VIEW THIS AS

Auto mode follows the Route Engine until you choose a viewpoint.

YOU ARE HERE

ROUTE CHECK

CONNECTED TO

WHAT NEXT

Use the canonical route for this room, or HELP if you are unsure.

What Vocabulary Words To Help My 9-Year-Old Child Think Better | Top 50 Words For Cognitive Processing

Three students sit around open books and worksheets at a classroom table, reading, writing and discussing the work together.

What vocabulary words can help a 9-year-old child think better? Words such as infer, analyse, evaluate, interpret, justify, assumption, evidence, perspective, strategy and conclude help children describe more complex thinking. They are useful when reading a story, examining a source, explaining a science process, interpreting a graph or planning a piece of writing.

At nine, many children are ready to move beyond naming information towards explaining how they know, why an idea fits and what a source does not tell them. They may still need concrete examples. The adult’s role is to connect the more advanced word to a real task, show how it is used and help the child check whether the explanation is accurate.

This guide begins with the 50 words, then explores how they support inference, analysis, evidence-based conclusions and independent learning. They are not a universal achievement checklist and should not be used to compare children’s intelligence. Their value lies in helping a child express the reasoning behind an idea.

  • The 50 words are grouped around the age-appropriate cognitive processes in this guide.
  • Use words with books, school routines, building, drawing, simple investigations and everyday choices.
  • Model the word and the thinking process; do not demand a perfect verbal answer.
  • Look for understanding and transfer across situations rather than memorisation alone.
  • These words support communication about thinking; they do not guarantee intelligence or academic results.

The Top 50 Vocabulary Words for Cognitive Processing

Here are the 50 selected words for a 9-year-old child. This is a practical teaching list, not a fixed developmental standard.

  1. infer
  2. interpret
  3. imply
  4. explicit
  5. implicit
  6. clue
  7. evidence
  8. suggest
  9. perspective
  10. assumption
  11. analyse
  12. compare
  13. contrast
  14. classify
  15. relationship
  16. pattern
  17. cause
  18. effect
  19. variable
  20. factor
  21. justify
  22. evaluate
  23. reliable
  24. relevant
  25. accurate
  26. limitation
  27. conclusion
  28. claim
  29. support
  30. verify
  31. objective
  32. plan
  33. strategy
  34. method
  35. resource
  36. priority
  37. organise
  38. revise
  39. monitor
  40. reflect
  41. summarise
  42. synthesise
  43. explain
  44. describe
  45. conclude
  46. reason
  47. detail
  48. main idea
  49. implication
  50. qualify

Why these 50 words make a difference

Cognitive processing is a broad description of how people attend to information, remember it, compare it with what they know, make decisions and respond. At age 9, these abilities are developing. The purpose of this vocabulary is to give a child language for actions and relationships that already occur in everyday life.

Words can help make an invisible mental step visible. “Notice” tells a child to look for a detail. “Compare” asks them to consider a relationship. “Remember” invites them to revisit information. “Because” links an event with a reason. “Check” encourages them to look again. A word does not create a cognitive skill by itself, but it can help an adult model, explain and share the process.

It is important not to confuse a vocabulary list with an intelligence test. Knowing 50 words does not automatically improve IQ, executive function, memory or grades. Children develop through many interacting influences: relationships, health, sleep, movement, play, language exposure, instruction and opportunities to explore. Vocabulary is one part of a broad developmental picture.

Inference and interpretation

Words in this group: infer, interpret, imply, explicit, implicit, clue, evidence, suggest, perspective, assumption.

These words help children reason beyond what is directly stated. Explicit information is stated directly; implicit meaning is suggested. Infer describes the reader’s process of drawing a conclusion. Interpret means explain the meaning of information. A perspective is a point of view; an assumption is something accepted without checking. The words help the child identify what the source says and what the reader concludes.

Analysis and comparison

Words in this group: analyse, compare, contrast, classify, relationship, pattern, cause, effect, variable, factor.

These words help children examine parts and connections. Analyse means look closely at components and relationships. Contrast draws attention to differences. A factor contributes to an outcome; a variable can change. The precise meaning of technical terms should follow the subject’s teaching and definitions.

Evidence and judgement

Words in this group: justify, evaluate, reliable, relevant, accurate, limitation, conclusion, claim, support, verify.

These words help children judge the quality of an explanation. Justify means support with reasons or evidence. Evaluate means make a reasoned judgement against a purpose or criteria. Reliable, relevant and accurate are not interchangeable. Limitation identifies a boundary or weakness; verify means check that information is correct.

Planning and independent learning

Words in this group: objective, plan, strategy, method, resource, priority, organise, revise, monitor, reflect.

This group supports independent work. An objective is the intended goal; a priority is what needs attention first; a resource is something that can help. Monitor means keep track of progress. Revise means change or improve a draft or plan. Reflect means consider what has been learned.

Communication and synthesis

Words in this group: summarise, synthesise, explain, describe, conclude, reason, detail, main idea, implication, qualify.

These words help children communicate the result of thinking. Summarise selects the main points. Synthesise combines information into a coherent account. Implication concerns what a statement may mean or lead to. Qualify makes a claim more precise or limited. Use these words in age-appropriate examples and build complexity gradually.

Ten real-life situations where the words can support thinking

1. A story suggests a feeling without naming it

Ask what the character does and what those actions might suggest.

Infer and clue help the child connect observable details with an interpretation.

Give the child time to respond. The response may be spoken, drawn, pointed to or shown through an action. The adult can describe what happened and add one useful word. The goal is a meaningful exchange, not a performance.

2. A child makes a broad claim from one example

Ask what the evidence shows and what it cannot establish.

Limitation and qualify help keep the conclusion proportionate.

Give the child time to respond. The response may be spoken, drawn, pointed to or shown through an action. The adult can describe what happened and add one useful word. The goal is a meaningful exchange, not a performance.

3. Two sources show different views

Ask who created each source and what perspective it represents.

Perspective and compare help children recognise that accounts may differ.

Give the child time to respond. The response may be spoken, drawn, pointed to or shown through an action. The adult can describe what happened and add one useful word. The goal is a meaningful exchange, not a performance.

4. An answer needs justification

Ask for a reason and a detail that supports it.

Justify and relevant turn an unsupported answer into a reasoned response.

Give the child time to respond. The response may be spoken, drawn, pointed to or shown through an action. The adult can describe what happened and add one useful word. The goal is a meaningful exchange, not a performance.

5. A graph has an unusual value

Ask whether the value follows the pattern and how it should be checked.

Verify and anomaly can be introduced in a simple way without assuming an error.

Give the child time to respond. The response may be spoken, drawn, pointed to or shown through an action. The adult can describe what happened and add one useful word. The goal is a meaningful exchange, not a performance.

6. A project has too many tasks

Ask what the objective is and which step is the priority.

Objective and priority help the child organise effort around a goal.

Give the child time to respond. The response may be spoken, drawn, pointed to or shown through an action. The adult can describe what happened and add one useful word. The goal is a meaningful exchange, not a performance.

7. A paragraph is unclear

Ask for the main idea, then identify which detail supports it.

Summarise and support help the child organise the explanation.

Give the child time to respond. The response may be spoken, drawn, pointed to or shown through an action. The adult can describe what happened and add one useful word. The goal is a meaningful exchange, not a performance.

8. A child copies a definition

Ask them to paraphrase and provide a new example.

Interpret and explain reveal whether the meaning is understood rather than memorised.

Give the child time to respond. The response may be spoken, drawn, pointed to or shown through an action. The adult can describe what happened and add one useful word. The goal is a meaningful exchange, not a performance.

9. The first plan stops working

Ask what resource or alternative strategy may help.

Revise and strategy name a deliberate change to the approach.

Give the child time to respond. The response may be spoken, drawn, pointed to or shown through an action. The adult can describe what happened and add one useful word. The goal is a meaningful exchange, not a performance.

10. The child finishes a task

Ask what was learned, what remains uncertain and what to check next.

Reflect and monitor support self-review without making it a judgement of worth.

Give the child time to respond. The response may be spoken, drawn, pointed to or shown through an action. The adult can describe what happened and add one useful word. The goal is a meaningful exchange, not a performance.

How the words connect with cognitive processing

Inference is a reasoned step beyond the sentence

A text may say, “Ravi put his books away, checked the clock and ran towards the door.” It does not explicitly say that Ravi is late. A reader might infer that he is in a hurry because of the actions described. Ask the child which details support the idea and whether another explanation is possible. The purpose is to connect a conclusion to evidence, not to reward imaginative guessing.

Explicit means directly stated. Implicit means suggested but not directly stated. A child can practise this distinction by highlighting a sentence that gives information clearly and discussing a second idea that the writer expects the reader to work out. The writer’s implication and the reader’s inference are connected but not identical: one is suggested, the other is concluded.

Perspective is another important word in reading. Two people can describe the same event differently because they were in different places, had different experiences or wanted different things from the reader. Use accessible examples: a player and a referee may describe a match differently. Ask what each person could see and what information might be missing.

Analysis means looking at parts and relationships

A child analysing a story does more than name the characters. They might look at the character’s decision, the reason for it and what happened next. The same idea applies to a science diagram, a graph or a historical source. Analyse means examine parts and how they connect. It does not mean simply making a list of details.

Cause, effect, factor and variable help describe relationships. A cause contributes to an event; an effect is an outcome; a factor is something that influences a result; a variable is something that can change. These words can be used in simple activities, but formal definitions should follow the subject curriculum when the terms are taught technically.

Contrast and compare make relationships explicit. Compare can include similarities and differences; contrast focuses on differences. A child can compare two sources by topic, author or purpose, then contrast the explanations they provide. This is a more organised task than saying vaguely that one is “better.”

Evidence and judgement protect against overclaiming

A claim is a statement being made. Evidence is information that supports it. A conclusion is reached after considering the information. A child may say that all birds prefer one type of food because one bird ate it. The observation supports the statement that this bird ate that food; it does not establish what all birds prefer. Explain the limitation and model a more accurate conclusion.

Reliable, relevant and accurate describe different qualities. Reliable concerns whether information can be trusted or consistently obtained in the context. Relevant means connected to the question. Accurate means correct or sufficiently exact. A source might be accurate about one detail but irrelevant to the question. A measurement might be relevant but recorded inaccurately.

Verify means check. Children can verify a copied fact against a source, recheck a calculation or compare a conclusion with the original evidence. Verification is not an expression of distrust in the child; it is a normal part of careful work. Make it a habit to ask, “How could we check?”

Planning words make independent learning manageable

Objective describes the goal. Plan identifies steps. Priority is the task that deserves attention first. Resource is something that can help. Monitor means keep track of progress. Revise means make a change. These words can be taught through a small project: decide what the child wants to make, gather the materials, choose the first step and check whether the result matches the goal.

Independent learning does not mean leaving a child alone with a difficult task. It means gradually transferring parts of the process. An adult might first model how to choose a resource, then ask the child to select between two useful options. Later the child may identify what information is missing. Support remains available, but the child has an increasing role.

A priority should be chosen for a reason. A child may want to decorate a model, but first needs to make the base stable. Explain why one task comes before another. This turns priority from an adult command into a relationship between actions and goals.

Synthesis and summary are not the same

Summarise means select the main points from one source or experience. Synthesise means combine ideas from more than one source into a coherent account. At nine, synthesis can begin simply: read two short descriptions of the same animal and write one explanation that combines a shared fact and a difference between them.

Implication describes what a statement may suggest or lead to. Qualify means make a claim more exact or limited. If a child writes that a new rule will “always” help everyone, ask whether the evidence supports such a broad statement. They may qualify it: “The rule may help children who need more time.” This is more careful language.

The main idea and detail also have different functions. The main idea tells what the text is mostly about; a detail supports, explains or illustrates it. Ask the child to state the main idea before collecting several details. This helps prevent an explanation from becoming a list with no clear point.

Teach advanced words without adding pressure

Choose a word when the need appears. During a story, infer may be useful. During source comparison, perspective may help. During a project, objective and priority may fit. Children remember words more meaningfully when they solve a real communication problem with them.

Model the reasoning. “I think the character is worried. That is an inference because the text does not say it directly, but the character keeps looking at the door.” This gives a child an example of how to use the word. The child can respond with a different view if they can point to other clues.

Do not correct every sentence to include academic vocabulary. If the child says “I think he is scared because he keeps looking outside,” respond to the idea first. You can then say, “You made an inference from what he did.” The formal word is added without dismissing the child’s natural expression.

A fourteen-day family routine

The routine below is an optional way to bring the words into everyday life. Keep each interaction brief and responsive. Repeat an activity that the child enjoys and stop when attention or energy is running low.

  1. Day 1: Find one implicit idea in a short story and identify its clue.
  2. Day 2: Distinguish one explicit statement from one inference.
  3. Day 3: Compare two sources and identify a difference in perspective.
  4. Day 4: Justify one answer with relevant evidence from a text.
  5. Day 5: Find a claim and ask whether the source supports it fully or partly.
  6. Day 6: Use interpret to explain what a graph or picture communicates.
  7. Day 7: Identify one limitation in a simple observation or source.
  8. Day 8: Write a one-sentence summary of a paragraph.
  9. Day 9: Set an objective and identify the first priority in a project.
  10. Day 10: Review a completed task and decide what to verify or revise.

How to know whether a word is becoming meaningful

Look for understanding in more than one situation. A child who uses a word only in the exact example where it was first introduced may still be building the connection. A child who recognises the same idea in another story, object or conversation is beginning to transfer the meaning. Transfer is more informative than repeating a definition immediately after an adult.

Notice whether the child can show, explain or act on the word. A child may understand a direction before being able to use the vocabulary independently. Another child may use a word in conversation but need help applying it in a school task. These different observations should not be compressed into one simple label such as “good vocabulary” or “poor vocabulary.”

Parents can keep a short observation note: the situation, the word modelled, the child’s response and whether the child used the idea spontaneously. For example: “During reading, I asked what clue showed the character was worried. The child pointed to the character hiding under the table.” This note describes what happened without turning it into a score.

What research says about vocabulary and thinking

Research finds meaningful relationships between vocabulary and reading comprehension. Readers need to know the meanings of words to build a coherent understanding of a text. Vocabulary also develops through reading, conversation, explicit explanation and experience. The references below describe these relationships and provide guidance for teaching vocabulary and reading comprehension.

The relationship between vocabulary and broader cognitive skills is complex. Some studies report associations between language and aspects of executive functioning, such as remembering information, controlling a response or shifting between tasks. An association does not prove that teaching these exact words causes a specific improvement. It is more accurate to say that words can help children represent and communicate what they notice, remember and reason about.

The practical implication for families is straightforward: talk about thinking while doing meaningful things. Read together, compare objects, organise a small project, observe a change, ask what a clue suggests and explain how an answer was checked. Vocabulary is most useful when it serves understanding rather than being treated as a trophy.

Common mistakes to avoid

  • Teaching all 50 words in one sitting and expecting the child to retain them.
  • Choosing words because they sound advanced rather than because they fit the child’s current experience.
  • Demanding a spoken definition before accepting a demonstration, drawing or gesture.
  • Turning family conversation into a constant quiz.
  • Assuming that correct pronunciation proves a child understands a word.
  • Using a technical term without checking its subject-specific meaning.
  • Claiming that vocabulary guarantees a higher IQ, better memory or academic success.
  • Comparing a child’s word list with another child’s without considering individual experience and language background.
  • Treating mistakes as evidence that a child is not capable of reasoning.
  • Waiting for a home vocabulary plan to end before seeking help about a genuine developmental or learning concern.

Frequently asked questions

Is infer too difficult for a nine-year-old?

The concept can be introduced through story clues and simple conclusions. The word should be linked to an understandable example.

What is the difference between analyse and evaluate?

Analyse examines parts and relationships; evaluate makes a judgement using reasons or criteria. A task may require both.

Should children learn the word synthesise?

It can be introduced as combining information from more than one source into a coherent explanation. Start with two short, related examples.

Why is evidence important?

It helps show why a claim or conclusion is reasonable. Evidence must be relevant and should not be stretched beyond what it shows.

What does perspective mean?

A perspective is a particular point of view shaped by a person’s position, experience or purpose. It helps explain why sources may present events differently.

Does a bigger vocabulary mean better intelligence?

Vocabulary is associated with aspects of language and learning, but word count is not an intelligence score. Cognitive development has many influences.

How can parents encourage independent learning?

Model how to set an objective, select a resource, monitor progress and revise a plan. Gradually let the child take over more of the process.

When should I seek help?

Discuss persistent difficulties in reading, language, understanding, hearing or school participation with teachers and appropriate professionals.

When to seek additional support

This article is an educational guide, not a developmental screening tool or diagnosis. If a child persistently struggles to understand language, express ideas, follow instructions, read, hear or participate in communication, discuss the concern with the child’s teacher, paediatrician or an appropriately qualified speech-language professional. Share specific examples from home and school rather than relying on a word-count comparison.

If a child loses previously acquired communication or other developmental abilities, seek prompt professional advice. Home vocabulary activities can continue when appropriate, but they should not delay assessment. If a child has an existing communication, learning or developmental plan, follow the advice of the professionals who know the child.

A practical teaching guide for parents and educators

Begin with the child’s current interest. A child who enjoys reading may be ready to use notice, clue, predict and summarise. A child who enjoys building may use plan, strategy, adjust and improve. A child who enjoys sorting may explore category, feature, compare and classify. These are starting points, not fixed labels for the child’s ability.

Model the thinking aloud in short sentences. “I will compare these two shapes. They are both triangles, but one is larger.” “I need to check the instruction again.” “My first strategy did not work, so I will try another.” The adult shows that thinking includes noticing, checking and revising.

Give the child a chance to contribute. Ask one question, wait and accept a response in the form available to the child. If the child offers an incomplete explanation, extend it naturally rather than correcting every word. “You noticed the wet umbrella. That is a clue that it may have rained.”

Keep the interaction pleasant. A child who is tired or frustrated may need a break rather than another vocabulary activity. Language should support the relationship and the task, not turn every moment into schoolwork. The strongest learning opportunities are often small, repeated and shared.

Related eduKateSG reading

References and further reading

The essential takeaway

The best thinking vocabulary for a 9-year-old is not the most difficult list. It is language that helps the child notice, organise, compare, remember, explain and check. Introduce the words through real tasks, model the thinking behind them, welcome the child’s own way of communicating and keep claims about cognitive development honest.

Deeper parent and educator guide: putting thinking words into daily practice

Inference and stated meaning

A text may say, “Ravi put his books away, checked the clock and ran towards the door.” It does not explicitly say that Ravi is late. A reader might infer that he is in a hurry because of the actions described. Ask the child which details support the idea and whether another explanation is possible. The purpose is to connect a conclusion to evidence, not to reward imaginative guessing.

Explicit means directly stated. Implicit means suggested but not directly stated. A child can highlight a sentence that gives information clearly and discuss a second idea that the writer expects the reader to work out. The writer’s implication and the reader’s inference are connected but not identical: one is suggested, the other is concluded.

Analysis means looking at parts and relationships

A child analysing a story does more than name the characters. They might look at the character’s decision, the reason for it and what happened next. The same idea applies to a science diagram, a graph or a historical source. Analyse means examine parts and how they connect. It does not mean simply making a list of details.

Cause, effect, factor and variable help describe relationships. A cause contributes to an event; an effect is an outcome; a factor is something that influences a result; a variable is something that can change. These words can be used in simple activities, but formal definitions should follow the subject curriculum.

Evidence and judgement protect against overclaiming

A claim is a statement being made. Evidence is information that supports it. A conclusion is reached after considering the information. A child may say that all birds prefer one type of food because one bird ate it. The observation supports the statement that this bird ate that food; it does not establish what all birds prefer. Explain the limitation and model a more accurate conclusion.

Reliable, relevant and accurate describe different qualities. Reliable concerns whether information can be trusted or consistently obtained in the context. Relevant means connected to the question. Accurate means correct or sufficiently exact. A source might be accurate about one detail but irrelevant to the question. A measurement might be relevant but recorded inaccurately.

Planning and independent learning

Objective describes the goal. Plan identifies steps. Priority is the task that deserves attention first. Resource is something that can help. Monitor means keep track of progress. Revise means make a change. These words can be taught through a small project: decide what the child wants to make, gather materials, choose the first step and check whether the result matches the goal.

Independent learning does not mean leaving a child alone with a difficult task. It means gradually transferring parts of the process. An adult might first model how to choose a resource, then ask the child to select between two useful options. Later the child may identify what information is missing. Support remains available, but the child has an increasing role.

Synthesis and summary are different

Summarise means select the main points from one source or experience. Synthesise means combine ideas from more than one source into a coherent account. At nine, synthesis can begin simply: read two short descriptions of the same animal and write one explanation that combines a shared fact and a difference between them.

Implication describes what a statement may suggest or lead to. Qualify means make a claim more exact or limited. If a child writes that a new rule will “always” help everyone, ask whether the evidence supports such a broad statement. They may qualify it: “The rule may help children who need more time.” This is more careful language.

Independent word learning and verification

A child may find a definition but still need help deciding whether it fits the sentence. Encourage them to read the entire paragraph, inspect meaningful word parts and consult a suitable dictionary or glossary. The next step is to paraphrase the definition and test it in the original sentence. Copying a definition is not the same as understanding it.

A resource should be chosen for the task. A textbook glossary may be best for a technical subject term; a general dictionary may help with everyday meanings; a teacher may clarify how a word is used in class. The child can learn to ask, “Which source is suitable for this question?” This is a transferable study habit.

Thinking about source limitations

A source may provide useful information without answering every question. A photograph shows what was visible from one position and at one time. A short interview reveals one person’s account, not necessarily what everyone experienced. A graph summarises selected measurements, not every possible factor. Limitation is a word for the boundary of what a source can tell us.

Teach a child to ask: who made the source, what was its purpose, what information does it contain and what is missing? These questions should be handled in an age-appropriate way. They are not a demand to distrust every source. They help the child understand that information has a context and a scope.

Using precision in conclusions

A conclusion should be as broad as the evidence permits, but no broader. If a child observes that three plants grew after watering, it is reasonable to say that the plants grew during the observation period. It may be reasonable to suggest that water helped. It would be too strong to claim that water was the only factor unless the activity controlled other relevant conditions.

Qualify means make a statement more exact or limited. Words such as may, suggests, in this example and under these conditions help a child express uncertainty honestly. These terms do not weaken a sound answer; they show that the writer understands what the evidence can support. This is an important habit for later research and school writing.

A parent observation sheet

Record the situation, the word or phrase modelled, what the child did and whether the idea appeared independently. For example: “During reading I said ‘clue’; the child pointed to the wet umbrella and suggested that it had rained.” This describes an actual interaction more clearly than writing “knows clue.”

Keep observations in context. A child may use a word comfortably with one caregiver but not in class. They may understand a spoken word before using it in writing. Different settings provide different opportunities and demands. A short record can help a parent speak with a teacher about what is working and what remains difficult.

Do not turn the record into a score or intelligence measure. Its purpose is to notice useful communication and prepare clear questions if further guidance is needed. A child should not be compared with another child based on how many words appear in a notebook.

How adults can model flexible and careful thinking

Adults can say what they are noticing: “I see two possible answers. I will check the clue.” This shows that a person can pause rather than guess. It is especially useful when a child is uncertain. The adult does not have to pretend to know everything; modelling how to check is part of good teaching.

Show how an idea changes when evidence changes. “I thought the red piece was the match, but the shape does not fit. I will revise my choice.” The word revise becomes meaningful because the child sees an actual change in response to information. Similarly, adjust can be modelled when a plan needs a small change.

Praise the explanation and the effort to check, not only speed. Ask what the child noticed, which detail mattered and how the answer could be checked. These questions are more useful than repeatedly asking whether the child is correct.

Choosing words that match the child’s next learning step

A useful word should solve a communication problem. If the child describes many details but cannot identify the main point, summarise may be the next helpful word. If the child has an answer but cannot give a reason, because or justify may become useful. If the child changes a rule after noticing new information, flexible, shift or revise can name that thinking move.

Avoid introducing too many abstract words together. Use the child’s current activity as a guide. During a reading task, clue, infer and summarise may fit. During a construction task, plan, strategy, adjust and improve may fit. During a science activity, observe, measure, variable and result may be appropriate, but technical meanings should match the school curriculum.

The adult’s explanation should remain accurate. If a word has a specialist meaning, use the teacher’s definition or a suitable textbook. A simplified explanation is helpful only when it preserves the essential meaning. Do not use an impressive word as a substitute for explaining the idea.

What this guide can—and cannot—promise

This guide can offer parents a structured set of words, real-life examples and ways to talk about thinking. It can help adults notice how children organise information, explain a choice, compare examples and ask for clarification. It can encourage richer conversations around books, projects and schoolwork.

It cannot guarantee higher intelligence, better grades, longer attention or improved memory simply because a child has been taught a list. Vocabulary is one influence within a much wider developmental environment. The best use of this article is to support interaction and understanding, not to create pressure or make promises that research does not justify.