Organic-waste reports often place total solids, volatile solids, fixed solids, moisture and destruction efficiency in one table. They are related but not interchangeable. Total solids are a drying residue under a declared method. Volatile solids are the subsequent method-defined ignition loss from that dried residue.
The central invented aliquot weighs 50.000 g in a 40.000 g dish. After drying, dish plus residue is 50.000 g; after ignition, it is 44.000 g. Total solids are 10.000 g or 20.0% of wet mass. Volatile solids are 6.000 g, equal to 60.0% of total solids and 12.0% of wet mass. Fixed solids are 4.000 g.
This is measurement education, not a laboratory SOP, regulatory interpretation, process design, product-quality claim or waste-handling recommendation.
This specialist guide belongs to the Waste root. It also connects to The Gold Standard of Education | Learning That Transfers into Life and the How X Works hub. The worked cases are original teaching examples; their numbers are stipulated so that the reasoning can be checked.
eduKateSG · Waste
Find your next learning step
Follow wet sample, dry residue and ignited residue through one mass ledger, then report every percentage with its denominator and method.
ROUTE 1 · CHAPTERS 1–5
Define the quantities
Fix the object, unit, denominator and reference condition.
ROUTE 2 · CHAPTERS 6–10
Work the central example
Carry the calculation through a complete, checkable case.
ROUTE 3 · CHAPTERS 11–15
Audit the evidence
Test sensitivity, measurement choices and rival explanations.
ROUTE 5 · CHAPTERS 21–24
Report and continue
Repair shortcuts, state limits and follow verified routes.
Chapter contents
Define the quantities · Chapters 1–5
1. Define total solids operationally
2. Define volatile and fixed solids
Work the central example · Chapters 6–10
Audit the evidence · Chapters 11–15
12. Audit particle and container effects
Transfer the reasoning · Chapters 16–20
16. Transfer to dewatered sludge
17. Transfer to compost feedstock
18. Transfer to anaerobic digestion
Report and continue · Chapters 21–24
21. Repair volatile means organic
22. Repair total solids means recovered product
Start by naming the quantity that the decision actually needs. Total solids are the residue remaining after the declared drying step, not the original wet sample mass and not every material that might survive another method.
Work the teaching case in a visible order. A clean dish weighs 40.000 g. Dish plus wet sample is 90.000 g. After drying at 103–105°C to the method endpoint, dish plus residue is 50.000 g, so total solids are 10.000 g.
Make the reasoning independently checkable. Subtract the same tare from every mass.
Test transfer by changing one condition while holding the others still. Double the aliquot while keeping composition uniform.
Keep the claim boundary visible. Drying conditions and constant-mass criteria belong to the result.
Before accepting the result, predict what should move and what should stay fixed. Apply this check: Subtract the same tare from every mass. Then run the changed case: Double the aliquot while keeping composition uniform.
The evidence receipt for “Define total solids operationally” records the source, input, transformation, changed-context prediction and limit on separate lines. Keep tare, wet mass, dry residue, ignited residue, temperatures, endpoints, replicates and percentage bases together.
Keep the observation, transformation and conclusion on separate evidence lines. Volatile solids are the operational mass lost when the dried residue is ignited under the stated method; fixed solids are the residue left after ignition.
Work the teaching case in a visible order. After ignition at 550°C, dish plus residue is 44.000 g. Fixed solids are 4.000 g and volatile solids are 6.000 g.
Make the reasoning independently checkable. Verify 6+4=10 g total solids.
Test transfer by changing one condition while holding the others still. Change the after-ignition mass to 45.500 g.
Keep the claim boundary visible. Loss on ignition is not a molecule-by-molecule organic assay.
Build a compact audit receipt with input, unit, method, calculation, observation and limit. Use this check: Verify 6+4=10 g total solids. For transfer, Change the after-ignition mass to 45.500 g.
The evidence receipt for “Define volatile and fixed solids” records the source, input, transformation, changed-context prediction and limit on separate lines. Keep tare, wet mass, dry residue, ignited residue, temperatures, endpoints, replicates and percentage bases together.
Use the short answer only after the reference condition and units are fixed. Total solids can be reported relative to the wet sample, while volatile and fixed fractions are often reported relative to dried solids.
Work the teaching case in a visible order. The central wet sample is 50.000 g, so total solids are 20.0% wet basis; volatile solids are 60.0% of total solids and 12.0% of wet mass.
Make the reasoning independently checkable. Write each numerator and denominator beside the percentage.
Test transfer by changing one condition while holding the others still. Report the same masses on a dry basis.
Keep the claim boundary visible. The phrase percent solids is incomplete until the basis is named.
Ask a second reader to reproduce the decision from the stated evidence. They should be able to apply: Write each numerator and denominator beside the percentage. Next, Report the same masses on a dry basis.
The evidence receipt for “Keep wet and dry denominators distinct” records the source, input, transformation, changed-context prediction and limit on separate lines. Keep tare, wet mass, dry residue, ignited residue, temperatures, endpoints, replicates and percentage bases together.
Trace the mechanism in the order another reader can reproduce. A defensible calculation follows dish, wet sample, dry residue and ignited residue through one chain.
Work the teaching case in a visible order. Water and other drying loss are 40.000 g; ignition loss from the dried residue is 6.000 g; fixed residue is 4.000 g.
Make the reasoning independently checkable. Close the ledger from the original 50.000 g aliquot.
Test transfer by changing one condition while holding the others still. Add a 0.100 g residue transfer loss before ignition.
Keep the claim boundary visible. Unrecorded transfer loss is easily misclassified as volatile solids.
Turn the claim into a test that could fail. First, Close the ledger from the original 50.000 g aliquot. Then change one consequential condition: Add a 0.100 g residue transfer loss before ignition.
The evidence receipt for “Complete the mass ledger” records the source, input, transformation, changed-context prediction and limit on separate lines. Keep tare, wet mass, dry residue, ignited residue, temperatures, endpoints, replicates and percentage bases together.
Treat a plausible number as a prompt for a check rather than as proof. Ask whether the reader needs water removal, dry-residue composition or a validated process outcome.
Work the teaching case in a visible order. Use total solids for the dry-residue fraction and volatile solids for the stipulated ignition-loss fraction.
Make the reasoning independently checkable. State the decision before calculating percentages.
Test transfer by changing one condition while holding the others still. Change the question to actual methane yield.
Keep the claim boundary visible. Solids fractions alone do not measure biodegradability or energy recovery.
Before accepting the result, predict what should move and what should stay fixed. Apply this check: State the decision before calculating percentages. Then run the changed case: Change the question to actual methane yield.
The evidence receipt for “Use the short-answer gateway” records the source, input, transformation, changed-context prediction and limit on separate lines. Keep tare, wet mass, dry residue, ignited residue, temperatures, endpoints, replicates and percentage bases together.
Start by naming the quantity that the decision actually needs. The method endpoint requires repeated drying, cooling and weighing until the change satisfies the stated criterion.
Work the teaching case in a visible order. Successive dish-plus-dry-residue masses are 50.080, 50.015 and 50.000 g.
Make the reasoning independently checkable. Apply the method criterion instead of choosing the first convenient weight.
Test transfer by changing one condition while holding the others still. Use a hygroscopic sample that gains mass during weighing.
Keep the claim boundary visible. The teaching sequence illustrates endpoint logic and does not replace laboratory SOPs.
Build a compact audit receipt with input, unit, method, calculation, observation and limit. Use this check: Apply the method criterion instead of choosing the first convenient weight. For transfer, Use a hygroscopic sample that gains mass during weighing.
The evidence receipt for “Repeat to constant mass” records the source, input, transformation, changed-context prediction and limit on separate lines. Keep tare, wet mass, dry residue, ignited residue, temperatures, endpoints, replicates and percentage bases together.
Keep the observation, transformation and conclusion on separate evidence lines. Dish mass can change through residue, corrosion, fingerprints or incomplete cleaning.
Work the teaching case in a visible order. A post-run blank dish reads 40.012 g rather than 40.000 g.
Make the reasoning independently checkable. Investigate the tare shift before applying a correction.
Test transfer by changing one condition while holding the others still. Use a larger 0.100 g tare shift.
Keep the claim boundary visible. A blank trend is evidence, not permission to invent an adjustment.
Ask a second reader to reproduce the decision from the stated evidence. They should be able to apply: Investigate the tare shift before applying a correction. Next, Use a larger 0.100 g tare shift.
The evidence receipt for “Protect the tare” records the source, input, transformation, changed-context prediction and limit on separate lines. Keep tare, wet mass, dry residue, ignited residue, temperatures, endpoints, replicates and percentage bases together.
Use the short answer only after the reference condition and units are fixed. Material lost between drying and ignition lowers the after-ignition mass and falsely inflates calculated volatile solids.
Work the teaching case in a visible order. A documented 0.100 g spill would make the apparent ignition loss 6.100 g.
Make the reasoning independently checkable. Reconcile vessel custody and visible residue before calculation.
Test transfer by changing one condition while holding the others still. Repeat using a process that keeps the same dish throughout.
Keep the claim boundary visible. A numerical correction requires defensible evidence of the loss.
Turn the claim into a test that could fail. First, Reconcile vessel custody and visible residue before calculation. Then change one consequential condition: Repeat using a process that keeps the same dish throughout.
The evidence receipt for “Handle transfer loss” records the source, input, transformation, changed-context prediction and limit on separate lines. Keep tare, wet mass, dry residue, ignited residue, temperatures, endpoints, replicates and percentage bases together.
CHAPTER 9 OF 24 · Work the central example
9. Distinguish moisture from volatile solids
Trace the mechanism in the order another reader can reproduce. Water is mainly removed in the drying step; volatile-solids loss is evaluated from the dried residue during ignition.
Work the teaching case in a visible order. The central sample loses 40 g during drying and 6 g during ignition.
Make the reasoning independently checkable. Do not add the two losses and call both organic material.
Test transfer by changing one condition while holding the others still. Pre-dry the sample and begin with the 10 g residue.
Keep the claim boundary visible. Bound water and chemical decomposition can complicate the operational separation.
Before accepting the result, predict what should move and what should stay fixed. Apply this check: Do not add the two losses and call both organic material. Then run the changed case: Pre-dry the sample and begin with the 10 g residue.
The evidence receipt for “Distinguish moisture from volatile solids” records the source, input, transformation, changed-context prediction and limit on separate lines. Keep tare, wet mass, dry residue, ignited residue, temperatures, endpoints, replicates and percentage bases together.
CHAPTER 10 OF 24 · Work the central example
10. Distinguish fixed solids from inertness
Treat a plausible number as a prompt for a check rather than as proof. Fixed solids are what remains under the method, not a universal measure of chemically inert or harmless material.
Work the teaching case in a visible order. The 4 g residue may include mineral ash and method-stable components.
Make the reasoning independently checkable. Avoid translating the result directly into landfill behavior.
Test transfer by changing one condition while holding the others still. Test a sample containing carbonates that decompose under heating.
Keep the claim boundary visible. Some inorganic salts can lose mass and some organic carbon can remain.
Build a compact audit receipt with input, unit, method, calculation, observation and limit. Use this check: Avoid translating the result directly into landfill behavior. For transfer, Test a sample containing carbonates that decompose under heating.
The evidence receipt for “Distinguish fixed solids from inertness” records the source, input, transformation, changed-context prediction and limit on separate lines. Keep tare, wet mass, dry residue, ignited residue, temperatures, endpoints, replicates and percentage bases together.
Start by naming the quantity that the decision actually needs. A small aliquot must represent a heterogeneous organic-waste stream before precise weighing can support a broader claim.
Work the teaching case in a visible order. Take three stipulated aliquots with total-solids fractions 18%, 20% and 26%.
Make the reasoning independently checkable. Report spread and sampling method.
Test transfer by changing one condition while holding the others still. Mix the bulk sample and repeat.
Keep the claim boundary visible. Laboratory repeatability does not repair biased field sampling.
Ask a second reader to reproduce the decision from the stated evidence. They should be able to apply: Report spread and sampling method. Next, Mix the bulk sample and repeat.
The evidence receipt for “Audit sample homogeneity” records the source, input, transformation, changed-context prediction and limit on separate lines. Keep tare, wet mass, dry residue, ignited residue, temperatures, endpoints, replicates and percentage bases together.
Keep the observation, transformation and conclusion on separate evidence lines. Large particles, adhering films and evaporative loss before weighing can alter the aliquot.
Work the teaching case in a visible order. Record the time between sampling and wet-mass measurement.
Make the reasoning independently checkable. Inspect container walls and homogenization steps.
Test transfer by changing one condition while holding the others still. Leave the sample uncovered for thirty minutes.
Keep the claim boundary visible. This article does not prescribe comminution for every waste type.
Turn the claim into a test that could fail. First, Inspect container walls and homogenization steps. Then change one consequential condition: Leave the sample uncovered for thirty minutes.
The evidence receipt for “Audit particle and container effects” records the source, input, transformation, changed-context prediction and limit on separate lines. Keep tare, wet mass, dry residue, ignited residue, temperatures, endpoints, replicates and percentage bases together.
Use the short answer only after the reference condition and units are fixed. Temperature, duration, oxygen availability and loading influence ignition loss and residue.
Work the teaching case in a visible order. The receipt records 550°C and two hours because the cited method specifies them.
Make the reasoning independently checkable. Check furnace log and calibration status.
Test transfer by changing one condition while holding the others still. Lower the temperature while keeping time fixed.
Keep the claim boundary visible. Results from different methods should not be merged without comparison.
Before accepting the result, predict what should move and what should stay fixed. Apply this check: Check furnace log and calibration status. Then run the changed case: Lower the temperature while keeping time fixed.
The evidence receipt for “Audit furnace conditions” records the source, input, transformation, changed-context prediction and limit on separate lines. Keep tare, wet mass, dry residue, ignited residue, temperatures, endpoints, replicates and percentage bases together.
Trace the mechanism in the order another reader can reproduce. Hot samples create buoyancy and convection errors; exposed dry residues can take up moisture.
Work the teaching case in a visible order. Cool in a desiccator and weigh consistently in the teaching workflow.
Make the reasoning independently checkable. Compare repeated stable masses.
Test transfer by changing one condition while holding the others still. Delay weighing in humid air.
Keep the claim boundary visible. Environmental control is part of measurement quality.
Build a compact audit receipt with input, unit, method, calculation, observation and limit. Use this check: Compare repeated stable masses. For transfer, Delay weighing in humid air.
The evidence receipt for “Audit cooling and weighing” records the source, input, transformation, changed-context prediction and limit on separate lines. Keep tare, wet mass, dry residue, ignited residue, temperatures, endpoints, replicates and percentage bases together.
Treat a plausible number as a prompt for a check rather than as proof. Volatile solids can be expressed as percent of total solids or as mass per wet sample; those values answer different questions.
Work the teaching case in a visible order. The central case gives 60% of total solids and 12% of wet mass.
Make the reasoning independently checkable. Recalculate both from the mass ledger.
Test transfer by changing one condition while holding the others still. Compare with another sample that has the same 60% dry-basis fraction but only 10% total solids.
Keep the claim boundary visible. Never rank streams before aligning bases.
Ask a second reader to reproduce the decision from the stated evidence. They should be able to apply: Recalculate both from the mass ledger. Next, Compare with another sample that has the same 60% dry-basis fraction but only 10% total solids.
The evidence receipt for “Audit calculation basis” records the source, input, transformation, changed-context prediction and limit on separate lines. Keep tare, wet mass, dry residue, ignited residue, temperatures, endpoints, replicates and percentage bases together.
Start by naming the quantity that the decision actually needs. Dewatering changes wet mass and total-solids concentration without necessarily changing the dry volatile-to-fixed split.
Work the teaching case in a visible order. Remove half the water from the central ledger while retaining all 10 g dry solids.
Make the reasoning independently checkable. Predict wet-basis total solids rises while dry-basis volatile solids stays 60%.
Test transfer by changing one condition while holding the others still. Lose 1 g of volatile solids during treatment as well.
Keep the claim boundary visible. Real dewatering can lose suspended solids and change composition.
Turn the claim into a test that could fail. First, Predict wet-basis total solids rises while dry-basis volatile solids stays 60%. Then change one consequential condition: Lose 1 g of volatile solids during treatment as well.
The evidence receipt for “Transfer to dewatered sludge” records the source, input, transformation, changed-context prediction and limit on separate lines. Keep tare, wet mass, dry residue, ignited residue, temperatures, endpoints, replicates and percentage bases together.
Keep the observation, transformation and conclusion on separate evidence lines. Total and volatile solids support mass accounting, but compost maturity needs other chemical and biological evidence.
Work the teaching case in a visible order. Two feedstocks share 60% volatile solids of total solids but differ in stability.
Make the reasoning independently checkable. Keep operational solids data separate from respiration or maturity tests.
Test transfer by changing one condition while holding the others still. Add a stabilized organic material with the same ignition loss.
Keep the claim boundary visible. Volatile solids are not a universal biodegradability percentage.
Before accepting the result, predict what should move and what should stay fixed. Apply this check: Keep operational solids data separate from respiration or maturity tests. Then run the changed case: Add a stabilized organic material with the same ignition loss.
The evidence receipt for “Transfer to compost feedstock” records the source, input, transformation, changed-context prediction and limit on separate lines. Keep tare, wet mass, dry residue, ignited residue, temperatures, endpoints, replicates and percentage bases together.
Use the short answer only after the reference condition and units are fixed. Volatile-solids destruction compares aligned influent and effluent dry-solid flows, not two concentration percentages alone.
Work the teaching case in a visible order. A fictional process receives 100 kg VS/day and discharges 60 kg VS/day, giving 40% destruction on a flow basis.
Make the reasoning independently checkable. Include flow rate, sampling period and recycle boundaries.
Test transfer by changing one condition while holding the others still. Halve the effluent concentration but double its flow.
Keep the claim boundary visible. This simplified ledger is not a process design or safety recommendation.
Build a compact audit receipt with input, unit, method, calculation, observation and limit. Use this check: Include flow rate, sampling period and recycle boundaries. For transfer, Halve the effluent concentration but double its flow.
The evidence receipt for “Transfer to anaerobic digestion” records the source, input, transformation, changed-context prediction and limit on separate lines. Keep tare, wet mass, dry residue, ignited residue, temperatures, endpoints, replicates and percentage bases together.
Trace the mechanism in the order another reader can reproduce. Ignition loss in an analytical method and combustible energy in a plant are related imperfectly.
Work the teaching case in a visible order. Do not convert the central 6 g volatile-solids value directly into heating value.
Make the reasoning independently checkable. Use a calorific-value method for energy claims.
Test transfer by changing one condition while holding the others still. Compare two samples with equal volatile-solids fractions and different measured heating values.
Keep the claim boundary visible. Moisture, composition, ash chemistry and operating conditions all matter.
Ask a second reader to reproduce the decision from the stated evidence. They should be able to apply: Use a calorific-value method for energy claims. Next, Compare two samples with equal volatile-solids fractions and different measured heating values.
The evidence receipt for “Transfer to thermal treatment” records the source, input, transformation, changed-context prediction and limit on separate lines. Keep tare, wet mass, dry residue, ignited residue, temperatures, endpoints, replicates and percentage bases together.
Treat a plausible number as a prompt for a check rather than as proof. Record sample identity, wet mass, tare, drying temperature and endpoint, dry residue, ignition temperature and time, final residue, blanks, replicates and formulas.
Work the teaching case in a visible order. Another reader reconstructs 20.0%, 60.0% and 40.0% from the central row.
Make the reasoning independently checkable. Remove the denominator label and identify the ambiguity.
Test transfer by changing one condition while holding the others still. Version the receipt after changing method conditions.
Keep the claim boundary visible. Reproducibility does not prove the aliquot represents the whole waste stream.
Turn the claim into a test that could fail. First, Remove the denominator label and identify the ambiguity. Then change one consequential condition: Version the receipt after changing method conditions.
The evidence receipt for “Build a reproducible solids receipt” records the source, input, transformation, changed-context prediction and limit on separate lines. Keep tare, wet mass, dry residue, ignited residue, temperatures, endpoints, replicates and percentage bases together.
Start by naming the quantity that the decision actually needs. Ignition mass loss can include decomposition or volatilization of some inorganic constituents, so volatile solids do not precisely equal organic matter.
Work the teaching case in a visible order. Keep the EPA operational definition beside the 6 g result.
Make the reasoning independently checkable. Phrase the claim as method-defined ignition loss.
Test transfer by changing one condition while holding the others still. Test a mineral-rich sample with carbonate loss.
Keep the claim boundary visible. Specific chemical composition requires appropriate analytical methods.
Before accepting the result, predict what should move and what should stay fixed. Apply this check: Phrase the claim as method-defined ignition loss. Then run the changed case: Test a mineral-rich sample with carbonate loss.
The evidence receipt for “Repair volatile means organic” records the source, input, transformation, changed-context prediction and limit on separate lines. Keep tare, wet mass, dry residue, ignited residue, temperatures, endpoints, replicates and percentage bases together.
CHAPTER 22 OF 24 · Report and continue
22. Repair total solids means recovered product
Keep the observation, transformation and conclusion on separate evidence lines. A residue in a laboratory dish is not automatically saleable, safe or accepted recovery output.
Work the teaching case in a visible order. The 10 g dry residue closes the aliquot mass ledger only.
Make the reasoning independently checkable. Require destination, quality and custody evidence for recovery claims.
Test transfer by changing one condition while holding the others still. Move the same material into a sorting facility ledger.
Keep the claim boundary visible. This article does not validate product quality or regulatory status.
Build a compact audit receipt with input, unit, method, calculation, observation and limit. Use this check: Require destination, quality and custody evidence for recovery claims. For transfer, Move the same material into a sorting facility ledger.
The evidence receipt for “Repair total solids means recovered product” records the source, input, transformation, changed-context prediction and limit on separate lines. Keep tare, wet mass, dry residue, ignited residue, temperatures, endpoints, replicates and percentage bases together.
Use the short answer only after the reference condition and units are fixed. The method supports calculating and comparing method-defined total, volatile and fixed solids while preserving bases and limits.
Work the teaching case in a visible order. It can reject a claim that 60% volatile solids means 60% biodegradable organic matter.
Make the reasoning independently checkable. Write the operational method and denominator before reporting.
Test transfer by changing one condition while holding the others still. Move from the teaching aliquot to a regulated laboratory programme.
Keep the claim boundary visible. Use current approved methods, QA controls and qualified laboratories for compliance.
Ask a second reader to reproduce the decision from the stated evidence. They should be able to apply: Write the operational method and denominator before reporting. Next, Move from the teaching aliquot to a regulated laboratory programme.
The evidence receipt for “State the supported decision” records the source, input, transformation, changed-context prediction and limit on separate lines. Keep tare, wet mass, dry residue, ignited residue, temperatures, endpoints, replicates and percentage bases together.
Trace the mechanism in the order another reader can reproduce. This lesson sits beside moisture-loss, tare, sorting-capture and heating-value branches.
Work the teaching case in a visible order. Choose the sibling that owns the next mass-balance or process question.
Make the reasoning independently checkable. Keep wet mass, dry residue, ignition loss, fixed residue and verified recovery distinct.
Test transfer by changing one condition while holding the others still. Move to wet-versus-dry heating value without treating volatile solids as calorific value.
Keep the claim boundary visible. This article owns total-solids versus volatile-solids reasoning under a declared analytical method.
Turn the claim into a test that could fail. First, Keep wet mass, dry residue, ignition loss, fixed residue and verified recovery distinct. Then change one consequential condition: Move to wet-versus-dry heating value without treating volatile solids as calorific value.
The evidence receipt for “Continue through verified waste routes” records the source, input, transformation, changed-context prediction and limit on separate lines. Keep tare, wet mass, dry residue, ignited residue, temperatures, endpoints, replicates and percentage bases together.
Continue through the verified reading route
Moisture loss and dry-material recovery
Moisture loss and dry-material recovery. Use this when a wet-mass change is mistaken for recovered dry material.
Container tare and scale resolution
Container tare and scale resolution. Use this when vessel mass and residue affect a mass balance.
Wet-basis and dry-basis heating value
Wet-basis and dry-basis heating value. Use this when moisture basis affects an energy comparison.
Frequently asked questions
Are volatile solids the same as organic matter?
No. The EPA method says ignition loss is not confined to organic matter; some inorganic constituents can also lose mass.
Can total solids be reported without a basis?
No. State wet-sample mass, dry-residue mass, method and denominator.
Does a high volatile-solids fraction prove biodegradability?
No. Biodegradability and process yield need additional tests and a defined process boundary.
Authoritative sources and further reading
U.S. EPA Method 1684. The official draft method defines total, fixed and volatile solids, the drying and ignition steps, QA and calculation bases.
U.S. EPA analytical methods overview. Official access point for Clean Water Act analytical methods and method-use context.
Singapore NEA food-waste management. Official context for food-waste segregation, treatment and resource recovery in Singapore.
Return to the Waste subject guide, The Gold Standard of Education, or the How X Works hub.