiplying by zero can make different starting statements collapse to the same equality. For example, both 2 ≤ 5 and 8 ≤ 5 would lead to 0 ≤ 0 after multiplication, although one original is true and the other false.
That loss of distinction prevents the step from being an equivalent solving operation. You cannot recover the original order information by dividing by zero, because division by zero is undefined in the ordinary real-number model.
The core linear examples avoid this problem by dividing by a known nonzero coefficient. Always identify the divisor before applying an order rule. A coefficient of −2 and a coefficient of zero have fundamentally different roles.
The fractional-equation guide develops the related need to preserve domain conditions when dividing. The shared habit is to ask what makes the operation reversible on the values being considered.
Contents · Previous section · Next section
The simple rule for negative division assumes you know the divisor is negative. If an expression contains an unknown variable as divisor, its sign may vary. You cannot automatically choose preserve or reverse without addressing that condition.
This is a caution about transferring a familiar rule, not an invitation to treat every G2 linear problem as an advanced rational inequality. In the core form ax < b with a given nonzero integer a, the coefficient’s sign is already known.
For example, dividing by −4 is different from dividing by x when x has not been restricted. The former has a fixed negative sign. The latter could be positive, negative or zero, and zero may make the proposed operation invalid.
Before using an operation in a new context, ask which condition the rule requires. If the condition is not given or established, choose a suitable taught route or seek clarification rather than applying the rule blindly.
This is the same reasoning discipline used in geometry and percentages: a method works because its conditions hold. Recognising a familiar symbol is not enough to license an operation when its essential sign information is missing.
Contents · Previous section · Next section
An invented model gives a remaining quantity R = 15 − 2n, where n is a whole-number count of completed steps. The condition is that at least 7 units remain. Therefore 15 − 2n ≥ 7.
Subtracting 15 gives −2n ≥ −8. Dividing by −2 reverses the inequality, so n ≤ 4. The context also says n is a whole-number count, so suitable nonnegative counts are 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4.
If the question asks for the greatest permitted count, answer 4. If it asks for all permitted counts, report the set. The algebraic boundary and the requested final quantity are not always the same form of answer.
Check the boundary: n = 4 leaves 7 units, meeting at least 7. At n = 5, only 5 units remain, which fails. This gives a contextual reason for accepting smaller counts rather than larger ones.
The two-valid-examples guide explains the importance of a target and domain. Here the inequality gives a range, while the whole-number and nonnegative conditions select the actual counts relevant to the model.
Contents · Previous section · Next section
Question A: Rewrite x < 6 with the sides exchanged. Then multiply the original inequality by −1. State why the resulting expressions are different even though both steps change the written comparison direction.
Question B: Solve −3x ≤ 12. Check the boundary and one value on each side in the original inequality. Explain why the negative boundary does not itself determine the direction.
Question C: Solve 7 − 2x ≤ 15 by dividing a negative coefficient, then by first moving the variable term through addition. Compare the final solution sets.
Question D: Solve 4 > x + 7 and write the final answer with x on the left. Identify the subtraction step and the side-exchange step separately.
Question E: Compare the solutions of −2x < 6 and −2x ≤ 6. Test x = −3 and explain the endpoint difference.
Question F: A learner says that subtracting a negative number requires reversing the inequality. Use 2 < 5 and subtraction of −3 to test the claim. Name the operation that actually triggers reversal when its multiplier is negative.
Contents · Previous section · Next section
For A, swapping sides gives 6 > x. Multiplying the original by −1 gives −x > −6. Swapping changes the positions of the expressions; negating changes their values and signs.
For B, division by −3 gives x ≥ −4. The boundary −4 gives equality, zero satisfies the original, and −5 does not. The operation on a negative coefficient causes the reversal, not the final sign of −4.
For C, both routes give x ≥ −4. The first reverses during negative division; the second can end at −4 ≤ x and then exchange sides for presentation.
For D, subtract 7 to obtain −3 > x, then swap sides to write x < −3. The subtraction preserves the comparison direction. The exchange rewrites the same order from the other side.
For E, the results are x > −3 and x ≥ −3. The first excludes the boundary and the second includes it. For F, subtracting −3 is adding 3, giving 5 < 8 with no reversal. Multiplication or division by a known negative number reverses order.
Contents · Previous section · Next section
A learner reverses the inequality while subtracting a constant. Ask for the actual operation rather than the phrase move it across. If both sides were shifted by the same amount, their order should stay the same.
Another learner swaps sides without changing < to >. Ask them to read both statements in words and test a value. The change in meaning usually becomes apparent immediately.
A third correctly divides by a negative number but forgets to negate the boundary. The comparison direction is only one part of the operation; both expressions must also be divided correctly. A fourth finds the right boundary but changes strictness. Use the boundary substitution to inspect inclusion.
The marked-paper guide helps turn these into distinct practice decisions. A general label such as sign error hides whether the difficulty concerns subtraction, negative scaling, side exchange or endpoint interpretation.
Ask the learner to repair the first unsupported step, then continue from the repaired line. Rewriting the whole solution without identifying that decision may leave the same confusion ready to recur.
Contents · Previous section · Next section
Begin with true numerical comparisons and ask what happens under one named operation. Mix adding a negative number with multiplying by a negative number so that the learner must attend to the action rather than merely detect a minus sign.
Next use one-step variable inequalities. Ask for the operation and a test value. Then give the same inequality with its sides exchanged and compare the accepted sets.
Finally, use a multistep example with two possible valid routes. The learner should explain why each route preserves the same solution set even when the intermediate symbols differ. This builds flexibility without requiring a more advanced inequality type.
The worked-example revision guide explains how to reduce prompts gradually. Independence here means choosing an operation, applying its correct order rule and interpreting the resulting set without depending on one familiar page arrangement.
Contents · Previous section · Next section
The statement a < b is equivalent to b − a > 0. The positive difference records how far the larger quantity exceeds the smaller one. This gives another way to explain the operations without relying only on a number-line picture.
If the same c is added to both sides, the difference becomes (b + c) − (a + c) = b − a. It remains positive, so the order is unchanged. Subtraction is the same argument with a negative addition.
If both sides are multiplied by a positive k, the difference becomes k(b − a), still positive. If k is negative, that difference becomes negative, so the left and right order reverses. The sign condition is therefore part of the reason, not an arbitrary instruction.
Swapping the two sides changes which difference is written. The same comparison can be expressed as b > a without changing either quantity. It is a change in reading order, whereas negative multiplication changes the quantities themselves.
This short argument is an extension for a learner ready to connect the rules. It need not be reproduced in every solution. Its value is to unify the operations while keeping their different mechanisms visible.
Contents · Previous section · Next section
Start with −2x > 6. Dividing by −2 reverses the comparison and gives x < −3. Exchanging sides then gives −3 > x. The written symbol changed from > to < and then back to >, but the final set remains the values below −3.
A learner who counts flips may think the final > must be wrong. Read the complete statement instead: −3 is greater than x means x is less than −3. The expressions’ positions matter as much as the symbol.
Alternatively, swap the original sides first to write 6 < −2x. Dividing by −2 gives −3 > x. The two routes agree and show that both operations have been handled consistently.
Check x = −4 in the original: −2 × (−4) = 8, and 8 > 6 is true. Check x = −2: 4 > 6 is false. Both final forms accept the first value and reject the second.
This is a good near-pair exercise because the algebra is short and the apparent symbol pattern can be misleading. Ask the learner to explain each operation and read the final set in words. The aim is to preserve meaning, not to enforce a fixed number of reversals on the page.
Contents · Previous section · Next section
Suppose a learner solves 5 − 2x > 11 and writes −3 as the final answer. Subtracting 5 gives −2x > 6, and division by −2 gives x < −3. The number −3 is the boundary, but the solution contains all permitted values below it.
The boundary itself is excluded because the original comparison is strict. At x = −3, both sides equal 11, so the statement 11 > 11 is false. The single number cannot describe either the direction or the endpoint rule.
If the question restricts x to integers, examples include −4, −5 and smaller integers. If it asks for the greatest integer solution, that target is −4. If it asks for all real solutions, write x < −3. The domain and requested output determine how the final set should be presented.
This distinction connects algebra to a number line. A boundary point, an endpoint marker and a direction together represent the set. They are not optional decorations around an answer that is fundamentally one number.
For practice, keep the boundary fixed and vary the relation: x < −3, x ≤ −3, x > −3 and x ≥ −3. Ask which values belong to each set. The shared boundary makes the different meanings easier to see.
Contents · Previous section · Next section
Substitution is useful when the chosen value distinguishes competing answers. If two proposed sets are x < 4 and x > 4, a value such as x = 0 quickly shows which is compatible with the original example. The boundary x = 4 may fail both strict versions and therefore not distinguish their directions.
Use a boundary test for inclusion and an off-boundary test for direction. These are different questions. One test value is not automatically sufficient for both.
For x < −3 and x > −3, the shared boundary −3 is excluded from both sets. Testing only that boundary cannot tell the directions apart. Testing −4 or zero does. For x < −3 and x ≤ −3, an off-boundary value such as −4 belongs to both, while the boundary distinguishes inclusion. Choose the test to match the suspected error rather than selecting a convenient number without a purpose.
Also avoid choosing a value outside the contextual domain. If x counts completed steps, a fractional input might not be a permitted case even though it can be substituted algebraically. Keep the domain attached to the check.
A passed test illustrates consistency for that value; valid algebra establishes the whole equivalent set. This balance helps a learner use checking efficiently without treating a few successful substitutions as a proof that every possible value has been handled.
The valid-solution guide develops the same relationship between candidates, conditions and checks. In a linear inequality, the final object is a set, so the review should inspect its boundary and direction rather than only the number printed beside x.
Contents · Previous section · Next section
A useful final explanation names the operation and its effect separately: dividing by a negative number reverses order; exchanging the left and right expressions changes how the same comparison is written. Those explanations remain useful when the numbers change. Memorising the final symbol in one worked example does not provide that transferable check.
Do I reverse whenever I see a minus sign?
No. Identify the operation. Adding or subtracting the same quantity preserves order, while multiplication or division by a known negative number reverses it. A negative answer or boundary does not trigger a separate rule.
Are x < 3 and 3 > x different answers?
They describe the same values. The sides have exchanged positions and the comparison has been rewritten accordingly. Put x first if that is the preferred presentation, but preserve the meaning.
Does reversal change whether the endpoint is included?
No. A strict comparison stays strict, and an included comparison stays included under the valid operations discussed here. Direction and endpoint inclusion are separate features.
Can I avoid dividing by a negative coefficient?
Often you can choose an alternative route using addition to place the variable term with a positive coefficient. That is valid when every step preserves the comparison. It is still useful to understand negative division so you can read and check either route.
Where should I go next?
Use the Mathematics explanation directory for another focused guide. The Clementi Secondary 1 Mathematics small-group guide gives the local teaching context. The immediate habit is to name the operation before changing the comparison, then check the direction and endpoint against the original statement.
Contents · Previous section · Mathematics hub
Continue the G1/G2/G3 Mathematics series
Browse the Mathematics explanation directory
What Is G1 Mathematics | Why a Zero Observation Counts in the Mean but a Zero Frequency Does Not
What Is G3 Mathematics | Why Equal Magnitudes Do Not Mean Equal Vectors
What Is G1/G2/G3 Mathematics | Why Rounding Each Item Can Differ from Rounding the Total