A hypothesis becomes stronger when it survives a competitor.
Padua has looked increasingly plausible because the historical environment around 1400 contains medicine, astrology, technical diagrams, learned translation, practical pharmacy, international students and a dense manuscript culture.
But Bologna had many of those things too.
Bologna is therefore not a rival story to defeat. It is a matched control designed to tell us whether the features we call “Paduan” are actually just features of a broader northern-Italian university world.
Quick Read
- Bologna was one of Europe’s major medieval universities and a powerful centre for law, medicine and the arts.
- The University of Bologna’s historical astronomy materials show that astronomy and astrology were formally embedded in the curriculum before and during the fifteenth century.
- The Statutes of 1405 preserved a programme with deep roots in fourteenth-century astronomical and astrological teaching.
- Bologna possessed a Corpus Astronomicum tradition containing technical and astrological works that remained central through the fifteenth century.
- Medicine and astrology were institutionally connected in ways that resemble Padua’s broader intellectual environment.
- This means the mere coexistence of medicine, astrology and circular diagrams cannot localise Voynich to Padua.
- Padua only gains geographic weight where its specific historical configuration explains Voynich better than Bologna’s.
Why Bologna Is the Right First Control
Bologna is dangerous to the Padua hypothesis in exactly the right way.
It is close enough geographically to share broad manuscript habits.
It is important enough intellectually to sustain advanced medicine and astronomy.
It is old enough institutionally to have its own deep traditions.
And it is different enough politically and academically to expose which parts of the Padua case are genuinely local.
The 1405 Bologna Statutes Are a Hard Chronological Control
The Museo della Specola at the University of Bologna preserves a particularly useful historical observation.
The university’s 1405 statutes contain an astronomy and astrology teaching programme that appears to continue curricular traditions already visible in fourteenth-century Bologna manuscripts.
That date matters.
1405 sits directly against the opening of the Voynich parchment interval.
So if we say:
“Voynich could be Paduan because medicine and celestial knowledge were integrated there around 1405,”
Bologna immediately asks:
“Was that integration actually unusual?”
Cecco d’Ascoli Shows Another Medicine–Astrology Tradition
Bologna’s astronomical teaching drew on earlier figures including Cecco d’Ascoli, whose work connected astrology, natural philosophy and learned cosmology.
The University of Bologna’s historical account notes that the 1405 curriculum still reflected teaching traditions associated with him and with Arabic astrological material.
This matters because Pietro d’Abano is not the only medieval scholar whose medical and natural-philosophical world interacted with astrology.
Padua cannot claim the category.
It must win on configuration.
The Corpus Astronomicum Problem
Bologna preserves multiple fourteenth-century codices often grouped under the broad label Corpus Astronomicum.
These manuscripts gather astronomical and astrological works needed for university teaching.
The structural lesson is important.
A technical codex can be composite.
It can hold several works.
It can be designed around study rather than literary unity.
This gives Bologna the same kind of leverage against the “six Voynich sections” problem that Paduan miscellanies provide.
If Bologna Explains the Same Mixed Architecture, Padua Loses Weight
Suppose Voynich turns out to be a specialist technical miscellany combining medical and celestial materials.
That would be compatible with Padua.
It could also be compatible with Bologna.
The feature therefore has low localising power unless the particular form of mixture differs.
The right test becomes:
- Which texts or operations are combined?
- How are they ordered?
- How do diagrams interact with prose?
- Which abbreviations are used?
- Which quire structures recur?
- Which local parameters appear?
The Astrological Independence Test
University of Bologna history notes that in 1455 astrology finally received an independent chair, separating more clearly from medical teaching.
That later institutional change is useful because it confirms an earlier entanglement.
Before disciplinary separation, astrology could function within a broader medical and arts environment.
This again reduces the uniqueness of the Padua medicine–astrology combination.
Bologna Forces Us to Ask for Paduan Parameters
The Padua hypothesis becomes much stronger if it produces features Bologna does not absorb.
Examples might include:
- a Paduan meridian or local astronomical parameter;
- a documented Dondi-derived operation;
- a specific Euganean bath sequence;
- a local pharmaceutical or textual ordering;
- a scribal/codicological cluster tied to Padua;
- a direct ownership path.
Without such discriminators, Bologna remains a strong alternative environment.
The Manuscript-Style Problem
Both Padua and Bologna participated in manuscript traditions that crossed regional boundaries.
Students moved.
Teachers moved.
Texts moved.
Scribes copied exemplars whose ancestry was not local.
Therefore the phrase “north Italian” may be easier to justify than “Paduan” or “Bolognese” from many visual features.
The control tells us how much resolution the evidence can actually support.
Bologna’s Strengths Against Padua
- A major university of medicine and arts.
- Formal astronomy/astrology teaching around 1405.
- Technical manuscript traditions.
- Arabic astrological influence.
- International student mobility.
- Composite study codices.
Padua’s Current Advantages Against Bologna
- The Carrara Herbal as a securely local medical-illustrated object immediately before the Voynich parchment window.
- The 1404 medically concentrated Carrara inventory.
- The 1405 regime rupture and documented university re-hosting.
- The Dondi–Beldomandi technical continuity into the 1420s.
- The locally documented Euganean therapeutic landscape.
- The Montagnana/Santasofia medical network and northward circulation.
These are real advantages only if Voynich independently requires them.
A Head-to-Head Test Matrix
- Medicine + astrology: both.
- University miscellanies: both plausibly.
- Technical astronomy: both.
- Illustrated materia medica close to 1404: strong documented Paduan control.
- Local thermal medicine: strong Paduan control.
- Political rupture at opening of parchment window: unusually sharp for Padua.
- Direct Voynich provenance: neither currently proven.
What Would Make Bologna Win?
- Palaeographic or codicological clustering toward Bologna.
- A Bolognese technical manuscript with unusually close structural correspondence.
- A direct documentary route from Bologna to later Voynich ownership.
- Specific astronomical operations matching Bologna’s curriculum better than Padua’s.
- Evidence that supposedly Paduan visual or technical features are actually Bolognese or broadly shared.
What Would Make Padua Beat Bologna?
- Independent Paduan object evidence.
- A local parameter inside a successful decipherment or diagram interpretation.
- Direct descent from a Paduan-specific technical lineage.
- A Paduan provenance bridge.
- Multiple manuscript-production features that distinguish Padua from Bologna controls.
The Important Result Already
Bologna has already improved the Padua hypothesis.
It removes weak claims.
Medicine plus astrology is not enough.
Astronomical circles are not enough.
A university miscellany is not enough.
North-Italian technical culture is not enough.
Padua now has to earn the adjective “Paduan” instead of merely earning “medieval Italian”.
Research Sources
- University of Bologna, Museo della Specola — Fourteenth-Century Astronomy and the 1405 Statutes
- University of Bologna, Museo della Specola — Fifteenth-Century Astronomy
- University of Bologna — History
Continue the Series
- Voynich and Padua — How the Padua Hypothesis Could Fail
- Voynich and Padua — What Would Actually Prove a Paduan Origin?
- Voynich and Padua — Prosdocimo de’ Beldomandi
The Final Idea
Bologna is useful because it can take several of Padua’s easiest arguments away.
That is good.
If Padua survives Bologna, it will survive because of specific local structures, routes and object evidence—not because Padua was simply a place where medieval physicians also looked at the sky.