What Is Public Notice Evidence in G2 History? | Read Instructions, Authority and Intended Action

CHAPTER 1 OF 26 · Read the instruction

1. Identify what the notice asks readers to know or do

Back to contents

A notice can announce information, require action, prohibit conduct or invite participation. Its central job should be established before evaluating its wider historical meaning. Identify the instruction or message in plain language, including who is expected to respond and what action is specified.

Fictional teaching example: a municipal notice tells residents that water collection will move to a new point from Monday. The message concerns location and timing. It does not automatically establish that the new point opened as planned or that every household could reach it easily.

Some notices contain several actions. Residents may be asked to register before collecting supplies, bring a document or observe particular hours. Keep the sequence and conditions rather than reduce the whole text to a vague instruction to cooperate.

The explicit instruction and broader purpose can differ in scale. Registration may be the immediate action, while the stated aim is orderly distribution. Explain the relationship through wording and context rather than invent a hidden motive.

A useful opening sentence states who tells whom to do what, where and when. That anchors the answer in the source. The student can then analyse authority, purpose or effects without allowing a striking heading to replace the actual instruction.

CHAPTER 2 OF 26 · Read the instruction

2. The issuer’s identity needs a particular role

Back to contents

A notice may come from a government office, employer, school, association or other body. Identify the issuer and the authority relevant to the instruction. A title or emblem can support attribution, but it does not automatically establish power over every person or issue.

Fictional teaching example: a town water office announces collection hours for its own service. The notice establishes an institutional message about that arrangement. It does not by itself show that the office controlled all water sources or could change unrelated public rules.

The issuer may act under another authority. A local office can communicate a central decision while having limited discretion. Read the source information and avoid giving the local signatory powers the evidence does not establish.

An unfamiliar title needs context. Do not assume that an official name carried the same responsibilities across different places or periods. Use the supplied description or relevant record.

A strong paragraph connects the issuer’s documented role with the message. It might explain why residents would be directed to that office for a particular service. This makes provenance useful through a clear relationship rather than a general claim that official appearance proves complete authority or factual accuracy.

CHAPTER 3 OF 26 · Read the instruction

3. Issue date, display date and effective date can differ

Back to contents

A notice may be written, posted and brought into effect at different times. It can also describe a future event or an earlier decision. Read the date wording carefully before placing its contents on a timeline. One printed date does not automatically identify every stage.

Fictional teaching example: a notice issued on Friday states that collection arrangements change on Monday. A later record shows copies reached an outlying district on Tuesday. The timeline matters to any claim about what residents there could have known before Monday.

The source may not establish actual display. A retained printing proof shows planned wording, while a photograph or distribution record can support publication in a particular place. Identify the version before claiming exposure.

Expiry and revision matter too. A temporary instruction may apply for one week, while a later notice changes it. Do not extend the first arrangement beyond its stated period simply because the document survives.

A useful note distinguishes creation, circulation and application. This helps the student explain communication and behaviour without giving people information before it could have reached them or treating a temporary measure as a permanent feature of the historical setting.

CHAPTER 4 OF 26 · Read the instruction

4. Conditions and exceptions define the instruction’s scope

Back to contents

Notices often specify groups, places, dates or circumstances. Those details are part of the meaning, not small print to discard. A rule applying to registered households in one district cannot automatically be described as a universal rule for the whole territory.

Fictional teaching example: a notice offers evening collection to households registered at two depots. The provision does not establish evening access for everyone. Registration and location define its scope and affect any judgement about reach.

Exceptions can also change the apparent message. A prohibition with an emergency exemption differs from an absolute ban. Preserve the actual condition rather than strengthen the rule through a simplified paraphrase.

Words such as may, must, should and will can express different relationships. Permission, obligation, advice and expected action should not become interchangeable. Read the sentence and context before selecting a stronger verb.

A strong answer names the group, action and condition supported. It can then explain what the notice contributes to the enquiry. Precise scope prevents a short public instruction from becoming an unsupported account of every person’s duties, opportunities or experience.

CHAPTER 5 OF 26 · Read the instruction

5. An announcement and its fulfilment require different evidence

Back to contents

A notice can communicate a plan or decision about future action. Establishing fulfilment needs appropriate records of what happened. The clarity of the announcement does not guarantee that resources, conditions or implementation matched it.

Fictional teaching example: an office announces that a new water point will open on Monday. The notice supports the planned opening date. Work records, operating logs or relevant testimony would help establish whether it opened, at what hours and with what service.

A later delay does not automatically prove the original issuer intended to deceive. The explanation might involve resources, changed conditions or inaccurate planning. Those possibilities require evidence. Conversely, a stated good purpose does not establish that the institution met its commitment.

A notice may also report a completed action. Then assess the information route and measure behind that claim rather than treat every notice as a future promise. The task is to identify what this particular text states.

A useful paragraph separates the public commitment from the documented outcome. It might establish an announced change while leaving operation uncertain. This is a meaningful historical finding and avoids inventing completion merely because the institution told people to expect it.

CHAPTER 6 OF 26 · Follow authority and reach

6. A rule is different from evidence of compliance

Back to contents

A notice can show what conduct an authority sought to require or prevent. It does not automatically establish what people did. To investigate compliance, use records or observations relevant to the action, population and period.

Fictional teaching example: a notice requires residents to use marked queues at a collection point. The text establishes the instruction. A later inspection may describe orderly lines on one visit, while another account reports crowding. These sources address practice under particular conditions.

The existence of a rule may respond to a problem, but it does not by itself measure that problem’s frequency. A prohibition can be preventive, routine or reactive. Context is needed before concluding that the prohibited conduct was widespread.

Likewise, a penalty printed on a notice does not establish that anyone was penalised. Enforcement records answer another question. Keep the intended system and its actual use distinct.

A strong paragraph states the rule and then evaluates the evidence of behaviour. It can find some compliance without assuming universality, or identify a practical gap without declaring the notice irrelevant. This makes the source useful for both institutional expectations and the enquiry into how those expectations operated.

CHAPTER 7 OF 26 · Follow authority and reach

7. Enforcement needs evidence of action rather than a threat

Back to contents

Notices may specify fines, exclusion, inspection or another consequence. Such wording can communicate authority and encourage compliance. It does not establish that the consequence was imposed or that it had the intended effect. Identify the action actually documented.

Fictional teaching example: a notice warns that unregistered collection may be refused. The warning establishes a stated condition. A register of refusals could help investigate enforcement, while a complaint might describe one person’s experience. Neither should be invented from the warning alone.

The severity of language also needs context. A formal phrase may follow an institutional style rather than reveal unusual intensity. Compare wording and circumstances where the enquiry concerns escalation, but avoid treating one emphatic line as a complete measure of coercion.

Enforcement can vary across places and staff. One documented refusal does not establish identical treatment everywhere. A source’s coverage matters even when the event itself is clear.

A useful answer distinguishes stated power, documented action and effect. It might show that the office threatened refusal while the available pack establishes only particular cases. This keeps authority visible without allowing the printed consequence to supply its own implementation history.

CHAPTER 8 OF 26 · Follow authority and reach

8. Public visibility does not establish universal exposure

Back to contents

A notice may be printed, posted, read aloud or distributed through institutions. Each route can affect who encountered it. The word public does not mean every person saw, understood or remembered the message. Establish the documented circulation before drawing a conclusion about knowledge.

Fictional teaching example: copies are posted at a depot used by morning collectors. The evidence supports exposure through that location, but not automatic awareness among people who attended another point or could not visit. The distribution route defines a starting scope.

A photograph of one posted copy shows display at a particular place and moment. It does not establish the number of copies, how long they remained or how many readers noticed them. Additional records can answer those questions.

Literacy, language and practical access may matter where the sources establish them. Do not assume inability from a person’s identity or invent a barrier without evidence. Investigate the actual conditions.

A strong paragraph identifies the route and its limits. It can explain how the notice made information available while leaving reception uncertain. This is more precise than treating publication as proof that everyone acted with full knowledge of the instruction.

CHAPTER 9 OF 26 · Follow authority and reach

9. Intended readers and actual recipients can differ

Back to contents

A notice may target one group while being encountered by others or missing some people it was meant to reach. Identify the intended audience from wording, distribution and context. Then assess actual reach through separate evidence where the question requires it.

Fictional teaching example: an announcement addresses registered households, but copies are circulated through workplaces. Some intended readers may receive it indirectly, while others may not be connected with those workplaces. The source needs a route, not an assumed universal audience.

Pronouns and labels can construct a wider public. Residents, workers or all users may be the group invoked, but the document’s ability to reach them remains a historical question. Do not adopt the label as a measured result.

The notice may also address intermediaries who are expected to pass information on. A circular to local officers differs from a notice directly displayed to residents. The communication stage matters.

A useful answer states both the intended group and the documented delivery route. It can then explain any relevant mismatch. This gives audience analysis a concrete role and helps students avoid confusing whom the issuer wanted to reach with whom the surviving evidence shows was reached.

CHAPTER 10 OF 26 · Follow authority and reach

10. Layout and emphasis direct attention to selected information

Back to contents

Headings, bold type, symbols and placement can make an instruction easy to notice or give one part special prominence. Analyse what the presentation emphasises and how that relates to the notice’s task. Naming a visual feature alone does not explain its historical significance.

Fictional teaching example: a large heading announces a new collection point, while smaller text limits evening hours to registered households. The layout may foreground change more strongly than eligibility. The student should still preserve the condition when explaining the instruction.

The available version matters. A plain transcript may not reproduce original type size or placement. Do not claim visual effects from a version that does not show them. A scan or source note can support a different kind of observation.

Emblems and official signatures may present institutional authority. Their presence is evidence of that representation, subject to attribution. It does not automatically establish universal trust or compliance.

A strong paragraph moves from feature to meaning: prominent location details help direct readers towards the new point, while the eligibility text defines access. This uses layout as evidence without allowing an eye-catching heading to erase the more precise instruction.

CHAPTER 11 OF 26 · Compare communication layers

11. Different language versions need comparison of meaning

Back to contents

A notice may be issued in several languages or encountered through a later translation. Compare the proposition that matters: the group, action, time, condition or consequence. Similar appearance does not establish identical meaning, and different wording does not automatically establish a substantive conflict.

Fictional teaching example: two translated versions of a water notice appear to differ between permission to collect and a requirement to collect. The difference affects the instruction. Edition notes, the original versions or qualified explanation may help resolve it. Do not select the meaning that simply makes the answer easier.

Preserve any uncertainty supplied. A classroom translation can still support clear source reasoning without giving the student expertise in an original language they do not know. Attribute the version actually used.

Language availability and understanding also differ. Printing several versions provides potential routes of access. It does not establish that every intended reader received the appropriate one or understood every term.

A useful paragraph identifies the difference and explains its effect on the historical claim. It might establish a stated collection arrangement while leaving one obligation uncertain. This keeps translation relevant to the enquiry rather than turn it into automatic acceptance or blanket distrust.

CHAPTER 12 OF 26 · Compare communication layers

12. Local adaptation can change how a central instruction operates

Back to contents

A central notice may be reproduced or supplemented by local offices. Historical analysis should identify which authority supplied each part and what discretion was available. Do not assume every local variation was either unauthorised defiance or a centrally intended detail.

Fictional teaching example: a general notice establishes collection days, while a district addition specifies a different entrance because of building work. The documents may be compatible if the local office had that role. The practical detail should not be attributed to the central text without support.

Another variation could change eligibility rather than access route. That would raise a different question about powers and implementation. Read the actual provision and context before judging the relationship.

A local copy may also be outdated. Dates and revision marks can matter to explaining why residents received different instructions. The source’s survival does not guarantee it remained the current notice.

A strong paragraph identifies the general rule, local addition and documented authority. It can then assess their effect on the relevant group. This makes variation an investigable relationship rather than evidence for one assumed story about institutional unity or conflict.

CHAPTER 13 OF 26 · Compare communication layers

13. Compare a notice with a personal account at the same level

Back to contents

A notice and an individual’s experience can illuminate the gap between an intended arrangement and its operation. Begin with the exact proposition before deciding whether they contradict each other. A rule can exist while a person encounters difficulty using it.

Fictional teaching example: a notice advertises evening collection, while a resident writes that the point was closed on arrival. Check the date, location, eligibility and actual time. The account may describe a genuine implementation gap or circumstances outside the advertised condition.

The notice is strong evidence for the stated arrangement, while the testimony concerns a particular experience. Neither automatically represents every day or every person. Use their different access rather than rank one format universally above the other.

If the sources conflict about the same opening, seek relevant corroboration such as operating records. Do not invent a reason for closure merely to protect the notice’s claim.

A useful paragraph states what each source establishes and how the relationship affects the conclusion. It might find an announced service with a documented exception, while leaving prevalence uncertain. This produces a richer account than declaring either the entire notice false or the resident mistaken without analysis.

CHAPTER 14 OF 26 · Compare communication layers

14. Repeated notices can show circulation without independent confirmation

Back to contents

Several copies may reproduce one decision or central text. Their agreement can reveal distribution, but it does not create several independent observations of the outcome. Follow the information origin behind the claim.

Fictional teaching example: a wall poster, newspaper notice and local circular all announce the same opening date from one office. Together they support several communication routes. They do not independently establish that the service actually opened.

A later notice can add a new decision or correction. That is different from another copy of the original. Identify whether the content and authority changed rather than count documents alone.

Different locations may also help assess intended reach. Copies found in several districts can support a wider distribution account, subject to provenance and dates. They still do not measure how many people read them.

A strong paragraph distinguishes repetition of the message from evidence of action or reception. This helps students give circulation its proper value while avoiding the common leap from many announcements to a verified successful outcome.

CHAPTER 15 OF 26 · Compare communication layers

15. Revisions can change the instruction rather than merely repeat it

Back to contents

A later notice may replace, clarify or extend an earlier arrangement. Read dates, effective periods and references to previous instructions. The existence of two versions does not automatically establish simultaneous contradiction.

Fictional teaching example: an initial notice announces Monday opening, while a later one postpones it to Wednesday. The sequence supports a revised plan. The first notice remains evidence of the earlier public expectation, while the later version changes the current instruction.

The timing of circulation matters to behaviour. A resident who saw only the first version may have acted on information that was later superseded. That is a hypothesis to test through evidence, not an explanation to assume for every difficulty.

A clarification may narrow rather than reverse a rule. Adding an eligibility note can affect scope while leaving the main arrangement intact. State exactly what changed.

A useful timeline identifies the versions and their documented reach. This allows the student to explain changing information without treating the whole notice system as either perfectly consistent or entirely unreliable.

CHAPTER 16 OF 26 · Test the interpretation

16. The reason stated in a notice is a claim to evaluate

Back to contents

A notice can explain an instruction through safety, efficiency, fairness or another justification. That explanation is evidence of the reason publicly offered. It does not automatically establish that the condition existed exactly as described or that it was the only consideration.

Fictional teaching example: an office moves a collection point and cites safer access. Inspection records may help test the safety claim, while minutes may reveal additional concerns about space or staffing. Several reasons can coexist.

The stated reason can still be historically important even when implementation is disputed. It shows how the authority justified the action and which consideration it asked readers to accept.

Avoid replacing the public reason with an invented hidden motive. Evidence of another interest can complicate the explanation, but an imagined desire for control is not a substitute for source analysis.

A strong paragraph identifies the justification, its supporting or conflicting evidence and its role in the message. This keeps purpose and factual evaluation connected without treating either the notice’s own explanation or the student’s suspicion as automatically decisive.

CHAPTER 17 OF 26 · Test the interpretation

17. A notice can reveal institutional expectations without measuring reality

Back to contents

The topics addressed in a notice can illuminate what an institution considered necessary to communicate. It may reveal categories, priorities or anticipated behaviour. Those uses differ from measuring how common the targeted activity actually was.

Fictional teaching example: a notice instructs collectors to bring containers of a stated size. The text can help investigate the intended distribution procedure. It does not by itself establish that everyone previously used unsuitable containers or that the instruction eliminated the problem.

A rule may be preventive or routine. Context is needed before interpreting it as a response to a recent crisis. Repeated wording across years might reflect a standard procedure rather than repeated emergencies.

The categories themselves can be historically revealing. Registered households and casual users identify distinctions the institution made. Their practical meaning still needs explanation through the source and relevant context.

A useful answer states the particular expectation or classification supported, then separates it from a prevalence claim. This expands the notice’s value while keeping the evidence precise. The student can learn about institutional thinking without turning every instruction into a direct description of what people actually did.

CHAPTER 18 OF 26 · Test the interpretation

18. Acceptance of authority is different from receipt or compliance

Back to contents

People can encounter a notice, follow its instruction and still disagree with the authority or policy. Reception, behaviour and belief are distinct relationships. A historical answer should not treat a posted rule or orderly queue as automatic proof of universal consent.

Fictional teaching example: residents use the new collection point while petitioning against its distance. Compliance with the arrangement and criticism can coexist. The sources may establish both without contradiction.

The reasons for compliance require evidence. Acceptance, practical necessity, habit and fear of consequences are possibilities, but the student should not choose one without support. A register records action more directly than private belief.

A notice may claim that the public welcomes a measure. Treat that as a proposition to test through relevant coverage rather than adopt it as a population finding.

A strong paragraph states what the behaviour or communication establishes and how far an attitude inference can extend. It might show implementation alongside contestation. This makes the concept of authority more precise and prevents a public instruction from supplying its own evidence of legitimacy.

CHAPTER 19 OF 26 · Test the interpretation

19. Preservation and source versions can limit what is visible

Back to contents

A notice can survive as a photograph, printing proof, archive copy, transcript or later quotation. Each version offers different evidence. Identify what the student actually sees before claiming a particular display, material feature or audience.

Fictional teaching example: an archive holds a clean proof of a notice. It preserves intended wording and layout but does not necessarily establish that this copy was posted publicly. A photograph of a displayed version can answer a different question.

A transcript may omit type size, location or annotations. Do not analyse those visual features unless another source provides them. Conversely, a photograph may leave small text unreadable, requiring a documented transcription.

Editorial notes should remain distinct from original wording. A later description calling the notice unpopular is not automatically evidence of contemporary public response. It needs the source behind that assessment.

A useful source record identifies the issuer, date, version, collection and relevant qualifications. This keeps the evidence traceable and helps students see why a clear modern reproduction is not a complete record of the notice’s entire historical life.

CHAPTER 20 OF 26 · Test the interpretation

20. A complete fictional water-notice enquiry

Back to contents

This pack is invented. A water office issues a notice on Friday announcing a new collection point from Monday. Evening access applies only to registered households. A later notice postpones opening to Wednesday. A district record shows the revision arrived there on Tuesday. One resident’s letter describes finding the point closed on Monday.

The enquiry asks what the notices help explain about the resident’s difficulty. Begin with the stated arrangements and sequence. The first notice created a Monday expectation; the later notice changed it. The district record establishes a delay in that communication route.

The resident’s experience is consistent with arriving before the revised opening. It does not alone establish what the resident saw or knew. A claim that they definitely read only the first notice would require evidence of their information.

Eligibility also remains relevant. The notice’s evening provision did not cover everyone. The student’s answer should preserve that condition rather than describe universal access or assume the resident’s registration status.

A proportionate conclusion is that changing arrangements and delayed circulation provide a supported context for the Monday closure, while the resident’s precise knowledge and wider prevalence remain uncertain. The notices are useful for the intended schedule and its revision, not automatic proof of universal awareness or successful service.

CHAPTER 21 OF 26 · Practise and revise

21. Repair an answer that turns announcement into operation

Back to contents

Consider this fictional sentence: the office announced Monday opening, so all residents could collect water then and anyone absent chose not to use the service. The sentence adds operation, universal access and motive to a printed plan. Each extension needs evidence.

First read the revision. The later notice changes opening to Wednesday, so the original date cannot stand as the final operational arrangement. Keep the earlier notice as evidence of the initial expectation.

Next restore scope. Evening access applied to registered households, not everyone. The source does not establish every person’s eligibility or practical ability to attend.

Then remove the unsupported motive. Absence can have many causes, and a notice does not reveal each resident’s choice. Appropriate testimony or records would be needed to explain behaviour.

A repaired paragraph could state that the first notice announced a Monday plan later postponed, with delayed revision reaching one district. The evidence helps explain a communication gap while leaving individual knowledge and wider access open. This conclusion follows the actual stages instead of allowing an official message to prove its own fulfilment.

CHAPTER 22 OF 26 · Practise and revise

22. Choose further evidence for the unresolved relationship

Back to contents

Asking for more sources becomes useful when the student names the claim to test. Different records address display, operation, reception and effect. A general request for more information does not sharpen the enquiry.

In the fictional water case, operating logs could help establish actual opening and hours. Distribution records could clarify where notices were sent. A resident’s account of reading a version could help investigate their knowledge.

Each additional source has scope. A dispatch list shows sending, not necessarily display or understanding. An operating log can establish service at one point without measuring every household’s experience. The next source should not be expected to settle everything.

Unavailable material also differs from nonexistent evidence. A catalogue entry can identify a record the student has not examined. Its content cannot be supplied from expectation.

A strong answer names the proposed evidence, the question it would address and how the result could change the conclusion. This makes uncertainty productive while preserving an honest boundary around what the current pack establishes.

CHAPTER 23 OF 26 · Practise and revise

23. Build a paragraph through instruction, evidence and consequence

Back to contents

A focused notice paragraph begins with the relationship the question asks about. It identifies the relevant wording or version, explains the inference and uses comparison where it changes the answer. The notice’s order need not become the answer’s order.

Fictional teaching example: an enquiry about confusion over opening dates needs the initial notice, revision and circulation record. A long discussion of the emblem may be less useful unless authority or presentation is the focus.

Use precise wording for conditions and future action. Preserve registered households, from Wednesday or may apply rather than replace them with universal and completed claims. Small wording changes can transform the historical meaning.

A limitation should affect the inference. Unknown readership matters to knowledge; it may not prevent a confident finding about the stated schedule. Explain the boundary rather than attach a general warning about bias.

A useful final check asks whether each sentence has a source and serves the question. If the answer jumps from instruction to compliance without evidence, repair the link. Clear stages make the paragraph more accurate and easier for another reader to assess.

CHAPTER 24 OF 26 · Practise and revise

24. A practical routine and short notice exercise

Back to contents

Begin with issuer, intended readers, date, action and scope. Identify the version and distinguish issue, display and effective dates where possible. Read conditions before forming an overall message.

Next separate the announcement from evidence of operation, compliance and reception. A rule can be clear while its fulfilment remains uncertain. Use the source for what it establishes and select additional evidence for the next stage.

A short fictional exercise can use an original notice, a revision and one operating record. Ask the student to place them in time and explain what changes. Removing a card should make one particular inference uncertain, not erase every finding.

A parent or study partner can ask for two sentences: the instruction documented and the outcome supported. If everyone replaces a limited group or will becomes did, return to the wording and repair it.

Finish with a judgement tied to the enquiry. The student should be able to show what was publicly stated, which communication route is documented and what remains open. This makes public notices useful evidence of both institutional action and the practical questions that a printed instruction cannot settle alone.

CHAPTER 25 OF 26 · Practise and revise

25. Two authorities can issue instructions about different parts of one activity

Back to contents

Notices from different bodies may appear inconsistent while addressing separate responsibilities. Identify the action, place and power involved before deciding that the sources contradict each other. A transport office’s timetable and a building office’s entrance restriction can both apply to one journey.

Fictional teaching example: a water office announces collection hours, while a works office closes one approach for repairs. The second notice may alter access without cancelling the service itself. The student’s answer should explain the relationship rather than turn every restriction into evidence that the opening announcement was false.

A genuine conflict can also occur. If two offices give incompatible hours for the same point and period, the source pack may reveal unclear coordination. Establish which version was current and how it circulated before assigning responsibility.

Institutional titles do not settle the issue automatically. One body might hold final authority while another communicates local arrangements. The evidence needs to identify the relevant role.

A useful paragraph names each instruction and shows where they overlap. This makes the practical situation clearer and helps explain why a resident could face difficulty even when each office’s separate announcement accurately described part of the arrangement.

CHAPTER 26 OF 26 · Practise and revise

26. A notice’s physical setting can change its practical use

Back to contents

Where a notice was displayed can affect visibility, relevance and the action a reader could take. A copy at an office, at a service entrance or in a newspaper reaches people at different stages. Use evidence of the setting rather than assume that identical wording had an identical practical role everywhere.

Fictional teaching example: a revision posted inside a closed collection point may be difficult for early arrivals to encounter. If a photograph or record establishes that placement, it can help explain a communication limit. The student should not invent the placement merely because people were confused.

The surrounding environment can also supply meaning. A sign beside a particular doorway may refer to that entrance rather than every route into the building. A transcript detached from the setting can leave the referent unclear.

Check the photograph’s date and frame. It may show one surviving display without establishing how long the copy remained or what other information was nearby.

A strong answer connects the documented setting with the specific communication question. It might establish limited visibility at one point while leaving wider circulation open. This gives physical context a useful role without asking a single image to measure the whole audience.

Keep each claim attached to its proper evidence stage.