eduKate Singapore

VIEW THIS AS

Auto mode follows the Route Engine until you choose a viewpoint.

YOU ARE HERE

ROUTE CHECK

CONNECTED TO

WHAT NEXT

Use the canonical route for this room, or HELP if you are unsure.

Next useful routeCanonical hubHELP

Why Study Science | Understand How Water Filtration Works and What It Cannot Remove

—

by

eduKate Asia
Original conceptual panorama linking a city water system, train line, power network and maintenance team in a coherent service landscape.

Why study Science? Water filtration lets us ask which substances a method removes, how it does so and what measurements establish its performance. Clear water alone is not a chemical or microbiological safety test.

Quick answer: particle filtration, adsorption, membrane separation and disinfection work through different mechanisms. The appropriate process depends on whether the target is sediment, a dissolved chemical or a microorganism. PUB states that Singapore’s public tap water is already safe to drink without extra household filtration.

This educational guide uses fictional numbers, not actual water-test data. It does not recommend a treatment for unknown contaminated water or replace PUB’s current water-quality guidance.

Contents

A clear glass of water is an observation, not a safety certificate

I sometimes begin a Science explanation with a glass of water. It looks transparent, but its appearance cannot tell us which dissolved ions are present, whether microscopic organisms are present or what happened before it reached the glass. A filter might remove visible particles and still leave other substances unchanged.

That is why water treatment is such a useful subject. It trains us to ask what the substance is, how it can be separated, which measurement confirms removal and which questions remain unanswered. The subject joins chemistry, physics, microbiology, membranes and real public infrastructure.

Singapore adds an especially helpful local example. PUB states that Singapore’s public tap water is safe to drink directly without additional household filtration and describes an extensive treatment and monitoring system. Learning how filtration works does not mean assuming our local taps are unsafe.

Begin by deciding which problem the treatment must solve

The word dirty can mean several different things. Water may contain suspended sediment, dissolved salts, certain organic compounds or disease-causing microorganisms. One treatment method may address one category well and another poorly.

A child’s useful first question is not ‘Which filter is best?’ It is ‘What would we need to remove or inactivate, and how could we tell whether that happened?’ The CDC explains that household filtration, distillation, ultraviolet treatment and softening have different target functions.

Without identifying a target, a photograph of a filter cartridge or a promise of universal purification has little scientific meaning. The method’s intended contaminants and verified performance must be stated.

Suspended material is different from a dissolved substance

Sand grains and large sediment particles may be suspended in water. Dissolved sodium and chloride ions are distributed through the solution on a much smaller scale. A common paper or sand filter that catches coarse sediment cannot be assumed to remove dissolved salts.

Students often think a clear liquid contains only water. Yet dissolved substances may leave it transparent. A cup of carefully prepared saltwater can remain visually clear while the dissolved ions are still present.

Science teaches a basic but powerful distinction: an observation of clarity is not a chemical analysis of everything in the liquid.

What physical filtration actually does

Filtration passes a fluid through a material intended to retain specified components. In a simple sieve or porous filter, particles larger than appropriate openings can be caught, although real filtration may also involve particles adhering to the medium or being trapped along complicated pathways.

The relationship is not always a neat picture of one round particle meeting one smaller round hole. Filter geometry, particle shape, flow, surface properties and clogging affect actual performance.

A good explanation names the particles, the filter medium and the proposed mechanism. It does not claim that every molecule larger than one advertisement’s printed pore size must be retained with perfect efficiency.

Pore size is useful but not an entire performance specification

Pore size describes aspects of a filter’s openings and influences what materials may pass. For many practical products, the distribution of openings and the distinction between nominal and absolute ratings matter.

The CDC’s filter-selection guidance tells readers to check the specific claim and the target organism or chemical. One pore number does not certify complete removal of every pathogen or dissolved contaminant.

Students should resist the temptation to treat the smallest printed number on a product as proof of the best overall drinking-water treatment. A useful comparison requires the same tested target and conditions.

Millimetres, micrometres and nanometres should not be mixed

One millimetre is one thousand micrometres. One micrometre is one thousand nanometres. Filters and the substances they retain can occupy quite different parts of that scale.

If the water contains a hypothetical particle 100 micrometres wide, it is 0.10 millimetres across. If another is one micrometre wide, it is one hundred times smaller in length, but that ratio alone says nothing about its chemical identity.

This lesson connects filtration with SI prefixes and proportional reasoning. Understanding scale is a prerequisite for comparing methods rather than an optional arithmetic exercise.

Worked conversion: read the units before choosing a filter

Invented classroom dimensions: particle A is 0.25 millimetres wide and particle B is 20 micrometres wide. Convert A to micrometres: 0.25 × 1,000 = 250 micrometres.

A is 250 ÷ 20 = 12.5 times wider than B. That comparison concerns a linear dimension, not relative volume or whether either particle contains bacteria, chemicals or plastic.

The calculation is illustrative and does not specify a real filter’s performance. It teaches the habit of putting quantities on a common scale before reasoning from them.

A filter cartridge can have several mechanisms at once

An engineered cartridge may include porous layers, fibrous materials and adsorbents. Some components physically retain particles while others bind particular dissolved chemicals at their surfaces.

Calling the entire cartridge a filter is convenient in everyday speech, but it can conceal different processes. The improvement in taste may result from a different stage than the reduction in particulates.

Science learners should identify which part produces each claimed effect and ask whether the relevant outcome has been independently tested.

Sand filtration is more sophisticated than a kitchen sieve

Water-treatment plants can use beds of granular media through which water flows. Particle capture can involve transport, attachment and retention within the filter bed, rather than only the rejection of objects too big for one visible gap.

PUB describes rapid gravity sand filtration in Singapore’s waterworks after suitable chemical treatment and settlement. The purpose is to help remove suspended particles from raw water within a monitored process.

A bucket of sand assembled for a school model does not reproduce the plant’s operational controls, water-quality monitoring or other safeguards. A classroom diagram is a beginning for explanation, not a certification that homemade filtered water is safe to drink.

Coagulation changes the behaviour of fine particles

Very small suspended particles can remain dispersed and be difficult to remove by simple settling. Coagulation uses appropriate treatment chemicals to alter their surface interactions and facilitate subsequent aggregation.

PUB identifies aluminium sulphate among the coagulants used in its conventional treatment process. The chemicals and dosing are professionally controlled rather than selected by guessing from how cloudy a sample looks.

The Chemistry lesson is that two particles may behave differently after their surface interactions change. This can make later separation steps more effective.

Flocculation produces larger aggregates

After coagulation, controlled mixing can help particles come together into larger aggregates called flocs. These may settle or become easier for downstream filters to retain.

The word floc is not a new kind of pollutant magically generated from nothing. It refers to a larger association of material that had been present in the liquid, together with relevant treatment substances.

Students can distinguish the stages: coagulation alters relevant interactions; flocculation develops aggregates; settling or filtration removes suitable material.

Sedimentation relies on settling

Sedimentation uses gravity and suitable flow conditions to allow suspended aggregates to move toward the bottom of a basin. The removal rate depends on particle properties, density difference, turbulence and residence time.

Not every tiny dissolved or floating substance will settle under the same conditions. A tank containing clear-looking upper water does not prove that all microorganisms or chemicals have disappeared.

Science makes the distinction between removing a visible suspended solid and meeting drinking-water quality requirements.

A treatment train uses several barriers

Large treatment systems commonly combine coagulation, flocculation, sedimentation, filtration and disinfection as relevant to the source water and plant design. One step can improve the conditions for another.

The CDC describes these as common public water treatment operations, not one universal recipe that every water utility must use in precisely the same configuration.

The lesson is systems thinking. We can evaluate each process and still recognise that overall safety depends on the complete treatment, distribution and monitoring chain.

Activated carbon is not a universal chemical magnet

Activated carbon has a highly developed porous surface that can adsorb certain compounds. It may improve taste and odour and reduce some specified organic substances depending on the media and operating conditions.

Adsorption means molecules associate with surfaces; absorption, in the everyday sense of a sponge taking in bulk liquid, is a different description. The two terms should not be used as exact synonyms.

CDC guidance notes that many pitcher or refrigerator carbon filters are intended mainly to improve taste and smell, not to establish universal safety from all germs and chemicals. Product-specific certified claims are the meaningful evidence.

What adsorption capacity means

A carbon bed has a finite ability to retain target substances under specified conditions. As sites become occupied or the system ages, its performance can change and breakthrough may occur.

Students should not imagine that a visibly dark carbon cartridge can store unlimited contaminants forever. Design parameters include water composition, flow, contact time, temperature and maintenance.

A claim of removal on the first day is not necessarily a claim of unchanged removal after extended use. Science teaches us to ask when performance was measured.

Worked example: a removal percentage

Fictional laboratory comparison: a specified dissolved substance has a measured inlet concentration of 80 micrograms per litre and outlet concentration of 20 micrograms per litre under one defined test.

The concentration reduction is (80 − 20) ÷ 80 × 100 = 75%. That ratio describes one target under the invented conditions, not 75% removal of every possible contaminant.

A real study would need suitable calibration, replicates, blanks, uncertainty and details about flow and media age before making a reliable product claim.

Particle capture does not always remove dissolved ions

Many conventional particle filters can improve clarity while leaving sodium, chloride or other small dissolved ions largely unchanged. Water passing through a cloth is not thereby desalinated.

To reduce certain dissolved substances, treatment may require activated media with suitable chemistry, ion exchange, reverse osmosis or other specific processes.

Students should identify whether the task concerns suspended particles, dissolved ions or disease-causing organisms before deciding what method could be relevant.

Microfiltration and ultrafiltration are different membrane categories

Membrane filtration uses engineered barriers with defined separation behaviour. Microfiltration and ultrafiltration commonly target various suspended particles and microorganisms, with exact performance dependent on the membrane and test method.

CDC’s home-water-treatment overview distinguishes these technologies and the organisms they can reduce. It cautions that some categories do not reliably remove viruses or dissolved chemicals.

The scientific point is that a category name is not a guarantee for every product. Students should inspect validated claims and understand that membrane damage or poor operation can affect performance.

Why a virus question can differ from a bacterial question

Bacteria, viruses and protozoan parasites vary in typical size and biological structure. An ordinary pore-based filter designed for some larger organisms may not be sufficient against much smaller infectious agents.

The correct response is not to select a filter by looking at an enlarged cartoon of a virus. CDC guidance relates selection to tested absolute pore size, treatment category and appropriate certification.

Science reinforces careful biological classification while avoiding the claim that one technique completely removes all germs.

Nanofiltration is not simply finer cloth

Nanofiltration membranes can separate species through a combination of size-related, chemical and charge-dependent interactions. Their behaviour depends on the membrane and feed-water conditions.

Such membranes may reduce certain ions and organic molecules, but one cannot infer a complete list of removed substances from the word nano in the name.

The scientific lesson is that separation at molecular scales can involve more than rigid holes in a sheet.

Reverse osmosis uses applied pressure

Reverse osmosis drives water through an appropriate selective membrane using pressure to overcome an osmotic tendency. It can remove many dissolved salts and other specified contaminants, depending on the system.

This differs from simple cloth filtration because the membrane and pressure establish a much more selective molecular separation. Reverse osmosis also produces a concentrated reject stream in many configurations.

Students should not assume every countertop device using the word membrane performs reverse osmosis, or that RO removes every conceivable substance with exactly 100% efficiency.

Singapore’s NEWater demonstrates connected processes

PUB explains that NEWater production uses advanced treatment including microfiltration or ultrafiltration, reverse osmosis and ultraviolet disinfection, with configurations that can evolve as technology develops.

These stages address different aspects of water treatment. The membrane barriers remove relevant particles and dissolved substances, while UV provides an additional disinfection safeguard.

A pupil who understands why several stages are used has learned something broader than the names of Singapore’s water sources: reliable systems often combine complementary mechanisms rather than depend on one miracle filter.

Filtration and disinfection answer different questions

Filtration can remove specified material from a fluid. Disinfection aims to inactivate disease-causing microorganisms using a suitable method. Removing and inactivating are not the same action.

Some filters remove many bacteria or parasites without removing certain viruses or chemicals. A disinfectant may inactivate appropriate germs while leaving dissolved chemical contaminants in place.

CDC public-health guidance advises choosing treatment for the actual contaminant and cautions that water suspected of containing fuel, toxic chemicals or radioactive material is not made safe by ordinary household disinfection methods.

Ultraviolet disinfection has defined conditions

Ultraviolet light can damage biological structures of susceptible microorganisms under suitable exposure conditions, reducing their ability to cause infection. The performance depends on delivered dose, water clarity, device condition and microorganism type.

Particles may shield organisms from light, which helps explain why pretreatment can be important. UV disinfection does not physically remove ordinary dissolved salts or metals from water.

Students should distinguish an inactivation mechanism from a filtration mechanism instead of putting both under the vague word cleaning.

Why chlorine may remain after a treatment plant

A water utility can use an appropriate disinfectant residual to help protect water within the distribution network after the principal treatment stages. This provides a different function from removing sediment before disinfection.

PUB describes disinfection and chloramine residual management in Singapore’s treated-water system. A small permitted disinfectant residual does not establish that the tap water is unsafe; PUB states that the local supply meets its regulated quality requirements.

The Science skill is to ask why a substance is present and whether its measured amount meets a relevant standard, rather than labelling every detectable chemical as contamination.

Boiling and filtration should not be confused

Boiling is a heat-based method for inactivating many disease-causing organisms. It is not a process that removes dissolved salts, heavy metals or every other chemical from water.

Filtering may remove certain particles but not all microbes. The methods have different intended outcomes and, in some circumstances, may be used together under official instructions.

Students should never treat an educational explanation as advice to make an unknown contaminated water source drinkable. For actual incidents, the relevant authority’s current guidance must govern.

Taste and smell are useful observations but incomplete

Off-odours or unusual taste can draw attention to a water-quality question, but many important contaminants are not detectable through ordinary senses. Conversely, aesthetic changes can sometimes have explanations that do not imply a health hazard.

PUB provides explanations for occasional discolouration or milky appearance and describes testing when quality concerns arise. The appropriate response is to use official information rather than make a diagnosis from one photograph.

Science teaches us to distinguish a signal worth investigating from a conclusion already demonstrated.

Turbidity is not a complete microbiological test

Turbidity describes cloudiness associated with the scattering of light by suspended particles. Lower turbidity can be an important sign of particle removal and may improve some subsequent processes.

However, turbidity is not a direct count of bacteria, viruses or dissolved chemicals. Water with low turbidity may still require appropriate chemical and microbiological assessment.

The measurement is useful because it answers a defined question. Treating it as a universal safety score would be an overclaim.

What a standardised removal claim should include

A product’s statement of 99% reduction should identify the target substance or organism, the tested conditions, a credible method and the applicable certification or standard. Without these, the number is difficult to interpret.

Two products claiming 99% may have tested completely different targets, such as chlorine taste versus a specified pathogen. Their identical percentages do not establish equal performance on another contaminant.

Science teaches readers to look at both the denominator and what was measured before choosing between apparently impressive numbers.

A high percentage can still leave material behind

Fictional teaching example: if a water sample begins with 10,000 qualifying particles and a process removes 99%, then about 100 remain under the simplified calculation.

If another sample begins with 100 particles and experiences the same 99% reduction, one remains. The same reduction percentage corresponds to different outlet counts because the starting amounts differ.

The calculation cannot decide whether either water sample is safe. A health-related conclusion depends on what the particles are, the relevant standards and the quality of the measurement.

Why total volume matters for count comparisons

One report may find 20 particles in one litre; another finds 60 in five litres. Their concentrations are 20 particles/L and 12 particles/L respectively, not 20 versus 60 on an equal-volume basis.

Students should convert to comparable units before ranking the samples. They should then check whether the studies counted the same sizes, materials and collection methods.

This is the same measurement discipline used in microplastics research and many environmental datasets.

A filter with a clogged medium changes over time

As captured material accumulates, a filter’s flow resistance can rise, changing pressure drop and operating behaviour. Some media require cleaning, replacement or other maintenance under validated procedures.

A slower flow does not automatically mean better removal, and a visibly brown cartridge does not prove that dangerous contaminants are present. Product construction and incoming water matter.

PUB specifically warns that neglected household filters can become sites of bacterial growth. Students should learn why maintenance is part of performance rather than an optional cosmetic detail.

Why pressure drop matters

Driving water through a restrictive filter requires a pressure difference. As media clog or membrane resistance changes, a greater pressure drop may be needed to maintain the same flow.

The energy cost can therefore be relevant at treatment-plant scale. A finer separation may improve removal of selected contaminants while also creating operational demands.

Science shows engineering trade-offs without claiming that the lowest flow or the smallest pore is always the best design.

A filter can remove useful substances too

Some treatment processes reduce substances that serve a useful function in a drinking-water system, such as a disinfectant residual. Reverse osmosis may also reduce dissolved minerals alongside contaminants.

Whether that matters depends on the water quality, product design and reason for treatment. CDC advises checking the target and product label before selecting a household system.

Students should resist the assumption that removing every detectable substance is automatically healthier. The scientific question is whether the treated water meets appropriate criteria.

A clear sample can still be chemically different

Imagine two transparent solutions, one containing dissolved salt and one containing very little salt. An ordinary photograph cannot distinguish their ionic concentrations reliably.

Electrical conductivity and chemical analysis can help investigate dissolved ions, but conductivity itself is not a universal measurement of individual contaminant identity.

Science teaches that different measurements reveal different dimensions of one sample and should not be treated as synonyms.

A home filter is not an automatic improvement to Singapore tap water

PUB states that Singapore’s tap water is safe to drink straight from the tap and that additional point-of-use filtering is not needed to make the public supply potable. It monitors water from source through treatment and the distribution system.

This does not mean no person may ever choose a household filter for a specific aesthetic preference or specialised need. It means a general advertisement implying Singapore’s public water is unsafe without extra treatment contradicts the water agency’s position.

Families should distinguish a purchasing preference from a scientifically established safety requirement.

Why source water matters to treatment design

Reservoir water, treated used water and seawater can begin with different dissolved and suspended substances. They are therefore handled through different treatment trains designed for the quality and purpose of the incoming water.

PUB’s NEWater process is not simply the same operation as rapid gravity sand filtration of reservoir water. Its advanced membrane and UV stages perform additional separation and disinfection functions.

Science makes local water infrastructure understandable by connecting input composition with the chosen process.

An imagined treatment plant should specify each stage

Ask students to draw an incoming-water arrow, a coagulation/flocculation stage, a settling basin, a filter and a disinfection step. They should identify the principal intended change at each stage and label remaining uncertainties.

Such a diagram must be described as conceptual. Actual waterworks vary, and their operating settings, chemical doses and monitoring requirements cannot be determined from a classroom sketch.

The result is a clearer mental model of how several imperfect but complementary barriers work together.

Why water testing must have reliable samples

A laboratory result is only meaningful if the sample was collected, preserved and analysed using suitable methods. Contamination during handling or a sample taken from an unrepresentative location can distort interpretation.

Blank controls, calibration, sample provenance and repeat observations help establish credibility. Even a highly sophisticated detector cannot repair every problem introduced before the sample reached it.

This connects filtration with the general Science of evidence quality and experimental design.

A non-detect result has a detection limit

If a test reports that a substance was not detected, it means the method did not find it above relevant detection conditions. That is not universal proof that precisely zero molecules are present.

Students should ask for the target, measurement sensitivity and reporting threshold. A method designed to identify one contaminant may say nothing about an unrelated contaminant.

Learning this prevents the same error in water testing, microplastics analysis and medical laboratory results.

A two-week learning route through water treatment

Start with particle-size conversions and the differences among suspension, solution and emulsion. Compare paper filtration with dissolved salts using diagrams rather than tasting or sampling unknown water.

Next study PUB’s treatment-flow description and the CDC’s filter categories. Ask which methods remove particles, which reduce dissolved chemicals and which primarily inactivate germs.

During week two, calculate invented removal percentages, explain why starting concentration matters and discuss filter clogging and maintenance. Finish with an evidence audit of a fictional ‘all contaminants removed’ advertisement.

These tasks use published sources and hypothetical numbers; none require collecting untreated water or constructing an unsafe drinking-water system.

  • Days 1–3: suspended particles, dissolved substances and units.
  • Days 4–5: filtration, coagulation and flocculation.
  • Days 6–7: adsorption and membrane differences.
  • Days 8–9: disinfection versus physical removal.
  • Days 10–11: removal percentages and detection limits.
  • Days 12–13: PUB treatment and local water-quality claims.
  • Day 14: independently evaluate a fictional filtration advertisement.

Questions parents can ask about a filter advertisement

Ask what the device actually claims to remove. Does its evidence concern an odour, a metal, a virus or suspended particles? If the label says 99%, ask 99% of which measured target and under which conditions.

Then discuss why Singapore’s PUB says our tap water is safe without additional filtering, and why scientific learning can still help us understand waterworks and environmental monitoring.

The most useful answer is one that states a supported claim and recognises what the data do not establish.

Common misconceptions worth correcting

A student may say clear water must be safe, a small pore removes every dissolved molecule, activated carbon destroys all chemicals or boiling removes heavy metals. These statements confuse different processes.

Others assume every chlorine residual is dangerous, a filter works indefinitely without maintenance or a percentage removal claim applies to every contaminant.

Repair the errors by identifying the target, mechanism, quality-control method and scope of the conclusion.

  • Clarity is not a universal drinking-water test.
  • Particle filtration and dissolved-ion separation differ.
  • Activated carbon works through adsorption for suitable substances.
  • Membrane categories have different separation behaviour.
  • Disinfection inactivates organisms; filtration removes relevant material.
  • Pore size alone does not certify performance against all targets.
  • 99% reduction is meaningful only with a defined denominator.
  • Singapore public tap water is safe to drink without additional filtration, according to PUB.

What this article cannot certify

It cannot determine whether a particular privately sourced water sample is safe, approve a household treatment product or establish the condition of a damaged plumbing system. Those require current official information and suitable professional testing.

It also gives no instructions for turning unknown contaminated water into drinking water. For a suspected water-quality incident, follow PUB and relevant public-health authorities rather than a classroom model.

The educational goal is to understand how separation and disinfection work and why evidence must match the safety claim.

The lasting reason to study Science

Water treatment demonstrates that one familiar-looking liquid can contain substances requiring very different methods of detection and removal. Physical filtration, adsorption, membrane separation and disinfection each answer different questions.

A learner who can distinguish them and interpret a removal percentage has developed skills relevant to health, technology, environmental management and responsible consumer decisions.

That is why Science deserves study: it makes invisible processes understandable and teaches us not to confuse an attractive result with a complete proof.

Frequently asked questions

Does clear water always mean safe water?

No. Clear water can contain dissolved chemicals or microorganisms; relevant quality needs appropriate testing.

What is physical filtration?

Moving water through a medium that retains selected particles or substances through specified separation mechanisms.

Can a paper filter remove dissolved salt?

An ordinary coarse paper filter cannot be assumed to remove sodium and chloride ions dissolved in water.

What is the difference between filtration and disinfection?

Filtration removes selected material; disinfection inactivates suitable microorganisms.

What does a water filter’s pore size mean?

It describes the scale of openings, but actual performance also depends on material, distribution, operating conditions and certification.

What is activated carbon?

A porous adsorbent used to reduce certain substances, often improving taste and odour under suitable conditions.

Does activated carbon eliminate every contaminant?

No. It has target- and condition-dependent adsorption behaviour and finite capacity.

What is coagulation?

A treatment stage that changes particle interactions so small suspended particles can form larger aggregates.

What is flocculation?

Controlled formation of larger flocs from particles, aiding settling or filtration.

What is reverse osmosis?

Pressure-driven membrane separation that can reduce many dissolved substances and other relevant contaminants.

Does UV remove dissolved salt?

No. UV is used for disinfection under suitable conditions, not for removing dissolved salts.

Can boiling remove dissolved heavy metals?

Boiling is not a reliable method for removing dissolved toxic metals or chemicals.

Do all filters reliably remove viruses?

No. Different membrane categories and products have different validated microbial-removal capabilities.

What does 99% reduction mean?

The measured target fell by 99% relative to its starting quantity under defined test conditions; it says nothing by itself about other targets.

Is Singapore tap water safe to drink?

PUB states that the public tap supply is safe to drink directly without additional household filtration.

Why does PUB use several treatment steps?

Different steps address particles, dissolved substances and microorganisms with complementary controls.

Can an unmaintained filter become a problem?

Yes. Performance can deteriorate and inappropriate maintenance can create microbial growth concerns.

How should families respond to suspected local water problems?

Use PUB’s current information and appropriate professional testing rather than guessing from an educational article.

Official sources and connected learning

Singapore PUB documents local drinking-water treatment, NEWater and quality monitoring. CDC guidance distinguishes household filter categories and disinfection technologies. The invented calculations illustrate measurement principles rather than an actual product or water source.

At eduKateSG, effective Science learning means defining the target, understanding the mechanism, checking the measurements and explaining exactly what remains unknown.