How to Survive G3 Exercise and Sports Science

To survive G3 Exercise and Sports Science, start with evidence, not simply more physical training. Students can be skilled at sport but unable to explain a tactical choice, or understand a theory chapter but struggle to apply it to a video. These are different learning gaps. The practical route is to find one genuine performance observation, name the relevant concept, explain a reasonable cause, and decide what further information would test that explanation. Improving those steps can produce better written answers and more honest coursework.

The 2027 Singapore–Cambridge Secondary Education Certificate G3 Exercise and Sports Science syllabus is K354. Paper 1 is an 80-mark, two-hour theory e-examination counting 40%. Paper 2 is 21 weeks of assessed coursework worth 80 raw marks and 60%, with one individual/dual practical activity and one team practical activity, plus a Development Log. The scheme does not reward students solely for being enthusiastic athletes: video interpretation, physiological reasoning, practical competency and evidence-led reflection all matter.

The subject can inspire pathways related to coaching, sports science, health promotion, physical education, sport technology, research and applied performance analysis. These interests are worth exploring, but the subject itself does not constitute a coaching or medical qualification, and cannot promise entry to a particular JC, MI, polytechnic, ITE or specialist course. The first SEC cohort receives results in 2027 and participates in the revised post-secondary admissions arrangements from 2028, so check actual eligibility rules instead of relying on rumours.

This guide explains exactly where the marks come from, how the five disciplines of Exercise and Sports Science interact, how to interpret movement without exaggerating what a photograph or video proves, and how to plan a four-week study repair within the real 21-week coursework timetable. It emphasises safe school-approved practice, honest measurement and the student’s own assessed work. A useful first action is to correct just one weak explanation on a fresh example.

Begin with four small decisions

Confirm K354 and school-approved activity choices.
Differentiate what is observed from what is interpreted.
Practise the actual electronic question formats and video tasks.
Keep the Development Log honest, current and supervised.

2027 K354: three e-exam sections and a substantial coursework paper

Paper 1 is a two-hour e-examination with all questions compulsory. Its Section A, worth 20 marks, may use multiple choice, matching, drag-and-drop, checkbox, blanks and short responses based on text, images or short animations. Section B, 40 marks, contains structured questions based on written and visual materials. Section C, 20 marks, requires structured interpretation of one or two videos. Students must learn to read unfamiliar performance material rather than recite a sequence of prepared definitions.

Paper 2 is a 21-week internally assessed and externally moderated component worth 60% overall. Its 80 marks comprise 40 for two practical performances and 40 for the Development Log. The practical activities are one individual or dual sport and one team sport, each 20 marks. The Development Log covers a ten-mark tactical-decision task and a thirty-mark staged training programme. These facts should govern the student’s schedule and the kind of feedback requested from the supervising teacher.

An accurate preparation strategy spends regular time on both performance skills and theory. A candidate can know anatomy but interpret video poorly; another can perform confidently but fail to explain how a training choice followed from evidence. After each assessment, tag the first missing reasoning step. The most useful label might be anatomical understanding, measurement, tactical analysis, graph reading or coursework documentation rather than simply ‘not enough effort’.

Five academic disciplines, one movement-focused question

The syllabus studies Exercise Physiology, Motor Learning and Development, Biomechanics, Sports Psychology and Sports Sociology. Each asks a different question about movement, participation or performance. Physiology concerns body systems and response; motor learning concerns skill development; biomechanics examines physical forces; psychology explores motivation and attention; sociology considers equity, ethics and commercial influence.

Imagine a fictional badminton player making errors late in a game. Fitness, movement efficiency, decision speed, concentration and training context could all be relevant, but the examination question may focus on only one. An effective student identifies the specific evidence provided and chooses the discipline that explains it. Listing every possible concept can obscure the causal relationship the examiner wants.

Make a concept map with one observed sporting action at the centre and five separate possible academic questions around it. This makes the subject less intimidating because each chapter is a different perspective on a common activity. Ask the student to distinguish what the observation directly shows from what the academic model helps infer.

Exercise physiology: systems, response and adaptation

The muscular, skeletal, cardiovascular and respiratory systems interact during activity. Students should know their main roles and how physiological responses may change with effort and duration. However, a temporary rise in heart rate during exercise is not identical to a long-term training adaptation. That distinction is central to understanding evidence and explaining outcomes.

Suppose a school-provided chart shows heart rate increasing during authorised activity and then returning towards its prior level. Describe the observed trend first. A plausible interpretation involves changing demand and recovery, but a chart alone cannot diagnose an individual’s fitness or medical condition. Do not infer a specific disease or training prescription from one graph.

Learn to use the vocabulary of short-term response, longer-term adaptation and measurement conditions. Practical activity remains under approved teacher or coach guidance, while personal health or injury concerns require qualified professional support. The aim is reliable scientific understanding rather than pressuring students to reach unsafe intensity.

Energy systems and exercise intensity

The subject connects how energy is supplied with the type and duration of activity. Brief high-intensity efforts and longer sustained activities can depend on energy pathways in different proportions. No normal sporting activity draws on a single isolated pathway for every second. Students should describe the relative importance of systems with appropriate qualifiers.

A hypothetical sprint and a steady longer run differ in duration and intensity. A strong comparison states the relevant demands and explains why the energy contribution differs under the syllabus model, without claiming all athletes will show identical responses. A simplified model helps learning, but it does not describe every physiological detail of a person’s performance.

Write a short comparison grid with effort type, duration, intensity, main concept and data needed to check it. This encourages explanation rather than an unexamined equation between one sport and one energy-system label. Academic revision does not require students to conduct risky maximal tests at home.

Muscles, joints and movement roles

A movement may involve several bones, joints and muscles working in sequence. Memorising the names of muscles is useful only when the student can explain how a joint moves and what role a muscle action contributes. Agonists and antagonists must be understood within the particular movement rather than assigned permanently to one muscle without context.

Draw a simple elbow flexion and extension diagram using classroom materials. Label the joint, direction of movement and relevant muscle roles. When the movement reverses, the roles can change. If the learner can name an arm muscle but not explain the action, repair the connection between structure and function.

Complex sport skills often involve several joints and stabilising actions. Avoid treating a single still image as sufficient evidence for full movement timing. Use authorised video sequences or teacher diagrams and explain the differences between what is seen and what is inferred.

Motor learning: getting better is more than repeating

Motor learning includes how movement skills develop, how practice is structured and how feedback informs improvement. A candidate may perform many repetitions and still preserve an error if the feedback never identifies the decision that needs changing. Quality of feedback and opportunities to respond to it matter.

Imagine a fictional volleyball player who regularly reacts late to a ball moving across the court. The relevant challenge might be recognising earlier cues rather than simply moving the arms faster. In a paper explanation, identify the cue, intended decision and evidence for its timing. The most useful practice targets the identified learning problem under coaching supervision.

Use a four-stage study note: what the student did, why it may have happened, what the authorised teacher suggested and what the later observation showed. Do not claim that an improved performance proves one cause when other conditions also changed.

Reaction time versus movement time

Reaction time is the interval between stimulus and initiation of the relevant response. Movement time is the duration of the ensuing movement. Total response time includes both in a simple model. The terms are not interchangeable: a performer who starts sooner can still finish later if the movement itself takes longer.

Original invented figures: player A reacts in 0.25 seconds and moves for 0.60 seconds, completing in 0.85 seconds. Player B reacts in 0.20 seconds and moves for 0.70 seconds, completing in 0.90 seconds. Player B has faster initial reaction but slower total completion. This counterexample helps identify what a question actually measures.

Draw a timeline with stimulus, onset and completion before calculating. If a video lacks sufficiently precise timing, report the limitation rather than invent exact hundredths of a second. Numerical precision is only useful when the measurement can support it.

Stages of skill acquisition and meaningful feedback

A novice learning a movement may rely heavily on conscious instructions while a more experienced participant can perform familiar elements with greater fluency. The syllabus explores learning stages and the kinds of feedback appropriate to performance. Avoid assuming a learner reaches a new stage permanently after one successful attempt.

An original paper case describes a tennis beginner who understands the task but misjudges contact timing. Feedback that identifies the location and timing of contact may be more actionable than simply telling the student to try harder. Later, a different opponent or ball trajectory tests whether learning transfers.

A study answer should explain what feature of performance changed and what evidence supports the claim. Students benefit from feedback that names a specific controllable feature while avoiding shame or unrealistic comparisons with elite athletes.

Biomechanics: use forces to explain a movement

Biomechanics applies physical concepts to sporting action. Forces can produce acceleration and moments around joints, while mass, momentum, stability and support conditions shape what movement is possible. Students should draw the situation and label forces before selecting a relationship, just as in Physics.

In a simplified paper-only example, a 20 kg object under a net horizontal force of 40 N has acceleration 2 m/s². The object is a classroom model, not an instruction to push heavy sports equipment. If opposing friction acts, distinguish net force from the force applied by a person.

Biological motion is usually more complex than a single object with one force. The academic goal is to connect the key features of a supplied sporting case with the appropriate simplified principle, acknowledging assumptions rather than using formulas without interpretation.

Moments, lever arms and how direction matters

A moment depends on the applied force and its perpendicular distance from the relevant pivot. In a sporting or joint diagram, measuring a non-perpendicular distance can give a wrong calculation despite the right formula. Forces from muscles, external loads and body segments may contribute different moments.

An original simplified example has a 10 N force acting at a perpendicular distance of 0.30 m from a pivot, producing 3 N m of turning effect. If only the perpendicular distance doubles, the moment doubles. These paper calculations help students reason about movement without undertaking loaded experiments.

Use a joint sketch to mark pivot, force direction and the relevant perpendicular arm. Then ask whether moving the line of action changes the turning effect. Understanding the geometry is more useful than memorising a collection of numbers.

Stability and balance: read the whole situation

Base of support, centre of mass, external forces and movement can affect stability. A wider or more appropriate stance may help in a particular sporting position, but the best position depends on the task and the need to move again quickly. Absolute rules about one stance being universally best are not sound.

Imagine comparing a player standing still with a defender preparing to change direction. A stable static posture is not automatically the most effective dynamic movement position. A photograph may show where the feet are, but cannot demonstrate the next change in motion.

A useful answer describes support, loading and required movement before recommending a technique. Follow school-coach guidance rather than asking students to perform unsafe balance demonstrations to obtain data.

Sports psychology: motivation and useful goals

Motivation, arousal, anxiety and goal setting can influence how a learner approaches exercise and competition. A good goal describes something useful to practise or measure, not merely a demand to win. A student who feels pressure to achieve a particular rank may benefit from focusing on relevant controllable processes in the academic model.

A fictional beginner sets a process goal to recognise a teammate’s movement before deciding where to pass. The goal can be reviewed through authorised observation, whereas winning the game depends on many other factors. The comparison illustrates the difference between process, performance and outcome goals.

Do not interpret academic concepts as medical diagnoses or prescriptions for anxiety. Use the language and evidence supplied in the paper. Where distress or health concerns arise, qualified adults and professionals should provide appropriate support.

Arousal, precision and differing demands

Arousal refers to activation; anxiety includes concern or apprehension. Their effects on performance may differ by person and task. The assumption that more arousal always produces a better performance is overly simplistic, as is the opposite assumption that every form of activation harms precision.

Imagine a novice performing an unfamiliar delicate movement during an important trial. Increased pressure may interfere with timing, while a familiar vigorous activity may respond differently. The reasoned comparison identifies experience, task demands and observed effect rather than forcing one universal curve onto every student.

When analysing an examination scenario, distinguish the reported behaviour from the proposed cause. The explanation should be framed as plausible under the academic model unless the problem provides enough evidence for a stronger conclusion.

Sport in society: ethics, equity and commercialisation

Sports Sociology asks how ethics, equity and commercialisation influence participation. Funding and media coverage can increase opportunities, while unequal access, scheduling or commercial priorities can create other concerns. Neither the presence of sponsorship nor the absence of it decides whether a sporting programme is fair.

An invented junior tournament receives funding but must move to a venue that some participants cannot easily access. The organiser may gain equipment and facilities while creating an equity issue. Students should assess potential alternatives such as a more accessible venue or modified arrangement within budget.

Write a stakeholder table with athletes, families, organisers and sponsors, then assess how each is affected using case evidence. Avoid assuming one representative speaks for an entire community or claiming a commercial decision is automatically unethical.

Paper 1 electronic response: learn the format and the evidence

The 2027 theory paper uses e-examination responses and short visual or video stimuli. Section A may require dragging items into correct positions or selecting multiple checkboxes, while later sections demand developed answers. Navigation and response accuracy matter, but they do not replace conceptual understanding.

Use official or school-approved practice materials to rehearse the permitted interface. In video questions, identify the moment the command refers to and state what action was visible. Resist writing a detailed motive for a player when the clip shows only positioning.

An effective self-check asks whether the answer identifies the scientific concept, connects it to the visual evidence and addresses the requested change or recommendation. Long prose with no reference to the given data is unlikely to solve a video-analysis task.

Practical activity choices and two assessment opportunities

Candidates complete one approved individual or dual activity and one approved team activity. Examples of the first category include running, swimming, athletics and racket sports; team choices include basketball, football, floorball, netball and other permitted sports. Actual options depend on school and syllabus rules, and parents should not assume every school will assess every listed activity.

The course awards 20 marks to each practical activity. SEAB allows two opportunities for evidence and assessment so the best performance can be selected according to prescribed procedures. Some activities use objective timings or distances, while dual and team activities require video-recorded performance under centre arrangements.

Ask the teacher which activity has been registered, when assessments occur and which performance descriptors apply. Extra unofficial recordings are not a substitute for official evidence. Safe and progressive preparation is more useful than last-minute overtraining.

Development Log Task 1: tactical choices have consequences

Task 1 of the coursework log, worth ten marks, requires analysing tactical decisions in the selected team activity, using video evidence provided by school. A student who simply recounts the match from start to finish has not necessarily evaluated the key decisions or their impact.

An invented passing scenario has an attacker tightly marked and another teammate moving into open space. The relevant analysis asks what cues were available at the decision moment, what option was chosen and how it affected the team’s next move. A plausible alternative should be justified within the rules and actual conditions.

Write four columns: visible cue, chosen action, observed consequence and possible improvement. Keep observation separate from speculation about another player’s intentions. Authentic independent analysis is central to the assessment.

Task 2(A): plan a training programme with real justification

Task 2(A) contributes fifteen marks of the Development Log, focusing on analysis and programme development. The starting point should be a genuine performance need identified from allowed evidence, not a generic fitness programme downloaded from the internet. The student must connect goal, training principle, progress measure and safe feasibility.

An original planning example describes a player whose movement timing is inconsistent in a particular approved sport. A relevant academic explanation would identify which skill aspect is being addressed and how change could be measured reliably. The exact authorised activities, repetitions and progression are matters for the coursework supervisor, not an unsupervised article.

The official scheme permits a specified consultation for developing the plan, with the supervisor endorsing it for safety. Students should follow that process, maintain their own authentic work and avoid assistance that crosses the boundary into completing assessed coursework.

Task 2(B) and Task 2(C): implementation, evaluation, consolidation

Task 2(B) is worth ten marks for implementing and evaluating the training programme, and Task 2(C) another five for consolidating experience. The student should record what was actually done, what measurements or observations were obtained and how the results relate to the original aim. A reflective conclusion cannot replace missing evidence.

Suppose hypothetical success counts across three sessions are five, seven and six out of ten. The results fluctuate; they do not show an uninterrupted rise. A thoughtful evaluation may identify some change while acknowledging the small sample and differences in conditions. Replacing a six with a larger number to draw a tidy upward chart would undermine integrity.

The school controls the prescribed consultations and assessment. Keep records current instead of recreating them after the programme has ended. Distinguish what the learner observed from what they believe explains the result.

Risk assessment and training safely

Exercise participation involves hazards that vary with the activity, environment, equipment and participant. A risk assessment identifies the hazard, who may be affected, potential consequences and suitable precautions. ‘Be careful’ is not a sufficient control measure because it does not explain what should change.

An example may concern wet playing surfaces or poorly maintained equipment. A sensible response is to follow approved inspection and school safety procedures rather than conduct a high-risk demonstration. The paper may ask the student to justify why a chosen precaution addresses the named risk.

No academic guide can prescribe safe training intensity for every teenager. Students should follow their authorised physical education or sports supervisor and qualified health guidance where necessary. Rest, recovery and safe participation belong in a responsible study plan.

A four-week revision cycle inside a 21-week project

Week one: review one theoretical concept, one e-exam video task and the actual Development Log milestone. Label errors as content, measurement, inference, choice or communication. Week two: repair the most repeated reasoning gap with unfamiliar paper problems, while continuing supervised sports practice according to school instruction.

Week three: interpret a new performance video, connect a genuine tactical decision to evidence and revisit the relevant log entry. Week four: rehearse timed written sections and check whether your analysis distinguishes observation, explanation and plausible improvement. Keep the official coursework timetable separately visible.

The support cycle should reduce confusion, not add unsafe training or displace other school subjects. Improvement is demonstrated through clearer independent reasoning and legitimate supervised performance rather than dramatic promises based on one practice session.

Parents, tutors and what the subject may lead to

Students need different kinds of help. Some can describe the theory but misread a graph; some execute techniques confidently but cannot write a valid evaluation; others are still developing safely supervised performance. Ask for a marked answer or real authorised performance log before selecting tuition or extra practice. The first incorrect decision is the best starting point.

A tutor can improve scientific explanation, quantitative interpretation and case-based evaluation without taking over the student’s assessed coursework. Parents can ask what the evidence shows and why an improvement is appropriate, while leaving actual training decisions to the authorised supervisor. Avoid turning assessment into a competition to tolerate unsafe workloads.

Potential future interests include sport science, health promotion, coaching, education, recreation, analytics and fields beyond sport. All specialised professions and courses have their own requirements. A realistic goal now is to connect movement, measured evidence and reasoned choices while preserving the student’s safety and independence.

Twenty original diagnostic tasks

These examples are fictional classroom exercises. They are not training prescriptions, real assessment data or official exam questions. Use school-authorised data and supervision for all practical work.

Time components

Reaction begins 0.25 s after a signal and movement lasts 0.60 s. Find the 0.85 s total and explain why movement time does not equal reaction time.

Compare two athletes

One athlete reacts sooner but moves more slowly than another. Use two separately labelled intervals to explain how finishing order can differ from reaction speed ranking.

Graph without diagnosis

A school-provided heart-rate graph rises during activity. Describe the pattern without claiming the graph diagnoses the student’s health condition.

Forces on paper

Use a fictional 20 kg object under a net force 40 N to compute 2 m/s² acceleration under the stipulated simple model, not as an actual training drill.

Perpendicular lever arm

An ideal 10 N force with 0.30 m perpendicular lever arm produces 3 N m moment. Explain what changes if the distance doubles.

Risk identification

Name one risk in a wet indoor court, the foreseeable consequence and the appropriate school-supervised safeguard.

Sport’s social context

A sponsor offers funding for an inaccessible venue. Weigh benefit and access fairly without assuming every participant has the same experience.

Five-discipline sorting

Given one sport movement, write one question each for physiology, motor learning, biomechanics, psychology and sociology.

Practice versus learning

A fictional student repeats the same skill poorly. Explain how feedback directed at a specific movement cue could be more useful than arbitrary extra repetitions.

Confidence and evidence

A participant feels less anxious after practice. Explain why self-report is relevant yet insufficient to prove a universal causal effect.

Video observation

Describe an unmarked teammate appearing in a school-supplied clip and distinguish the visible movement from a claim about hidden intentions.

Tactical alternatives

Choose one passing decision and a plausible alternative, explaining the cue and likely effect under the game’s rules.

Individual and team categories

Identify one approved individual/dual sport and one team sport as distinct coursework requirements, subject to actual school provision.

Log objective

Write an academically clear, measurable aim for an authorised performance programme without prescribing any unsupervised exercise load.

Log data

Invent percentages 50%, 70%, 60% and explain why that pattern does not show continuous improvement.

Percent change

A hypothetical task time decreases from 12 s to 11 s. Find a reduction of about 8.3% relative to 12 s and distinguish this from a direct speed percentage.

Assessment questions

State Paper 1 Section A 20, B 40, C 20 raw marks; identify what type of data or evidence each section can present.

Consultation boundaries

Explain why the school-approved supervisor must oversee the training programme and why parents should not author assessed log content.

Choose the first wrong step

From a marked script, select whether the error is missing definition, inappropriate inference, incorrect unit or unsupported practical recommendation.

Fresh performance context

Apply a corrected tactical reasoning sequence to another hypothetical team sport, with new cues and different relevant consequences.

Frequently asked K354 questions

What is G3 Exercise and Sports Science in 2027?

The SEC syllabus is K354, previously 6081, examining sports science theory and assessed supervised participation.

What are the two papers?

Paper 1 theory e-exam is 40%, two hours and 80 raw marks. Paper 2 coursework is 60%, 21 weeks and 80 raw marks.

How is the electronic paper divided?

Section A 20 marks; Section B 40; Section C 20. Questions can include interactive tasks and video-based analysis.

How many sporting activities are assessed?

One individual or dual and one team sport, each worth 20 raw marks.

What is the Development Log?

A 40-mark coursework component covering ten-mark tactical analysis and a 30-mark training-programme task.

How are Task 2 marks divided?

2(A) 15, 2(B) 10 and 2(C) 5 raw marks.

Do athletes get high grades automatically?

No. Theory, video interpretation, safe practice, observed performance and authentic log evaluation all contribute.

Are home workouts required for coursework?

School-supervised training and approved assessment instructions control the programme. Do not improvise unsafe training to complete assessed work.

Can ESS lead to physiotherapy or sports coaching?

It can support interest and foundations, but actual professional training and course entry have separate prerequisites.

Can students improve without extra tuition?

Yes. Clear school feedback, careful case practice and valid supervised performance reflection can produce progress.

Official syllabus and connected learning

Use the authoritative 2027 SEAB K354 syllabus and school supervisor’s instructions for coursework, assessment and safety. Other resources explain related study skills and conceptual distinctions.

The next useful step

Review one observation from approved school performance evidence, interpret it carefully, and name a specific question or safe supervised improvement worth investigating. The academic habit of separating evidence from claims, and adjusting a decision responsibly, matters more than trying to prove sporting talent in one exhausting session.

Learn about eduKate Singapore learning support

How to tell an improved explanation from a longer explanation

A learner might write a full paragraph explaining that muscles work harder and breathing increases during exercise. That may be a relevant general principle, but a data-based question often asks something more precise: which observation supports a particular explanation? To improve, make a claim about the supplied numbers or sequence and then describe why the relevant physiological relationship could account for them. A longer fact list is not automatically stronger.

Imagine an invented dataset in which two students complete a supervised task with different observed times, but the question supplies no information about health or training history. The correct analysis can compare the measured times and discuss possible influencing factors. It cannot reliably diagnose the physical capacity of either student or assign a personal weakness. This demonstrates why a small, cautious answer can be scientifically stronger than a grand, confident claim.

Ask the student to underline the observation, circle the scientific concept and draw a line connecting them. If the connection cannot be explained, revise that point rather than adding more vocabulary. After correction, use another fictional sport or video example to check whether the reasoning transfers.

The role of measurement quality in sport performance analysis

Performance data may come from video, timing, distance measurements, repeated counts or observation checklists. The quality of a conclusion depends on how those data were gathered. A short clip can show positioning at a key moment but may not reveal what happened earlier in the match. A stopwatch time may be affected by start and stop decisions. A small sample of attempts may vary simply because sporting conditions change.

An original example compares six successful passes out of ten observed attempts in one session with seven out of ten in another. The sample rates are 60% and 70%. That is a ten-percentage-point increase in the recorded success rate, but it does not prove the training programme caused the difference. Opponent skill, position, weather and other factors could affect the observed outcomes, depending on the sport.

To write a careful evaluation, specify the definition of success, keep measurement conditions as comparable as possible under school supervision and acknowledge factors that might differ. Do not replace missing evidence with estimated values. These habits make the Development Log more informative and prepare the student for data-based e-examination questions.

How families can support ESS without overstepping coursework boundaries

Parents can help organise time, encourage rest and ask calm questions about schoolwork, but the 2027 coursework has formal assessment and consultation rules. The candidate’s analysis, decisions and written log must remain their own. When family members supply complete paragraphs, design an unofficial training programme or manufacture performance measurements, they prevent the student from demonstrating genuine skills and may conflict with assessment requirements.

A useful home conversation begins with one question: what was observed, and how does that observation relate to the principle you are using? Another is: what additional information would make the conclusion stronger? These questions do not require a parent to be a sports scientist. They encourage students to explain and defend their reasoning without putting pressure on physical performance.

If progress feels slow, coordinate with the school teacher or coursework supervisor to understand the student’s actual assessment needs. Do not introduce an extra high-intensity workout or a risky practical test to improve a grade. A safer and more productive next step is often clarifying the written analysis and practising appropriate school-authorised skills.

How to survive G3 Exercise and Sports Science? | Theory, Performance and Development Log