Singapore’s railway opened in stages during 1903, while a rikisha strike interrupted street transport. Electric tramways and refrigerated food supply were still being prepared. Currency reform, shipbuilding, municipal works, schools and charitable institutions give this year a history extending well beyond its best-known openings.
- January to December: a railway across the island
- The January rikisha strike and the rules of street transport
- Electric tramways: engineers, materials and preparations
- Currency reform: arguments, new coins and an unsettled ratio
- Cold Storage: incorporation and preparations for a supply chain
- Shipbuilding, repairs and work at the harbour
- Naval visitors, coaling and the classification of trade
- River works, reclamation and roads
- Water, building materials and municipal health enforcement
- The Convent roof and organised charitable support
- School life, a Malay-medium school and the YMCA
- Concerts, public rooms and the Memorial Hall project
- Hospitals, quarantine and the colony’s public decisions
January to December: a railway across the island
Public trains began running on the Singapore–Kranji Railway as far as Bukit Timah on 1 January 1903. The New Year holiday therefore marked a specific opening stage, rather than completion of the whole route. The contemporary account described the journey through Newton and Cluny to Bukit Timah; its northern extension to Woodlands followed in April. (The Straits Times, 2 January 1903; The Straits Times, 11 April 1903)
The first holiday passengers quickly tested the available accommodation. On 5 January, the newspaper reported that trains had been heavily patronised the previous Saturday, with some unable to carry everyone who wanted to board. A separate notice put expenditure on the railway up to 30 November 1902 at $1,562,392, a construction total reported as the new passenger service began. (The Straits Times, 5 January 1903; The Straits Times, 3 January 1903)
A resident near Killiney Road said that the stream beneath the railway bridge had silted up over several months and overflowed during heavy rain. In March, a newspaper notice contrasted the comparatively regular trains with an erratic clock at the Singapore station, whose timekeeping had become a subject of public ridicule. (The Straits Times, 3 January 1903; The Straits Times, 2 March 1903)
Additional passenger equipment was already on the government’s agenda in February. A notice for the forthcoming Legislative Council meeting specified a proposed purchase of one locomotive, six third-class carriages and two passenger brake vans. (The Straits Times, 26 February 1903)
On 9 April, the completed route to Woodlands was advertised with a new timetable. The newspaper explained that the permanent way was not yet thoroughly ballasted and that the initial service would consequently be limited. The first through train left the Tank Road station at seven in the morning on 10 April. Woodlands was the terminus at the northern end of Singapore island. (The Straits Times, 9 April 1903; The Straits Times, 11 April 1903)
The first days of through running brought another surge of passengers. The 14 April account described crowded trains carrying both European and Asian travellers, with two engines needed on some occasions to pull the heavy loads. (The Straits Times, 14 April 1903)
By late September, increased traffic had led management to announce six through trains in each direction on weekdays from 1 October. (The Straits Times, 30 September 1903)
The railway also carried organised groups. During the Singapore Volunteer Corps exercise of 4 October, troops assembled at Tank Road; the attacking party, comprising infantry and two guns, detrained at Cluny Road. (The Straits Times, 5 October 1903)
On 12 October, a defect in the Orchard Road bridge’s ironwork delayed the first departure until after nine and held up traffic for two hours; heavy rain later that month flooded a short section between Singapore and Bukit Timah. (The Straits Times, 12 October 1903; The Straits Times, 30 October 1903)
Offices and service information continued to be developed after the passenger openings. Government tenders for new railway offices at Tank Road were announced in November. A handy timetable for the service effective from 1 November had been published at 32 Raffles Place and was to be distributed at the stations. The final notice of the year corrected the next timetable change: the new service would begin on 4 January 1904, rather than New Year’s Day. (The Straits Times, 12 November 1903; The Straits Times, 5 November 1903; The Straits Times, 31 December 1903)
The January rikisha strike and the rules of street transport
Rikisha pullers stopped work on 15 January. The dispute centred on the magisterial jurisdiction recently assumed by Mr Hooper over rikisha owners and pullers and over hackney-carriage owners and drivers. The report said that traffic, and to some extent trade, had been paralysed that day. (The Straits Times, 15 January 1903)
The strike continued on 16 January, when police placed armed guards at several points, particularly near the workers’ quarters. The newspaper described conditions as quiet. Several low-lying streets were also flooded during the tides of 15 and 16 January, and the absence of rikishas made getting around the wet streets more difficult for passengers. (The Straits Times, 16 January 1903)
By 17 January, only a small number of the more than 9,000 licensed second-class vehicles were reported to be plying for hire. One account described a marine engineer who secured employment on a ship at Tanjong Pagar but found it had sailed by the time he obtained a horse carriage and reached the wharf. (The Straits Times, 17 January 1903)
The 19 January report recorded a police visit led by the chief police officer and assistant superintendents Wathen and Chancellor, accompanied by armed Sikh policemen and Malay policemen carrying batons. On 20 January, the newspaper said that most rikishas had returned to the streets, while police were still intervening in Kampong Glam. (The Straits Times, 19 January 1903; The Straits Times, 20 January 1903)
The return to work was not complete at once. On 21 January, a report announced the arrest of two towkays and the seizure of 200 rikishas, while noting that vehicles were again available for hire. The following morning, the newspaper said that the strike appeared to have ended and that pullers had come out without police persuasion. (The Straits Times, 21 January 1903; The Straits Times, 22 January 1903)
Passengers could also be prosecuted. On 26 August, a man who refused to pay a seven-cent rikisha fare was fined $20, with twenty days’ imprisonment in default. The magistrate ordered that, if the fine was recovered, two dollars should go to the puller. (The Straits Times, 26 August 1903)
Regulation continued after the strike. From 1 September, pullers could demand a revised scale of hire charges. The announcement referred to a syndicate’s earlier proposal for better rikishas with rubber-tyred wheels. In October, Hooper’s court at the Middle Road depot fined a puller $2 for refusing a passenger in Cecil Street, showing the continuing use of the specialised enforcement arrangement. (The Straits Times, 1 September 1903; The Straits Times, 9 October 1903)
Electric tramways: engineers, materials and preparations
The electric tramway scheme became a visible construction project during 1903. In March, the newspaper reported the Governor’s confidence at a Legislative Council meeting that the long-delayed scheme was proceeding. Owners of 156 proposed freehold building allotments at Serangoon Road and Lavender Street postponed an advertised auction until the tramway company began operations, anticipating a route alongside the property. (The Straits Times, 12 March 1903; The Straits Times, 19 March 1903)
Guthrie and Company, the tramway company’s agents, announced the arrival from London of chief construction engineers James Ginnel and Thomas J. Seed on 16 May. On 5 June, rails and other tramway materials were being discharged at Tanjong Pagar. (The Straits Times, 16 May 1903; The Straits Times, 5 June 1903)
By 22 June, rails were lying along the roadside from the Keppel Harbour Post Office towards Mount Palmer, with further material being landed daily. The report anticipated the start of construction work around the beginning of July. Four days later, Ginnel described preparations for breaking the ground and embedding the rails. (The Straits Times, 22 June 1903; The Straits Times, 26 June 1903)
The undertaking also required stone. A July report identified granite at Pulau Nongsa being worked by the tramway company’s contractors. It described good-quality material that was difficult to obtain. (The Straits Times, 23 July 1903)
Electric supply was another planned component. In September, the tramway company told the Municipal Commissioners that it expected to be able to supply electrical energy by the end of October 1904. The Municipality engaged Mr Thomas to report on distribution arrangements. (The Straits Times, 29 September 1903)
Currency reform: arguments, new coins and an unsettled ratio
Discussion of the currency question was already extensive early in the year. On 16 February, The Straits Times acknowledged publishing letters whose views differed sharply from its own. On 2 March, it announced the publication of August Huttenbach’s book, The Silver Standard and the Straits Currency Question. (The Straits Times, 16 February 1903; The Straits Times, 2 March 1903)
The Currency Committee’s report of 17 March proposed replacing the existing dollars with a special Straits coin, then stopping new coinage until its exchange value reached the government’s chosen sterling value. Once that point was reached, government would supply dollars against gold at the fixed rate. This was a recommended sequence, with the eventual ratio still to be determined. (Stability of International Exchange, 1903, Appendix F)
The Legislative Council accepted the Currency Commission’s recommendations at its meeting of 29 May, as reported the following day. The newspaper subsequently interviewed Huttenbach about the decision. By the end of August, it was distributing his further memorandum on the scheme as a supplement, showing that official acceptance had not ended the circulation of competing views. (The Straits Times, 30 May 1903; The Straits Times, 2 June 1903; The Straits Times, 31 August 1903)
The Coinage Order of 25 June authorised a silver Straits Settlements dollar. Its design paired Edward VII’s portrait with a reverse bearing the denomination in Chinese and Malay, together with the English words and date. The order empowered the Governor to bring the new coin into legal tender by proclamation and, with the Secretary of State’s consent, to change which dollar served as the standard. (Stability of International Exchange, 1903, Appendix F)
On 10 July, a P&O vessel leaving Singapore for Bombay carried $1,900,000 from the Currency Note Reserve for recoinage. The money was to remain there until dies for the new dollars arrived. A Council paper reported later that month stated that the new coin’s size had been set at one-sixteenth less than the existing dollar and that it would bear the King’s effigy. (The Straits Times, 10 July 1903; The Straits Times, 18 July 1903)
A July proposal addressed the physical cost of changing the money. The Colonial Secretary was to seek a vote not exceeding $154,000 for reminting coins from the currency-note reserve into Straits dollars. (The Straits Times, 16 July 1903)
The new dollar was being shown before general circulation. On 26 September, Raffles Library and Museum curator Dr R. Hanitsch enabled the newspaper to inspect a specimen that had been presented to the Museum. An account three days earlier had described disagreement over the effects of the pending Coin Import and Export Bill. (The Straits Times, 26 September 1903; The Straits Times, 23 September 1903)
By 5 October, the newspaper was discussing the immediate operation of provisions prohibiting the importation of British trade dollars and Mexican dollars into the colony. It expressed confidence that trade would not be adversely affected. (The Straits Times, 5 October 1903)
New coins also attracted counterfeiting. On 30 November, the newspaper warned of false new dollars circulating in Singapore and described a specimen that looked convincing but could be distinguished by its ring. At the close of the year, discussion of the Straits Settlements Association’s London dinner still referred to an exchange ratio that had not been announced. (The Straits Times, 30 November 1903; The Straits Times, 31 December 1903)
Cold Storage: incorporation and preparations for a supply chain
In May, H. W. H. Stevens, representing the Queensland Meat Export and Agency Company, arrived in Singapore. A contemporary notice said that the proposed Singapore Cold Storage Company would be formed locally rather than in Queensland, avoiding additional registration costs. On 9 June, the paper reported that the company had been registered and that a prospectus would probably follow about a week later. (The Straits Times, 5 May 1903; The Straits Times, 9 June 1903)
The projected business extended beyond Singapore. At the end of August, a report attributed to the Malay Mail described negotiations with government for a branch store at Port Swettenham, from which meat could be supplied to the southern Malay States. A Penang branch was also contemplated. (The Straits Times, 31 August 1903)
In September, the Queensland Meat Export and Agency Company was identified as the intended supplier once preliminary arrangements were complete and the stores had been erected. (The Straits Times, 16 September 1903)
The company’s first general meeting was held at Gresham House on 8 December, with A. Gentle presiding. Those named included Stevens as managing director and G. A. Derrick as secretary, alongside directors Becker and Fowlie. (The Straits Times, 9 December 1903)
Shipbuilding, repairs and work at the harbour
The Tanjong Pagar Dock Company began the year with a new managing director. J. R. Nicholson arrived with his wife in January and was met at the wharf by company chairman John Anderson. In March, Anderson chaired the company’s half-yearly meeting at its Collyer Quay town office, with Nicholson among those present. The accounts under consideration covered the half-year ending December 1902. (The Straits Times, 13 January 1903; The Straits Times, 23 March 1903; The Straits Times, 16 March 1903)
Ship construction took place at more than one Singapore yard. On 28 March, a steel screw steamer built for Koe Guan and Company of Penang was launched at Riley Hargreaves and Company’s Tanjong Rhu yard. It had been constructed to Lloyd’s Class 90A1. On 11 August, the Singapore Slipway and Engineering Company launched Khengseng, commissioned by Tan Keong Kiam of Robinson Road. (The Straits Times, 30 March 1903; The Straits Times, 12 August 1903)
Repair work brought damaged ships back into service. Tanglin, damaged by the P&O steamer Valetta while alongside Tanjong Pagar Wharf in early May, completed its repairs and moved from the docks to the roads on 10 June. Asahan, which had entered Keppel Harbour Dock around the middle of April, completed its repairs and left for the roads on 14 July. (The Straits Times, 12 June 1903; The Straits Times, 16 July 1903)
Bentong passed through several distinct stages during the year. Built at Keppel Harbour and launched in July, the steamer subsequently had its engines installed at Tanjong Pagar. Its steam trial took place on the afternoon of 31 October. The earlier trial announcement identified it as a vessel built and equipped for the Straits Steamship Company. (The Straits Times, 2 November 1903; The Straits Times, 30 October 1903)
In November, Bentong’s first west-coast voyage was announced. On 21 November, its sailing was postponed until six in the evening for passengers attending the races, with a connecting train from Port Swettenham to Kuala Lumpur arranged for its arrival. (The Straits Times, 12 November 1903; The Straits Times, 21 November 1903)
Another Keppel-built steamer, Sri Muar, was launched on 21 November for Soon Keck Limited. The report put its gross tonnage at about 300 and stated that construction had taken place under Lloyd’s special survey, with classification 100A1, and under Board of Trade survey. (The Straits Times, 21 November 1903)
The docks were workplaces governed by coercive labour discipline as well as engineering schedules. In March, two Greek seamen from Willowdene were fined six days’ pay and sentenced to seven days’ rigorous imprisonment for absence from their vessel and refusal to work. In August, three European firemen from Battenhall received seven-day prison sentences for absence without leave at Keppel Harbour; the report also recorded their complaint about the food and an order to return them aboard before the ship sailed. (The Straits Times, 23 March 1903; The Straits Times, 26 August 1903)
Shipping firms could inspect new safety equipment locally. On 8 December, representatives of Singapore businesses accepted the East Asiatic Company’s invitation aboard Boribat in the harbour to watch a demonstration of an Engelhardt collapsible lifeboat. (The Straits Times, 9 December 1903)
Port-health rules published in October gave the Port Health Officer power to board and inspect craft in the Singapore, Rochore and Kallang rivers, among other waterways, as far as the harbour limits. The officer could require nuisances found aboard to be abated. (The Straits Times, 17 October 1903)
Naval visitors, coaling and the classification of trade
Admiral Sir Cyprian Bridge arrived off Singapore on 18 January aboard the battleship Glory, accompanied by the cruiser Talbot and the despatch vessel Alacrity. The ships anchored in the roads. The port also served routine naval refuelling: in March, Thetis went alongside Tanjong Pagar to coal before returning to the roads, and in May Sirius departed the wharf after taking bunker coal. (The Straits Times, 19 January 1903; The Straits Times, 9 March 1903; The Straits Times, 30 May 1903)
Singapore’s role as a coaling station entered a House of Lords debate on 19 May. The Earl of Crewe placed it on the sea route from Britain through Gibraltar, Malta, Aden and Colombo to Hong Kong. He questioned unrestricted access by foreign warships to strategic harbours, suggesting gradual strengthening of defences and limits on the number of visiting ships where necessary. (Hansard, 19 May 1903)
First Lord of the Admiralty Selborne defended reciprocal naval hospitality and explained that restrictions introduced in 1887 had been removed in 1893 with colonial concurrence. He agreed to submit the arguments for further consideration, without promising a new restriction. His defence policy treated fortified coaling stations as supports for a mobile fleet, rather than stations to which the fleet should be permanently tied. (Hansard, 19 May 1903)
The distinction between foreign and British trade was challenged in the Commons on 30 June. Seely noted that one official paper classified 65 per cent of Straits Settlements imports as foreign, while the colony’s report gave 45 per cent. Joseph Chamberlain explained that the colonial report had counted trade with the Malay Peninsula, Sarawak and French India as British; together those categories represented 19.2 per cent of the total. The newer return instead classified as foreign all trade outside the United Kingdom and British possessions. The apparent discrepancy arose from different territorial categories in the two returns. (Hansard, 30 June 1903)
River works, reclamation and roads
A select committee investigated raising the bridges over the Singapore River. Its report, laid before the Legislative Council and discussed in March, followed six meetings and the examination of six witnesses. By July, newspaper comment was describing friction between government and Municipal Commissioners over bridging the river. (The Straits Times, 9 March 1903; The Straits Times, 16 July 1903)
Work on the waterfront involved temporary tracks as well as permanent structures. An August notice described three Decauville railway lines crossing the road near the Boarding Officers’ quarters, two originally used to take earth from Mount Wallich to reclamation works in front of Fort Palmer. By then two tracks were disused, leaving remnants of construction transport in the street. (The Straits Times, 12 August 1903)
In September, Howarth Erskine and Company had taken control of reclamation work in front of the Singapore Club, Harbour Office and Drill Hall. Staging was being extended from both ends with a railway line on it. Later that month, a newspaper notice urged that a man with a red flag warn road users when stone trolleys crossed Anson Road from Mount Wallich towards the reclamation works. (The Straits Times, 9 September 1903; The Straits Times, 28 September 1903)
Road repairs remained visible subjects of complaint and observation. In September, the widening of the junction of Scotts Road and Orchard Road had begun, while municipal workers were repairing the road in front of Mount Palmer. A November correspondent was still protesting about Racecourse Road, pointing to the number of users and residences along it. (The Straits Times, 19 September 1903; The Straits Times, 12 November 1903)
Wet weather prompted a further argument about maintenance equipment. At the end of November, a correspondent proposed two or three mechanical road sweepers to deal with muddy streets. A December reply pointed out that the Municipality already possessed a rotary sweeping machine in its store. (The Straits Times, 30 November 1903; The Straits Times, 5 December 1903)
Water, building materials and municipal health enforcement
The Kallang water-supply extension remained an active municipal question. In January, the Municipal Engineer advised the Commissioners to retain the adopted route rather than take the risks of a proposed alternative. The Kallang works appeared again on the November meeting agenda, together with trade water-supply charges, and a special meeting was called to consider the tunnel works and estimates for 1904. (The Straits Times, 17 January 1903; The Straits Times, 3 November 1903; The Straits Times, 12 November 1903)
Water provision could serve fire protection and domestic needs together. In June, Mr Barker gave notice of a motion for a fire main to Kampong Martin to protect the district’s godowns. His proposal also called for standpipes as close as possible to the nearby kampongs. (The Straits Times, 16 June 1903)
Questions about construction quality reached both the Municipal Commission and the courts. In June, Barker proposed asking whether a newspaper correspondent’s allegations about building lime had a factual basis and what checks were being made. In July, Municipal Building Inspectors brought complaints before Mr Broadrick about the quality of lime used in dwelling houses. (The Straits Times, 2 June 1903; The Straits Times, 3 July 1903)
The Municipality recruited specialist scientific staff. Dr Bullock, its newly appointed bacteriologist, arrived on 12 May and was expected to take up his duties the next day. In September, the bacteriological examination of rats appeared on the Municipal Commission’s agenda. (The Straits Times, 12 May 1903; The Straits Times, 23 September 1903)
Sanitary regulation affected food production and farming near homes. In June, the newspaper said enforcement against unlicensed pig keeping was moving piggeries away from roads and dwellings. In September, the Municipality was preparing notices requiring owners and occupiers of vegetable gardens off Serangoon Road to abate the nuisance caused by using night soil. (The Straits Times, 23 June 1903; The Straits Times, 26 September 1903)
Food inspection also reached the Convent’s milk supply. On 26 June, two milkmen appeared before Broadrick on summonses brought by sanitary inspectors. One inspector had bought milk from the Convent’s supplier, and Dr Glennie stated that the Convent had complained about its quality. (The Straits Times, 26 June 1903)
Enforcement itself depended on administrative processing. On 23 June, two courts were occupied with municipal cases, and the paper attributed the unusually large accumulated list to delay in the Municipal Secretariat. In October, Chief Sanitary Inspector Mayhew prosecuted people for placing advertisements on bridges contrary to municipal regulations. Ten defendants pleaded guilty; the account noted that two had put up fresh notices after earlier proceedings had begun. (The Straits Times, 23 June 1903; The Straits Times, 16 October 1903)
The Convent roof and organised charitable support
A storm early in January tore away half the roof of the Convent dormitory housing about 200 children. The 12 January report said the children were finding dry places elsewhere and that municipal engineers had condemned the building. (The Straits Times, 12 January 1903)
Public subscriptions were proposed for the repairs. An April Legislative Council notice announced that the Colonial Secretary would seek a charitable grant towards the Convent roof. By June, Mr Frizell was reporting subscriptions received for the repair fund. (The Straits Times, 26 January 1903; The Straits Times, 16 April 1903; The Straits Times, 22 June 1903)
The Indra Zanibar Theatrical Company offered a benefit performance. Its announcement on 26 June said that Ali Baba would be staged the following Monday, with proceeds after expenses going to the Convent Roof Repair Fund. (The Straits Times, 26 June 1903; The Straits Times, 2 June 1903)
Later in the year, the Convent’s annual bazaar was scheduled for the Town Hall on 3 and 4 December. A report after the second evening described a large attendance and a crowded café chantant. (The Straits Times, 30 November 1903; The Straits Times, 5 December 1903)
The Children’s Aid Society made its own appeal after its financial year ended on 31 August. Its report was published in September, followed by subscriber lists in October. Harmston’s Circus also advertised a performance for the society’s benefit on 30 October after bad weather had prevented a show the previous evening. (The Straits Times, 16 September 1903; The Straits Times, 2 October 1903; The Straits Times, 30 October 1903)
School life, a Malay-medium school and the YMCA
Siglap Malay School was established in 1903 in a wooden structure at Kee Sun Avenue. Malay was its language of instruction. The Ministry of Education’s institutional history supplies the year of founding, rather than an exact opening day. Its later concrete building and its later name, Siglap Indah Primary School, should not be used to describe the school’s original premises or identity. (MOE Heritage Centre, Siglap Indah Primary School)
The Anglo-Chinese School’s seventeenth annual distribution took place on 21 January before a crowded gathering. Two days later, the Anglo-Chinese Free School’s large classroom was filled for its own ceremony, chaired by Colonial Treasurer F. G. Penney. (The Straits Times, 22 January 1903; The Straits Times, 23 January 1903)
Fundraising and organised recreation were part of school life. A Town Hall fancy sale for the Chinese Girls’ School was advertised for 26 and 27 June. Anglo-Chinese School sports were announced for the boarding-school grounds on Orchard Road on 17 June, with finals there on 19 June; both afternoons’ events were scheduled to begin at three. In July, a football match between Raffles and Cross Street schools ended in a five-nil victory for Raffles. (The Straits Times, 26 June 1903; The Straits Times, 16 June 1903; The Straits Times, 30 July 1903)
At Raffles Institution, the annual prize distribution took place on 18 December in the school’s large upper hall. Anglo-Chinese School held its eighteenth prize distribution on 22 December in the school chapel, with flags and greenery decorating the room. (The Straits Times, 19 December 1903; The Straits Times, 23 December 1903)
The YMCA was taking institutional shape before its formal establishment date. On 2 June, E. C. Hill, W. R. Collyer and Arthur Barker were named as new members of its board of directors. Sport Singapore dates the association’s formal establishment to 30 June and identifies R. D. Pringle as the organiser appointed by the English National Council following requests from missionaries and prominent officials. (The Straits Times, 2 June 1903; Sport Singapore, YMCA)
Pringle had already helped inaugurate YMCA associations in Bombay and Colombo. In Singapore, the initial premises were at the Oriental Club, and his programme included devotional meetings, outdoor physical activity and educational classes. Sport Singapore places the lease of Zetland House in January 1904 and the opening of the Orchard Road building in 1911. The founding belongs to 1903, while those premises have their own later dates. (Sport Singapore, YMCA)
A December notice advertised a YMCA Christmas social for the evening of 23 December in the association’s rooms. (The Straits Times, 19 December 1903)
Concerts, public rooms and the Memorial Hall project
At the Singapore Philharmonic Society’s Town Hall concert on 21 March, the orchestra under W. G. St. Clair played eight pieces. In May, an accidental double booking placed a regular Thursday orchestral rehearsal and an evangelistic meeting in the same hall, exposing the practical competition for a shared public venue. (The Straits Times, 23 March 1903; The Straits Times, 12 May 1903)
The Society’s advertised June programme included a violin solo by Mr Dorasamai, a visiting musician from Madras. A separate notice announced a one-hour concert for European and Eurasian children on 3 July, with arrangements directed through schools and parents. The following day’s report described a packed Town Hall and an audience of children responding enthusiastically to the programme. (The Straits Times, 12 June 1903; The Straits Times, 26 June 1903; The Straits Times, 4 July 1903)
Religious musical organisations also presented substantial programmes. For Corpus Christi in June, the Cathedral of the Good Shepherd’s Philharmonic Society of St Cecilia was to perform Mozart’s Twelfth Mass with orchestral accompaniment. Bishop Bourdon was to officiate at the pontifical high Mass at eight in the morning. In November, its celebration of St Cecilia’s feast included Haydn’s Imperial Mass under D. O’Cruz. (The Straits Times, 12 June 1903; The Straits Times, 23 November 1903)
Construction of the Victoria Memorial Hall was under way by July. Its general committee had approved plans, and an executive committee headed by Governor Frank Swettenham was managing the undertaking. Subscribers were called to a meeting at the Town Hall on 16 September to consider changes to the design. The next day’s report said that the small meeting, chaired by the Governor, had adopted new designs. (The Straits Times, 18 July 1903; The Straits Times, 12 September 1903; The Straits Times, 17 September 1903)
At the end of December, another children’s concert was postponed because the necessary wind instrumentalists could not be secured; an early-January performance was proposed instead. The Town Hall nevertheless hosted C. B. Buckley’s annual children’s entertainment on 28 December. (The Straits Times, 23 December 1903; The Straits Times, 29 December 1903)
Hospitals, quarantine and the colony’s public decisions
Loke Yew offered $50,000 for charitable provision. In July, the newspaper reported that the Governor had accepted the offer and promised to consider the donor’s wishes for either better accommodation for people quarantined on St John’s Island or a new hospital for poor Chinese residents in Singapore. (The Straits Times, 16 July 1903)
Quarantine accommodation was separately before the Legislative Council in October. The Colonial Secretary proposed a $56,000 vote for additions and improvements at St John’s Island station. (The Straits Times, 3 October 1903)
The Singapore committee’s broader report on the estimates for 1904 recommended $3,100 for a public morgue near the proposed new Tan Tock Seng Hospital and $22,000 for a new currency-note vault. (The Straits Times, 3 November 1903)
Hospital support included modest, organised gifts as well as large donations. At Christmas, the Women’s Christian Temperance Union’s committee allocated $30 for the hospital for people with leprosy and Tan Tock Seng Hospital. A Presbyterian Church notice asked children to bring flowers to the Christmas-morning service for onward delivery to the General Hospital, continuing an established practice of gifts to patients. (The Straits Times, 29 December 1903; The Straits Times, 23 December 1903)
Changes to everyday public services could be less conspicuous. In February, a postal notice announced that all Singapore sub-post offices would issue and cash Straits postal orders. At year’s end, another notice distinguished full closure of the General Post Office and sub-offices on New Year’s Day from the following day’s closure of only the savings-bank, money-order and parcel-post branches. (The Straits Times, 2 February 1903; The Straits Times, 29 December 1903)
Frank Swettenham was honoured at a public Town Hall banquet on 7 October and at a ball two nights later. On 12 October he departed for Europe aboard Annam from Tanjong Pagar. A report on 13 October said that Annam had gone ashore on Pulo Laut reef after departure. On 13 October, W. T. Taylor took the necessary oaths before the Chief Justice and assumed office as Officer Administering the Government during Swettenham’s absence; the appointment was announced in an extraordinary Gazette. (The Straits Times, 8 October 1903; The Straits Times, 10 October 1903; The Straits Times, 13 October 1903; The Straits Times, 14 October 1903)
Changes in municipal personnel continued in December. A. J. W. Watkins was appointed to the Municipal Commission after Sohst’s resignation. At a special meeting on 29 December, Dr W. R. C. Middleton took the chair for the first time as Deputy President. (The Straits Times, 16 December 1903; The Straits Times, 19 December 1903; The Straits Times, 26 September 1903; The Straits Times, 30 December 1903)
Continue exploring
Continue to Singapore in 1904. Explore the Singapore history Atlas.