Did you know? Dry solid salt contains electrically charged ions yet conducts poorly, while the molten salt can carry an electrical current. The decisive difference is whether suitable charge carriers can move through the material.
This original Hougang JC1 H1 Chemistry tutorial connects ionic, metallic and covalent bonding models to the electrical behaviour of solids, melts and solutions. It explains the counterexamples that defeat memorised shortcuts: salt water versus sugar water, copper versus solid salt, graphite versus diamond, and HCl gas versus aqueous acid.
The scope follows Singapore’s 2027 H1 Chemistry 8873 Chemical Bonding learning outcomes. Comparisons below are conceptual, not measurements made with electrical equipment. The teaching reference from eduKateSG’s Clementi small-group programme is preserved unchanged.
EDUKATESG · HOUGANG · JC1 H1 CHEMISTRY
Navigate the reasoning
14 learning chapters · Comparative evidence table · Transfer exercises · FAQs · 2027 syllabus sources
Chapter index: structure, carriers and consequence
- Chapter 1: Begin with the paradox: charged particles do not guarantee a current
- Chapter 2: Draw the ionic lattice before predicting conductivity
- Chapter 3: Explain the solid state without claiming ions are motionless
- Chapter 4: Predict how melting changes the movement of charge
- Chapter 5: Explain why dissolving NaCl in water can also permit conduction
- Chapter 6: Distinguish a polar solvent from a conducting ionic solution
- Chapter 7: Use sugar solution as a non-electrolyte counterexample
- Chapter 8: Compare HCl gas with hydrochloric acid in water
- Chapter 9: Use magnesium oxide to test whether the rule applies beyond sodium chloride
- Chapter 10: Contrast metallic conduction with ionic conduction
- Chapter 11: Graphite is a covalent network that does not obey a crude conductivity slogan
- Chapter 12: Read a conductivity table without inventing apparatus results
- Chapter 13: Separate electrical conduction from electrolysis products
- Chapter 14: Transfer the method to an unseen mixture
1. Begin with the paradox: charged particles do not guarantee a current
Solid sodium chloride contains positively and negatively charged ions arranged in an extended crystal. Yet a dry, pure, ordinary piece of crystalline sodium chloride is a very poor electrical conductor. When the same ionic substance is molten, it can carry an electric current. When it dissolves in water, the resulting solution can also conduct. The difference is not whether the particles are charged; all three descriptions involve ions in the chemical model.
The missing condition is mobility. In a conductor, charge must be carried through the material by particles or other mobile charge carriers. Fixed ions can exert electrostatic forces and constitute an ionic lattice without transporting a sustained electric current across the crystal. At the introductory level, this distinction connects microscopic structure to a macroscopic observation.
An exam answer should state both what the charge carriers are and why they can or cannot move in the stated state. Writing ‘solid salt does not conduct because it has no ions’ is false. Writing ‘molten salt conducts because electrons are free’ usually imports the explanation for metals into an ionic melt. It is more reliable to identify moving cations and anions.
This is an important Chemical Bonding learning task in Singapore’s H1 syllabus 8873. The syllabus asks students to describe ionic bonding and interpret the electrical properties of structures from their bonding models. The answer follows from the nature and mobility of particles, not from an unsupported claim about the brightness of a lamp in an unspecified apparatus.
Ask the learner: Why does NaCl(s) not normally conduct even though it contains Na⁺ and Cl⁻?
Answer standard: Its ions are constrained to lattice sites and cannot serve as mobile charge carriers through the solid.
Back to chapter index · Next chapter
2. Draw the ionic lattice before predicting conductivity
Ionic bonding can be described as electrostatic attraction between oppositely charged ions in an extended arrangement. Sodium loses its outer electron to become Na⁺ and chlorine gains an electron to become Cl⁻ in a common introductory electron-transfer account of NaCl formation. The resulting solid is not a collection of isolated, permanently paired NaCl molecules.
An ionic lattice contains numerous positive and negative ions held in position by attractions involving surrounding ions. The repeating formula NaCl gives a 1:1 ratio of sodium to chloride ions in the bulk compound, not a promise that each sodium ion is bonded to just one chloride partner and disconnected from all others.
Dot-and-cross diagrams can help pupils see electron transfer and completed outer-shell arrangements, but they do not show the full three-dimensional lattice. A tutor should connect the symbolic ion formula to a separate lattice diagram. The former explains the ionic species and electron count; the latter explains why a high-melting solid can be structurally rigid.
Students can identify the charged species, state the attractions holding the lattice together and then ask which of those species can move. A correct structural drawing prevents the misleading shortcut ‘one sodium atom shares a pair of electrons with one chlorine atom’. That would confuse ionic and covalent bonding models.
Ask the learner: What does NaCl represent in a solid ionic lattice?
Answer standard: The simplest ratio of Na⁺ and Cl⁻ ions in a continuous ionic structure, not a discrete covalent molecule.
Back to chapter index · Next chapter
3. Explain the solid state without claiming ions are motionless
In a crystal lattice, ions occupy positions around which they can vibrate. They are not perfectly stationary in the literal physical sense. However, ordinary thermal vibrations around fixed sites do not give them the long-range mobility needed to carry a continuous electric current across a dry insulating crystal.
The school statement ‘ions are not free to move in the solid’ is therefore a shorthand for being unable to migrate through the structure as mobile charge carriers. It is not a statement that their temperature is absolute zero or that a sodium ion has no kinetic energy.
The high melting temperatures of many ionic solids are consistent with their extensive electrostatic attractions, although actual melting points also depend on ion charge, ion size and lattice structure. None of that changes the conductivity reasoning: strong attractions and fixed lattice positions limit ionic migration in the dry solid.
Real materials can show minor defect-based ionic conduction at sufficiently high temperatures or in specially engineered solid electrolytes. That more advanced physical chemistry does not invalidate the standard H1 comparison of dry crystalline salt and molten salt. The tutor should explain the core model while acknowledging that ‘never conducts in any solid’ is too absolute.
Ask the learner: Does saying ‘solid ionic ions cannot move freely’ mean they cannot vibrate?
Answer standard: No. They can vibrate locally, but ordinary solid-state lattice ions cannot migrate freely to transport current.
Back to chapter index · Next chapter
4. Predict how melting changes the movement of charge
When NaCl is heated above its melting point under suitable controlled conditions, its ordered long-range solid lattice is disrupted. The molten ionic liquid still contains sodium cations and chloride anions. What changes is the freedom of the ions to move through the liquid, not their basic chemical identity.
In an electric field, positive and negative ions can contribute to charge transport in opposite physical directions. Their motion makes the ionic melt a conductor. A useful school description identifies Na⁺ and Cl⁻ as mobile charge carriers without implying that all ions necessarily travel at the same speed or follow a perfectly straight line.
Melting is a physical phase change of the salt in this description. It is not itself proof that sodium metal and chlorine gas have formed. Those substances are associated with specific chemical electrode reactions under electrolysis conditions, which require additional factors beyond simply warming a salt.
Because molten salts can involve extreme temperatures and serious hazards, this is a paper-based model, not a practical experiment for independent learners. The useful question is conceptual: if the ions are now mobile, why does current become possible? The student can answer without designing a cell or attempting to melt any compound.
Ask the learner: Why can molten NaCl carry current without turning into metallic sodium first?
Answer standard: Mobile Na⁺ and Cl⁻ ions transport charge through the ionic liquid.
Back to chapter index · Next chapter
5. Explain why dissolving NaCl in water can also permit conduction
Water is a polar molecular solvent. When suitable sodium chloride dissolves, the ions become surrounded by water molecules and are dispersed through the liquid as hydrated Na⁺(aq) and Cl⁻(aq). The ions can move in solution rather than remain constrained within the solid lattice.
Thus an aqueous sodium chloride solution can conduct electricity because both the positively and negatively charged ions are mobile. The solution does not need to contain visible grains of salt to carry charge. A clear liquid can contain substantial numbers of dissolved ions.
Distinguish dissociation from a new elemental composition. The water has not converted NaCl into unrelated sodium atoms and chlorine molecules simply by dissolving it. In the common simplified model, existing ionic constituents separate and become hydrated; the chemical formulas of the dissolved ions remain Na⁺ and Cl⁻.
Whether all of an added salt dissolves depends on amount, temperature and solubility. A saturated solution may contain undissolved solid as well as mobile dissolved ions. Its electrical conduction is associated with the ions in the liquid phase, not the stuck ions within a crystal sitting at the bottom.
Ask the learner: What carriers are available in NaCl(aq) that are not freely available in NaCl(s)?
Answer standard: Mobile hydrated sodium and chloride ions.
Back to chapter index · Next chapter
6. Distinguish a polar solvent from a conducting ionic solution
A polar molecule may have partial charges and a permanent molecular dipole without being composed of free mobile ions. Water has polar O–H bonds and a bent geometry, yet ideally pure water contains only small equilibrium concentrations of ions and therefore has relatively low conductivity compared with a typical salt solution.
The electrical conductivity of very pure water is small but not mathematically zero: water can autoionise and any dissolved impurities change the measurement. A student should avoid claiming that water consists entirely of neutral molecules under every condition. The basic comparison is one of charge-carrier populations.
Aqueous sodium chloride has additional ions introduced by dissolution, supporting much greater charge transport than ideal pure water under comparable conditions. This does not mean water itself is an ionic compound. The solvent molecules remain molecular and the added salt contributes ionic species.
The lesson also connects back to molecular polarity. Polar bonds make many solvents good at stabilising ions, but molecular polarity alone does not mean the liquid has freely migrating ions in large concentrations. Charge carriers and their mobility are still the decisive concepts for conductivity.
Ask the learner: Why is pure water’s low conductivity not the same as that of a concentrated NaCl solution?
Answer standard: The salt solution has far more mobile dissolved ions; water’s intrinsic ionic population is small.
Back to chapter index · Next chapter
7. Use sugar solution as a non-electrolyte counterexample
Sugar dissolves in water, but familiar sucrose remains predominantly as neutral molecules in the ordinary aqueous model rather than separating into positive and negative sucrose-derived ions. A sugar solution can therefore be much less conducting than a salt solution of comparable ordinary preparation conditions.
Students frequently overgeneralise from dissolving salt: ‘If it dissolves, it makes ions’. This is false. Dissolution describes dispersal into the solvent; dissociation into charged species is a chemical characteristic that depends on the solute and solvent. Two clear solutions can contain very different forms of dissolved matter.
An exam question might give equal volumes of sodium chloride solution and sucrose solution, then ask which is a better conductor. The correct explanation compares the nature and mobility of dissolved species; it does not use visual clarity, sweetness, or the fact that both substances dissolved.
The amount of solute and exact conductivity cannot be determined merely by labelling one solution salt and the other sugar. Real conductivity depends on ion concentration, mobility and temperature. The reliable school-level conclusion is that the salt introduces mobile ions while the molecular sugar contributes few ions of its own.
Ask the learner: Why does aqueous sucrose not conduct as strongly as a typical comparable NaCl solution?
Answer standard: Sucrose remains largely as neutral molecules, while NaCl contributes mobile ions.
Back to chapter index · Next chapter
8. Compare HCl gas with hydrochloric acid in water
Hydrogen chloride is a covalent molecular substance in the gas phase, HCl(g). In the ordinary gas model, it consists of neutral molecules rather than a large mobile population of positive and negative ions. An HCl gas sample is therefore not explained as conducting in the same way as a strong aqueous acid.
When hydrogen chloride dissolves in water, it acts as a strong acid and produces hydrated protons and chloride ions in the familiar aqueous model. The solution, hydrochloric acid, contains mobile ionic species and can conduct well. The physical and chemical contexts differ significantly.
This comparison introduces a useful distinction beyond ionic solids: a covalent molecular solute can produce ions through a chemical proton-transfer process in water. NaCl(aq) and HCl(aq) can both conduct, but the origin and chemistry of their ions are not identical.
A student who writes ‘covalent compounds never conduct electricity’ has overgeneralised. The correct description refers to the species and state under consideration. Ionic compounds may be non-conducting when their ions are fixed, while some covalent molecules produce aqueous ions and become conducting solutions.
Ask the learner: Why can HCl(aq) conduct when an ordinary sample of HCl(g) lacks abundant mobile ions?
Answer standard: Dissolution in water produces mobile aqueous ions through strong-acid dissociation.
Back to chapter index · Next chapter
9. Use magnesium oxide to test whether the rule applies beyond sodium chloride
Magnesium oxide can be represented as an ionic compound containing Mg²⁺ and O²⁻ in a lattice. The formula MgO gives equal numbers of the two types of ions in the simplest ratio. In a normal dry crystalline sample, those ions are held at lattice sites and cannot migrate freely through the solid.
In a properly molten ionic model, mobile Mg²⁺ and O²⁻ can transport charge. The melting temperature is exceptionally high, so this is a conceptual comparison rather than a recommended school exercise. The presence of double charges does not enable a dry crystal to conduct if the charged species cannot move.
The question may also ask about behaviour in water. MgO is not simply a salt that dissolves in any quantity to produce unaltered oxide ions in water. It reacts with water to form magnesium hydroxide, which has limited solubility. The resulting dissolved ionic species and conductivity require attention to that chemistry.
This shows why the state of a compound matters as much as its formula. The NaCl(s)/NaCl(l) comparison transfers to another ionic lattice, but the aqueous MgO case must not be copied mechanically from NaCl. A correct answer states the available phases and species rather than assume every ionic solid gives a concentrated solution in water.
Ask the learner: Would dry crystalline MgO conduct merely because Mg²⁺ and O²⁻ have charges of magnitude two?
Answer standard: No. The lattice ions are not mobile in the dry solid, and the aqueous chemistry differs from NaCl.
Back to chapter index · Next chapter
10. Contrast metallic conduction with ionic conduction
In a metallic solid, positive metal cores occupy an extended structure with delocalised electrons. The electrons can move and transport electrical charge without the solid crystal melting. This is a different conduction mechanism from that of a dry ionic salt, in which the ions are fixed and no corresponding mobile electron population is available in the school model.
A solid copper wire is an excellent conductor because of its mobile electronic charge carriers. Its positive metal ions do not have to migrate along the wire to create an ordinary electric current. A student who applies the molten-salt carrier explanation to a solid metal has confused two bonding models.
The distinction also explains why a metal can conduct in both solid and molten states under suitable conditions, even though its detailed electronic transport properties can change with temperature and physical state. ‘Conductor’ describes the ability to transport charge, not one universal type of microscopic carrier.
A useful school comparison table should therefore label solid metal: delocalised electrons; molten ionic compound: mobile ions; aqueous electrolyte: mobile dissolved ions; dry ionic solid: few mobile carriers in the simple model. Naming the carriers is the shortest path to a defensible answer.
Ask the learner: What carries current in solid copper and what carries current in molten NaCl?
Answer standard: Delocalised electrons in copper; mobile Na⁺ and Cl⁻ ions in molten NaCl.
Back to chapter index · Next chapter
11. Graphite is a covalent network that does not obey a crude conductivity slogan
Graphite is a covalent carbon structure containing extended sheets. Each carbon is bonded to three neighbours in an sp²-based network, allowing delocalised electrons associated with the π system. These electrons can contribute to conduction, especially along the layers. The atoms do not need to become free ions before current can flow.
Diamond is another extended covalent carbon structure, but each carbon is tetrahedrally bonded to four neighbours, with electrons held in the bonding network in the ordinary school model. Diamond therefore does not have the same mobile-electron population as graphite and is generally a poor electrical conductor under ordinary conditions.
The two substances contain the same element but have different structures. That makes them an effective counterexample to ‘all covalent solids are insulators’ or ‘all carbon solids must conduct because carbon is an element’. The arrangements and electron availability determine the different properties.
For H1 revision, the student need not derive a detailed band structure. It is enough to explain the relevant mobile electrons in graphite compared with diamond, and to distinguish both from NaCl’s ionic lattice. A more elaborate solid-state description can be a separate extension.
Ask the learner: Why does graphite often conduct while diamond does not under ordinary conditions?
Answer standard: Graphite has delocalised electrons along its layers, whereas diamond’s electrons are tied into its tetrahedral covalent network.
Back to chapter index · Next chapter
12. Read a conductivity table without inventing apparatus results
A paper table might label four samples A, B, C and D as dry NaCl crystals, molten NaCl, aqueous NaCl and aqueous sucrose. Under the ordinary school model, the first is a poor conductor, the second and third can conduct through ions, and the fourth is relatively poor because the solute is largely molecular.
The question should not be answered by assigning fabricated numerical amperes or bulb brightnesses when no apparatus geometry, temperature, electrode spacing or concentration has been supplied. The model supports the direction and type of conduction; quantitative measurements require controlled conditions and actual data.
For solutions, conductivity depends on the number, charge and mobility of ions as well as temperature. Diluting a strong electrolyte changes ion concentration, but raw conductivity and molar conductivity have different dependencies; students should not assume one formula covers all such physical quantities.
A good tutor asks students to write two columns headed ‘charge carriers’ and ‘can the carriers move?’. Then compare samples without using chemical names as shortcuts. If an unfamiliar mixture might undergo reaction or partial dissociation, state the additional information needed before claiming a definite numerical property.
Ask the learner: Can a sample’s exact electrical current be calculated from its formula alone?
Answer standard: No. Carrier population and mobility, experimental geometry, field, temperature and other conditions matter.
Back to chapter index · Next chapter
13. Separate electrical conduction from electrolysis products
An ionic melt may conduct current because ions are mobile. At suitable electrodes, the ions can also undergo reduction or oxidation reactions when external electrical energy drives an electrolysis process. The species formed at electrodes are a different question from the identity of the charge carriers within the electrolyte.
For example, in a conceptual molten sodium chloride electrolysis model, Na⁺ may accept electrons at the cathode while Cl⁻ loses electrons at the anode. But the present bonding discussion does not require learners to perform the operation or supply hazardous apparatus conditions. The chemical products follow from a specified electrochemical situation, not from the mere fact of melting.
In aqueous sodium chloride, water can also participate in electrode reactions, so the possible electrode products may differ from those for the molten substance. This distinction makes it important to read ‘molten’ and ‘aqueous’ carefully before transferring an electrolysis rule.
A tutor should stop the H1 conduction answer after establishing what carries charge unless the question also asks for electrolysis. Correct scope is part of scientific skill: do not overwhelm a bonding explanation with unrelated reaction equations and do not infer products from an unspecified circuit.
Ask the learner: Are the mobile ions in NaCl(aq) automatically the same as the final electrolysis products?
Answer standard: No. Electrode reactions depend on medium, available species and conditions; charge carriers and products are different questions.
Back to chapter index · Next chapter
14. Transfer the method to an unseen mixture
Imagine a fictional laboratory worksheet with a dry sample of KBr, a molten sample of KBr and a KBr solution in water. In the normal ionic model, solid KBr has fixed ions and conducts poorly, while its melt and solution possess mobile K⁺ and Br⁻ carriers. The same structural principle transfers without memorising NaCl as a unique case.
Change the soluble substance to sucrose, however, and the answer should change because the dissolved particles are largely neutral molecules. Change it again to an aqueous strong acid and an electrolyte can reappear through proton transfer to water. The state and chemistry of the dissolved species must be identified in every case.
A new final card might show graphite, diamond, aluminium metal and sodium chloride crystals. A student who can state the relevant mobile carriers or lack of them has moved beyond an ionic-only rule to a broader understanding of bonding and physical properties.
Parents can use one question that reveals whether the lesson has transferred: ‘If the substance has ions, are they able to move through the sample?’ Then ask the analogous question of metals: ‘If the sample is solid but conducts, are electrons mobile instead?’ The goal is a causal explanation for both cases.
Ask the learner: Which evidence decides whether molten KBr can conduct in the school model?
Answer standard: Mobile potassium and bromide ions in the melt; the dry crystal lacks long-range ionic mobility.
Worked evidence: charge carriers across ten examples
Each row in the following original teaching table assumes the ordinary chemical state named, without electrolysis or added conductive impurities. These are qualitative conductivity expectations; precise resistance or current requires actual physical and experimental parameters.
| Material and state | Available species | Charge mobility | Expected conduction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry NaCl(s) | Na⁺ and Cl⁻ fixed in lattice | No freely migrating carriers in ordinary dry solid | Poor conductor |
| Molten NaCl(l) | Mobile Na⁺ and Cl⁻ | Ions can move through ionic liquid | Conductor |
| Aqueous NaCl(aq) | Hydrated Na⁺ and Cl⁻ | Dissolved ions can migrate | Conductor |
| Aqueous sucrose | Mostly neutral sugar molecules | Few solute-derived ions | Relatively poor conductor |
| Very pure water | Water and small equilibrium ionic populations | Very limited ionic carriers | Weak conductor, not perfect zero |
| HCl(g) | Predominantly neutral molecular HCl | Few mobile ions under ordinary model | Poor ionic conductor |
| HCl(aq) | Hydrated protons and chloride | Strong-acid ionic species mobile | Conductor |
| Copper(s) | Metal lattice with delocalised electrons | Electrons mobile | Good conductor |
| Graphite(s) | Extended sp² carbon network | Delocalised electrons in layers | Can conduct, anisotropically |
| Diamond(s) | Tetrahedral covalent network | No comparable mobile electrons | Poor conductor at ordinary conditions |
The table reveals the consistent principle: classify the structure, identify charged carriers and test whether they are mobile in the stated state. A compound’s chemical name alone is not a complete conductivity prediction. For aqueous substances, ionisation and solubility conditions must also be considered.
Four diagnostic tasks to test independent understanding
- An unknown ionic crystal contains divalent ions but does not conduct dry: explain why the magnitude of charge does not substitute for ion mobility.
- A clear sucrose solution and a clear sodium chloride solution look alike: explain the different solute particle types and expected conductivities.
- An electrical conductor is a solid metal rather than a molten electrolyte: identify electrons, not migrating metal ions, as its normal charge carriers.
- A fictional compound conducts when molten but dissolves only slightly in water: avoid predicting a highly conducting aqueous solution without solubility evidence.
Tutor checklist: verify reasoning rather than a memorised table
- Confirm the student’s course is H1 Chemistry 8873 and identify the Chemical Bonding chapter actually being taught.
- Ask for a charged-particle diagram of an ionic solid before discussing physical state.
- Separate local ionic vibrations in a lattice from sustained long-range ionic transport.
- Name the mobile ions in molten and aqueous salt; name delocalised electrons in solid metals.
- Use HCl(g)/HCl(aq) and sugar water/salt water to expose the claim that all dissolved substances supply ions.
- Explain graphite and diamond using electron availability rather than the element carbon alone.
- Keep electrolysis product prediction separate from the conduction mechanism unless the question specifically requests both.
- Use a changed, unfamiliar material to test whether the student can infer carriers and mobility independently.
Frequently asked questions
Why does solid NaCl not conduct electricity?
It has ions, but they are held in crystal lattice positions and cannot migrate freely through the dry solid.
Why can molten NaCl conduct?
Its ions become mobile in the liquid, allowing them to carry charge.
Does dissolving NaCl in water form sodium metal and chlorine gas?
No. Normal dissolution forms hydrated sodium and chloride ions. Electrode products require an additional electrochemical reaction context.
Why does sugar water differ from salt water?
Sugar largely remains as neutral molecules while dissolved salt contributes mobile ions.
Why does solid copper conduct when solid NaCl does not?
Copper provides delocalised mobile electrons in its metallic structure; crystalline NaCl has fixed ions with no analogous conduction electrons.
Does pure water conduct at all?
Very pure water has very low but nonzero conductivity due to a small equilibrium ionic population and unavoidable real-world effects.
Is this within H1 Chemistry 8873?
Yes. The 2027 Chemical Bonding syllabus includes ionic, metallic and covalent bonding, lattice structures and reasoning from bonding to physical properties.
Is it safe to melt salt or assemble a home electrolysis cell?
No. Molten salts and electrochemical reactions present serious hazards. These explanations are intended for paper work and supervised institutional study.
Connected Chemistry teaching guides
- JC1 H1 Chemistry Tutor | Why CO₂ Has Polar Bonds but No Net Dipole
- Secondary 3 SEC G3 Chemistry | Ionic Conductivity and Mobile Carriers
- Secondary 4 G3 Chemistry | Electrolysis Products from Different States
- Hougang Chemistry Tuition and Tutor Library
To discuss tutoring support, bring the student’s current H1 school topic, examination year and one attempted bonding-and-properties question. Confirm teacher, lesson format, group size and teaching location directly with the provider. This article does not claim a currently available class or guarantee examination results.
Official syllabus, assumptions and boundaries
- SEAB: 2027 H1 Chemistry 8873 syllabus, Chemical Bonding
- SEAB: 2027 A-Level school-candidate syllabus directory
- eduKateSG immutable Clementi small-group tutorial reference
- Hougang Chemistry Tuition and Tutor Library
The 2027 H1 Chemical Bonding outcomes address ionic, metallic and covalent bonding, lattice structures and physical properties including conductivity. The ordinary solid-ion fixed-lattice model is the expected school-level contrast; special solid electrolytes and conductivity defects are acknowledged extensions, not the focus. These are original conceptual examples, not laboratory data or instructions for melting salt.