Start here: identify the decision before collecting evidence
Confirm the provider’s exact legal identity and Pearson centre number, then verify the qualification rather than stopping at centre approval. Pearson states that an organisation must be an approved centre to offer its academic, vocational or work-based qualifications. Its centre-approval and qualification-approval policy separates approval of the organisation from permission for particular qualifications, subsites, exceptional collaborations and online delivery. One approved relationship is not unlimited permission.
For international centres, begin with Pearson’s current approval route and keep the signed terms, location, centre number, qualification family and delivery model together. Pearson’s public international-centre search is useful but expressly says it is not a complete list because centres choose whether to share details. Absence from that public listing therefore needs direct Pearson confirmation; it is not by itself proof that a centre is unapproved. Likewise, a listing must still be matched to the learner’s exact qualification and dates.
This guide was checked on 29 October 2026 against current primary guidance. Pearson sources checked on 29 October 2026 include the current becoming-a-centre route, international approval form, July 2025 centre-and-qualification policy, centre listing, terms library, vocational approval handbook and removal policy. Pearson may monitor, suspend service or remove centre or programme approval. Centre approval does not guarantee a learner’s result, university admission, professional recognition, government licensing, immigration permission or approval for every site and delivery mode.
This specialist sits under The Gold Standard of Education: Learning That Transfers into Life. The parent framework keeps the purpose visible: understand the system, act on the correct evidence and build independence for the next decision.
Contents and reading routes
Use the quick route for an immediate decision, the complete route for a live case, and the teaching route when helping a learner explain the mechanism.
- Quick route: chapters 1, 4, 7, 10 and 12.
- Complete route: chapters 1–12, authoritative sources, verification workbook and FAQs.
- Teaching route: chapters 2–3, worked case in chapter 7, and failure repair in chapter 10.
Open the chapter index
- Identify the legal centre
- Separate centre and qualification approval
- Check the correct approval route
- Verify subsites and collaborations
- Verify online delivery
- Read public listings cautiously
- Worked case: one centre, two qualifications
- Track quality assurance
- Interpret finance blocks and suspension
- Handle programme or centre removal
- Join learner registration to results
- Ask the receiving institution
1. Identify the legal centre
Match trading name, legal entity, address and centre number.
A brand may represent a different legal organisation or location.
Decision rehearsal and changed-context transfer
Turn this chapter into a live file. the parent, student, centre leader, examinations officer, adviser, university applicant, registrar or evaluator checking a Pearson Edexcel or BTEC centre states the present decision in one sentence. Pearson Qualifications, the approved centre and Head of Centre, any approved subsite or online-delivery partner, local regulator, examinations staff, receiving institution, learner and family supplies only the evidence it owns. the Pearson centre approval, centre number, signed terms, qualification approval, subsite or online-delivery approval, centre listing, quality-assurance record, finance or service restriction, removal or appeal record, learner registration, result and destination decision records the result. Date every source and distinguish an official fact, an institution-specific decision, an estimate and a personal preference.
Now change one condition: the receiving organisation changes. Preserve every fact that remains valid and reopen only the conclusions that depend on the changed condition. Name the new page, document, calculation or contact required. This is the difference between understanding a system and memorising one outcome.
Run a boundary test. Write what the current evidence proves, what it does not prove and who has authority over the next decision. Replace one identifier, date or category and repeat the reasoning. If the conclusion changes without a cited rule or written decision, an assumption has entered the file.
Finish with a five-line handover: current state; controlling source; unresolved question; next permitted action; review date. A parent, adviser or future learner should be able to reconstruct the case without relying on memory or a private conversation.
2. Separate centre and qualification approval
Record the exact qualification family and programme permission.
Centre approval is not blanket approval for every Pearson qualification.
Decision rehearsal and changed-context transfer
Turn this chapter into a live file. the parent, student, centre leader, examinations officer, adviser, university applicant, registrar or evaluator checking a Pearson Edexcel or BTEC centre states the present decision in one sentence. Pearson Qualifications, the approved centre and Head of Centre, any approved subsite or online-delivery partner, local regulator, examinations staff, receiving institution, learner and family supplies only the evidence it owns. the Pearson centre approval, centre number, signed terms, qualification approval, subsite or online-delivery approval, centre listing, quality-assurance record, finance or service restriction, removal or appeal record, learner registration, result and destination decision records the result. Date every source and distinguish an official fact, an institution-specific decision, an estimate and a personal preference.
Now change one condition: the record is older than expected. Preserve every fact that remains valid and reopen only the conclusions that depend on the changed condition. Name the new page, document, calculation or contact required. This is the difference between understanding a system and memorising one outcome.
Run a boundary test. Write what the current evidence proves, what it does not prove and who has authority over the next decision. Replace one identifier, date or category and repeat the reasoning. If the conclusion changes without a cited rule or written decision, an assumption has entered the file.
Finish with a five-line handover: current state; controlling source; unresolved question; next permitted action; review date. A parent, adviser or future learner should be able to reconstruct the case without relying on memory or a private conversation.
3. Check the correct approval route
Distinguish academic, vocational, work-based and international routes.
A form designed for one category should not be projected onto another.
Decision rehearsal and changed-context transfer
Turn this chapter into a live file. the parent, student, centre leader, examinations officer, adviser, university applicant, registrar or evaluator checking a Pearson Edexcel or BTEC centre states the present decision in one sentence. Pearson Qualifications, the approved centre and Head of Centre, any approved subsite or online-delivery partner, local regulator, examinations staff, receiving institution, learner and family supplies only the evidence it owns. the Pearson centre approval, centre number, signed terms, qualification approval, subsite or online-delivery approval, centre listing, quality-assurance record, finance or service restriction, removal or appeal record, learner registration, result and destination decision records the result. Date every source and distinguish an official fact, an institution-specific decision, an estimate and a personal preference.
Now change one condition: a deadline moves forward. Preserve every fact that remains valid and reopen only the conclusions that depend on the changed condition. Name the new page, document, calculation or contact required. This is the difference between understanding a system and memorising one outcome.
Run a boundary test. Write what the current evidence proves, what it does not prove and who has authority over the next decision. Replace one identifier, date or category and repeat the reasoning. If the conclusion changes without a cited rule or written decision, an assumption has entered the file.
Finish with a five-line handover: current state; controlling source; unresolved question; next permitted action; review date. A parent, adviser or future learner should be able to reconstruct the case without relying on memory or a private conversation.
4. Verify subsites and collaborations
Confirm additional locations and partner responsibilities in writing.
An approved main site does not silently approve every teaching site.
Decision rehearsal and changed-context transfer
Turn this chapter into a live file. the parent, student, centre leader, examinations officer, adviser, university applicant, registrar or evaluator checking a Pearson Edexcel or BTEC centre states the present decision in one sentence. Pearson Qualifications, the approved centre and Head of Centre, any approved subsite or online-delivery partner, local regulator, examinations staff, receiving institution, learner and family supplies only the evidence it owns. the Pearson centre approval, centre number, signed terms, qualification approval, subsite or online-delivery approval, centre listing, quality-assurance record, finance or service restriction, removal or appeal record, learner registration, result and destination decision records the result. Date every source and distinguish an official fact, an institution-specific decision, an estimate and a personal preference.
Now change one condition: the programme changes after an offer. Preserve every fact that remains valid and reopen only the conclusions that depend on the changed condition. Name the new page, document, calculation or contact required. This is the difference between understanding a system and memorising one outcome.
Run a boundary test. Write what the current evidence proves, what it does not prove and who has authority over the next decision. Replace one identifier, date or category and repeat the reasoning. If the conclusion changes without a cited rule or written decision, an assumption has entered the file.
Finish with a five-line handover: current state; controlling source; unresolved question; next permitted action; review date. A parent, adviser or future learner should be able to reconstruct the case without relying on memory or a private conversation.
5. Verify online delivery
Check the delivery model and any separate approval or quality requirement.
Online advertising is not proof of online-delivery approval.
Decision rehearsal and changed-context transfer
Turn this chapter into a live file. the parent, student, centre leader, examinations officer, adviser, university applicant, registrar or evaluator checking a Pearson Edexcel or BTEC centre states the present decision in one sentence. Pearson Qualifications, the approved centre and Head of Centre, any approved subsite or online-delivery partner, local regulator, examinations staff, receiving institution, learner and family supplies only the evidence it owns. the Pearson centre approval, centre number, signed terms, qualification approval, subsite or online-delivery approval, centre listing, quality-assurance record, finance or service restriction, removal or appeal record, learner registration, result and destination decision records the result. Date every source and distinguish an official fact, an institution-specific decision, an estimate and a personal preference.
Now change one condition: one identifier is wrong. Preserve every fact that remains valid and reopen only the conclusions that depend on the changed condition. Name the new page, document, calculation or contact required. This is the difference between understanding a system and memorising one outcome.
Run a boundary test. Write what the current evidence proves, what it does not prove and who has authority over the next decision. Replace one identifier, date or category and repeat the reasoning. If the conclusion changes without a cited rule or written decision, an assumption has entered the file.
Finish with a five-line handover: current state; controlling source; unresolved question; next permitted action; review date. A parent, adviser or future learner should be able to reconstruct the case without relying on memory or a private conversation.
6. Read public listings cautiously
Use the search as evidence without treating it as complete.
Pearson states that listing depends on centres giving permission to publish details.
Decision rehearsal and changed-context transfer
Turn this chapter into a live file. the parent, student, centre leader, examinations officer, adviser, university applicant, registrar or evaluator checking a Pearson Edexcel or BTEC centre states the present decision in one sentence. Pearson Qualifications, the approved centre and Head of Centre, any approved subsite or online-delivery partner, local regulator, examinations staff, receiving institution, learner and family supplies only the evidence it owns. the Pearson centre approval, centre number, signed terms, qualification approval, subsite or online-delivery approval, centre listing, quality-assurance record, finance or service restriction, removal or appeal record, learner registration, result and destination decision records the result. Date every source and distinguish an official fact, an institution-specific decision, an estimate and a personal preference.
Now change one condition: a listing is current but the intake is not. Preserve every fact that remains valid and reopen only the conclusions that depend on the changed condition. Name the new page, document, calculation or contact required. This is the difference between understanding a system and memorising one outcome.
Run a boundary test. Write what the current evidence proves, what it does not prove and who has authority over the next decision. Replace one identifier, date or category and repeat the reasoning. If the conclusion changes without a cited rule or written decision, an assumption has entered the file.
Finish with a five-line handover: current state; controlling source; unresolved question; next permitted action; review date. A parent, adviser or future learner should be able to reconstruct the case without relying on memory or a private conversation.
7. Worked case: one centre, two qualifications
Match a learner’s qualification and site to the centre’s approved scope.
Approval for one BTEC or Edexcel qualification does not prove another.
Decision rehearsal and changed-context transfer
Turn this chapter into a live file. the parent, student, centre leader, examinations officer, adviser, university applicant, registrar or evaluator checking a Pearson Edexcel or BTEC centre states the present decision in one sentence. Pearson Qualifications, the approved centre and Head of Centre, any approved subsite or online-delivery partner, local regulator, examinations staff, receiving institution, learner and family supplies only the evidence it owns. the Pearson centre approval, centre number, signed terms, qualification approval, subsite or online-delivery approval, centre listing, quality-assurance record, finance or service restriction, removal or appeal record, learner registration, result and destination decision records the result. Date every source and distinguish an official fact, an institution-specific decision, an estimate and a personal preference.
Now change one condition: the learner changes jurisdiction. Preserve every fact that remains valid and reopen only the conclusions that depend on the changed condition. Name the new page, document, calculation or contact required. This is the difference between understanding a system and memorising one outcome.
Run a boundary test. Write what the current evidence proves, what it does not prove and who has authority over the next decision. Replace one identifier, date or category and repeat the reasoning. If the conclusion changes without a cited rule or written decision, an assumption has entered the file.
Finish with a five-line handover: current state; controlling source; unresolved question; next permitted action; review date. A parent, adviser or future learner should be able to reconstruct the case without relying on memory or a private conversation.
8. Track quality assurance
Keep monitoring, sampling, action plans and current status beside the approval.
Initial approval does not end continuing obligations.
Decision rehearsal and changed-context transfer
Turn this chapter into a live file. the parent, student, centre leader, examinations officer, adviser, university applicant, registrar or evaluator checking a Pearson Edexcel or BTEC centre states the present decision in one sentence. Pearson Qualifications, the approved centre and Head of Centre, any approved subsite or online-delivery partner, local regulator, examinations staff, receiving institution, learner and family supplies only the evidence it owns. the Pearson centre approval, centre number, signed terms, qualification approval, subsite or online-delivery approval, centre listing, quality-assurance record, finance or service restriction, removal or appeal record, learner registration, result and destination decision records the result. Date every source and distinguish an official fact, an institution-specific decision, an estimate and a personal preference.
Now change one condition: evidence arrives after an internal deadline. Preserve every fact that remains valid and reopen only the conclusions that depend on the changed condition. Name the new page, document, calculation or contact required. This is the difference between understanding a system and memorising one outcome.
Run a boundary test. Write what the current evidence proves, what it does not prove and who has authority over the next decision. Replace one identifier, date or category and repeat the reasoning. If the conclusion changes without a cited rule or written decision, an assumption has entered the file.
Finish with a five-line handover: current state; controlling source; unresolved question; next permitted action; review date. A parent, adviser or future learner should be able to reconstruct the case without relying on memory or a private conversation.
9. Interpret finance blocks and suspension
Record what new registrations, assessments or certification remain possible.
A restriction should not be described more broadly or narrowly than the official notice.
Decision rehearsal and changed-context transfer
Turn this chapter into a live file. the parent, student, centre leader, examinations officer, adviser, university applicant, registrar or evaluator checking a Pearson Edexcel or BTEC centre states the present decision in one sentence. Pearson Qualifications, the approved centre and Head of Centre, any approved subsite or online-delivery partner, local regulator, examinations staff, receiving institution, learner and family supplies only the evidence it owns. the Pearson centre approval, centre number, signed terms, qualification approval, subsite or online-delivery approval, centre listing, quality-assurance record, finance or service restriction, removal or appeal record, learner registration, result and destination decision records the result. Date every source and distinguish an official fact, an institution-specific decision, an estimate and a personal preference.
Now change one condition: a published route disappears. Preserve every fact that remains valid and reopen only the conclusions that depend on the changed condition. Name the new page, document, calculation or contact required. This is the difference between understanding a system and memorising one outcome.
Run a boundary test. Write what the current evidence proves, what it does not prove and who has authority over the next decision. Replace one identifier, date or category and repeat the reasoning. If the conclusion changes without a cited rule or written decision, an assumption has entered the file.
Finish with a five-line handover: current state; controlling source; unresolved question; next permitted action; review date. A parent, adviser or future learner should be able to reconstruct the case without relying on memory or a private conversation.
10. Handle programme or centre removal
Preserve the effective date, learner-protection steps and appeal record.
A prior certificate cannot prove ongoing approval after withdrawal.
Decision rehearsal and changed-context transfer
Turn this chapter into a live file. the parent, student, centre leader, examinations officer, adviser, university applicant, registrar or evaluator checking a Pearson Edexcel or BTEC centre states the present decision in one sentence. Pearson Qualifications, the approved centre and Head of Centre, any approved subsite or online-delivery partner, local regulator, examinations staff, receiving institution, learner and family supplies only the evidence it owns. the Pearson centre approval, centre number, signed terms, qualification approval, subsite or online-delivery approval, centre listing, quality-assurance record, finance or service restriction, removal or appeal record, learner registration, result and destination decision records the result. Date every source and distinguish an official fact, an institution-specific decision, an estimate and a personal preference.
Now change one condition: the decision-maker asks for the original document. Preserve every fact that remains valid and reopen only the conclusions that depend on the changed condition. Name the new page, document, calculation or contact required. This is the difference between understanding a system and memorising one outcome.
Run a boundary test. Write what the current evidence proves, what it does not prove and who has authority over the next decision. Replace one identifier, date or category and repeat the reasoning. If the conclusion changes without a cited rule or written decision, an assumption has entered the file.
Finish with a five-line handover: current state; controlling source; unresolved question; next permitted action; review date. A parent, adviser or future learner should be able to reconstruct the case without relying on memory or a private conversation.
11. Join learner registration to results
Verify registration, entries, assessed units, result and certificate.
Centre approval alone does not prove an individual award.
Decision rehearsal and changed-context transfer
Turn this chapter into a live file. the parent, student, centre leader, examinations officer, adviser, university applicant, registrar or evaluator checking a Pearson Edexcel or BTEC centre states the present decision in one sentence. Pearson Qualifications, the approved centre and Head of Centre, any approved subsite or online-delivery partner, local regulator, examinations staff, receiving institution, learner and family supplies only the evidence it owns. the Pearson centre approval, centre number, signed terms, qualification approval, subsite or online-delivery approval, centre listing, quality-assurance record, finance or service restriction, removal or appeal record, learner registration, result and destination decision records the result. Date every source and distinguish an official fact, an institution-specific decision, an estimate and a personal preference.
Now change one condition: the search result is correct but incomplete. Preserve every fact that remains valid and reopen only the conclusions that depend on the changed condition. Name the new page, document, calculation or contact required. This is the difference between understanding a system and memorising one outcome.
Run a boundary test. Write what the current evidence proves, what it does not prove and who has authority over the next decision. Replace one identifier, date or category and repeat the reasoning. If the conclusion changes without a cited rule or written decision, an assumption has entered the file.
Finish with a five-line handover: current state; controlling source; unresolved question; next permitted action; review date. A parent, adviser or future learner should be able to reconstruct the case without relying on memory or a private conversation.
12. Ask the receiving institution
Obtain written recognition for the exact qualification and purpose.
Pearson approval cannot guarantee admission, employment or licensing.
Decision rehearsal and changed-context transfer
Turn this chapter into a live file. the parent, student, centre leader, examinations officer, adviser, university applicant, registrar or evaluator checking a Pearson Edexcel or BTEC centre states the present decision in one sentence. Pearson Qualifications, the approved centre and Head of Centre, any approved subsite or online-delivery partner, local regulator, examinations staff, receiving institution, learner and family supplies only the evidence it owns. the Pearson centre approval, centre number, signed terms, qualification approval, subsite or online-delivery approval, centre listing, quality-assurance record, finance or service restriction, removal or appeal record, learner registration, result and destination decision records the result. Date every source and distinguish an official fact, an institution-specific decision, an estimate and a personal preference.
Now change one condition: the learner changes goal. Preserve every fact that remains valid and reopen only the conclusions that depend on the changed condition. Name the new page, document, calculation or contact required. This is the difference between understanding a system and memorising one outcome.
Run a boundary test. Write what the current evidence proves, what it does not prove and who has authority over the next decision. Replace one identifier, date or category and repeat the reasoning. If the conclusion changes without a cited rule or written decision, an assumption has entered the file.
Finish with a five-line handover: current state; controlling source; unresolved question; next permitted action; review date. A parent, adviser or future learner should be able to reconstruct the case without relying on memory or a private conversation.
Authoritative sources and evidence boundary
These primary sources were checked on 29 October 2026. Reopen the live record near any enrolment, recognition, immigration, transfer, funding or licensing decision because statuses, dates and operating guidance can change.
- Pearson current routes for UK and international centre approval
- Pearson international centre approval expression-of-interest form
- Pearson current centre, learner and employee policy library
- Pearson July 2025 centre and qualification approval policy
- Pearson international centre search and completeness limitation
- Pearson vocational centre approval evidence and location obligations
- Pearson policy on suspension and removal of centre or programme approval
- Pearson centre administration, accounts, entries and results gateway
A source can establish only the fact within its remit. Keep the current authority record beside learner-specific evidence and obtain the responsible organisation’s written decision where acceptance, credit, protection, immigration or eligibility is at stake.
Verification workbook
Complete every line with a dated official page, document, recorded state or named follow-up. A blank is useful because it shows where certainty has not yet been earned.
- Legal centre name
- Pearson centre number
- Centre approval
- Qualification approval
- Academic qualification
- Vocational qualification
- International centre
- Subsite
- Exceptional collaboration
- Online delivery
- Signed terms
- Public listing
- Quality monitoring
- Finance block
- Suspension
- Programme removal
- Centre removal
- Appeal
- Learner registration
- Assessment entry
- Result
- Certificate
- Receiver decision
Build an auditable decision file
Open with the exact decision and its deadline. Attach the current current Pearson confirmation of the centre and qualification approval for the exact location and delivery model, the learner-specific record and the receiver’s published requirements. A general webpage explains a rule; it does not replace a learner-specific decision from the responsible body.
Create one evidence row for each controlling fact: legal entity, centre number, centre approval, qualification approval, academic qualification, vocational qualification, subsite, exceptional collaboration, online delivery, signed terms, international listing, quality monitoring, finance block, suspension of service, programme removal, centre removal, learner registration, assessment entry, result, certificate and receiver decision. Give every row a source, retrieval date, status and owner. Mark a fact confirmed only when the cited source proves it. Use reported, estimated or pending for everything else.
Separate inputs from outputs. Inputs are facts supplied by the learner, provider or authority. Outputs are comparisons, classifications and decisions made from them. If an output looks wrong, check the input, then the dated rule, then any recorded exception.
Keep a change log for legal identity, centre number, qualification scope, subsite, partner, online-delivery model, quality status, service restriction, programme or centre approval, learner dates and destination rules. Record the old fact, new fact, date learned, source and every conclusion that must be reopened. Do not silently overwrite the earlier state; the history explains why a reasonable plan changed.
Add a deadline map with the formal deadline, an earlier internal deadline and the recovery route if evidence arrives late. Where no recovery route is published, record that absence rather than inventing one. Reopen the official page near the action date because archived guidance can look authoritative.
Use a responsibility matrix. Pearson owns centre and qualification approval; the Head of Centre owns compliant operation and records; local authorities own permission to operate; delivery partners own only their documented role; receivers own recognition and admission decisions. If two people assume the other has acted, the file should expose the gap before the deadline.
Keep a contact note for each official enquiry: channel, date, question, answer and reference number. If verbal advice conflicts with a published rule or written decision, ask for clarification in writing before an irreversible action.
Run a source hierarchy check. Put the responsible authority first, current operational guidance second, the learner-specific notice third and informal explanation last. Where two official pages appear inconsistent, record both dates and ask which governs the present case.
Schedule a cold review two working days before any irreversible boundary. Recheck names, identifiers, dates, programme codes, study load and document version. Save the submission acknowledgement without treating receipt as approval.
After the decision, reconcile the notice with the plan line by line. Record what was accepted, refused, limited or deferred and the route for correction, review or appeal. Preserve the original decision when adding later correspondence.
Add a “not yet proved” page. List every conclusion that still depends on legal entity, centre number, centre approval, qualification approval, academic qualification, vocational qualification, subsite, exceptional collaboration, online delivery, signed terms, international listing, quality monitoring, finance block, suspension of service, programme removal, centre removal, learner registration, assessment entry, result, certificate and receiver decision. Beside each item, name the smallest official record that would settle it and the person who can obtain that record. This stops a plausible estimate from drifting into the confirmed column merely because it has been repeated.
Rehearse a correction request before one is needed. Identify the learner, present decision, disputed input, supporting document and requested remedy without claiming an entitlement the evidence cannot establish. Address it to the organisation that owns the record or decision, keep a copy, and record the published response or escalation route.
Ask an independent reader to challenge the file. They should identify the weakest assumption, locate the official sentence that controls it and describe what changes if the assumption fails. Record that answer without deleting the earlier reasoning; the audit trail should show learning, not pretend uncertainty never existed.
Build a conservative time and cost plan beside the evidence file. Show what is already confirmed, what is estimated, which payment or enrolment step becomes irreversible and when. Then test a delayed decision and a less favourable outcome. The exercise does not predict the authority’s answer; it prevents an optimistic reading from becoming an unexamined commitment.
Ask the parent, student, centre leader, examinations officer, adviser, university applicant, registrar or evaluator checking a Pearson Edexcel or BTEC centre to narrate the case aloud in under two minutes: “This is my present state; this is the governing source; this is the learner-specific evidence; this is the unresolved boundary; this is my next permitted action.” A listener should be able to distinguish fact, comparison and choice without prompting.
Practise one counterfactual. Change only the Pearson centre number stays the same but the learner changes qualification, subsite, delivery mode, assessment series, completion date or receiving institution and trace which conclusions stay valid. The exercise reveals whether the learner understands the dependency chain or has memorised an answer belonging to another case.
Finish with a retention plan. Keep source documents, decisions, receipts and later corrections for as long as they remain useful to explain the education record. Store identifiers securely and share only what the named recipient needs.
Frequently asked questions
Is Pearson centre approval the same as qualification approval?
No. Confirm both the organisation and the exact qualification scope.
Is the international centre search complete?
No. Pearson says centres choose whether to share their details publicly.
Can an approved centre use any subsite?
Not automatically. Additional locations and collaborations need the required approval.
Does centre approval cover online delivery?
Not automatically; check the stated online-delivery approval and conditions.
Can Pearson remove programme approval?
Yes. Pearson publishes a policy for suspension or removal of programme or centre approval.
Does a centre listing prove a learner earned a certificate?
No. Check the learner registration, assessment, result and certificate.
Does Pearson approval guarantee university acceptance?
No. The receiving institution decides.
What should a family save?
Centre and qualification evidence, site and delivery approval, learner records, certificate and receiver decision.
Close the workbook by explaining the process without notes. A dependable explanation names the authority, present state, evidence, deadline and consequence if one assumption fails.
Continue with this Education batch
These companion guides use the same evidence-first method for a different register, framework or recognition decision.
Continue through the Education branch
Return to The Gold Standard of Education. Continue with the international-school pathways guide, the institutional and programme accreditation guide, the official international-curriculum source guide, the IB Diploma bilingual-diploma specialist, the Pearson Edexcel Astronomy evidence specialist. Each guide preserves the specialist owner while showing how records, qualifications and decisions connect.