The Economy of the World | Chapter 11: The Price of Other People’s Money — Currencies, Exchange Rates and Global Finance

Book contents · Previous · Chapter 10 · Next · Chapter 12

A small manufacturer agrees to buy a machine from abroad. The machine’s price is fixed in US dollars, but the firm earns its revenue in its home currency. Between signing the order and paying the invoice, the exchange rate changes. The machine has not become larger, faster or more useful. It nevertheless costs the firm more of the money it earns.

On the same day, an exporter elsewhere receives a foreign-currency payment that converts into more home currency than expected. A student studying overseas discovers that tuition has become harder to afford. A pension fund’s foreign assets rise in home-currency value.

One exchange-rate movement can produce all these outcomes. Whether it helps depends on what a person earns, owns, buys and owes. Understanding currencies therefore begins with a relationship: one money’s price in terms of another, followed by the particular balance sheet exposed to that price.

An exchange rate is a relative price. It can be written in either direction. One US dollar might exchange for 1.25 units of a fictional home currency. Equivalently, one home unit exchanges for 0.80 US dollars. These statements describe the same rate.

Suppose the quotation changes to 1.50 home units per US dollar. More home currency is now needed to buy a dollar. The home currency has depreciated against the dollar. Its foreign-currency value has fallen to about 0.667 US dollars per home unit.

The percentage depends on the direction of the quotation. The dollar’s price in home units rose by 20 per cent, from 1.25 to 1.50. The home unit’s dollar price fell by about 16.7 per cent, from 0.80 to 0.667. Both are correct. A headline giving a percentage without specifying the quotation can therefore confuse even an attentive reader. The Reserve Bank of Australia explains bilateral rates, effective rates and different exchange-rate arrangements in its measurement guide.

Here is the practical effect. A machine priced at 100 US dollars initially costs 125 home units. At the new rate it costs 150. Assume no fees, taxes, hedging or change in the dollar price. The home-currency cost has risen by 25 units.

An exporter selling a product for a fixed 150 home units faces the opposite calculation. Initially, a foreign customer needs 120 US dollars. After depreciation, that customer needs 100 US dollars. The product can become cheaper abroad even though its home-currency price is unchanged.

Actual firms may change their prices, and many contracts fix a currency price for a period. The arithmetic identifies the exposure; it does not guarantee the final adjustment.

It is tempting to treat an appreciating currency as proof of success and a depreciating one as proof of failure. The interpretation is more conditional.

An appreciation can make imports and overseas spending cheaper. It can also make some domestic producers less competitive against foreign firms, depending on invoicing, costs and productivity. A depreciation may assist some exporters while making imported essentials and foreign-currency obligations more expensive.

The starting point matters. If a currency had become unusually expensive relative to underlying conditions, a decline might help adjustment. If depreciation reflects a loss of confidence during financial distress, it may accompany serious harm. The direction alone does not supply the explanation.

The size of a currency unit is also largely conventional. A country can redefine one new unit as a thousand old units without making its people a thousand times richer. Comparing how many units equal one US dollar tells us little about living standards without prices and incomes.

A country trades with many partners. Its currency can rise against one while falling against another. An effective exchange-rate index combines several bilateral rates using weights. A real exchange-rate measure also takes relative prices or costs into account. This helps explain why an unchanged nominal rate does not necessarily mean unchanged competitiveness.

Suppose two trading economies maintain a fixed nominal exchange rate while prices rise persistently faster in one. Its products may become more expensive relative to the other’s even without an official currency change. Productivity, product quality and margins complicate the result further.

The useful question is what changed in a relevant relative price and who is exposed to it. National pride provides little assistance with the invoice.

Currencies are exchanged to pay for trade, purchase assets, repay debts, send remittances and manage risk. The desired flows can change quickly. Interest-rate differences, expected future conditions, commodity prices, political risks and investors’ need for liquidity can all matter.

Higher interest rates may make assets in one currency more attractive, other things equal. But a high rate can also signal inflation or default risk. An investor cares about the expected return after currency changes and losses, not just the number printed on a deposit account.

Expectations matter because assets promise future payments. A change in beliefs about next year can affect exchange rates today. Several influences can operate at once, and their relative importance can change. The RBA’s explanation of exchange-rate drivers illustrates how interest differences, trade conditions and financial flows interact.

Exchange-rate regimes also differ. Under a floating arrangement, market trading plays a central role in determining the rate, though authorities may sometimes intervene. Under a peg, authorities seek to maintain a specified relationship to another currency or basket. Other arrangements manage a band or a path.

Maintaining a peg can require reserves, changes in domestic financial conditions or controls on capital movements. A promise to exchange currencies at a fixed rate must be supported by credible arrangements. A government cannot make all the trade-offs disappear by announcing a convenient number.

The classic policy tension concerns exchange-rate stability, monetary-policy independence and freely moving capital. Full control over all three is generally unavailable at once. Countries choose arrangements according to their circumstances and priorities, with imperfect tools and varying degrees of flexibility.

For readers, the first task is to identify the regime. An explanation suited to a freely floating currency may not describe a currency union, a tightly managed rate or a country using another nation’s currency.

When goods cross borders, payments and financial claims move too. The balance of payments records transactions between residents of an economy and the rest of the world over a period. It distinguishes current transactions from financial transactions. The UK Office for National Statistics explains the relationship between the current, capital and financial accounts in its balance of payments guide.

The current account includes trade in goods and services, primary income such as investment income, and secondary income such as many current transfers. The trade balance is therefore part of the current account, not the entire account.

Consider an invented economy with exports of 80 billion units and imports of 100 billion. Its trade balance is minus 20 billion. It receives net primary income of 3 billion from abroad and net current transfers of 2 billion. Its current account balance is minus 15 billion.

Assume the capital account is zero and ignore statistical discrepancies for this example. The economy must have a matching financial counterpart. One possibility is that residents acquire 5 billion of foreign financial assets while nonresidents acquire 20 billion of claims on the home economy. Net financing from abroad is then 15 billion.

Under the financial-account convention used in modern international accounts, net acquisition of financial assets minus net incurrence of liabilities is 5 minus 20, or minus 15. That equals the combined current and capital account balance in this simplified case. Everyday language often calls the same event a positive net financial inflow of 15. These different sign conventions should not be mixed.

Financing need not all take the form of borrowing. Foreigners can purchase equity, and residents can sell foreign assets or reduce deposits abroad. The composition affects the risks. In real statistics, errors and omissions can also appear because recording every transaction perfectly is impossible.

The accounts tell us that the transactions fit together. They do not by themselves establish which decision caused which. Weak saving, strong investment, changes in government finances and international demand for assets can influence the result through many channels.

A current account deficit is not automatically a national failure. A country may obtain foreign financing to build productive capacity whose returns arrive later. It may also finance consumption or property speculation that leaves it vulnerable. The purpose, financing terms and capacity to generate future income matter. The IMF discusses these distinctions in its explanation of current account deficits.

A surplus is likewise not an automatic certificate of good policy. It can reflect strong exports or income from foreign assets. It can also reflect weak domestic investment or households unable to consume as much as they would like. Context determines the interpretation.

Financial flows change stocks of assets and liabilities. Their market values can also change without a new cross-border transaction. If residents own foreign-currency assets, depreciation may raise their value in home currency. If they owe foreign-currency debt, the same depreciation can raise the burden of that debt.

Imagine a firm owes 100,000 US dollars but earns entirely in the fictional home currency. At 1.25 home units per dollar, the principal corresponds to 125,000 home units. At 1.50, it corresponds to 150,000. The dollar debt has not changed, but the home-currency obligation has increased by 25,000.

If the firm also receives dollar revenues, those revenues may provide a natural offset. If it has a valid hedging contract, the immediate exposure may be reduced. If it has neither, it has a currency mismatch: the money it earns and the money it owes respond differently to exchange-rate movements.

Maturity matters too. Borrowing that must be renewed next month creates a different risk from borrowing fixed for many years. A project can be productive in the long run yet fail financially if lenders withdraw before its income arrives. International finance connects opportunities across time as well as across space.

The RBA’s discussion of exchange rates and the economy shows why trade effects and balance-sheet effects must be considered together. Depreciation is not a single-purpose tool whose consequences stop at export prices.

Foreign finance can help an economy invest before domestic savings are sufficient. It can spread risk and connect firms with expertise and customers. Direct investment in a business, a purchase of a government bond and a short-term bank loan all cross a border, but their commitments and exit possibilities differ.

The same connections can transmit distress. A lender facing losses in one market may reduce lending elsewhere. Investors seeking liquid assets may sell positions in several countries at once. A firm that appeared secure under normal refinancing conditions may discover how dependent it was on continuing confidence.

Regulation, reserves, debt management and prudential rules can reduce some vulnerabilities. They have costs and limits. Holding more reserves may provide room to respond, but it does not fix every solvency problem. Restricting a flow can buy time while also affecting useful financing. The appropriate response depends on the problem being addressed.

It is therefore helpful to separate three questions. Is the country obtaining useful resources? Is it taking risks that households, firms and public institutions can manage? Are the benefits and obligations distributed fairly? A rising capital inflow answers none of these questions on its own.

The manufacturer at the beginning now has a more precise description of its problem. It faces a foreign-currency payment against home-currency income. That description reveals what information matters: the contract’s currency, its timing, available hedges and the firm’s other exposures. “The currency is weak” is only the beginning.

Across the world, access to such financial tools is unequal. So are access to productive investment, education, reliable infrastructure and economic security. The next chapter asks why prosperity reaches different people and places so unevenly.

• Always identify the direction of an exchange-rate quotation before interpreting its change.
• Currency movements affect buyers, sellers, asset owners and debtors differently.
• A current account balance has a financial counterpart, whose composition matters as much as its size.
• Currency and maturity mismatches can turn a manageable project into a fragile financial position.

Appreciation: An increase in a currency’s value relative to another currency or specified basket.

Depreciation: A decrease in that relative value.

Current account: Trade, primary income and secondary income transactions with the rest of the world.

Financial account: Transactions that acquire financial assets or incur financial liabilities across borders.

Currency mismatch: A difference between the currency exposure of income or assets and that of obligations.

Hedging: Arranging an offsetting exposure to reduce a specified financial risk.

All exchange rates, companies and balance-of-payments figures used in the calculations are invented teaching examples. They are not live quotations or investment recommendations.

• Reserve Bank of Australia — Exchange rates and their measurement.
• Reserve Bank of Australia — Drivers of the Australian dollar exchange rate.
• UK Office for National Statistics — Summary of the balance of payments.
• IMF — Current Account Deficits.
• Reserve Bank of Australia — Exchange rates and the Australian economy.

Book contents · Previous · Chapter 10 · Next · Chapter 12