The 200-word examination instruction list
CLEP College Composition asks you to revise writing, assess sources and develop arguments. Identify whether the task asks for a sentence edit, a choice about a draft, a position based on your own examples or an argument using supplied sources.
Start with the list or jump to exam requirements, worked examples, the Fencing Method or practice. The entries are a study aid for interpreting tasks and recognising useful subject terms.
Essential instructions
| No. | Instruction or term | Meaning or action |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Identify | Name or pick out the item the question specifies. |
| 2 | State | Express the required point directly and clearly. |
| 3 | Describe | Report the relevant characteristics, events or pattern. |
| 4 | Explain | Connect the result to its cause, mechanism or reasoning. |
| 5 | Compare | Set the items side by side on the same relevant feature. |
| 6 | Interpret | Say what a statement, result or display means in context. |
| 7 | Infer | Use clues to reach a conclusion the material implies. |
| 8 | Evaluate | Weigh relevant evidence or criteria before reaching a judgment. |
| 9 | Justify | Give evidence for the claim and explain how that evidence supports, qualifies or defends it. |
| 10 | Determine | Work from the given information to establish an answer. |
| 11 | Select | Choose only the number of options requested. |
| 12 | Best supported | Prefer the conclusion backed most directly by the evidence. |
| 13 | In context | Use the meaning that fits this passage or situation. |
| 14 | Evidence | A fact, detail or observation that supports a claim. |
| 15 | Claim | An assertion that can be tested against evidence or reasoning. |
| 16 | Purpose | Identify why a text, study or source was produced. |
Composition and revision
| No. | Instruction or term | Meaning or action |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Timed position essay | Defend a position with reasons and specific examples drawn from reading, experience or observation. |
| 18 | Timed synthesis essay | Build an argument that incorporates and cites both supplied sources. |
| 19 | Cite both sources | Identify each source when borrowing an idea, paraphrasing or quoting. |
| 20 | Attribution phrase | Introduce evidence by naming the author, title or another clear identifier. |
| 21 | Source synthesis | Explain how ideas from different sources work together in your own argument. |
| 22 | Relevant personal example | Use an experience that directly tests or illustrates your claim. |
| 23 | Discuss the extent | State how far you agree and identify a meaningful qualification. |
| 24 | Coherent paragraph | Keep sentences focused on one purpose and connect the evidence to the point. |
| 25 | Topic sentence | State the point a paragraph develops. |
| 26 | Thesis scope | Match the claim to what the essay’s evidence can support. |
| 27 | Paragraph placement | Choose where a sentence belongs by checking what precedes and follows it. |
| 28 | Sentence combining | Join ideas while preserving their logical relationship and avoiding ambiguity. |
| 29 | Revision in context | Evaluate a change against the whole draft rather than the sentence alone. |
| 30 | Transition of contrast | Signal how the following point differs from the preceding one. |
| 31 | Transition of cause | Show that one condition or action explains another. |
| 32 | Redundancy | Remove repetition that adds no meaning or emphasis. |
| 33 | Wordiness | Replace an unnecessarily long expression with clearer wording. |
| 34 | Parallel structure | Give grammatically equivalent items matching forms. |
| 35 | Subject–verb agreement | Match the verb to its grammatical subject. |
| 36 | Pronoun–antecedent agreement | Match a pronoun to the noun or expression it represents. |
| 37 | Ambiguous antecedent | Revise when more than one noun could be the pronoun’s referent. |
| 38 | Dangling modifier | Supply the intended actor for an opening modifying phrase. |
| 39 | Misplaced modifier | Move the modifier close to what it describes. |
| 40 | Comma splice | Correct a comma that improperly joins two independent clauses. |
| 41 | Fused sentence | Separate or correctly connect independent clauses run together. |
| 42 | Sentence fragment | Complete a word group that cannot stand as the intended sentence. |
| 43 | Independent clause | A clause capable of functioning as a complete sentence. |
| 44 | Dependent clause | A clause that depends on another construction to complete the sentence. |
| 45 | Coordination | Join elements of equal grammatical rank. |
| 46 | Subordination | Use a dependent construction to mark a relationship such as time or cause. |
| 47 | Shifts in tense | Keep tense consistent unless the time relationship justifies a change. |
| 48 | Shifts in person | Maintain a consistent viewpoint unless the change serves a clear purpose. |
| 49 | Precise diction | Choose the word that states the intended meaning accurately. |
| 50 | Research question | Formulate an inquiry specific enough to guide the selection of sources. |
| 51 | Reference tool | Choose a source type suited to locating the particular information requested. |
| 52 | Direct quotation | Use exact words and identify their source. |
| 53 | Paraphrase | Restate a source’s idea in your own wording and credit it. |
| 54 | Source-based concession | Recognise a genuine objection and explain how it qualifies your position. |
| 55 | Distinguish source and claim | Make clear which idea belongs to the source and which judgment is yours. |
| 56 | Logical development | Arrange reasons and evidence so readers can follow the argument. |
Rhetoric, research and argument
| No. | Instruction or term | Meaning or action |
|---|---|---|
| 57 | Synthesis question | Build an argument and use the required sources as evidence for your own thesis. |
| 58 | Rhetorical analysis | Explain how a writer’s choices serve meaning or purpose in context. |
| 59 | Argument question | Defend a position on the stated issue with evidence and commentary. |
| 60 | Rhetorical situation | Identify the writer, audience, occasion, purpose and relevant constraints. |
| 61 | Exigence | Identify the circumstance or problem that prompted the communication. |
| 62 | Audience expectations | Explain how the writer responds to what the intended readers value or expect. |
| 63 | Rhetorical choice | Name a specific choice and explain what it does in this passage. |
| 64 | Writer’s purpose | Explain what the writer seeks to accomplish for the intended audience. |
| 65 | Defensible thesis | Make a specific claim that answers the prompt and can be supported. |
| 66 | Line of reasoning | Organise claims so each helps establish the thesis. |
| 67 | Evidence and commentary | Pair the supporting material with an explanation of how it advances the argument. |
| 68 | Source attribution | Identify the source when paraphrasing, quoting or using its information. |
| 69 | Source conversation | Show how sources agree, qualify or challenge each other on the same issue. |
| 70 | Use a visual source | Read labels and scope before connecting the visual evidence to your point. |
| 71 | Qualify the claim | Set an appropriate condition or limit on the claim. |
| 72 | Rebut an objection | Explain why an opposing point does or does not change the conclusion. |
| 73 | Concede a point | Acknowledge a valid concern before explaining its effect on your case. |
| 74 | Assumption behind the claim | Identify the premise on which the reasoning depends. |
| 75 | Develop a paragraph | Add relevant reasoning and explain how the evidence supports the paragraph’s claim. |
| 76 | Best revision | Choose the version that fulfils the specified purpose in context. |
| 77 | Placement of a sentence | Find the location that fits the logical development and nearby references. |
| 78 | Delete or retain | Decide whether the material helps achieve the stated purpose. |
| 79 | Effective transition | Choose wording that expresses the real relationship between the ideas. |
| 80 | Introduce a source | Provide relevant context for the material without losing focus on your own argument. |
| 81 | Source credibility | Assess which features make the source useful for the claim being made. |
| 82 | Scope of evidence | Check whether the evidence applies to the people, time or situation named. |
| 83 | Analytic rubric | Use separate criteria to review thesis, evidence and commentary, and sophistication. |
| 84 | Complexity of the issue | Recognise meaningful tensions or limits and explain why they matter. |
| 85 | Written stimulus | Use the supplied passage and question rather than assumptions about the larger topic. |
| 86 | Nonfiction passage | Analyse the claims and rhetorical choices in the nonfiction text supplied. |
| 87 | Reading question | Use the text to identify meaning, structure or function. |
| 88 | Writing question | Choose a revision that advances the goal stated in the prompt. |
| 89 | Develop a position | Connect the thesis, reasons and specific support throughout the essay. |
| 90 | Proposed revision | Check what the revised wording changes and how that affects the stated goal. |
| 91 | Logical progression | Check whether each idea follows and prepares the next one. |
| 92 | Context for the audience | Include background the intended readers need to understand the claim. |
| 93 | Reason and evidence | Distinguish the basis for a claim from the material that supports that basis. |
| 94 | Acknowledge another perspective | Represent the view accurately before responding to it. |
| 95 | Thesis qualification | Explain when the main claim applies and how far it can be defended. |
| 96 | Purpose of a paragraph | Identify what the paragraph does for the piece’s argument. |
| 97 | Relevant source detail | Use the specific part of a source that advances the point. |
| 98 | Synthesis commentary | Explain why two source details reinforce or complicate the same claim. |
| 99 | Rhetorical effect | Connect the choice to its effect on the intended audience in that situation. |
| 100 | Passage-based multiple choice | Choose the answer most consistent with the supplied text and stem. |
| 101 | Timed essay | Plan, write and review within the available writing time. |
| 102 | Author’s central claim | Find the main assertion the author wants the reader to accept. |
| 103 | Warranted inference | Choose an inference that has adequate support in the text. |
| 104 | Least supported | Choose the option with the weakest support under the stated criterion. |
| 105 | Closest in meaning | Match the expression’s meaning in the passage rather than its most familiar sense. |
| 106 | Function of the example | Explain which general idea the example develops, illustrates or limits. |
| 107 | Role of a paragraph | Identify how the paragraph contributes to the passage’s overall reasoning. |
| 108 | Writer’s attitude | Infer the author’s position from emphasis, tone and qualification. |
| 109 | View reported by the author | Attribute the view to the source the author identifies. |
| 110 | Argument structure | Identify the relationship between reasons, objections and conclusions. |
| 111 | Evidence and conclusion | Check whether the evidence actually establishes the conclusion offered. |
| 112 | Evaluate a claim | Use relevant criteria and explain the strengths or limits of the reasoning. |
| 113 | Consider a counterargument | Address a plausible objection to the position you intend to defend. |
| 114 | Contextual meaning | Use the surrounding text to decide which interpretation fits. |
| 115 | Relevant example | Give an example that demonstrates the reason rather than only mentioning the topic. |
| 116 | Paragraph focus | Make each paragraph develop a particular part of the answer. |
| 117 | Conclusion follows | Check that the final judgment is supported by what precedes it. |
| 118 | Scope of a term | Check which cases the word or expression includes. |
| 119 | Circular reasoning | Recognise when the reason effectively assumes the conclusion. |
| 120 | Author’s attitude | Infer the writer’s stance from wording, emphasis and qualification. |
| 121 | Quantifier scope | Check exactly which people, cases or claims are covered by all, some or none. |
| 122 | Inference from silence | Identify a conclusion drawn only because the passage leaves a matter unstated. |
| 123 | Normative claim | Recognise a claim about what ought to happen. |
| 124 | Descriptive claim | Recognise a claim about what happens or has happened. |
| 125 | Main conclusion | Identify the claim that the rest of the reasoning ultimately supports. |
| 126 | Intermediate conclusion | Identify a claim that receives support and then helps support a further claim. |
| 127 | Support gap | Find the step that is assumed between the premises and conclusion. |
| 128 | Complete the argument | Choose the conclusion or missing proposition that follows from the stated reasoning. |
| 129 | Reason and example | Show how the example demonstrates the point made by the reason. |
| 130 | Reasoning flaw | Locate the exact step where the evidence fails to support the conclusion. |
| 131 | Author’s assumption | Identify a premise the argument relies on without stating directly. |
| 132 | Strength of support | Judge how directly a detail bears on the exact claim. |
| 133 | Most logically completes | Choose the ending that follows from the text or notes. |
| 134 | Main purpose | Identify what the text as a whole is trying to accomplish. |
| 135 | Most directly supports | Pick the evidence with the clearest connection to the named claim. |
| 136 | Author’s claim | Find what the named author argues or asserts. |
| 137 | Cause and effect | Choose a link that shows one event producing or explaining the other. |
| 138 | Textual evidence | Choose a detail from the source that supports the precise claim. |
| 139 | Scope | Check the population, time frame or range covered by the claim. |
| 140 | Logical relationship | Identify whether adjacent ideas add, contrast, explain or exemplify. |
| 141 | Author’s reservation | Identify a stated hesitation, exception or limit on the main claim. |
| 142 | Scope of the claim | Match the answer to the people, period or cases the passage actually discusses. |
| 143 | Support | Supply evidence that helps establish the claim. |
| 144 | Reason | The basis for a statement, choice or result. |
| 145 | Conclusion | The result reached after considering the reasoning or evidence. |
| 146 | Context | The surrounding information that helps determine meaning. |
| 147 | Support the claim | Give evidence that bears on the exact claim in the question. |
| 148 | Contrast | Show how the items differ on a shared point of comparison. |
| 149 | Check | Test the answer against the original instruction or condition. |
| 150 | Distinguish | Give the feature that lets the reader tell two things apart. |
| 151 | Summarise | Select the central points and leave out minor details. |
| 152 | Define | Give the precise meaning used in the subject or question. |
| 153 | Outline | Give the main steps or points in brief. |
| 154 | Give | Supply the requested fact, example or result. |
| 155 | Name | Supply the correct term, person or item. |
| 156 | List | Set out the requested items separately. |
| 157 | Indicate | Make the chosen feature or answer clear. |
| 158 | Complete | Fill in what is missing while keeping the supplied structure. |
| 159 | Locate | Find the specified detail, point or region. |
| 160 | Refer to | Use the specified passage, figure or notes when responding. |
| 161 | Based on | Ground the answer in the material named in the question. |
| 162 | According to | Use what the specified source says. |
| 163 | Most likely | Choose the conclusion with the strongest support among the options. |
| 164 | Explicit | Stated directly in the source. |
| 165 | Implicit | Suggested by the source and recoverable from clues. |
| 166 | Example | A particular case used to make a general idea clear. |
| 167 | Assumption | A premise taken as given for the purpose of the question. |
| 168 | Condition | A requirement that must be satisfied. |
| 169 | Constraint | A restriction that shapes the possible answers. |
| 170 | Criterion | A standard used to choose or judge an answer. |
| 171 | Source | The particular text, figure, notes or data supplied for use. |
| 172 | Passage | A stretch of text provided for reading and answering questions. |
| 173 | Statement | A complete assertion to examine or respond to. |
| 174 | Option | One of the choices the question offers. |
Other examination vocabulary
| No. | Instruction or term | Meaning or action |
|---|---|---|
| 175 | Section | A group of questions or tasks within a test. |
| 176 | Illustrate | Make an idea clear with a relevant example or diagram. |
| 177 | Demonstrate | Show how a fact, process or result can be established. |
| 178 | Arrange | Put items into the order or grouping requested. |
| 179 | Sequence | Put stages into a meaningful order. |
| 180 | Classify | Assign each item to a category using the stated rule. |
| 181 | Order | Sort items by the criterion given in the prompt. |
| 182 | Omit | Leave out the indicated item or detail. |
| 183 | Include | Make sure the requested part appears in the response. |
| 184 | Exclude | Keep the named item or category outside your answer. |
| 185 | With reference to | Tie each important point to the specified material. |
| 186 | With examples | Support the answer with concrete cases from the appropriate material. |
| 187 | Two reasons | Give two distinct explanations for the relevant result. |
| 188 | Scoring guidelines | Review what the released rubric accepts for each point. |
| 189 | Explain one way | Give one specific example and show how it meets the stated condition. |
| 190 | Limitations | Identify specific boundaries on the conclusions that the method can support. |
| 191 | Strengths | Explain features that make the evidence or method fit the purpose. |
| 192 | Counterexample | Give one valid case that disproves a general claim. |
| 193 | Perspective | Explain the viewpoint from which a claim or event is presented. |
| 194 | Bias | Identify a systematic leaning and explain how it may shape the evidence. |
| 195 | Implication | Explain what would follow if the claim or finding holds. |
| 196 | Effect | Explain what changes or what impression a choice creates in context. |
| 197 | Compare both | Keep each named text, case or object visible across the same comparison points. |
| 198 | Point of view | Identify the standpoint influencing how the source presents events. |
| 199 | Synthesis | Combine related evidence into one coherent understanding. |
| 200 | Scope of comparison | Use the same group, period or criterion for the alternatives. |
What CLEP College Composition requires
College Board’s subject page lists a total of 125 minutes. College Composition and College Composition Modular are distinct exams, so check the exact title your college accepts before registering.
| Exam component | Format and scope |
|---|---|
| Multiple choice | 50 questions in 55 minutes. The official exam page lists conventions of written English, revision, source use and rhetorical analysis. |
| Essay 1 | 30 minutes. Develop a position using reasons and specific examples from your reading, observations or experience. |
| Essay 2 | 40 minutes, including reading the two supplied sources. Develop your position and cite both sources when you use their ideas or words. |
| Scoring | The two essays are typed and required. The combined essay score and the multiple-choice score receive equal weight in the overall result. |
CLEP is a U.S.-based college-credit examination programme. The receiving institution decides whether to accept the exam, which score qualifies, and how the credit applies. Candidates outside the United States should confirm testing options and acceptance with their intended institution and test centre.
Read the task before choosing evidence
For a revision question, read the sentence before and after the proposed edit. A choice can be grammatical and still weaken the draft if it changes the meaning or moves a point to the wrong place. For the source essay, give each source a role in your argument.
Worked examples for common instructions
Choose the right modifier
Prompt. Revise “Walking to the library, the rain soaked my notes.”
Answer. “As I walked to the library, the rain soaked my notes.” The original opening modifier attaches grammatically to the rain, but the writer is the one walking.
Preserve the intended relationship
Prompt. Choose a connector. The plan is inexpensive. It takes longer to put in place.
Answer. “However” marks a contrast between low cost and slow implementation. “Therefore” would imply that low cost causes the delay.
Develop a qualified position
Prompt. Should a school extend library hours every evening? Write a defensible thesis.
Answer. The school should first extend hours on evenings with the greatest demand. A targeted trial can test whether extra access justifies the staffing cost.
Synthesize both sources
Prompt. A fictional attendance report shows demand, while a fictional staffing memo identifies a limit. Put both to work.
Answer. The attendance report supports extending service during exam weeks. The staffing memo supports limiting the extension to two evenings. Together they support a focused pilot. Identify each source in the essay.
Use the Fencing Method to build an answer
Begin with a position you can state in one sentence. Add a concrete detail, then explain how it supports or qualifies the position. For a revision task, begin with one clear correction and check it against the surrounding draft.
Start. The school should extend access.
Add context. The school should extend library hours on exam-week evenings.
Add reasoning. The attendance report shows evening demand, while the staffing memo indicates why a limited schedule is more practical than daily opening.
Transfer. Use new sources about weekend access and decide whether your original position still fits.
Practise with the 200 terms
Take one draft paragraph and revise it for sentence structure, order and evidence. Then outline a timed argument using one reason and one specific example. Repeat with two sources and identify each where you use it.
Keep a list parallel
Try it. Revise “The plan saves time, reduces cost and is improving access.”
Check. “The plan saves time, reduces cost and improves access.” Each item now uses the same verb structure.
Frequently asked questions
Do I cite a source when I paraphrase?
Yes. On the source essay, identify each of the two supplied sources when you use its information or language. Make it clear which points are from the source and which are your own reasoning.
Official sources and next reading
College Board CLEP College Composition exam description
Related AP vocabulary guide · eduKateSG vocabulary learning guide · Learn the Fencing Method
