VIEW THIS AS

Auto mode follows the Route Engine until you choose a viewpoint.

YOU ARE HERE

ROUTE CHECK

CONNECTED TO

WHAT NEXT

Use the canonical route for this room, or HELP if you are unsure.

The Gold Standard Of School Scientific Argumentation

Three secondary students review textbooks and notes together at a classroom table.

A good scientific argument is not the loudest opinion

Two students disagree about whether a fertiliser improves plant growth. One points to a taller plant; the other asks whether watering was equal. Scientific argumentation connects claims to evidence and reasoning rather than personal confidence.

State the claim clearly

Students should identify exactly what they believe the evidence supports.

Select relevant evidence

Measurements, comparisons and observations should relate directly to the claim.

Explain the reasoning

Describe why the evidence supports the conclusion, including relevant scientific principles.

Consider alternative explanations

Confounding variables, measurement limits and sampling differences may weaken an argument.

Respond constructively

Challenge ideas with questions and evidence rather than attacking classmates.

Revise when justified

A strong scientific thinker can change a claim when better evidence appears.

Break-test: a convincing speaker uses weak evidence

Can the class separate presentation skill from scientific validity?

Connected knowledge

See Scientific Oral Defence, Evidence Evaluation and MOE Syllabuses.