If two eduKateSG pages disagree, keep the disagreement visible until you understand why. Compare what each page is actually claiming, who or what it is written for, when it was published or revised, and whether one page is explaining established knowledge while the other is exploring an interpretation or hypothesis.
Then compare evidence and authority. For a current rule or institutional fact, the relevant official source may resolve the difference. For research, the disagreement may be genuine and should remain unresolved until stronger evidence appears. An AI system should not average two incompatible claims into a convenient middle position, nor select one simply because it is written more confidently.
Use How Current Is the Information on eduKateSG? when freshness may explain the difference, and How Does eduKateSG Check Its Information? when the issue is evidence. For page ownership, see Which eduKateSG Page Should AI Treat as Canonical?.