The 200-word examination instruction list
AP Psychology asks you to name a research method, interpret a statistic, apply a concept or explain why evidence supports a claim. Check whether the prompt wants details from one article or evidence from different sources. Name the source when instructed.
Start with the words below or jump to exam requirements, worked examples, the Fencing Method or practice. The list includes response verbs and subject terms that help you understand the question.
Essential instructions
| No. | Instruction or term | Meaning or action |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Identify | Name the requested item or feature directly. |
| 2 | Describe | Report the relevant features, sequence or pattern. |
| 3 | Explain | Connect the result to a cause, mechanism or principle. |
| 4 | Compare | Use the same basis for both cases and state the relevant relationship. |
| 5 | Justify | Connect specific evidence or a rule to the answer you give. |
| 6 | Interpret | Explain what the result means in the scenario. |
| 7 | Evaluate | Judge the claim, design or result against a stated or relevant criterion. |
| 8 | Support | Give evidence that strengthens the named claim. |
| 9 | Predict | State the outcome expected under the supplied conditions. |
| 10 | Determine | Use the information given to reach the requested result. |
| 11 | Select | Choose the option that meets the stated condition. |
| 12 | Calculate | Use the supplied values and the relevant relationship to produce a result. |
| 13 | Analyze | Break the information into relevant parts and explain how they relate. |
| 14 | Fully digital | Use Bluebook for the tasks and responses as the course directions require. |
| 15 | Free-response question | Produce your own answer and complete each labelled task. |
| 16 | Multiple-choice question | Select the answer that satisfies the full stem and any limiting words. |
| 17 | Stimulus | Use the figure, extract or other material attached to the question. |
| 18 | Answer each subpart | Treat each lettered instruction as a separate job. |
Psychology instructions, methods and concepts
| No. | Instruction or term | Meaning or action |
|---|---|---|
| 19 | Article Analysis Question | Analyze a supplied study summary using the research, data, ethics and application tasks in its subparts. |
| 20 | Evidence-Based Question | Make a defensible claim, use evidence from different supplied sources and explain its relevance using psychology. |
| 21 | Identify the research method | Name the design based on how data were collected and whether a variable was manipulated. |
| 22 | Identify the ethical guideline | Name the relevant safeguard and connect it to what the researchers did. |
| 23 | Interpret a statistic | State what the number describes about the named group, measure or comparison. |
| 24 | Evaluate generalizability | Use recruitment and sample characteristics to say who the findings can reasonably describe. |
| 25 | Apply a psychological concept | Name a relevant concept and show how it accounts for a detail in the scenario. |
| 26 | Cite the study evidence | Attribute the specific result to the source named or numbered in the question. |
| 27 | Independent evidence | For this exam task, draw a second supporting detail from a different supplied source. |
| 28 | Operational definition | State exactly how the study manipulates or measures the construct in question. |
| 29 | Informed consent | Participants voluntarily agree after receiving relevant information about the research. |
| 30 | Debriefing | Researchers explain the study afterward, including relevant details withheld earlier. |
| 31 | Confidentiality | Identifiable information is protected from unauthorised disclosure. |
| 32 | Anonymity | The responses cannot readily be linked by the researchers to identified participants. |
| 33 | Right to withdraw | Participants can stop taking part without penalty. |
| 34 | Minimising harm | Identify measures that reduce foreseeable risks to participants. |
| 35 | Deception | Researchers intentionally withhold or misrepresent information, subject to ethical safeguards. |
| 36 | Experiment | Researchers manipulate a variable and measure its effect under controlled conditions. |
| 37 | Correlational study | Researchers examine an association between measured variables. |
| 38 | Case study | Researchers examine one person, group or case in depth. |
| 39 | Naturalistic observation | Researchers record behaviour in its usual setting. |
| 40 | Meta-analysis | Researchers statistically combine results across relevant studies. |
| 41 | Self-report measure | Participants report their own experiences, attitudes or behaviour. |
| 42 | Social desirability bias | Responses may shift toward what participants believe is socially acceptable. |
| 43 | Demand characteristics | Cues about the study can influence participants’ behaviour. |
| 44 | Placebo effect | Expectations about a treatment can influence outcomes. |
| 45 | Double-blind procedure | Participants and the relevant researchers or assessors do not know treatment assignments during the study. |
| 46 | Random selection | Use chance to choose participants from a defined population to support representativeness. |
| 47 | Convenience sample | Participants are recruited because they are readily accessible. |
| 48 | Representative sample | The sample reflects relevant characteristics of the population of interest. |
| 49 | Generalizability | The degree to which results can reasonably apply beyond the sample or setting studied. |
| 50 | Third-variable problem | Another factor could account for an observed association between two variables. |
| 51 | Directionality problem | An association alone leaves open which variable could influence the other. |
| 52 | Correlation coefficient | Use the sign for direction and the magnitude for strength of linear association. |
| 53 | Effect size | An estimate of the magnitude of a difference or relationship. |
| 54 | Neuron | A cell that processes and transmits information. |
| 55 | Action potential | A rapid change in electrical potential that travels along an axon. |
| 56 | Neurotransmitter | A chemical messenger released at a synapse. |
| 57 | Reuptake | Removal of a released neurotransmitter by transport back into a cell, often the releasing neuron. |
| 58 | Sympathetic nervous system | The autonomic division associated with mobilisation during challenge. |
| 59 | Parasympathetic nervous system | The autonomic division associated with rest and restoration. |
| 60 | Neuroplasticity | The nervous system’s ability to change in response to experience or injury. |
| 61 | Circadian rhythm | A biological cycle of roughly 24 hours. |
| 62 | Selective attention | Direct mental resources toward particular input while filtering other input. |
| 63 | Sensory adaptation | Reduced responsiveness during prolonged exposure to a constant stimulus. |
| 64 | Absolute threshold | The weakest stimulus detected on about half of presentations under the stated conditions. |
| 65 | Signal detection | Explain how sensitivity and decision criteria affect whether a stimulus is reported. |
| 66 | Top-down processing | Use prior knowledge and expectations to interpret sensory input. |
| 67 | Bottom-up processing | Build perception from incoming sensory features. |
| 68 | Classical conditioning | Learn an association between stimuli so that one can elicit a conditioned response. |
| 69 | Operant conditioning | Behaviour changes in relation to its consequences. |
| 70 | Positive reinforcement | Adding a consequence increases the future frequency of a behaviour. |
| 71 | Negative reinforcement | Removing or avoiding an aversive condition increases the future frequency of a behaviour. |
| 72 | Punishment | A consequence decreases the future frequency of a behaviour. |
| 73 | Extinction | A learned response weakens when the relevant conditioning relationship is discontinued. |
| 74 | Stimulus generalization | A learned response also occurs in the presence of similar stimuli. |
| 75 | Observational learning | Acquire behaviour or information by observing others. |
| 76 | Encoding | Transform information into a form that can be stored. |
| 77 | Storage | Retain encoded information over time. |
| 78 | Retrieval | Access stored information. |
| 79 | Working memory | Temporarily maintain and manipulate information for the current task. |
| 80 | Retrieval practice | Strengthen access to knowledge by actively recalling it. |
| 81 | Spacing effect | Learning episodes distributed over time can improve long-term retention. |
| 82 | Proactive interference | Previously learned information disrupts recall of newer information. |
| 83 | Retroactive interference | Newly learned information disrupts recall of older information. |
| 84 | Confirmation bias | Search for or interpret information in ways that favour an existing belief. |
| 85 | Availability heuristic | Judge frequency or likelihood using how easily instances come to mind. |
| 86 | Attachment | An enduring emotional bond, often discussed in relation to a child and caregiver. |
| 87 | Conformity | Adjust behaviour or judgments to align with group norms. |
| 88 | Obedience | Change behaviour in response to a direct instruction from an authority. |
| 89 | Fundamental attribution error | Overemphasise dispositional and underweight situational factors when explaining others’ behaviour. |
| 90 | Cognitive dissonance | Discomfort arising from inconsistency among beliefs, attitudes or behaviours. |
| 91 | Intrinsic motivation | Engagement driven by interest or satisfaction inherent in the activity. |
| 92 | Extrinsic motivation | Engagement driven by separable outcomes such as grades or rewards. |
| 93 | Biopsychosocial model | Consider biological, psychological and social influences together. |
| 94 | Cognitive behavioral therapy | Identify and change unhelpful patterns of thinking and behaviour. |
Research, evidence and data
| No. | Instruction or term | Meaning or action |
|---|---|---|
| 95 | Hypothesis | State a testable prediction about a relationship. |
| 96 | Research question | Specify the focused question that the investigation will answer. |
| 97 | Independent variable | Identify what the investigator changes deliberately. |
| 98 | Dependent variable | Identify the measured outcome of the investigation. |
| 99 | Controlled variable | Identify a factor kept constant to help isolate the tested relationship. |
| 100 | Control group | Use the baseline comparison to interpret the treatment effect. |
| 101 | Experimental design | Use the stated groups, conditions and measurements to judge the experiment. |
| 102 | Sample size | Check how many observations, individuals or trials contribute to the result. |
| 103 | Random assignment | Use the assignment procedure to assess whether treatment groups support a causal conclusion. |
| 104 | Raw data | Use the measurements as originally collected. |
| 105 | Processed data | Use values calculated, combined or transformed from the original readings. |
| 106 | Outlier | Identify an observation unusually far from the general pattern. |
| 107 | Uncertainty | State or interpret the estimated doubt associated with a measurement or value. |
| 108 | Error bars | Read their meaning from the figure legend before interpreting them. |
| 109 | Repeatability | Consider agreement when the same method is repeated under the same conditions. |
| 110 | Reproducibility | Consider whether results agree when the method is repeated under changed conditions. |
| 111 | Validity | Consider whether the evidence or method answers the intended question. |
| 112 | Reliability | Consider whether a result or method gives consistent findings. |
| 113 | Confounding factor | Identify a factor that could contribute to the apparent relationship. |
| 114 | Correlation | Describe how variables vary together within the data. |
| 115 | Causation | Explain how one factor produces a change in another when evidence supports it. |
| 116 | Trend | The broad direction or pattern over a range. |
| 117 | Pattern | A regularity visible across observations or examples. |
| 118 | Scatterplot | Describe form, direction, strength and unusual points when relevant. |
| 119 | Baseline measurement | Use the reading taken before the stated intervention or change. |
| 120 | Identify the reference group | Find the comparison used to isolate the change attributed to the intervention. |
| 121 | Explain a limitation | Identify the assumption or data issue that restricts the conclusion. |
| 122 | Keep the comparison fair | Compare quantities on the same stated basis and units. |
| 123 | Control treatment | Use the treatment intended to provide a reference comparison. |
| 124 | Positive control | Use the comparison expected to show that the procedure can detect an effect. |
| 125 | Negative control | Use the comparison expected to show what happens without the target effect. |
| 126 | Model | Use a simplified mathematical or conceptual representation to address the task. |
| 127 | Table | Information arranged in rows and columns. |
| 128 | Graph | A visual display of data or a mathematical relationship. |
| 129 | Scale | The intervals or measurement relationship used in a display. |
| 130 | Cohort | Identify the group followed or compared in the study. |
| 131 | Cross-sectional comparison | Read the differences measured at the stated time without assuming a later causal sequence. |
| 132 | Experimental manipulation | Identify what investigators deliberately changed. |
| 133 | Selection bias | Check whether the way participants were included affects the comparison. |
| 134 | Alternative hypothesis | Identify a different explanation or prediction the study could test. |
| 135 | Control for | Account for a factor that could otherwise distort the comparison. |
| 136 | Statistically significant | Interpret the result under the test and threshold supplied, alongside the effect and uncertainty. |
| 137 | Sample mean | Use the average of the values in the specified sample. |
| 138 | Standard error | Interpret it as uncertainty in an estimated statistic where the question uses that measure. |
| 139 | Reasoning about Research Design | Judge the design, procedures and conclusions of the described study. |
| 140 | Data-Based and Statistical Reasoning | Use the relevant figures and statistical meaning before drawing a conclusion. |
| 141 | Alternative explanation | Consider a different reason that could account for the same observation. |
| 142 | Practical significance | Judge whether the estimated difference matters in the setting. |
| 143 | Confidence interval | Give the plausible range for the population parameter under the stated method and conditions. |
| 144 | Margin of error | Identify the amount added to and subtracted from the point estimate in the stated interval. |
| 145 | Compare distributions | Use the same features for each group and compare them explicitly. |
| 146 | Evidence from the study | Use the relevant comparison or numerical result from the stated study. |
| 147 | Source attribution | Identify the source when paraphrasing, quoting or using its information. |
| 148 | Support the claim | Give evidence that bears on the exact claim in the question. |
| 149 | Scope of evidence | Check whether the evidence applies to the people, time or situation named. |
| 150 | Unsupported extension | Reject an option that applies the conclusion beyond its evidence. |
| 151 | Direction of change | State whether the quantity increases, decreases or stays unchanged. |
| 152 | Percentage point | Find the simple difference between two percentage values. |
| 153 | Line of reasoning | Make the connection between the thesis, evidence and supporting ideas visible. |
| 154 | Empirical claim | Identify a statement that can be tested against observation or data. |
| 155 | Scope of the claim | Match the answer to the people, period or cases the passage actually discusses. |
| 156 | Strength of support | Judge how directly a detail bears on the exact claim. |
| 157 | Warranted inference | Choose an inference that has adequate support in the text. |
Other useful wording
| No. | Instruction or term | Meaning or action |
|---|---|---|
| 158 | Contrast | State a difference between the named cases on a common basis. |
| 159 | Estimate | Give a reasonable approximate value from the information provided. |
| 160 | Define | State the meaning of the term with its essential features. |
| 161 | Give one | Supply one relevant answer that meets the task. |
| 162 | Indicate | Point to or state the feature the prompt asks for. |
| 163 | Complete | Fill the missing parts while preserving the given structure. |
| 164 | Label | Attach clear names, units or symbols to the requested features. |
| 165 | Construct | Produce the specified representation using the information given. |
| 166 | Sketch | Show the required shape, relationships and labels. |
| 167 | Plot | Place the supplied points on the correct axes and scale. |
| 168 | Outline | Give the main steps or features in a logical order. |
| 169 | Infer | Draw a conclusion supported by the clues or evidence supplied. |
| 170 | Suggest | Offer a plausible answer that fits the scenario and constraints. |
| 171 | Distinguish | Name the feature that separates two easily confused ideas. |
| 172 | Demonstrate | Show that a stated claim follows by giving appropriate steps or an example. |
| 173 | Check | Test the proposed result against the original conditions. |
| 174 | Quantify | Give the magnitude of the change or relationship with units where relevant. |
| 175 | Represent | Express the same information in the requested form. |
| 176 | Evidence | A relevant observation, value, result or example that supports a claim. |
| 177 | Claim | A statement that can be tested or supported. |
| 178 | Assumption | A condition treated as true for the purpose of the reasoning. |
| 179 | Constraint | A restriction the answer must satisfy. |
| 180 | Criterion | The rule or standard used to judge whether a choice works. |
| 181 | Condition | A requirement or circumstance that affects the conclusion. |
| 182 | Conclusion | The result of the reasoning stated in the question’s context. |
| 183 | Exception | A case that departs from the stated rule. |
| 184 | Counterexample | A case that disproves a general claim. |
| 185 | At least | Includes the named value and every larger eligible value. |
| 186 | At most | Includes the named value and every smaller eligible value. |
| 187 | Exactly one | Allow one qualifying case and exclude zero and all cases with two or more. |
| 188 | Each | Apply the instruction separately to every item named. |
| 189 | All | Cover every eligible item in the group. |
| 190 | Any | Check whether the wording means one eligible item or any eligible choice. |
| 191 | Refer to | Use the specified passage, figure or notes when responding. |
| 192 | Based on | Ground the answer in the material named in the question. |
| 193 | According to | Use what the specified source says. |
| 194 | In context | Use the meaning that fits this passage or situation. |
| 195 | Most likely | Choose the conclusion with the strongest support among the options. |
| 196 | Best supported | Prefer the conclusion backed most directly by the evidence. |
| 197 | Explicit | Stated directly in the source. |
| 198 | Implicit | Suggested by the source and recoverable from clues. |
| 199 | Example | A particular case used to make a general idea clear. |
| 200 | Scoring guidelines | Review what the released rubric accepts for each point. |
What the AP Psychology exam requires
College Board lists the regular 2027 examination for May 14. Fully digital. Read the sources, select answers and type free responses in Bluebook.
| Section | Format and weighting |
|---|---|
| I · Multiple choice | 75 questions in 90 minutes, worth 66.7%. Items assess knowledge and use of concepts, data and scientific investigation. |
| II · Free response | 2 questions in 70 minutes, worth 33.3%. The Article Analysis Question uses one summarised study. The Evidence-Based Question uses three summaries on a shared topic. Each question is worth up to 7 points. |
| Calculator policy | College Board’s calculator policy does not allow a calculator on this exam except for students with an approved four-function calculator accommodation. |
AP is a U.S.-based examination programme taken in the United States and internationally. If you sit the exam outside the United States, confirm the local reporting time and registration arrangements with your school or testing centre. Study the exact course and exam year, and practise in Bluebook before your first full timed simulation.
Separate sample, method and inference
Random assignment helps make treatment groups comparable for a causal test. A representative sample helps support generalisation to a population. A classroom experiment can provide causal evidence in that setting while offering limited evidence about people beyond the class.
Worked examples for common exam instructions
Identify the research method
Prompt. Researchers randomly assign 40 volunteers to study one word list in quiet or with background speech, then record correct recall. Identify the method and one variable.
Answer. It is an experiment because the researchers assign the sound condition. The dependent variable is the number of list words recalled correctly.
For an operational definition of recall, specify the actual measurement, such as the count of correct list words produced during the stated test period.
Interpret the statistic and qualify the conclusion
Prompt. In a survey of one school’s volunteer respondents, sleep duration and self-rated alertness have a correlation of +0.45. Interpret it and explain a limit.
Answer. Longer reported sleep tended to go with greater self-rated alertness in the surveyed students. The study records an association and does not by itself show that changing sleep would change alertness. Volunteers at one school may differ from other students.
The plus sign gives the direction of association. A correlation coefficient is not a percentage of respondents.
Identify an ethical safeguard
Prompt. Students are told before the study that they may leave whenever they wish and their course grades will be unaffected. Identify the guideline illustrated.
Answer. The study protects the right to withdraw. Students may stop participating without a grade penalty.
If asked about confidentiality, look for a separate action involving protection of identifiable information.
Build an evidence-based argument
Prompt. In a fictional source set, Source 1 reports higher delayed recall after practice tests than rereading. Source 2 reports higher one-week retention after spaced rather than massed practice. Develop a supported study recommendation.
Answer. Students preparing for a delayed test should use spaced retrieval practice. Source 1 supports the retrieval part through the testing effect. Actively recalling the material strengthens later access to it, which fits the higher delayed recall. Source 2 supports the scheduling part through the spacing effect. Revisiting the material after intervals gives learners repeated opportunities to retrieve it after some forgetting, which fits the higher one-week retention.
The sources support two parts of the recommendation. They do not directly compare the combined routine with every other method. In an actual EBQ, cite sources as directed and apply the relevant course concepts or research findings in your reasoning.
Use the Fencing Method to build an answer
Start with a small task you can answer accurately. Add a detail that fixes the answer to the scenario. Then add the reason, evidence or comparison required by the verb. Practise transferring the same structure to a fresh example.
Start. Practice tests can help recall.
Add context. In Source 1, the practice-test group recalled more after a delay than the rereading group.
Add the reasoning. This supports the claim because retrieving an answer during practice rehearses accessing it when cues are limited later.
Transfer. Use a different source about the same topic. Identify what its result contributes before choosing a concept to explain it.
Practise with the 200 terms
Pick three terms with different answer formats. Cover the meanings and say what you would need to write. In each answer, mark the exact phrase that performs the command. When a prompt has two verbs, check that both are visible in the response.
Name the concept and apply it
Try it. A student puts on a seat belt, the warning sound stops, and the student begins buckling sooner on future trips. Name the learning process and explain it.
Check. Negative reinforcement. Buckling increases because it removes an aversive warning sound.
Practise typing one timed response in Bluebook or a plain text editor. Review a released question with its scoring guidance, then check where your own answer directly links evidence to the specific claim or situation.
Frequently asked questions
Can I use two findings from one source for the EBQ?
Use evidence from different supplied sources for the two evidence tasks. Follow each subpart’s directions for source citation. The published scoring guidelines call for a different psychological concept, theory, perspective or research finding in the second explanation.
Does this list replace the scoring guidelines?
Use this list to interpret a prompt and plan an answer. Check the specific course and question’s scoring guidance to see which details earn credit.
Official sources and next reading
College Board AP Psychology exam information and released questions · 2027 AP exam schedule · AP calculator policy
AP exam command words · eduKateSG vocabulary learning guide · Learn the Fencing Method
College Board AP Psychology scoring example for the evidence-based question
