The 200-word examination instruction list
AP English Literature and Composition instructions ask you to interpret how a poem, prose passage or work of fiction makes meaning. Pay attention to what the prompt names, such as a complex relationship or a shift in perspective. Select evidence for that particular interpretation and explain how it supports your reading.
This study bank includes prompt words, response formats and terms that help you interpret the task. Check the official directions for the particular question and exam year.
Exam requirements · Worked examples · Fencing Method
Literary analysis, interpretation and essay directions
| No. | Instruction or term | What it asks you to do |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Poetry analysis | Explain how choices in the supplied poem create meaning. |
| 2 | Prose fiction analysis | Explain how choices in the supplied passage develop the effect or relationship named. |
| 3 | Literary argument | Use a suitable work of fiction to defend an interpretation of the issue in the prompt. |
| 4 | Work as a whole | Connect the selected detail or scene to the meaning or development of the full work. |
| 5 | Select a suitable work | Choose a work you know well that gives evidence for the specific prompt. |
| 6 | Defensible interpretation | Make an interpretive claim supported by the details of the text. |
| 7 | Speaker versus poet | Attribute the voice in the poem to its speaker unless the text supports another attribution. |
| 8 | Narrator versus author | Separate the voice telling the story from the person who wrote the work. |
| 9 | Unreliable narrator | Explain which details invite doubt about the narrator’s account. |
| 10 | Character complexity | Explain how apparently conflicting traits, choices or pressures coexist. |
| 11 | Character foil | Use the contrast between characters to explain what becomes clearer about them. |
| 12 | Narrative distance | Explain how close the telling brings the reader to a character or event. |
| 13 | Point of view | Explain how the narrator’s or speaker’s perspective affects what readers understand. |
| 14 | Shift in the poem | Identify what changes and how the shift develops the poem’s meaning. |
| 15 | Line break | Explain how the break shapes emphasis, pace or a possible reading. |
| 16 | Enjambment | Explain the effect of carrying a grammatical unit across a line break. |
| 17 | Caesura | Connect a pause within a line to the rhythm, emphasis or meaning. |
| 18 | Stanza | Explain how the grouping of lines contributes to the poem’s development. |
| 19 | Meter | Connect the pattern of beats, or a departure from it, to an effect when relevant. |
| 20 | Sound pattern | Explain how repetition or contrast in sounds supports the interpretation. |
| 21 | Dramatic irony | Explain what the audience knows that a character does not. |
| 22 | Stage direction | Explain how the instruction affects the action or its interpretation. |
| 23 | Motif | Connect a recurring image, detail or action to a pattern in the work. |
| 24 | Symbol | Explain the significance a concrete detail takes on in context. |
| 25 | Ambiguity | Use the text to explain more than one plausible meaning where relevant. |
| 26 | Tension | Explain how competing ideas, feelings or expectations operate together. |
| 27 | Theme | State the developed idea about the subject rather than naming the subject alone. |
| 28 | Plot summary | Use only the events needed as evidence for an interpretation. |
| 29 | Close reading | Explain how the specific wording, structure or form supports a claim. |
| 30 | Textual commentary | Connect the selected detail to the interpretation and the prompt. |
| 31 | Analytic rubric | Review the thesis, evidence and commentary, and sophistication criteria separately. |
| 32 | Passage scope | Use the given passage for passage analysis and the chosen work for the literary argument. |
| 33 | Character development | Explain how particular choices or events change or reveal a character. |
| 34 | Complex relationship | Explain the distinct forces shaping the connection named in the prompt. |
| 35 | Consequence of a choice | Explain what a character’s decision reveals or changes. |
| 36 | Contrasting settings | Show how differences in setting contribute to meaning. |
| 37 | Narrative frame | Explain how the surrounding narrative changes the interpretation of the inner story. |
| 38 | Dialogue | Connect a character’s wording and exchange to the relationship or conflict. |
| 39 | Internal conflict | Explain the competing desires, beliefs or obligations in a character. |
| 40 | External conflict | Explain the pressure arising from another character, group or circumstance. |
| 41 | Diction in a poem | Explain how the exact word or phrase shapes the speaker’s meaning or tone. |
| 42 | Syntax in prose | Connect sentence structure to pace, perspective or emphasis. |
| 43 | Recurring image | Trace repeated details and explain how their meaning develops. |
| 44 | Resolution | Explain what the ending settles or leaves open and why that matters. |
Poetry, prose and reading evidence
| No. | Instruction or term | What it asks you to do |
|---|---|---|
| 45 | Interpret the speaker’s perspective | Use the voice, wording and situation in the supplied poem or passage. |
| 46 | How does the writer use language | Explain how particular words, phrases or forms contribute to an effect. |
| 47 | How has the writer structured | Explain how the ordering, focus or shifts shape the reader’s experience. |
| 48 | Effect on the reader | Explain a plausible impression or response created by a specific choice in context. |
| 49 | Narrative perspective | Identify who tells or filters the story and what their perspective lets readers know. |
| 50 | Structural contrast | Explain what changes between parts of the text and what that change makes noticeable. |
| 51 | Story opening | Establish a narrative direction within the part of the story the task requests. |
| 52 | Fully digital exam | Complete multiple-choice and essay responses in Bluebook. |
| 53 | Narrative pace | Explain how quickly the text moves through events and why that matters. |
| 54 | Contrast in tone | Compare the attitudes conveyed by the wording in two parts or sources. |
| 55 | Inclusive language | Explain how words such as we invite readers or listeners to share a position. |
| 56 | Give a reason | Connect the answer to a relevant principle or piece of evidence. |
| 57 | Reason for the shift | Explain why the change in focus or tone matters to the text’s effect. |
| 58 | Effect | State the resulting change or consequence. |
| 59 | Writer’s effect | Explain how a particular choice of language shapes the reader’s impression. |
| 60 | Purpose | Identify what the communication is intended to achieve. |
| 61 | Contrast | Show how the items differ on a shared point of comparison. |
| 62 | Evidence | A fact, detail or observation that supports a claim. |
| 63 | Reason | The basis for a statement, choice or result. |
| 64 | Narrative gap | Explain what the reader is made to wonder because information is withheld. |
| 65 | Single-word evidence | Use one well-chosen word when it can support a precise interpretation. |
| 66 | Same meaning | Preserve the original relationship, tense and other relevant meaning. |
| 67 | Language | Use clear and suitable vocabulary and grammar with appropriate range and control. |
| 68 | Present a reasoned case | Develop the position and show how the evidence supports it. |
| 69 | Evidence from the text | Use a detail from the source or lines named by the question. |
| 70 | Writer attitude | Infer how the writer feels from the language and evidence used. |
| 71 | Academic tone | Use clear, respectful language appropriate to an academic exchange. |
| 72 | Develop with a specific example | Show how an example makes your point about the text or viewpoint clearer. |
| 73 | Main purpose | Identify what the text as a whole is trying to accomplish. |
| 74 | Words in context | Choose the sense or expression that fits the local wording and purpose. |
| 75 | Reference within the text | Resolve a reference by locating the word or idea it points back to. |
| 76 | Illustrative example | Choose a particular case that demonstrates a broader point. |
| 77 | Sentence structure | Use word order and grammatical roles to make a complete sentence. |
| 78 | Rhetorical purpose | Identify the job a detail does in the author’s argument. |
| 79 | Writer’s view | Identify the opinion the writer expresses. |
| 80 | In context | Use the meaning that fits this passage or situation. |
| 81 | Example | A particular case used to make a general idea clear. |
| 82 | Context | The surrounding information that helps determine meaning. |
| 83 | Relevant example | Use an example that genuinely supports the paragraph’s point. |
| 84 | Cross-text connections | Compare how two texts address the same point. |
| 85 | Communicative purpose | Identify what the writer or speaker is trying to achieve. |
| 86 | Cause and effect | Choose a link that shows one event producing or explaining the other. |
| 87 | Support the claim | Give evidence that bears on the exact claim in the question. |
| 88 | Line of reasoning | Make the connection between the thesis, evidence and supporting ideas visible. |
| 89 | Interpret | Say what a statement, result or display means in context. |
| 90 | Literary form | Identify the form and explain its relevance to the interpretation. |
| 91 | Preserve the source meaning | Restate or select the information without changing what it says. |
| 92 | Identify the task purpose | Decide what the communication needs to achieve before drafting. |
| 93 | Write an analytical essay | Organise the interpretation, textual evidence and commentary in a coherent argument. |
| 94 | Identify a source’s purpose | Find why the writer or speaker supplied the particular information. |
| 95 | Compare the writers’ views | Use each source to identify its position on the same issue. |
| 96 | Reference in context | Identify the person, object or idea a pronoun or phrase points to. |
| 97 | Link the evidence to the claim | Explain how the cited detail supports your point. |
| 98 | Compare moments within a work | Pair scenes or details to support an interpretation of the work as a whole. |
| 99 | Pattern across a passage | Track how details develop or shift through the supplied extract. |
| 100 | Language criterion | Use a suitable range of precise grammar and vocabulary with control. |
| 101 | Support with an example | Add an example that demonstrates the reason you gave. |
| 102 | Select from the text | Use the interface to pick the exact visible item requested. |
| 103 | Evidence from dialogue | Use a character’s exact exchange to explain what it reveals. |
| 104 | Claim | An assertion that can be tested against evidence or reasoning. |
| 105 | Passage | A stretch of text provided for reading and answering questions. |
| 106 | Passage-based multiple choice | Choose the answer most consistent with the supplied text and stem. |
| 107 | Author’s central claim | Find the main assertion the author wants the reader to accept. |
| 108 | Closest in meaning | Match the expression’s meaning in the passage rather than its most familiar sense. |
| 109 | Best captures the passage | Choose the option that represents the main point at the right scope. |
| 110 | Function of the example | Explain which general idea the example develops, illustrates or limits. |
| 111 | Writer’s attitude | Infer the author’s position from emphasis, tone and qualification. |
| 112 | Argument structure | Identify the relationship between reasons, objections and conclusions. |
| 113 | Evidence and conclusion | Check whether the evidence actually establishes the conclusion offered. |
| 114 | Evaluate a claim | Use relevant criteria and explain the strengths or limits of the reasoning. |
| 115 | Contextual meaning | Use the surrounding text to decide which interpretation fits. |
| 116 | Circular reasoning | Recognise when the reason effectively assumes the conclusion. |
| 117 | Perspective supplied | Use the position in the writing materials to develop or test your own reasoning. |
| 118 | Normative claim | Recognise a claim about what ought to happen. |
| 119 | Descriptive claim | Recognise a claim about what happens or has happened. |
| 120 | Reason and example | Show how the example demonstrates the point made by the reason. |
| 121 | Reasoning flaw | Locate the exact step where the evidence fails to support the conclusion. |
| 122 | Author’s claim | Find what the named author argues or asserts. |
| 123 | Textual evidence | Choose a detail from the source that supports the precise claim. |
| 124 | Scope of the claim | Match the answer to the people, period or cases the passage actually discusses. |
| 125 | Specific passage detail | Use a concrete detail that directly supports the proposed interpretation. |
| 126 | Deductive reasoning | Show how a conclusion follows from premises or prior results. |
| 127 | Counterclaim | Present a plausible position that challenges the claim. |
| 128 | Perspective | Explain the viewpoint from which a claim or event is presented. |
| 129 | Role of the named passage detail | Decide whether the part illustrates, supports or limits a claim. |
| 130 | Given literary passage | Use the supplied passage as the basis of the analysis. |
Core instructions and answer checks
| No. | Instruction or term | What it asks you to do |
|---|---|---|
| 131 | Recognise | Find a familiar feature in a new example. |
| 132 | Identify | Name or pick out the item the question specifies. |
| 133 | Select | Choose only the number of options requested. |
| 134 | Match | Pair each item with the option that corresponds to it. |
| 135 | Complete | Fill in what is missing while keeping the supplied structure. |
| 136 | Label | Attach the correct name to the indicated part. |
| 137 | Locate | Find the specified detail, point or region. |
| 138 | Indicate | Make the chosen feature or answer clear. |
| 139 | Record | Write the result in the space and form provided. |
| 140 | Answer | Respond directly to the question being asked. |
| 141 | Give | Supply the requested fact, example or result. |
| 142 | State | Express the required point directly and clearly. |
| 143 | Name | Supply the correct term, person or item. |
| 144 | List | Set out the requested items separately. |
| 145 | Define | Give the precise meaning used in the subject or question. |
| 146 | Describe | Report the relevant characteristics, events or pattern. |
| 147 | Outline | Give the main steps or points in brief. |
| 148 | Summarise | Select the central points and leave out minor details. |
| 149 | Explain | Connect the result to its cause, mechanism or reasoning. |
| 150 | Compare | Set the items side by side on the same relevant feature. |
| 151 | Analyse | Break down the evidence and explain how its parts relate. |
| 152 | Infer | Use clues to reach a conclusion the material implies. |
| 153 | Predict | Use available evidence to say what is likely to happen. |
| 154 | Suggest | Offer a plausible answer suited to the information given. |
| 155 | Justify | Give evidence for the claim and explain how that evidence supports, qualifies or defends it. |
| 156 | Evaluate | Weigh relevant evidence or criteria before reaching a judgment. |
| 157 | Assess | Judge the extent, value or strength of something using evidence. |
| 158 | Discuss | Develop a structured response that considers the relevant issues. |
| 159 | Distinguish | Give the feature that lets the reader tell two things apart. |
| 160 | Support | Supply evidence that helps establish the claim. |
| 161 | Illustrate | Make an idea clear with a relevant example or diagram. |
| 162 | Demonstrate | Show how a fact, process or result can be established. |
| 163 | Determine | Work from the given information to establish an answer. |
| 164 | Identify a recurring pattern | Trace repetitions or contrasts and explain why they matter to the reading. |
| 165 | Qualify an interpretation | Explain the limits or alternative reading suggested by the evidence. |
| 166 | Check | Test the answer against the original instruction or condition. |
| 167 | Arrange | Put items into the order or grouping requested. |
| 168 | Sequence | Put stages into a meaningful order. |
| 169 | Classify | Assign each item to a category using the stated rule. |
| 170 | Group | Put items with a shared feature together. |
| 171 | Order | Sort items by the criterion given in the prompt. |
| 172 | Omit | Leave out the indicated item or detail. |
| 173 | Include | Make sure the requested part appears in the response. |
| 174 | Exclude | Keep the named item or category outside your answer. |
| 175 | Refer to | Use the specified passage, figure or notes when responding. |
| 176 | Based on | Ground the answer in the material named in the question. |
| 177 | According to | Use what the specified source says. |
| 178 | Most likely | Choose the conclusion with the strongest support among the options. |
| 179 | Best supported | Prefer the conclusion backed most directly by the evidence. |
| 180 | Explicit | Stated directly in the source. |
| 181 | Implicit | Suggested by the source and recoverable from clues. |
| 182 | Conclusion | The result reached after considering the reasoning or evidence. |
| 183 | Assumption | A premise taken as given for the purpose of the question. |
| 184 | Condition | A requirement that must be satisfied. |
| 185 | Constraint | A restriction that shapes the possible answers. |
| 186 | Criterion | A standard used to choose or judge an answer. |
| 187 | Poetry, prose and literary argument | Identify which of the three essay jobs the prompt sets. |
| 188 | In this part of the source | Use the stated extract rather than searching the whole text for any relevant quote. |
| 189 | Throughout the source | Consider how an effect or structural choice develops across the relevant source. |
| 190 | Use specific textual details | Select relevant details from the supplied text or the chosen work as the task requires. |
| 191 | Evaluate the statement | Make a judgment about the statement and support it with evidence from the specified text. |
| 192 | To what extent do you agree | Decide how far the evidence supports the interpretation and explain your reasoning. |
| 193 | Compare viewpoints | Show how the writers’ attitudes or ideas relate, using both sources. |
| 194 | Compare methods | Explain how choices such as voice, tone or examples convey the viewpoints. |
| 195 | Terminology where appropriate | Use a technical term when it helps explain a precise effect or feature. |
| 196 | Shift in focus | Identify what the text turns towards and explain why that movement matters. |
| 197 | Ending | Explain what the final part leaves the reader thinking about when the question asks. |
| 198 | Develop a literary thesis | Present a defensible interpretation and explain how textual evidence supports it. |
| 199 | Analyse a prose passage | Explain how specific details develop the interpretation named in the question. |
| 200 | Analyse a poem | Connect the poem’s specific choices to the meaning you argue for. |
Find the section you need
Exam requirements · Worked examples · Fencing Method · Practice checks · Official sources
What the examination requires
The exam is fully digital
College Board lists 55 multiple-choice questions in 60 minutes, worth 45%. The five sets use passages from poetry, prose fiction or drama, including at least two poetry passages and at least two prose fiction passages, which may include drama.
Three free-response essays in two hours
Free response contributes 55%. The questions ask for analysis of a supplied poem, analysis of a supplied prose fiction passage that may include drama, and a literary argument about a suitable work selected by the student. Both sections use Bluebook.
Connect evidence to interpretation
The prose and poetry tasks ask you to read what is supplied. For the literary argument, choose a work with enough specific evidence for the prompt. Use the official analytic rubrics to check that your response develops a defensible interpretation with evidence and commentary.
The College Board Advanced Placement programme is based in the United States and its exams are also offered internationally. Check arrangements with your exam centre and confirm credit or placement policies with the institution that will receive your score.
Worked examples of common examination instructions
Use these original examples to see how the wording changes the answer you need to give.
Explain what a poetic shift changes
Imagine a poem that first describes a busy station with quick verbs, then pauses on an empty bench. The shift from movement to stillness can draw attention to absence. Explain how the contrast develops the speaker’s experience rather than stopping at the name of the device.
Support a claim about a complex character
An invented character refuses help in public and privately checks whether a friend is still waiting. The two actions can support a reading in which pride and dependence coexist. Explain how each detail contributes to that interpretation.
Connect a scene to the work as a whole
Suppose an early broken promise returns at the climax, where a character finally accepts responsibility for it. The paired moments can show a change in the character’s understanding. Explain how that change contributes to the work’s broader treatment of accountability.
Use the Fencing Method to practise instructions
Start with a short, accurate answer. Add a precise detail, then explain the relationship or evidence the prompt calls for. Apply the same instruction to a fresh example.
- The passage shows that the character is conflicted.
- The character refuses help in public but privately checks for a friend.
- The contrast between public refusal and private reassurance suggests that pride and dependence coexist.
- Find a new pair of details and use them to explain a different tension in a character or relationship.
Read the eduKate Fencing Method for Vocabulary.
Practise and check your answers
Take a poem or passage and note two details that support one reading. Explain the connection in a complete sentence before naming a device. Then test an alternative reading against the same details.
For the literary argument, choose a work you know well and recall two moments that fit the prompt. Explain how those moments develop across the work. Keep summary short enough that you have room to interpret the pattern.
Frequently asked questions
How do I choose the work for Question 3?
Choose a suitable work of fiction you know well and whose details support a defensible answer to the actual prompt.
Does listing devices count as analysis?
Explain what each relevant choice does and how it supports the interpretation.
What is the difference between the speaker and the poet?
The speaker is the voice in the poem. Attribute a claim to the poet only where the evidence warrants it.
Official sources and next reading
- College Board AP English Literature and Composition exam format
- AP English Literature and Composition released exam questions and scoring guidance
Related guide · AQA GCSE English Language analysis instructions
Read eduKateSG’s 200-word vocabulary guide for more ways to group and practise vocabulary.