You can start liking a food you used to hate because you meet it again under different conditions. It might be cooked differently, served with something familiar or eaten at a table where you feel free to take one bite and stop. Repeated experience can also make some foods feel more familiar and acceptable. An acquired taste is a preference that develops with experience. It can arrive slowly enough that you only notice when you order the food yourself.
If you want to retry a food, work out what put you off the first time. A slippery texture, a strong smell and a bitter finish are three different experiences. Try a small portion of a different preparation if you are curious. If you still dislike it, you have learned something specific about what you prefer.
- Identify the feature you disliked and whether it changes with preparation.
- Give yourself an easy way to taste a small amount and stop.
- Notice the difference between recognising, tolerating and choosing a food.
- Make tasting optional when a child or guest is involved.
- Follow any allergy or medical restrictions when deciding what is safe to try.
eduKate Singapore · Mindset and character
Find the part you need
Choose where to start, or open the chapter list to read in order.
Chapters 1–5
Chapters 6–10
Chapter 1 of 10
What it means to acquire a taste
You refuse an olive at a family meal when you are eight. Years later, a friend shares a pizza and you enjoy how the olives taste with the cheese. Eventually you buy a small container of olives to eat on their own. The first and last scenes do sound like a change of mind, but there was a middle. You met the ingredient in a different setting, in a combination you already liked, and later discovered you were willing to make it the main feature of a bite.
That kind of path can help you understand the word acquired. You do not need to point to one dramatic moment when your taste changed. You might first learn what to expect, then find an acceptable version, then start choosing a particular preparation. Sometimes the path ends at “I will eat it in that dish.” That is a real preference and may be all you want.
Liking is more specific than a food name
When you say “I hate mushrooms,” you may have a very clear dish in mind. Someone else is picturing a crisp edge on a grilled mushroom, while you remember a soft slice in soup. Both belong under the same name. They place different demands on the person eating them. If one texture put you off, another preparation can give you a substantially different food experience.
Before you decide that a taste has changed, check whether you are comparing the same thing. A ripe tomato and an under-ripe one are different experiences. A slice of fruit right out of the fridge may have a different smell or texture from one left at room temperature. A food eaten by itself may taste different in a mouthful with rice, sauce or something crunchy. You may have discovered a combination you like even if your opinion of the ingredient alone is unchanged.
Accepting, liking and looking forward to it
There are many points between refusing a food and ordering it by choice. A child may accept a piece on the plate and leave it untouched. An adult may take one bite of a dish without wanting another. A third person may enjoy a small amount as part of dinner and prefer a different main course. These are different outcomes, and they can all be described without guessing whether a person is adventurous.
Notice the direction of any change. “I don’t mind that flavour any more” is a different report from “I look for it on the menu.” Some adults discover that they like bitterness in a particular drink or sweetness in a particular savoury dish. Later they may find they want the same quality elsewhere. That broader preference can develop, but enjoying one version gives you no obligation to enjoy the next.
Chapter 2 of 10
Why one first bite can tell you surprisingly little
A first bite often comes with several new things at once. The food looks unfamiliar, the smell reaches you early, the temperature surprises you and you have to work out what the texture is doing. If someone is watching your reaction, that is part of the event too. A fast judgement can be entirely adequate for that meal. You may want more information before treating it as a lasting description of the ingredient.
A friend who wants to share a food can tell you what it is and what to expect. “The skin is crisp and the middle is very soft” gives useful information. “You have to try it, it’s amazing” supplies enthusiasm and leaves the surprises untouched. If you are serving it, keep the offered portion small enough for the other person to choose. If you are trying it, you can ask how it was cooked or what people usually eat with it.
Flavour involves more than the tongue
The US National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders explains that smell, taste and other sensations contribute to flavour. You may think you dislike the taste of a dish when the strongest feature for you is the smell as you bring it to your mouth. A crunch, a burning sensation or a stringy texture may be what you remember from the first encounter. It helps to say which experience you want to compare.
Consider a person who likes the savoury flavour of a soup and removes a soft topping. They have already separated two parts of the meal. Another person enjoys the topping when it is crisp. These preferences can make sense together. A more specific description of the objection lets the cook decide whether there is an easy variation without trying to convince either person that the food is better than they think.
The company changes the experience of trying
An unfamiliar dish is easier to consider when a familiar person describes it and gives you time. You may choose to try it because you are interested in the story or want to know how the dish fits into the meal. That context can make the experience more memorable. If the flavour becomes familiar, the first impression no longer carries all the weight.
Pressure can shift your attention elsewhere. A table asking you to announce whether you like a food can make your reply feel like a judgement about the host, a family tradition or your own character. Offer a small portion and leave the conversation free to move on. A guest who actually wants to describe the taste can do so without having to report back on an assignment.
Chapter 3 of 10
What repeated exposure research actually shows
A review by Katherine Appleton and colleagues examined studies that used repeated tasting and other strategies to change how much people liked or ate vegetables. Across comparisons, repeated tasting showed improvements in some measures of liking and intake. The review also described limits in the evidence and differences between interventions. The size of a change and what follows from it depend on what was offered, who took part and what the studies measured.
A USDA evidence review examined repeated exposure and food acceptance in young children. It found evidence that repeated tasting can increase acceptance of some target vegetables in the groups and conditions examined. That is useful when someone assumes a first refusal settles the matter forever. It also gives a narrower lesson than promising that everyone will like a particular food after the same number of tries.
What was actually measured?
Eating a little more of a vegetable on a later visit can count as increased acceptance. Saying it tastes better, serving it voluntarily and choosing it on an ordinary shopping trip are different outcomes. An experiment can measure one or more of these. A household often cares most about what happens after the study period would be over. Does the person want it in a meal? Is there a version they enjoy enough to buy again?
When you try something yourself, decide what you would count as a useful result. For an adult at a shared table, it might be being able to taste an unfamiliar dish and describe it honestly. For a household planning dinners, it might be finding one more vegetable everyone is willing to eat in a particular preparation. Those outcomes differ, and either can be meaningful without a complete reversal of taste.
Familiarity opens a door that you can leave open
Repeated exposure means having opportunities to encounter a food again. Everyday invitations can stay light. A side bowl of vegetables at a meal already includes an opportunity. There is no need to count the number of bites or provide a reward for taking one. Someone can recognise the dish, see how the other parts of the meal go with it and decide if today is the day they want to taste it.
Adults often arrange these opportunities for themselves without thinking about it. A friend offers half a bite, someone orders a plate to share or a cafe includes a new ingredient alongside a familiar one. Over time the person can distinguish what they enjoy from what they merely recognise. The possibility of finding a good version is the reason to try again if you are curious.
Chapter 4 of 10
How to retry a food you are curious about
Choose one change. If you disliked the texture, find a preparation with a different texture. If the smell overwhelmed the meal, try a smaller quantity in a dish where other flavours are present. If you remember only that someone insisted you finish a plate, choose a situation where a single taste is available and your meal is already accounted for. The change should respond to something about the previous experience.
Keep the first new taste small. A large portion makes the decision feel expensive in money, waste or social effort. A spoonful beside a familiar meal or a piece from a plate someone has offered to share can be enough. Pay attention to what you notice first, what changes as you chew and what you are left tasting after you swallow. Then decide whether you want the next bite.
Compare one variable where you can
If you try a new ingredient in a spicy dish after previously tasting it plain, several things have changed. You can still learn whether you like the new dish. If you want to know why, make a smaller comparison. Try a little of the ingredient prepared two ways with the same meal. Notice whether the texture, smell or finish explains the difference. You may find that one method works for you and the other is the one you would skip.
Home cooking allows this with little ceremony. Someone can take a piece of a vegetable before the sauce goes on and compare it with the finished dish. At a restaurant, you can learn enough from knowing how a particular version was prepared. There is no need to turn an enjoyable meal into a blind test unless everyone at the table wants to do it.
Recognise a preference you would keep
Sometimes you discover that a particular bitterness is part of the pleasure. A sauce that once seemed sharp can make a rich bite feel balanced. A vegetable that once seemed uninteresting can become the part you look forward to for its texture. You are allowed to stop analysing once you have an answer you can use. “I like it roasted with a crisp edge” will help the next time you cook or order.
The other possible answer is specific too. “I still dislike the aftertaste and prefer something else” gives you enough information to choose another dish. If you have allergies, a history of reactions or a medical instruction to avoid an ingredient, follow that advice. Familiarity and preference are questions about food you can safely eat.
Chapter 5 of 10
How to share an unfamiliar dish without making it a test
Say the name, describe what is in it and let the other person choose. “This is bitter gourd with egg. The gourd still tastes a little bitter” is a clear introduction. If someone asks for a small bite, give them a small bite. A host can also provide the information a guest needs about ingredients, particularly when a guest has a restriction.
If the dish carries a family story, offer the story. “My aunt used to make this with more ginger” gives a guest a way into the meal without making approval compulsory. People can be interested in how a dish is made even when they prefer a different one. A parent or older relative might ask what the younger person noticed. The answer can become a conversation about cooking and memory instead of a score for politeness.
Make room for a child’s honest response
A child may say that a vegetable is “weird.” You can offer words if they seem interested. Was it chewy? Was the middle soft? Did it smell stronger than expected? That exchange helps the child talk about a food experience. It also gives you more information about a dish you might serve again. If the child has had enough of the conversation, let the meal continue.
A household can offer familiar components of the meal alongside a new one. The child can see what the adults eat and learn what a dish is called. If they want to try it another time, the invitation is still available. If eating is consistently difficult or very restricted and you are concerned about a child’s wellbeing, discuss it with an appropriate health professional. A repeated tasting study cannot assess an individual child’s needs.
Chapter 6 of 10
Four familiar experiences that can change your mind
The food that tastes different with rice
When Elaine first tasted a preserved vegetable on its own, she found it much too salty. Later she met a small amount chopped into a dish with plain rice and discovered what it was doing there. She liked the same strong feature in the combined bite. The discovery helped her order the dish with confidence. If she is ever offered the vegetable by itself again, she can still choose a different side.
The texture that changes with cooking
David remembered mushrooms as soft pieces in soup. He tried a well-browned slice while helping a friend cook and noticed that the edge was the best part. He learned to leave enough room in the pan to make the version he liked. Now he sometimes orders grilled mushrooms, while still preferring a different soup. The preparation gave him a new point of entry and a way to explain his choice to someone cooking for him.
The ingredient you grew up around but rarely chose
Priya knew what bitter gourd looked like and could name it on sight. She always passed the bowl at family meals. Years later she tried it when her mother made a milder version with egg and recognised a smell that had been in the kitchen for years. The familiarity made her curious about other family versions. Her mother can share how people in the family prepare it without requiring that Priya like them all.
The recipe that belongs to someone else
A colleague brings an unfamiliar dish to a shared lunch. A friend offers a little of it and explains the flavours. You try a bite, appreciate one part and decide to have more of something else. You can still ask how it is made or where the colleague learned the recipe. The exchange has value even if you leave lunch with the same favourite foods. On another day you may meet a version that suits you better, or you may remember the story more clearly than the taste.
Chapter 7 of 10
Find the words for what changed
If you want to understand an old dislike, describe the first experience before saying what you think of the food now. “It smelled strong before I tasted it, and the finish stayed with me” gives you two things to consider. You might now like the smell and still find the finish too strong. Or you might discover that the flavour which felt too intense on its own is exactly what you want in a small amount with a larger meal.
Specific words make it easier to talk to someone who cooked. If a friend asks whether you liked a dish, you can say “I liked the crisp outside and the sauce. I wasn’t used to how soft it was in the middle.” That is more helpful than ranking the whole plate. It also leaves room for the cook to tell you which qualities were deliberate. The two of you might enjoy entirely different parts of the same dish.
Ask which part comes first
Some foods give a clear impression before you take a bite. A warm smell, a bright colour or a texture you can see may tell you what to expect. Others change as you chew, leaving a taste you only notice after a few seconds. If you cannot work out what turned you away, follow the order. What did you notice before biting, when you first tasted it and after you finished the bite?
That distinction can guide a second try. If the first smell was the difficult part, ask whether people normally eat a smaller amount or serve the dish with other foods. If the middle was the part you did not enjoy, find out whether there is a firmer preparation. If the aftertaste was the issue, the preparation may still have the same finish. You can decide whether you are curious enough to try.
Use the same description when ordering
A menu name might tell you the ingredient and leave out the cooking method. Ask a short question that is relevant to what you like. “Does it come with a crisp edge?” or “Is the sauce mixed in or served on the side?” gives you information you can use. A friend familiar with the stall may be able to answer. If you have an ingredient restriction, make that clear as its own question and follow the advice you already have.
You can also order with someone who likes a different version. One person wants a strong flavour and the other prefers a little of it alongside something mild. Ask whether the dish can be shared or accompanied by a plain side. That makes the table easier to arrange without treating anybody’s palate as a problem to fix.
Chapter 8 of 10
A worked example from one old dislike to one usable preference
Hana has always said she hates aubergine. At a family meal she realises her strongest memory is of a soft piece she found in a stew. She has eaten other ingredients in the stew for years, so she has some reason to think texture mattered more than the sauce. At a friend’s place she sees aubergine cut thin and browned. Her friend describes the edge and offers half a slice. Hana enjoys it and chooses a second bite.
At a later meal, Hana tries a thick slice with a very soft centre. She is reminded of what she disliked. She can now say she enjoys a thin browned slice and rarely chooses a softer version. When a relative asks whether her taste has changed, the full answer contains both changes and continuities. She found a preparation she will choose. The texture she used to avoid remains one she would skip.
What Hana can and cannot conclude from her comparison
Hana met the food on two different days and with different people. The seasoning, thickness, temperature and rest of the meal may have differed too. She has no need to isolate them all to decide what to eat. If she wants to cook it herself, she can compare two slices from the same batch cut at different thicknesses. That would give her a better idea of what changes the result she cares about.
The useful conclusion is small. “I like the browned edge and want less of the soft centre.” It can guide her next order and gives the cook something concrete to offer. A broader conclusion such as “I have finally grown up” would tell her little about what to buy, and would make it harder to explain why she still refuses some versions.
Chapter 9 of 10
Keep the invitation separate from the meal plan
A household sometimes wants someone to try a dish because they need another reliable dinner option. A tiny optional portion can be part of the meal, with other food the person is able to eat. If the outcome of tasting determines whether the person gets an adequate dinner, the decision has a different weight. A predictable meal can leave room for curiosity on a day when the person has it.
Think about how you would offer the same dish to an adult guest. You might put a little in a serving bowl, say what it contains and answer a question. Then you would probably talk about something else. That is a useful model for a young person who already knows the food is available. An invitation can stay open across many meals without having to become the subject of every meal.
Let other people’s taste be useful information
If one person in the family likes a dish and another dislikes it, find out which feature matters to each. A strong sauce may be the reason one person wants it and the reason another avoids it. Serving that sauce separately, where the recipe permits, can make the two preferences compatible. A family member can still enjoy the version they remember. Another can try enough to see if the flavour suits them.
The same information can make the household shopping simpler. If a vegetable is only eaten in one preparation, buy the amount that preparation needs. If several people want to compare versions, use an ingredient you can divide without creating another whole dinner. An acquired taste is easier to explore when the person tasting has something to eat and the person cooking has a manageable job.
Chapter 10 of 10
Frequently asked questions
How many times do I need to try a food?
There is no universal number. Studies examine particular groups, foods and schedules, and people differ in what they come to accept. Try again if you are curious, especially if you can identify something about the earlier preparation you would like to change. You can end an experiment after one more bite or return to it years later.
Are acquired tastes always bitter or strong?
No. Strong bitterness, saltiness or smell can make a change more noticeable, but you can acquire a liking for a mild dish, a texture or a particular combination as well. The relevant change is that you start to enjoy something through experience. A subtle flavour you once overlooked can become a favourite.
Do I have to like a food by itself for it to count?
You can like an ingredient in the combination where you normally eat it. If you order a dish because you enjoy the ingredient with the rest of the plate, that is useful information about your preference. Try it plain only if you want to learn how it tastes by itself.
Why do I still dislike a food everyone else enjoys?
Other people have different histories with the food and may enjoy a quality you find unpleasant. Ask what they like about it if you are curious. You might learn about a preparation that interests you or discover that the quality they want is the one you would rather avoid. Either result gives you a clearer description of your own taste.
What if foods suddenly start tasting or smelling very different?
A sudden or lasting change in how familiar foods taste or smell is different from slowly coming to like a particular dish. The NIDCD has information on taste and smell problems. If a change concerns you, ask a healthcare professional, especially if it persists or affects your ability to eat normally.
Back to contents · Previous chapter · Sources and next reading