WHY ENGLISH?
Turn analysed data into a transparent results section that shows who and what was studied, what the prespecified analyses found, how uncertain the estimates are and where readers can verify the evidence
Writing a research results section means reporting participant or material flow, descriptive information, primary and secondary outcomes, estimates, uncertainty, missing data, harms or unintended events where relevant, and prespecified versus exploratory analyses. English matters because significant, important, associated, adjusted, precise and causal are not interchangeable.
EQUATOR identifies STROBE for observational studies and CONSORT 2025 for randomised trials. STROBE asks for participant numbers, reasons for non-participation, descriptive data, outcome events or summary measures, unadjusted and adjusted estimates with precision, category boundaries and other analyses. The correct checklist depends on the actual study design; no reporting guideline turns weak data into strong evidence.
This guide follows a fictional cross-sectional survey of study-planning habits among volunteer polytechnic students. It does not perform statistical analysis, choose models, approve a study, invent missing values, decide causal meaning or replace the discussion. Students and researchers must follow their protocol, analysis plan, reporting guideline, supervisor and outlet.
Article contents
Open all chapters
- 1. Return to the Question, Protocol and Analysis Plan
- 2. Report Participant or Material Flow
- 3. Describe Missing Data and Analysis Populations
- 4. Present Descriptive Data Before Comparisons
- 5. State the Primary Outcome Clearly
- 6. Give Effect Estimates and Precision
- 7. Distinguish Unadjusted and Adjusted Analyses
- 8. Report Categories, Cut Points and Continuous Measures
- 9. Design Tables and Figures as Evidence
- 10. Use Prose for the Pattern, Not Every Cell
- 11. Label Secondary, Sensitivity and Exploratory Analyses
- 12. Report Deviations, Harms and Null Findings Honestly
ORIENTATION
What this guide covers
Current fact check
Checked on 9 November 2026, EQUATOR listed STROBE for cohort, case-control and cross-sectional observational studies and CONSORT 2025 for randomised trials. Current STROBE results items include participant numbers and reasons for non-participation, descriptive data and missingness, outcome events or summary measures, unadjusted and adjusted estimates with precision, category boundaries and other analyses. These are reporting expectations for applicable designs, not a universal analysis recipe.
What this guide does not cover
This article covers organising, drafting and checking a results section after authorised analysis. It does not cover study design, ethics approval, data collection, data cleaning decisions, statistical consultation, model selection, causal identification, fabrication, methods writing, discussion, peer review, journal submission or claims beyond the approved evidence.
Worked example
Every chapter returns to a fictional cross-sectional anonymous survey of study-planning habits among volunteer polytechnic students with a prespecified descriptive comparison and acknowledged voluntary-response limits. It is fictional, low-stakes and educational; it does not report a real school, clinical decision or guaranteed outcome.
Did You Know? For research results section, precise communication makes appraisal possible but does not perform the appraisal, remove bias or guarantee transfer.
Warm up with eduKate’s guides to explaining scientific evidence and asking better questions in class.
CHAPTER 1 OF 12
1. Return to the Question, Protocol and Analysis Plan
Why this move matters
List the outcomes, time points, groups and analysis order that were specified before inspecting the results.
Did You Know? Results structure begins before sentence style.
Report what was found in the order the study asked
List the outcomes, time points, groups and analysis order that were specified before inspecting the results. For The survey’s primary result is weekly planning frequency, followed by a prespecified comparison by study load., begin with participant or material flow, descriptive data and the prespecified primary result before secondary or exploratory findings.
Pair every estimate with enough context to interpret it
Name groups, denominators, units, time points, effect estimates and uncertainty, and distinguish unadjusted from adjusted analysis. Preserve this limit: A manuscript should not rewrite the original plan to make an attractive finding primary.
Use tables and figures to carry evidence without duplication
Give each display a self-contained title, labels, notes and denominators, then use prose for the main pattern rather than reading every cell aloud.
Separate results from explanation and keep deviations visible
Report missing data, exclusions, harms, sensitivity analyses and departures from plan before interpretation. A manuscript should not rewrite the original plan to make an attractive finding primary. Clear reporting supports appraisal; it does not make an estimate causal or important by itself.
Practical reader check
- Evidence: List the outcomes, time points, groups and analysis order that were specified before inspecting the results.
- Boundary: A manuscript should not rewrite the original plan to make an attractive finding primary.
- Application: The survey’s primary result is weekly planning frequency, followed by a prespecified comparison by study load. Name the next output and how it will be checked.
Student, parent and career transfer
Practise “Return to the Question, Protocol and Analysis Plan” by separating evidence, interpretation, decision and next action. A parent, teacher, supervisor or teammate can ask what supports the sentence and which missing fact could change it. This discipline transfers to school investigations, university research, laboratory reports, social science, health research, evaluation, data analysis, dissertations, evidence synthesis and research communication without guaranteeing grades, approval, publication, system safety, research validity, employment or future outcomes.
CHAPTER 2 OF 12
2. Report Participant or Material Flow
Why this move matters
State numbers invited, screened, included, excluded, completed and analysed with reasons at each relevant stage.
Did You Know? Readers need the denominator history.
Report what was found in the order the study asked
State numbers invited, screened, included, excluded, completed and analysed with reasons at each relevant stage. For The section reports invitations, starts, completed surveys, duplicates removed and the final analysis count., begin with participant or material flow, descriptive data and the prespecified primary result before secondary or exploratory findings.
Pair every estimate with enough context to interpret it
Name groups, denominators, units, time points, effect estimates and uncertainty, and distinguish unadjusted from adjusted analysis. Preserve this limit: Flow numbers must reconcile across text, table and diagram.
Use tables and figures to carry evidence without duplication
Give each display a self-contained title, labels, notes and denominators, then use prose for the main pattern rather than reading every cell aloud.
Separate results from explanation and keep deviations visible
Report missing data, exclusions, harms, sensitivity analyses and departures from plan before interpretation. Flow numbers must reconcile across text, table and diagram. Clear reporting supports appraisal; it does not make an estimate causal or important by itself.
Practical reader check
- Evidence: State numbers invited, screened, included, excluded, completed and analysed with reasons at each relevant stage.
- Boundary: Flow numbers must reconcile across text, table and diagram.
- Application: The section reports invitations, starts, completed surveys, duplicates removed and the final analysis count. Name the next output and how it will be checked.
Student, parent and career transfer
Practise “Report Participant or Material Flow” by separating evidence, interpretation, decision and next action. A parent, teacher, supervisor or teammate can ask what supports the sentence and which missing fact could change it. This discipline transfers to school investigations, university research, laboratory reports, social science, health research, evaluation, data analysis, dissertations, evidence synthesis and research communication without guaranteeing grades, approval, publication, system safety, research validity, employment or future outcomes.
CHAPTER 3 OF 12
3. Describe Missing Data and Analysis Populations
Why this move matters
Show missingness by important variable and identify which records entered each analysis.
Did You Know? Missingness shapes every percentage and estimate.
Report what was found in the order the study asked
Show missingness by important variable and identify which records entered each analysis. For The planning-frequency item has three blanks, so its denominator differs from the demographic table., begin with participant or material flow, descriptive data and the prespecified primary result before secondary or exploratory findings.
Pair every estimate with enough context to interpret it
Name groups, denominators, units, time points, effect estimates and uncertainty, and distinguish unadjusted from adjusted analysis. Preserve this limit: Do not silently change denominators or impute values without reporting the method.
Use tables and figures to carry evidence without duplication
Give each display a self-contained title, labels, notes and denominators, then use prose for the main pattern rather than reading every cell aloud.
Separate results from explanation and keep deviations visible
Report missing data, exclusions, harms, sensitivity analyses and departures from plan before interpretation. Do not silently change denominators or impute values without reporting the method. Clear reporting supports appraisal; it does not make an estimate causal or important by itself.
Practical reader check
- Evidence: Show missingness by important variable and identify which records entered each analysis.
- Boundary: Do not silently change denominators or impute values without reporting the method.
- Application: The planning-frequency item has three blanks, so its denominator differs from the demographic table. Name the next output and how it will be checked.
Student, parent and career transfer
Practise “Describe Missing Data and Analysis Populations” by separating evidence, interpretation, decision and next action. A parent, teacher, supervisor or teammate can ask what supports the sentence and which missing fact could change it. This discipline transfers to school investigations, university research, laboratory reports, social science, health research, evaluation, data analysis, dissertations, evidence synthesis and research communication without guaranteeing grades, approval, publication, system safety, research validity, employment or future outcomes.
CHAPTER 4 OF 12
4. Present Descriptive Data Before Comparisons
Why this move matters
Describe the analysed sample or materials with units, categories and useful distributions.
Did You Know? Context lets readers see whom the result represents.
Report what was found in the order the study asked
Describe the analysed sample or materials with units, categories and useful distributions. For The report shows programme year, study load and median weekly planning frequency with a suitable spread., begin with participant or material flow, descriptive data and the prespecified primary result before secondary or exploratory findings.
Pair every estimate with enough context to interpret it
Name groups, denominators, units, time points, effect estimates and uncertainty, and distinguish unadjusted from adjusted analysis. Preserve this limit: Baseline description should not become a significance contest.
Use tables and figures to carry evidence without duplication
Give each display a self-contained title, labels, notes and denominators, then use prose for the main pattern rather than reading every cell aloud.
Separate results from explanation and keep deviations visible
Report missing data, exclusions, harms, sensitivity analyses and departures from plan before interpretation. Baseline description should not become a significance contest. Clear reporting supports appraisal; it does not make an estimate causal or important by itself.
Practical reader check
- Evidence: Describe the analysed sample or materials with units, categories and useful distributions.
- Boundary: Baseline description should not become a significance contest.
- Application: The report shows programme year, study load and median weekly planning frequency with a suitable spread. Name the next output and how it will be checked.
Student, parent and career transfer
Practise “Present Descriptive Data Before Comparisons” by separating evidence, interpretation, decision and next action. A parent, teacher, supervisor or teammate can ask what supports the sentence and which missing fact could change it. This discipline transfers to school investigations, university research, laboratory reports, social science, health research, evaluation, data analysis, dissertations, evidence synthesis and research communication without guaranteeing grades, approval, publication, system safety, research validity, employment or future outcomes.
CHAPTER 5 OF 12
5. State the Primary Outcome Clearly
Why this move matters
Report the prespecified primary result with group, time point, denominator, unit and direction.
Did You Know? The main result should be unmistakable.
Report what was found in the order the study asked
Report the prespecified primary result with group, time point, denominator, unit and direction. For The median weekly planning frequency is reported for the full analysed sample before subgroup comparisons., begin with participant or material flow, descriptive data and the prespecified primary result before secondary or exploratory findings.
Pair every estimate with enough context to interpret it
Name groups, denominators, units, time points, effect estimates and uncertainty, and distinguish unadjusted from adjusted analysis. Preserve this limit: A primary label must follow the plan, not the smallest p-value.
Use tables and figures to carry evidence without duplication
Give each display a self-contained title, labels, notes and denominators, then use prose for the main pattern rather than reading every cell aloud.
Separate results from explanation and keep deviations visible
Report missing data, exclusions, harms, sensitivity analyses and departures from plan before interpretation. A primary label must follow the plan, not the smallest p-value. Clear reporting supports appraisal; it does not make an estimate causal or important by itself.
Practical reader check
- Evidence: Report the prespecified primary result with group, time point, denominator, unit and direction.
- Boundary: A primary label must follow the plan, not the smallest p-value.
- Application: The median weekly planning frequency is reported for the full analysed sample before subgroup comparisons. Name the next output and how it will be checked.
Student, parent and career transfer
Practise “State the Primary Outcome Clearly” by separating evidence, interpretation, decision and next action. A parent, teacher, supervisor or teammate can ask what supports the sentence and which missing fact could change it. This discipline transfers to school investigations, university research, laboratory reports, social science, health research, evaluation, data analysis, dissertations, evidence synthesis and research communication without guaranteeing grades, approval, publication, system safety, research validity, employment or future outcomes.
CHAPTER 6 OF 12
6. Give Effect Estimates and Precision
Why this move matters
Pair differences, ratios or other effects with confidence or credible intervals and relevant units rather than reporting thresholds alone.
Did You Know? Estimates show magnitude; uncertainty shows limits.
Report what was found in the order the study asked
Pair differences, ratios or other effects with confidence or credible intervals and relevant units rather than reporting thresholds alone. For The comparison reports an estimated median difference and its interval under the prespecified method., begin with participant or material flow, descriptive data and the prespecified primary result before secondary or exploratory findings.
Pair every estimate with enough context to interpret it
Name groups, denominators, units, time points, effect estimates and uncertainty, and distinguish unadjusted from adjusted analysis. Preserve this limit: An interval is not a guarantee that the true value lies inside it.
Use tables and figures to carry evidence without duplication
Give each display a self-contained title, labels, notes and denominators, then use prose for the main pattern rather than reading every cell aloud.
Separate results from explanation and keep deviations visible
Report missing data, exclusions, harms, sensitivity analyses and departures from plan before interpretation. An interval is not a guarantee that the true value lies inside it. Clear reporting supports appraisal; it does not make an estimate causal or important by itself.
Practical reader check
- Evidence: Pair differences, ratios or other effects with confidence or credible intervals and relevant units rather than reporting thresholds alone.
- Boundary: An interval is not a guarantee that the true value lies inside it.
- Application: The comparison reports an estimated median difference and its interval under the prespecified method. Name the next output and how it will be checked.
Student, parent and career transfer
Practise “Give Effect Estimates and Precision” by separating evidence, interpretation, decision and next action. A parent, teacher, supervisor or teammate can ask what supports the sentence and which missing fact could change it. This discipline transfers to school investigations, university research, laboratory reports, social science, health research, evaluation, data analysis, dissertations, evidence synthesis and research communication without guaranteeing grades, approval, publication, system safety, research validity, employment or future outcomes.
CHAPTER 7 OF 12
7. Distinguish Unadjusted and Adjusted Analyses
Why this move matters
Name the model, adjustment variables and rationale previously specified, and present both forms where appropriate.
Did You Know? Labels keep analytical decisions visible.
Report what was found in the order the study asked
Name the model, adjustment variables and rationale previously specified, and present both forms where appropriate. For The section labels the raw comparison and a prespecified adjusted estimate separately., begin with participant or material flow, descriptive data and the prespecified primary result before secondary or exploratory findings.
Pair every estimate with enough context to interpret it
Name groups, denominators, units, time points, effect estimates and uncertainty, and distinguish unadjusted from adjusted analysis. Preserve this limit: Adjustment does not automatically remove confounding or create causality.
Use tables and figures to carry evidence without duplication
Give each display a self-contained title, labels, notes and denominators, then use prose for the main pattern rather than reading every cell aloud.
Separate results from explanation and keep deviations visible
Report missing data, exclusions, harms, sensitivity analyses and departures from plan before interpretation. Adjustment does not automatically remove confounding or create causality. Clear reporting supports appraisal; it does not make an estimate causal or important by itself.
Practical reader check
- Evidence: Name the model, adjustment variables and rationale previously specified, and present both forms where appropriate.
- Boundary: Adjustment does not automatically remove confounding or create causality.
- Application: The section labels the raw comparison and a prespecified adjusted estimate separately. Name the next output and how it will be checked.
Student, parent and career transfer
Practise “Distinguish Unadjusted and Adjusted Analyses” by separating evidence, interpretation, decision and next action. A parent, teacher, supervisor or teammate can ask what supports the sentence and which missing fact could change it. This discipline transfers to school investigations, university research, laboratory reports, social science, health research, evaluation, data analysis, dissertations, evidence synthesis and research communication without guaranteeing grades, approval, publication, system safety, research validity, employment or future outcomes.
CHAPTER 8 OF 12
8. Report Categories, Cut Points and Continuous Measures
Why this move matters
Explain how continuous variables were grouped and report continuous results when the plan requires them.
Did You Know? Category boundaries affect interpretation.
Report what was found in the order the study asked
Explain how continuous variables were grouped and report continuous results when the plan requires them. For Study load categories use published hour ranges and the original continuous hours remain available in a table., begin with participant or material flow, descriptive data and the prespecified primary result before secondary or exploratory findings.
Pair every estimate with enough context to interpret it
Name groups, denominators, units, time points, effect estimates and uncertainty, and distinguish unadjusted from adjusted analysis. Preserve this limit: Data-driven cut points can exaggerate apparent patterns.
Use tables and figures to carry evidence without duplication
Give each display a self-contained title, labels, notes and denominators, then use prose for the main pattern rather than reading every cell aloud.
Separate results from explanation and keep deviations visible
Report missing data, exclusions, harms, sensitivity analyses and departures from plan before interpretation. Data-driven cut points can exaggerate apparent patterns. Clear reporting supports appraisal; it does not make an estimate causal or important by itself.
Practical reader check
- Evidence: Explain how continuous variables were grouped and report continuous results when the plan requires them.
- Boundary: Data-driven cut points can exaggerate apparent patterns.
- Application: Study load categories use published hour ranges and the original continuous hours remain available in a table. Name the next output and how it will be checked.
Student, parent and career transfer
Practise “Report Categories, Cut Points and Continuous Measures” by separating evidence, interpretation, decision and next action. A parent, teacher, supervisor or teammate can ask what supports the sentence and which missing fact could change it. This discipline transfers to school investigations, university research, laboratory reports, social science, health research, evaluation, data analysis, dissertations, evidence synthesis and research communication without guaranteeing grades, approval, publication, system safety, research validity, employment or future outcomes.
CHAPTER 9 OF 12
9. Design Tables and Figures as Evidence
Why this move matters
Use self-contained titles, units, denominators, legends and notes, and make the display accessible and readable.
Did You Know? Displays should stand up to independent reading.
Report what was found in the order the study asked
Use self-contained titles, units, denominators, legends and notes, and make the display accessible and readable. For A figure labels every axis and the table footnote explains missing denominators and adjusted estimates., begin with participant or material flow, descriptive data and the prespecified primary result before secondary or exploratory findings.
Pair every estimate with enough context to interpret it
Name groups, denominators, units, time points, effect estimates and uncertainty, and distinguish unadjusted from adjusted analysis. Preserve this limit: Colour alone should not carry group meaning.
Use tables and figures to carry evidence without duplication
Give each display a self-contained title, labels, notes and denominators, then use prose for the main pattern rather than reading every cell aloud.
Separate results from explanation and keep deviations visible
Report missing data, exclusions, harms, sensitivity analyses and departures from plan before interpretation. Colour alone should not carry group meaning. Clear reporting supports appraisal; it does not make an estimate causal or important by itself.
Practical reader check
- Evidence: Use self-contained titles, units, denominators, legends and notes, and make the display accessible and readable.
- Boundary: Colour alone should not carry group meaning.
- Application: A figure labels every axis and the table footnote explains missing denominators and adjusted estimates. Name the next output and how it will be checked.
Student, parent and career transfer
Practise “Design Tables and Figures as Evidence” by separating evidence, interpretation, decision and next action. A parent, teacher, supervisor or teammate can ask what supports the sentence and which missing fact could change it. This discipline transfers to school investigations, university research, laboratory reports, social science, health research, evaluation, data analysis, dissertations, evidence synthesis and research communication without guaranteeing grades, approval, publication, system safety, research validity, employment or future outcomes.
CHAPTER 10 OF 12
10. Use Prose for the Pattern, Not Every Cell
Why this move matters
Point readers to the central comparison, direction and uncertainty without duplicating the whole table.
Did You Know? Prose guides attention while tables preserve detail.
Report what was found in the order the study asked
Point readers to the central comparison, direction and uncertainty without duplicating the whole table. For The paragraph names the primary difference and refers to Table 2 for full subgroup estimates., begin with participant or material flow, descriptive data and the prespecified primary result before secondary or exploratory findings.
Pair every estimate with enough context to interpret it
Name groups, denominators, units, time points, effect estimates and uncertainty, and distinguish unadjusted from adjusted analysis. Preserve this limit: Selective narration must not hide a contradictory result.
Use tables and figures to carry evidence without duplication
Give each display a self-contained title, labels, notes and denominators, then use prose for the main pattern rather than reading every cell aloud.
Separate results from explanation and keep deviations visible
Report missing data, exclusions, harms, sensitivity analyses and departures from plan before interpretation. Selective narration must not hide a contradictory result. Clear reporting supports appraisal; it does not make an estimate causal or important by itself.
Practical reader check
- Evidence: Point readers to the central comparison, direction and uncertainty without duplicating the whole table.
- Boundary: Selective narration must not hide a contradictory result.
- Application: The paragraph names the primary difference and refers to Table 2 for full subgroup estimates. Name the next output and how it will be checked.
Student, parent and career transfer
Practise “Use Prose for the Pattern, Not Every Cell” by separating evidence, interpretation, decision and next action. A parent, teacher, supervisor or teammate can ask what supports the sentence and which missing fact could change it. This discipline transfers to school investigations, university research, laboratory reports, social science, health research, evaluation, data analysis, dissertations, evidence synthesis and research communication without guaranteeing grades, approval, publication, system safety, research validity, employment or future outcomes.
CHAPTER 11 OF 12
11. Label Secondary, Sensitivity and Exploratory Analyses
Why this move matters
Identify analysis status, rationale and multiplicity or robustness context so discovery is not presented as confirmation.
Did You Know? Labels protect the evidence hierarchy.
Report what was found in the order the study asked
Identify analysis status, rationale and multiplicity or robustness context so discovery is not presented as confirmation. For A post-hoc comparison by commuting time is explicitly exploratory., begin with participant or material flow, descriptive data and the prespecified primary result before secondary or exploratory findings.
Pair every estimate with enough context to interpret it
Name groups, denominators, units, time points, effect estimates and uncertainty, and distinguish unadjusted from adjusted analysis. Preserve this limit: An interesting exploratory pattern still needs future confirmation.
Use tables and figures to carry evidence without duplication
Give each display a self-contained title, labels, notes and denominators, then use prose for the main pattern rather than reading every cell aloud.
Separate results from explanation and keep deviations visible
Report missing data, exclusions, harms, sensitivity analyses and departures from plan before interpretation. An interesting exploratory pattern still needs future confirmation. Clear reporting supports appraisal; it does not make an estimate causal or important by itself.
Practical reader check
- Evidence: Identify analysis status, rationale and multiplicity or robustness context so discovery is not presented as confirmation.
- Boundary: An interesting exploratory pattern still needs future confirmation.
- Application: A post-hoc comparison by commuting time is explicitly exploratory. Name the next output and how it will be checked.
Student, parent and career transfer
Practise “Label Secondary, Sensitivity and Exploratory Analyses” by separating evidence, interpretation, decision and next action. A parent, teacher, supervisor or teammate can ask what supports the sentence and which missing fact could change it. This discipline transfers to school investigations, university research, laboratory reports, social science, health research, evaluation, data analysis, dissertations, evidence synthesis and research communication without guaranteeing grades, approval, publication, system safety, research validity, employment or future outcomes.
CHAPTER 12 OF 12
12. Report Deviations, Harms and Null Findings Honestly
Why this move matters
Describe departures from plan, unintended events where relevant, analyses that could not be completed and results that do not support the hypothesis.
Did You Know? Integrity includes results that disappoint expectations.
Report what was found in the order the study asked
Describe departures from plan, unintended events where relevant, analyses that could not be completed and results that do not support the hypothesis. For The report states that one planned subgroup was too small for the specified analysis and does not replace it quietly., begin with participant or material flow, descriptive data and the prespecified primary result before secondary or exploratory findings.
Pair every estimate with enough context to interpret it
Name groups, denominators, units, time points, effect estimates and uncertainty, and distinguish unadjusted from adjusted analysis. Preserve this limit: Absence of statistical significance is not proof of no effect.
Use tables and figures to carry evidence without duplication
Give each display a self-contained title, labels, notes and denominators, then use prose for the main pattern rather than reading every cell aloud.
Separate results from explanation and keep deviations visible
Report missing data, exclusions, harms, sensitivity analyses and departures from plan before interpretation. Absence of statistical significance is not proof of no effect. Clear reporting supports appraisal; it does not make an estimate causal or important by itself.
Practical reader check
- Evidence: Describe departures from plan, unintended events where relevant, analyses that could not be completed and results that do not support the hypothesis.
- Boundary: Absence of statistical significance is not proof of no effect.
- Application: The report states that one planned subgroup was too small for the specified analysis and does not replace it quietly. Name the next output and how it will be checked.
Student, parent and career transfer
Practise “Report Deviations, Harms and Null Findings Honestly” by separating evidence, interpretation, decision and next action. A parent, teacher, supervisor or teammate can ask what supports the sentence and which missing fact could change it. This discipline transfers to school investigations, university research, laboratory reports, social science, health research, evaluation, data analysis, dissertations, evidence synthesis and research communication without guaranteeing grades, approval, publication, system safety, research validity, employment or future outcomes.
PRACTICE LAB
Build a research results section decision trail
Student route
- Choose one real example or official document inside this guide’s scope.
- Copy its objective and underline actor, action, context, evidence and intended decision.
- Draw the specific reasoning chain used in this article.
- Mark each step reported, inferred, contested or unknown.
- Rewrite the conclusion so it preserves the narrowest important limitation.
Parent or teacher route
Ask the learner to explain turn analysed data into a transparent results section that shows who and what was studied, what the prespecified analyses found, how uncertain the estimates are and where readers can verify the evidence twice: once to a classmate and once to a method specialist. Praise a precise correction and a well-stated unknown; both show disciplined attention to evidence.
Early-career route
Create a one-page research results section audit with source link, date checked, scope, method logic, decisive wording, contrary evidence, limit and next action. A colleague should be able to continue without guessing.
Decision rule
If a shorter explanation removes the condition that made the original claim true, it is not clearer yet. Restore the condition.
Continue with eduKate’s guides to reading course and career information and giving useful feedback in group projects.
USEFUL NEXT READING
Connect this narrow owner to its neighbour
Read the research methods-section guide for a related but different reader job. Return here when the question is specifically how to turn analysed data into a transparent results section that shows who and what was studied, what the prespecified analyses found, how uncertain the estimates are and where readers can verify the evidence. Use each guide for the reader task named in its heading.
For English practice across research, school and career communication, visit the Singapore English Tuition Centre learning site.
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
Questions students and parents often ask
Should the results section include interpretation?
Report the finding and necessary factual context; broader explanation, implications and comparison with literature usually belong in the discussion.
Must I report p-values?
Follow the study plan and field guidance, but do not let a threshold replace effect size, uncertainty and context.
Can tables repeat the text?
Use the text for the main pattern and tables for complete detail; avoid copying every number into prose.
What if denominators differ?
State the denominator for each result and explain missingness or exclusions so percentages remain interpretable.
How do I report a null result?
Report the estimate and uncertainty accurately without claiming proof of no effect merely because a threshold was not crossed.
Does following STROBE or CONSORT prove the study is valid?
No. Reporting guidelines improve completeness; design, conduct, analysis and inference still require appraisal.
PRIMARY SOURCES
Read the primary guidance for this research results section
Facts were checked against current official and primary sources on 9 November 2026. Follow the live source for later corrections, completed updates or companion material.
- EQUATOR STROBE guidance
- STROBE checklist
- EQUATOR CONSORT 2025 guidance
- eduKate research methods section guide
- eduKate research abstract guide
A cheerful final note
Precise English makes turn analysed data into a transparent results section that shows who and what was studied, what the prespecified analyses found, how uncertain the estimates are and where readers can verify the evidence more generous, not less. People can see how their evidence and values entered the work, where disagreement remains and what a responsible next step looks like.