Why English? | Reporting ROSES Environmental Evidence Syntheses Through Scope, Searches, Screening, Appraisal, Synthesis and Maps

ORIENTATION

What this guide owns

Current fact check

ROSES was published in 2018 for environmental systematic reviews and systematic maps. CEE currently requires relevant ROSES checklists with submissions, while an updated guideline registered on 28 October 2026 remains under development.

Canonical boundary

This article owns environmental systematic review and systematic map reporting. It does not replace PRISMA for general reviews, domain methods, critical appraisal or the future completed ROSES update.

Worked example

Every chapter returns to a fictional evidence synthesis on whether vegetated school grounds influence surface temperature and student use of outdoor spaces. It is fictional, low-stakes and educational; it does not report a real school, clinical decision or guaranteed outcome.

Warm up with eduKate’s guides to explaining scientific evidence and asking better questions in class.

CHAPTER 1 OF 16

1. Choose Between a Systematic Review and a Systematic Map

Back to contents

Why this move matters

Explain whether the project will synthesise effects or mechanisms, describe an evidence base, or do both with distinct outputs.

Fix the environmental unit and scale

For choose between a systematic review and a systematic map, name the place, population or ecological subject, intervention or exposure, comparator, outcome, date and scale. Explain whether the project will synthesise effects or mechanisms, describe an evidence base, or do both with distinct outputs. Without these fields, similar-looking studies may answer different questions.

Follow one record through the review

Use this worked case: The team maps all school-ground studies and reviews the subset with comparable surface-temperature outcomes. Trace it from search source to screening, study linkage, extraction, appraisal and synthesis or map coding. Every change of unit or definition should be visible.

Test comparability and missing evidence

Ask whether climate, geography, season, measurement, implementation and reporting make the evidence comparable. Then name what a missing cell or excluded record could mean before calling it an evidence gap.

Date the conclusion

End with the last search date, form version and this limit: A map identifies evidence patterns but does not by itself determine intervention effectiveness. Environmental conclusions are more useful when their time and place are visible.

Student, parent and career transfer

Make one evidence card for “Choose Between a Systematic Review and a Systematic Map”: source location, plain-language meaning, limit and next question. A parent or teacher can ask for one everyday explanation and one specialist explanation; both must preserve the same conditions. This habit supports environmental science, geography, sustainability, evidence synthesis and public decision support without promising a grade, admission, funding decision or job.

CHAPTER 2 OF 16

2. Frame the Environmental Question and Decision Context

Back to contents

Why this move matters

Define population or subject, intervention or exposure, comparator, outcomes, geography, time and intended decision users.

Fix the environmental unit and scale

For frame the environmental question and decision context, name the place, population or ecological subject, intervention or exposure, comparator, outcome, date and scale. Define population or subject, intervention or exposure, comparator, outcomes, geography, time and intended decision users. Without these fields, similar-looking studies may answer different questions.

Follow one record through the review

Use this worked case: The scope names temperate and tropical schools, vegetation changes, hard-surface comparators and measured temperature outcomes. Trace it from search source to screening, study linkage, extraction, appraisal and synthesis or map coding. Every change of unit or definition should be visible.

Test comparability and missing evidence

Ask whether climate, geography, season, measurement, implementation and reporting make the evidence comparable. Then name what a missing cell or excluded record could mean before calling it an evidence gap.

Date the conclusion

End with the last search date, form version and this limit: A precise question can still exclude culturally or ecologically important evidence. Environmental conclusions are more useful when their time and place are visible.

Student, parent and career transfer

Make one evidence card for “Frame the Environmental Question and Decision Context”: source location, plain-language meaning, limit and next question. A parent or teacher can ask for one everyday explanation and one specialist explanation; both must preserve the same conditions. This habit supports environmental science, geography, sustainability, evidence synthesis and public decision support without promising a grade, admission, funding decision or job.

CHAPTER 3 OF 16

3. Register a Protocol and Record Amendments

Back to contents

Why this move matters

Make planned methods accessible before full synthesis and report later changes with dates and reasons.

Fix the environmental unit and scale

For register a protocol and record amendments, name the place, population or ecological subject, intervention or exposure, comparator, outcome, date and scale. Make planned methods accessible before full synthesis and report later changes with dates and reasons. Without these fields, similar-looking studies may answer different questions.

Follow one record through the review

Use this worked case: The protocol fixes primary temperature outcomes and records a justified addition of student-space use after stakeholder input. Trace it from search source to screening, study linkage, extraction, appraisal and synthesis or map coding. Every change of unit or definition should be visible.

Test comparability and missing evidence

Ask whether climate, geography, season, measurement, implementation and reporting make the evidence comparable. Then name what a missing cell or excluded record could mean before calling it an evidence gap.

Date the conclusion

End with the last search date, form version and this limit: Registration does not prevent weak methods or all post-hoc choices. Environmental conclusions are more useful when their time and place are visible.

Student, parent and career transfer

Make one evidence card for “Register a Protocol and Record Amendments”: source location, plain-language meaning, limit and next question. A parent or teacher can ask for one everyday explanation and one specialist explanation; both must preserve the same conditions. This habit supports environmental science, geography, sustainability, evidence synthesis and public decision support without promising a grade, admission, funding decision or job.

CHAPTER 4 OF 16

4. Use the Current Official ROSES Form

Back to contents

Why this move matters

Identify the exact form and version used, complete it alongside the work and check the official site for updates.

Fix the environmental unit and scale

For use the current official roses form, name the place, population or ecological subject, intervention or exposure, comparator, outcome, date and scale. Identify the exact form and version used, complete it alongside the work and check the official site for updates. Without these fields, similar-looking studies may answer different questions.

Follow one record through the review

Use this worked case: The authors cite the review-report form downloaded on 5 November 2026 rather than relying on an old saved copy. Trace it from search source to screening, study linkage, extraction, appraisal and synthesis or map coding. Every change of unit or definition should be visible.

Test comparability and missing evidence

Ask whether climate, geography, season, measurement, implementation and reporting make the evidence comparable. Then name what a missing cell or excluded record could mean before calling it an evidence gap.

Date the conclusion

End with the last search date, form version and this limit: A completed checklist does not certify that every methodological decision was sound. Environmental conclusions are more useful when their time and place are visible.

Student, parent and career transfer

Make one evidence card for “Use the Current Official ROSES Form”: source location, plain-language meaning, limit and next question. A parent or teacher can ask for one everyday explanation and one specialist explanation; both must preserve the same conditions. This habit supports environmental science, geography, sustainability, evidence synthesis and public decision support without promising a grade, admission, funding decision or job.

CHAPTER 5 OF 16

5. Describe Search Sources Beyond One Database

Back to contents

Why this move matters

Report bibliographic databases, organisational sites, search engines, citation chasing, calls for evidence and stakeholder routes.

Fix the environmental unit and scale

For describe search sources beyond one database, name the place, population or ecological subject, intervention or exposure, comparator, outcome, date and scale. Report bibliographic databases, organisational sites, search engines, citation chasing, calls for evidence and stakeholder routes. Without these fields, similar-looking studies may answer different questions.

Follow one record through the review

Use this worked case: The search includes environmental databases, education repositories, municipal reports and citation networks. Trace it from search source to screening, study linkage, extraction, appraisal and synthesis or map coding. Every change of unit or definition should be visible.

Test comparability and missing evidence

Ask whether climate, geography, season, measurement, implementation and reporting make the evidence comparable. Then name what a missing cell or excluded record could mean before calling it an evidence gap.

Date the conclusion

End with the last search date, form version and this limit: Adding sources can increase coverage while introducing duplicates and uneven metadata. Environmental conclusions are more useful when their time and place are visible.

Student, parent and career transfer

Make one evidence card for “Describe Search Sources Beyond One Database”: source location, plain-language meaning, limit and next question. A parent or teacher can ask for one everyday explanation and one specialist explanation; both must preserve the same conditions. This habit supports environmental science, geography, sustainability, evidence synthesis and public decision support without promising a grade, admission, funding decision or job.

CHAPTER 6 OF 16

6. Report Full Search Strings, Dates and Limits

Back to contents

Why this move matters

Preserve exact strings, interfaces, dates, languages, document types and geographic or date restrictions with rationales.

Fix the environmental unit and scale

For report full search strings, dates and limits, name the place, population or ecological subject, intervention or exposure, comparator, outcome, date and scale. Preserve exact strings, interfaces, dates, languages, document types and geographic or date restrictions with rationales. Without these fields, similar-looking studies may answer different questions.

Follow one record through the review

Use this worked case: The appendix records vegetation, school-ground and heat terms exactly for each database. Trace it from search source to screening, study linkage, extraction, appraisal and synthesis or map coding. Every change of unit or definition should be visible.

Test comparability and missing evidence

Ask whether climate, geography, season, measurement, implementation and reporting make the evidence comparable. Then name what a missing cell or excluded record could mean before calling it an evidence gap.

Date the conclusion

End with the last search date, form version and this limit: A reproducible string cannot recover records added or re-indexed later. Environmental conclusions are more useful when their time and place are visible.

Student, parent and career transfer

Make one evidence card for “Report Full Search Strings, Dates and Limits”: source location, plain-language meaning, limit and next question. A parent or teacher can ask for one everyday explanation and one specialist explanation; both must preserve the same conditions. This habit supports environmental science, geography, sustainability, evidence synthesis and public decision support without promising a grade, admission, funding decision or job.

CHAPTER 7 OF 16

7. Manage Records and Deduplication Transparently

Back to contents

Why this move matters

Explain exports, software, automatic and manual deduplication, updates and how many records remained after each step.

Fix the environmental unit and scale

For manage records and deduplication transparently, name the place, population or ecological subject, intervention or exposure, comparator, outcome, date and scale. Explain exports, software, automatic and manual deduplication, updates and how many records remained after each step. Without these fields, similar-looking studies may answer different questions.

Follow one record through the review

Use this worked case: The team tests duplicate rules on reports with translated titles and shared project names. Trace it from search source to screening, study linkage, extraction, appraisal and synthesis or map coding. Every change of unit or definition should be visible.

Test comparability and missing evidence

Ask whether climate, geography, season, measurement, implementation and reporting make the evidence comparable. Then name what a missing cell or excluded record could mean before calling it an evidence gap.

Date the conclusion

End with the last search date, form version and this limit: Aggressive deduplication can remove genuinely different reports from one study. Environmental conclusions are more useful when their time and place are visible.

Student, parent and career transfer

Make one evidence card for “Manage Records and Deduplication Transparently”: source location, plain-language meaning, limit and next question. A parent or teacher can ask for one everyday explanation and one specialist explanation; both must preserve the same conditions. This habit supports environmental science, geography, sustainability, evidence synthesis and public decision support without promising a grade, admission, funding decision or job.

CHAPTER 8 OF 16

8. Define Eligibility and Screen Consistently

Back to contents

Why this move matters

State criteria, reviewer numbers, training, calibration, conflict resolution and reasons for full-text exclusion.

Fix the environmental unit and scale

For define eligibility and screen consistently, name the place, population or ecological subject, intervention or exposure, comparator, outcome, date and scale. State criteria, reviewer numbers, training, calibration, conflict resolution and reasons for full-text exclusion. Without these fields, similar-looking studies may answer different questions.

Follow one record through the review

Use this worked case: Two reviewers pilot criteria on studies mixing school and public-park settings before independent screening. Trace it from search source to screening, study linkage, extraction, appraisal and synthesis or map coding. Every change of unit or definition should be visible.

Test comparability and missing evidence

Ask whether climate, geography, season, measurement, implementation and reporting make the evidence comparable. Then name what a missing cell or excluded record could mean before calling it an evidence gap.

Date the conclusion

End with the last search date, form version and this limit: High agreement cannot prove that the eligibility criteria answer the right question. Environmental conclusions are more useful when their time and place are visible.

Student, parent and career transfer

Make one evidence card for “Define Eligibility and Screen Consistently”: source location, plain-language meaning, limit and next question. A parent or teacher can ask for one everyday explanation and one specialist explanation; both must preserve the same conditions. This habit supports environmental science, geography, sustainability, evidence synthesis and public decision support without promising a grade, admission, funding decision or job.

CHAPTER 9 OF 16

9. Link Multiple Reports to the Same Study

Back to contents

Why this move matters

Describe how project reports, articles, theses and datasets were connected so one study is not counted several times.

Fix the environmental unit and scale

For link multiple reports to the same study, name the place, population or ecological subject, intervention or exposure, comparator, outcome, date and scale. Describe how project reports, articles, theses and datasets were connected so one study is not counted several times. Without these fields, similar-looking studies may answer different questions.

Follow one record through the review

Use this worked case: A municipal report and journal article share location, dates and sample details and are grouped as one study. Trace it from search source to screening, study linkage, extraction, appraisal and synthesis or map coding. Every change of unit or definition should be visible.

Test comparability and missing evidence

Ask whether climate, geography, season, measurement, implementation and reporting make the evidence comparable. Then name what a missing cell or excluded record could mean before calling it an evidence gap.

Date the conclusion

End with the last search date, form version and this limit: Linkage remains uncertain when identifiers and methods are poorly reported. Environmental conclusions are more useful when their time and place are visible.

Student, parent and career transfer

Make one evidence card for “Link Multiple Reports to the Same Study”: source location, plain-language meaning, limit and next question. A parent or teacher can ask for one everyday explanation and one specialist explanation; both must preserve the same conditions. This habit supports environmental science, geography, sustainability, evidence synthesis and public decision support without promising a grade, admission, funding decision or job.

CHAPTER 10 OF 16

10. Extract Data With Units, Context and Provenance

Back to contents

Why this move matters

Report extraction forms, reviewers, units, conversions, study context and the source location for each value.

Fix the environmental unit and scale

For extract data with units, context and provenance, name the place, population or ecological subject, intervention or exposure, comparator, outcome, date and scale. Report extraction forms, reviewers, units, conversions, study context and the source location for each value. Without these fields, similar-looking studies may answer different questions.

Follow one record through the review

Use this worked case: Temperatures are converted to a common unit while measurement height, time and weather remain attached. Trace it from search source to screening, study linkage, extraction, appraisal and synthesis or map coding. Every change of unit or definition should be visible.

Test comparability and missing evidence

Ask whether climate, geography, season, measurement, implementation and reporting make the evidence comparable. Then name what a missing cell or excluded record could mean before calling it an evidence gap.

Date the conclusion

End with the last search date, form version and this limit: Unit conversion cannot make different measurement protocols equivalent. Environmental conclusions are more useful when their time and place are visible.

Student, parent and career transfer

Make one evidence card for “Extract Data With Units, Context and Provenance”: source location, plain-language meaning, limit and next question. A parent or teacher can ask for one everyday explanation and one specialist explanation; both must preserve the same conditions. This habit supports environmental science, geography, sustainability, evidence synthesis and public decision support without promising a grade, admission, funding decision or job.

CHAPTER 11 OF 16

11. Appraise Evidence With a Defined Tool and Purpose

Back to contents

Why this move matters

Explain the appraisal framework, domains, reviewer process and how appraisal influenced synthesis rather than hiding it in a score.

Fix the environmental unit and scale

For appraise evidence with a defined tool and purpose, name the place, population or ecological subject, intervention or exposure, comparator, outcome, date and scale. Explain the appraisal framework, domains, reviewer process and how appraisal influenced synthesis rather than hiding it in a score. Without these fields, similar-looking studies may answer different questions.

Follow one record through the review

Use this worked case: The review considers confounding, measurement and missingness separately and shows sensitivity analyses. Trace it from search source to screening, study linkage, extraction, appraisal and synthesis or map coding. Every change of unit or definition should be visible.

Test comparability and missing evidence

Ask whether climate, geography, season, measurement, implementation and reporting make the evidence comparable. Then name what a missing cell or excluded record could mean before calling it an evidence gap.

Date the conclusion

End with the last search date, form version and this limit: A tool from another field may omit environmental biases important to this question. Environmental conclusions are more useful when their time and place are visible.

Student, parent and career transfer

Make one evidence card for “Appraise Evidence With a Defined Tool and Purpose”: source location, plain-language meaning, limit and next question. A parent or teacher can ask for one everyday explanation and one specialist explanation; both must preserve the same conditions. This habit supports environmental science, geography, sustainability, evidence synthesis and public decision support without promising a grade, admission, funding decision or job.

CHAPTER 12 OF 16

12. Choose a Synthesis That Fits the Evidence

Back to contents

Why this move matters

Justify meta-analysis, narrative synthesis, subgrouping or no synthesis and report effect metrics, heterogeneity and assumptions.

Fix the environmental unit and scale

For choose a synthesis that fits the evidence, name the place, population or ecological subject, intervention or exposure, comparator, outcome, date and scale. Justify meta-analysis, narrative synthesis, subgrouping or no synthesis and report effect metrics, heterogeneity and assumptions. Without these fields, similar-looking studies may answer different questions.

Follow one record through the review

Use this worked case: Comparable temperature outcomes are combined, while student-use findings receive structured narrative synthesis. Trace it from search source to screening, study linkage, extraction, appraisal and synthesis or map coding. Every change of unit or definition should be visible.

Test comparability and missing evidence

Ask whether climate, geography, season, measurement, implementation and reporting make the evidence comparable. Then name what a missing cell or excluded record could mean before calling it an evidence gap.

Date the conclusion

End with the last search date, form version and this limit: Statistical combination can be misleading when interventions and contexts are too different. Environmental conclusions are more useful when their time and place are visible.

Student, parent and career transfer

Make one evidence card for “Choose a Synthesis That Fits the Evidence”: source location, plain-language meaning, limit and next question. A parent or teacher can ask for one everyday explanation and one specialist explanation; both must preserve the same conditions. This habit supports environmental science, geography, sustainability, evidence synthesis and public decision support without promising a grade, admission, funding decision or job.

CHAPTER 13 OF 16

13. Build a Systematic Map Without Claiming Effects

Back to contents

Why this move matters

Describe coding, categories, database or visual outputs and how users can explore evidence clusters and gaps.

Fix the environmental unit and scale

For build a systematic map without claiming effects, name the place, population or ecological subject, intervention or exposure, comparator, outcome, date and scale. Describe coding, categories, database or visual outputs and how users can explore evidence clusters and gaps. Without these fields, similar-looking studies may answer different questions.

Follow one record through the review

Use this worked case: The map shows studies by climate, age group, vegetation type and outcome family. Trace it from search source to screening, study linkage, extraction, appraisal and synthesis or map coding. Every change of unit or definition should be visible.

Test comparability and missing evidence

Ask whether climate, geography, season, measurement, implementation and reporting make the evidence comparable. Then name what a missing cell or excluded record could mean before calling it an evidence gap.

Date the conclusion

End with the last search date, form version and this limit: An empty map cell may reflect search or reporting gaps rather than no real-world effect. Environmental conclusions are more useful when their time and place are visible.

Student, parent and career transfer

Make one evidence card for “Build a Systematic Map Without Claiming Effects”: source location, plain-language meaning, limit and next question. A parent or teacher can ask for one everyday explanation and one specialist explanation; both must preserve the same conditions. This habit supports environmental science, geography, sustainability, evidence synthesis and public decision support without promising a grade, admission, funding decision or job.

CHAPTER 14 OF 16

14. Report Flow, Included Evidence and Data Availability

Back to contents

Why this move matters

Present record and study flow, characteristics, appraisal results, synthesis data and accessible files with lawful limits.

Fix the environmental unit and scale

For report flow, included evidence and data availability, name the place, population or ecological subject, intervention or exposure, comparator, outcome, date and scale. Present record and study flow, characteristics, appraisal results, synthesis data and accessible files with lawful limits. Without these fields, similar-looking studies may answer different questions.

Follow one record through the review

Use this worked case: A searchable table links each included study to methods, location and outcome categories. Trace it from search source to screening, study linkage, extraction, appraisal and synthesis or map coding. Every change of unit or definition should be visible.

Test comparability and missing evidence

Ask whether climate, geography, season, measurement, implementation and reporting make the evidence comparable. Then name what a missing cell or excluded record could mean before calling it an evidence gap.

Date the conclusion

End with the last search date, form version and this limit: Open files still require documentation and may exclude protected data. Environmental conclusions are more useful when their time and place are visible.

Student, parent and career transfer

Make one evidence card for “Report Flow, Included Evidence and Data Availability”: source location, plain-language meaning, limit and next question. A parent or teacher can ask for one everyday explanation and one specialist explanation; both must preserve the same conditions. This habit supports environmental science, geography, sustainability, evidence synthesis and public decision support without promising a grade, admission, funding decision or job.

CHAPTER 15 OF 16

15. Interpret Environmental Relevance and Transfer

Back to contents

Why this move matters

Discuss geography, climate, species or population, scale, implementation, stakeholder values and where findings may travel.

Fix the environmental unit and scale

For interpret environmental relevance and transfer, name the place, population or ecological subject, intervention or exposure, comparator, outcome, date and scale. Discuss geography, climate, species or population, scale, implementation, stakeholder values and where findings may travel. Without these fields, similar-looking studies may answer different questions.

Follow one record through the review

Use this worked case: Cooling evidence from humid climates is not presented as a guaranteed effect in dry or cold regions. Trace it from search source to screening, study linkage, extraction, appraisal and synthesis or map coding. Every change of unit or definition should be visible.

Test comparability and missing evidence

Ask whether climate, geography, season, measurement, implementation and reporting make the evidence comparable. Then name what a missing cell or excluded record could mean before calling it an evidence gap.

Date the conclusion

End with the last search date, form version and this limit: Transfer needs local knowledge and does not follow automatically from statistical significance. Environmental conclusions are more useful when their time and place are visible.

Student, parent and career transfer

Make one evidence card for “Interpret Environmental Relevance and Transfer”: source location, plain-language meaning, limit and next question. A parent or teacher can ask for one everyday explanation and one specialist explanation; both must preserve the same conditions. This habit supports environmental science, geography, sustainability, evidence synthesis and public decision support without promising a grade, admission, funding decision or job.

CHAPTER 16 OF 16

16. Date Conclusions and Watch the 2026 Update

Back to contents

Why this move matters

State the search end date, limitations and next review need, and distinguish the 2018 published standard from the update in development.

Fix the environmental unit and scale

For date conclusions and watch the 2026 update, name the place, population or ecological subject, intervention or exposure, comparator, outcome, date and scale. State the search end date, limitations and next review need, and distinguish the 2018 published standard from the update in development. Without these fields, similar-looking studies may answer different questions.

Follow one record through the review

Use this worked case: The conclusion says evidence searched to August 2026 and points to the official ROSES update record. Trace it from search source to screening, study linkage, extraction, appraisal and synthesis or map coding. Every change of unit or definition should be visible.

Test comparability and missing evidence

Ask whether climate, geography, season, measurement, implementation and reporting make the evidence comparable. Then name what a missing cell or excluded record could mean before calling it an evidence gap.

Date the conclusion

End with the last search date, form version and this limit: An announced update should not be cited as if its final checklist already exists. Environmental conclusions are more useful when their time and place are visible.

Student, parent and career transfer

Make one evidence card for “Date Conclusions and Watch the 2026 Update”: source location, plain-language meaning, limit and next question. A parent or teacher can ask for one everyday explanation and one specialist explanation; both must preserve the same conditions. This habit supports environmental science, geography, sustainability, evidence synthesis and public decision support without promising a grade, admission, funding decision or job.

PRACTICE LAB

Build a environmental_review decision trail

Student route

1. Choose one original report inside this guide’s scope.
2. Copy its objective and underline actor, action, context, evidence and intended decision.
3. Draw the specific reasoning chain used in this article.
4. Mark each step reported, inferred, contested or unknown.
5. Rewrite the conclusion so it preserves the narrowest important limitation.

Parent or teacher route

Ask the learner to explain make an environmental review transparent from question to evidence map twice: once to a classmate and once to a method specialist. Praise a precise correction and a well-stated unknown; both show disciplined attention to evidence.

Early-career route

Create a one-page roses audit with source link, date checked, scope, method logic, decisive wording, contrary evidence, limit and next action. A colleague should be able to continue without guessing.

Continue with eduKate’s guides to reading course and career information and giving useful feedback in group projects.

USEFUL NEXT READING

Connect this narrow owner to its neighbour

Read the PRISMA-S literature-search guide for a related but different reader job. Return here when the question is specifically how to make an environmental review transparent from question to evidence map. This boundary keeps one canonical owner per intent.

For English practice across research, school and career communication, visit the Singapore English Tuition Centre learning site.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Questions students and parents often ask

What does ROSES stand for?

RepOrting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses.

Is a systematic map the same as a systematic review?

No. A map describes the evidence base; a review answers a focused synthesis question, though projects may include both.

Which ROSES form should I use?

Use the official current form for your protocol or report and for a review or map.

Is the 2026 ROSES update finished?

No. It was registered on 28 October 2026 and remains under development as of 5 November 2026.

Does ROSES replace critical appraisal?

No. It supports reporting; appraisal methods must still be chosen and explained.

Why report grey literature?

Environmental evidence may sit in government, organisational and technical reports outside journals.