If you are searching for how to translate fabric composition labels, how to translate textile fibre percentages, or how to translate cotton, polyester, wool, nylon, elastane, viscose and blended-fabric labels across languages, the key rule is that fibre name and percentage form one factual claim. “80% cotton, 20% polyester” cannot be translated as a general description of a cotton blend while losing which percentage belongs to which fibre.
Textile-composition translation matters in clothing labels, e-commerce listings, footwear, upholstery, bedding, uniforms, sportswear, technical textiles and product packaging. A target label can look polished yet still be wrong if shell and lining compositions are merged, elastane is confused with elastic as a general property, viscose is replaced with an unrelated fibre term, or several percentages are accidentally reassigned during reordering.
This guide explains how to translate textile fibre composition and fabric-content labels without changing the material identity. It covers single-fibre products, blends, shell and lining, filling, coatings, trims, recycled-content wording, natural and manufactured fibres, fibre percentages, regional naming variants and how to verify the final label against the supplier specification and product construction.
Why textile composition is structured product data
A fibre-content label is not simply descriptive copy. It usually contains structured facts: component, fibre, proportion and sometimes recycled or origin-related qualifiers. Those relationships should survive translation exactly.
Different markets may prefer different established names for the same fibre. For example, a source may use a regional or industry naming convention while the target market uses another recognized term. Translation should preserve fibre identity rather than choose a superficially similar everyday word.
Garments and textile products also contain layers. A jacket can have one composition for the outer shell, another for the lining and another for padding. Adding percentages across the whole product may therefore be meaningless if the source reports each component separately.
The safest workflow is to lock percentages and component boundaries first, choose verified fibre terminology second, and format the target label only after every material relationship is confirmed.
A reliable translation method
1. Separate product components
Mark shell, lining, filling, padding, coating, trim, upper, backing and other material sections before translating fibre names. Do not merge them for brevity.
2. Lock each percentage to its fibre
Treat “80% cotton” as one inseparable data pair during drafting and review. Reordering target syntax must not break the pairing.
3. Use established fibre terminology
Prefer recognized target-language names for cotton, wool, polyester, polyamide/nylon, elastane and other fibres. Verify regional variants rather than translating by appearance.
4. Distinguish fibre from fabric construction
Denim, jersey, fleece, satin and canvas can describe fabric structures or product types, not necessarily fibre content. Do not substitute them for cotton, polyester or other fibre names.
5. Preserve qualifiers
Recycled, organic, regenerated, coated and other qualifiers should remain attached to the correct fibre or component when the source specifies them.
6. Keep percentages within their own block
A shell may total 100% and a lining may separately total 100%. Do not add or average across components.
7. Treat marketing names cautiously
Brand fibre names and trademarked material names may coexist with generic fibre composition. Preserve brand identity while translating generic material descriptions separately.
8. Verify against supplier or manufacturing data
Compare the final target label with the bill of materials, approved packaging copy or supplier composition sheet before release.
undefined
1. 100% cotton
This problem appears when a product contains a single declared fibre. A source statement such as 100% cotton combines fibre identity, proportion, product layer or material category. The translator must preserve both what the material is and how much of it is present, because changing either can alter consumer expectations, care requirements or product description.
Use the established target-language name for cotton and keep 100% exactly. Use the established target-language fibre name for the same material and keep the percentage attached to the correct fibre. Do not replace a technical fibre category with a marketing synonym unless the source itself does so. If the product has shell, lining, filling, trim or multiple fabric panels, preserve each composition block separately.
For quality assurance, confirm no separate lining or trim block is being overlooked. Then add the percentages within each composition block where appropriate and compare the target label with the physical product specification. The translated label should describe the same fibres, in the same proportions and in the same garment or textile component as the source.
2. Cotton-polyester blend
This problem appears when two fibres share the same fabric. A source statement such as 80% cotton, 20% polyester combines fibre identity, proportion, product layer or material category. The translator must preserve both what the material is and how much of it is present, because changing either can alter consumer expectations, care requirements or product description.
Keep each percentage paired with its fibre even if target-language order changes. Use the established target-language fibre name for the same material and keep the percentage attached to the correct fibre. Do not replace a technical fibre category with a marketing synonym unless the source itself does so. If the product has shell, lining, filling, trim or multiple fabric panels, preserve each composition block separately.
For quality assurance, confirm the pair totals 100% for that fabric block. Then add the percentages within each composition block where appropriate and compare the target label with the physical product specification. The translated label should describe the same fibres, in the same proportions and in the same garment or textile component as the source.
3. Elastane in stretch fabric
This problem appears when a small proportion provides stretch. A source statement such as 95% cotton, 5% elastane combines fibre identity, proportion, product layer or material category. The translator must preserve both what the material is and how much of it is present, because changing either can alter consumer expectations, care requirements or product description.
Use the established fibre name, not a generic translation of ‘elastic’. Use the established target-language fibre name for the same material and keep the percentage attached to the correct fibre. Do not replace a technical fibre category with a marketing synonym unless the source itself does so. If the product has shell, lining, filling, trim or multiple fabric panels, preserve each composition block separately.
For quality assurance, check that 5% remains attached to elastane. Then add the percentages within each composition block where appropriate and compare the target label with the physical product specification. The translated label should describe the same fibres, in the same proportions and in the same garment or textile component as the source.
4. Nylon / polyamide naming
This problem appears when source and target markets may use different common terminology. A source statement such as 100% nylon combines fibre identity, proportion, product layer or material category. The translator must preserve both what the material is and how much of it is present, because changing either can alter consumer expectations, care requirements or product description.
Use the recognized equivalent appropriate to the target market without changing fibre identity. Use the established target-language fibre name for the same material and keep the percentage attached to the correct fibre. Do not replace a technical fibre category with a marketing synonym unless the source itself does so. If the product has shell, lining, filling, trim or multiple fabric panels, preserve each composition block separately.
For quality assurance, check official product terminology or supplier data. Then add the percentages within each composition block where appropriate and compare the target label with the physical product specification. The translated label should describe the same fibres, in the same proportions and in the same garment or textile component as the source.
5. Viscose
This problem appears when manufactured cellulose fibre terminology varies across languages and markets. A source statement such as 70% viscose combines fibre identity, proportion, product layer or material category. The translator must preserve both what the material is and how much of it is present, because changing either can alter consumer expectations, care requirements or product description.
Use the accepted target fibre name rather than replacing it with a vague ‘rayon-like’ description. Use the established target-language fibre name for the same material and keep the percentage attached to the correct fibre. Do not replace a technical fibre category with a marketing synonym unless the source itself does so. If the product has shell, lining, filling, trim or multiple fabric panels, preserve each composition block separately.
For quality assurance, confirm the supplier’s generic fibre designation. Then add the percentages within each composition block where appropriate and compare the target label with the physical product specification. The translated label should describe the same fibres, in the same proportions and in the same garment or textile component as the source.
6. Rayon terminology
This problem appears when source uses rayon as the declared fibre name. A source statement such as 100% rayon combines fibre identity, proportion, product layer or material category. The translator must preserve both what the material is and how much of it is present, because changing either can alter consumer expectations, care requirements or product description.
Map to the recognized target-market equivalent only when the material identity is verified. Use the established target-language fibre name for the same material and keep the percentage attached to the correct fibre. Do not replace a technical fibre category with a marketing synonym unless the source itself does so. If the product has shell, lining, filling, trim or multiple fabric panels, preserve each composition block separately.
For quality assurance, avoid assuming every rayon/viscose label is interchangeable without context. Then add the percentages within each composition block where appropriate and compare the target label with the physical product specification. The translated label should describe the same fibres, in the same proportions and in the same garment or textile component as the source.
7. Wool blend
This problem appears when wool appears with synthetic or other animal fibres. A source statement such as 60% wool, 40% polyester combines fibre identity, proportion, product layer or material category. The translator must preserve both what the material is and how much of it is present, because changing either can alter consumer expectations, care requirements or product description.
Preserve wool proportion and the identity of the second fibre. Use the established target-language fibre name for the same material and keep the percentage attached to the correct fibre. Do not replace a technical fibre category with a marketing synonym unless the source itself does so. If the product has shell, lining, filling, trim or multiple fabric panels, preserve each composition block separately.
For quality assurance, do not simplify to ‘wool mix’ if exact percentages are required. Then add the percentages within each composition block where appropriate and compare the target label with the physical product specification. The translated label should describe the same fibres, in the same proportions and in the same garment or textile component as the source.
8. Cashmere
This problem appears when a luxury animal fibre appears in a small proportion. A source statement such as 90% wool, 10% cashmere combines fibre identity, proportion, product layer or material category. The translator must preserve both what the material is and how much of it is present, because changing either can alter consumer expectations, care requirements or product description.
Keep cashmere distinct from generic wool. Use the established target-language fibre name for the same material and keep the percentage attached to the correct fibre. Do not replace a technical fibre category with a marketing synonym unless the source itself does so. If the product has shell, lining, filling, trim or multiple fabric panels, preserve each composition block separately.
For quality assurance, check the percentage and component. Then add the percentages within each composition block where appropriate and compare the target label with the physical product specification. The translated label should describe the same fibres, in the same proportions and in the same garment or textile component as the source.
9. Linen / flax
This problem appears when the fibre and plant name may have different target conventions. A source statement such as 100% linen combines fibre identity, proportion, product layer or material category. The translator must preserve both what the material is and how much of it is present, because changing either can alter consumer expectations, care requirements or product description.
Use the recognized textile fibre term for the target market. Use the established target-language fibre name for the same material and keep the percentage attached to the correct fibre. Do not replace a technical fibre category with a marketing synonym unless the source itself does so. If the product has shell, lining, filling, trim or multiple fabric panels, preserve each composition block separately.
For quality assurance, do not replace with a raw-plant term if the label convention uses linen. Then add the percentages within each composition block where appropriate and compare the target label with the physical product specification. The translated label should describe the same fibres, in the same proportions and in the same garment or textile component as the source.
10. Silk
This problem appears when the source specifies silk fibre content. A source statement such as 100% silk combines fibre identity, proportion, product layer or material category. The translator must preserve both what the material is and how much of it is present, because changing either can alter consumer expectations, care requirements or product description.
Use the established fibre name and keep modifiers such as mulberry only when the source includes them. Use the established target-language fibre name for the same material and keep the percentage attached to the correct fibre. Do not replace a technical fibre category with a marketing synonym unless the source itself does so. If the product has shell, lining, filling, trim or multiple fabric panels, preserve each composition block separately.
For quality assurance, verify no synthetic ‘silky’ marketing adjective is being mistaken for fibre content. Then add the percentages within each composition block where appropriate and compare the target label with the physical product specification. The translated label should describe the same fibres, in the same proportions and in the same garment or textile component as the source.
11. Acrylic
This problem appears when knitwear uses acrylic alone or in blends. A source statement such as 70% acrylic, 30% wool combines fibre identity, proportion, product layer or material category. The translator must preserve both what the material is and how much of it is present, because changing either can alter consumer expectations, care requirements or product description.
Preserve the synthetic fibre name and proportions. Use the established target-language fibre name for the same material and keep the percentage attached to the correct fibre. Do not replace a technical fibre category with a marketing synonym unless the source itself does so. If the product has shell, lining, filling, trim or multiple fabric panels, preserve each composition block separately.
For quality assurance, distinguish acrylic fibre from acrylic coatings or resins. Then add the percentages within each composition block where appropriate and compare the target label with the physical product specification. The translated label should describe the same fibres, in the same proportions and in the same garment or textile component as the source.
12. Polypropylene
This problem appears when technical textiles or nonwovens use polypropylene. A source statement such as 100% polypropylene combines fibre identity, proportion, product layer or material category. The translator must preserve both what the material is and how much of it is present, because changing either can alter consumer expectations, care requirements or product description.
Use the correct polymer fibre term. Use the established target-language fibre name for the same material and keep the percentage attached to the correct fibre. Do not replace a technical fibre category with a marketing synonym unless the source itself does so. If the product has shell, lining, filling, trim or multiple fabric panels, preserve each composition block separately.
For quality assurance, do not shorten to generic plastic. Then add the percentages within each composition block where appropriate and compare the target label with the physical product specification. The translated label should describe the same fibres, in the same proportions and in the same garment or textile component as the source.
13. Lyocell
This problem appears when regenerated cellulose fibres appear under generic or brand-associated names. A source statement such as 50% lyocell combines fibre identity, proportion, product layer or material category. The translator must preserve both what the material is and how much of it is present, because changing either can alter consumer expectations, care requirements or product description.
Preserve the generic fibre identity and keep any separate trademarked brand name as brand text. Use the established target-language fibre name for the same material and keep the percentage attached to the correct fibre. Do not replace a technical fibre category with a marketing synonym unless the source itself does so. If the product has shell, lining, filling, trim or multiple fabric panels, preserve each composition block separately.
For quality assurance, check supplier specification. Then add the percentages within each composition block where appropriate and compare the target label with the physical product specification. The translated label should describe the same fibres, in the same proportions and in the same garment or textile component as the source.
14. Modal
This problem appears when another regenerated cellulose fibre is declared. A source statement such as 60% modal, 40% cotton combines fibre identity, proportion, product layer or material category. The translator must preserve both what the material is and how much of it is present, because changing either can alter consumer expectations, care requirements or product description.
Use the recognized fibre name rather than translating it as an everyday adjective. Use the established target-language fibre name for the same material and keep the percentage attached to the correct fibre. Do not replace a technical fibre category with a marketing synonym unless the source itself does so. If the product has shell, lining, filling, trim or multiple fabric panels, preserve each composition block separately.
For quality assurance, confirm the proportions remain paired. Then add the percentages within each composition block where appropriate and compare the target label with the physical product specification. The translated label should describe the same fibres, in the same proportions and in the same garment or textile component as the source.
15. Recycled polyester
This problem appears when recycled content is attached to a specific fibre. A source statement such as 100% recycled polyester combines fibre identity, proportion, product layer or material category. The translator must preserve both what the material is and how much of it is present, because changing either can alter consumer expectations, care requirements or product description.
Keep recycled as a qualifier of polyester. Use the established target-language fibre name for the same material and keep the percentage attached to the correct fibre. Do not replace a technical fibre category with a marketing synonym unless the source itself does so. If the product has shell, lining, filling, trim or multiple fabric panels, preserve each composition block separately.
For quality assurance, do not move ‘recycled’ to describe the entire product if only one component is qualified. Then add the percentages within each composition block where appropriate and compare the target label with the physical product specification. The translated label should describe the same fibres, in the same proportions and in the same garment or textile component as the source.
16. Organic cotton
This problem appears when the source makes an organic-material claim. A source statement such as 100% organic cotton combines fibre identity, proportion, product layer or material category. The translator must preserve both what the material is and how much of it is present, because changing either can alter consumer expectations, care requirements or product description.
Translate the qualifier faithfully without expanding it into certification claims not present in the source. Use the established target-language fibre name for the same material and keep the percentage attached to the correct fibre. Do not replace a technical fibre category with a marketing synonym unless the source itself does so. If the product has shell, lining, filling, trim or multiple fabric panels, preserve each composition block separately.
For quality assurance, compare approved marketing/compliance copy. Then add the percentages within each composition block where appropriate and compare the target label with the physical product specification. The translated label should describe the same fibres, in the same proportions and in the same garment or textile component as the source.
17. Shell versus lining
This problem appears when different garment layers have independent compositions. A source statement such as Shell: 100% wool; Lining: 100% viscose combines fibre identity, proportion, product layer or material category. The translator must preserve both what the material is and how much of it is present, because changing either can alter consumer expectations, care requirements or product description.
Keep component headings and compositions separate. Use the established target-language fibre name for the same material and keep the percentage attached to the correct fibre. Do not replace a technical fibre category with a marketing synonym unless the source itself does so. If the product has shell, lining, filling, trim or multiple fabric panels, preserve each composition block separately.
For quality assurance, confirm each block totals correctly on its own. Then add the percentages within each composition block where appropriate and compare the target label with the physical product specification. The translated label should describe the same fibres, in the same proportions and in the same garment or textile component as the source.
18. Filling or padding
This problem appears when insulation composition differs from outer fabric. A source statement such as Filling: 100% polyester combines fibre identity, proportion, product layer or material category. The translator must preserve both what the material is and how much of it is present, because changing either can alter consumer expectations, care requirements or product description.
Translate filling/padding as a component label and preserve the fibre. Use the established target-language fibre name for the same material and keep the percentage attached to the correct fibre. Do not replace a technical fibre category with a marketing synonym unless the source itself does so. If the product has shell, lining, filling, trim or multiple fabric panels, preserve each composition block separately.
For quality assurance, do not merge it into shell composition. Then add the percentages within each composition block where appropriate and compare the target label with the physical product specification. The translated label should describe the same fibres, in the same proportions and in the same garment or textile component as the source.
19. Coating
This problem appears when a textile base has a surface coating. A source statement such as polyurethane coated combines fibre identity, proportion, product layer or material category. The translator must preserve both what the material is and how much of it is present, because changing either can alter consumer expectations, care requirements or product description.
Preserve whether polyurethane is a coating rather than a fibre percentage. Use the established target-language fibre name for the same material and keep the percentage attached to the correct fibre. Do not replace a technical fibre category with a marketing synonym unless the source itself does so. If the product has shell, lining, filling, trim or multiple fabric panels, preserve each composition block separately.
For quality assurance, check product construction documentation. Then add the percentages within each composition block where appropriate and compare the target label with the physical product specification. The translated label should describe the same fibres, in the same proportions and in the same garment or textile component as the source.
20. Leather and textile mix
This problem appears when products such as footwear combine fibre-based textiles with non-fibre materials. A source statement such as textile upper with leather trim combines fibre identity, proportion, product layer or material category. The translator must preserve both what the material is and how much of it is present, because changing either can alter consumer expectations, care requirements or product description.
Keep material categories separate and do not force leather into a fibre-percentage structure. Use the established target-language fibre name for the same material and keep the percentage attached to the correct fibre. Do not replace a technical fibre category with a marketing synonym unless the source itself does so. If the product has shell, lining, filling, trim or multiple fabric panels, preserve each composition block separately.
For quality assurance, verify component mapping. Then add the percentages within each composition block where appropriate and compare the target label with the physical product specification. The translated label should describe the same fibres, in the same proportions and in the same garment or textile component as the source.
21. Trims excluded from composition
This problem appears when small components such as elastic, labels or decorative trim may be listed separately or excluded. A source statement such as excluding trims combines fibre identity, proportion, product layer or material category. The translator must preserve both what the material is and how much of it is present, because changing either can alter consumer expectations, care requirements or product description.
Translate the scope qualifier exactly. Use the established target-language fibre name for the same material and keep the percentage attached to the correct fibre. Do not replace a technical fibre category with a marketing synonym unless the source itself does so. If the product has shell, lining, filling, trim or multiple fabric panels, preserve each composition block separately.
For quality assurance, ensure the exclusion is not lost in a shortened target label. Then add the percentages within each composition block where appropriate and compare the target label with the physical product specification. The translated label should describe the same fibres, in the same proportions and in the same garment or textile component as the source.
22. Multiple fabric panels
This problem appears when front, back or sleeves have different compositions. A source statement such as Body 100% cotton; sleeves 95% cotton, 5% elastane combines fibre identity, proportion, product layer or material category. The translator must preserve both what the material is and how much of it is present, because changing either can alter consumer expectations, care requirements or product description.
Keep each panel-specific block separate. Use the established target-language fibre name for the same material and keep the percentage attached to the correct fibre. Do not replace a technical fibre category with a marketing synonym unless the source itself does so. If the product has shell, lining, filling, trim or multiple fabric panels, preserve each composition block separately.
For quality assurance, compare garment construction. Then add the percentages within each composition block where appropriate and compare the target label with the physical product specification. The translated label should describe the same fibres, in the same proportions and in the same garment or textile component as the source.
23. Brand fibre name plus generic fibre
This problem appears when a branded material name appears next to a generic composition. A source statement such as BrandName™ fibre / polyester combines fibre identity, proportion, product layer or material category. The translator must preserve both what the material is and how much of it is present, because changing either can alter consumer expectations, care requirements or product description.
Preserve the brand name unchanged and translate the generic fibre description accurately. Use the established target-language fibre name for the same material and keep the percentage attached to the correct fibre. Do not replace a technical fibre category with a marketing synonym unless the source itself does so. If the product has shell, lining, filling, trim or multiple fabric panels, preserve each composition block separately.
For quality assurance, do not treat the trademark as a generic fibre category. Then add the percentages within each composition block where appropriate and compare the target label with the physical product specification. The translated label should describe the same fibres, in the same proportions and in the same garment or textile component as the source.
24. Unknown or ambiguous fibre term
This problem appears when the source uses a local, obsolete or supplier-specific term. A source statement such as supplier-specific fibre abbreviation combines fibre identity, proportion, product layer or material category. The translator must preserve both what the material is and how much of it is present, because changing either can alter consumer expectations, care requirements or product description.
Research the material before selecting a target fibre name and preserve the source term if equivalence is uncertain. Use the established target-language fibre name for the same material and keep the percentage attached to the correct fibre. Do not replace a technical fibre category with a marketing synonym unless the source itself does so. If the product has shell, lining, filling, trim or multiple fabric panels, preserve each composition block separately.
For quality assurance, seek supplier or technical confirmation rather than guessing. Then add the percentages within each composition block where appropriate and compare the target label with the physical product specification. The translated label should describe the same fibres, in the same proportions and in the same garment or textile component as the source.
Common failure modes
1. Breaking percentage-fibre pairs
Reordering target syntax can accidentally attach 80% to the wrong fibre. Treat each pair as structured data.
2. Merging shell and lining
Each product component can have its own 100% composition. Do not average or combine them.
3. Translating elastane as ‘elastic’
Elastane is a fibre name; elastic is a broader property or product category.
4. Confusing fabric construction with fibre
Denim, jersey and satin do not by themselves tell you the fibre composition.
5. Dropping recycled or organic qualifiers
Qualifiers may be important product claims and should stay attached to the correct fibre.
6. Turning a trademark into a generic fibre
Branded material names should be preserved as brands while the underlying generic composition remains separate.
7. Using a familiar synonym without verifying regional terminology
Textile nomenclature can vary by market. Verify equivalence rather than translating by habit.
8. Forcing every material into percentage format
Coatings, leather components and trims may be described differently from fibre-content declarations.
Worked practice
Practice 1: T-shirt
Situation: 95% cotton, 5% elastane.
Reasoning: Keep each percentage-fibre pair intact and use the accepted target fibre names.
Practice 2: Lined jacket
Situation: Shell: 100% wool. Lining: 100% viscose.
Reasoning: Preserve the two component blocks rather than creating one blended composition.
Practice 3: Sportswear
Situation: 88% recycled polyester, 12% elastane.
Reasoning: Keep recycled attached specifically to polyester unless the source says both fibres are recycled.
Practice 4: Branded fibre
Situation: A trademarked fibre name is followed by a generic composition.
Reasoning: Retain the trademark and separately translate the generic fibre identity.
Practice 5: Footwear
Situation: Textile upper, leather trim, synthetic lining.
Reasoning: Translate component/material categories accurately instead of forcing all items into a textile-fibre percentage list.
Practice 6: Panelled garment
Situation: Body and sleeves have different fibre percentages.
Reasoning: Keep each garment zone and its composition aligned.
Practice 7: Supplier abbreviation
Situation: The source uses an unfamiliar three-letter fibre abbreviation.
Reasoning: Research the supplier specification rather than expanding the abbreviation from guesswork.
Practice 8: Coated fabric
Situation: Polyester textile with polyurethane coating.
Reasoning: Preserve polyester as fibre/base fabric and polyurethane as coating rather than making both appear as fibre percentages.
Supplier specifications, label proofs and AI
Supplier composition sheets, bills of materials, approved care-label proofs and manufacturer specifications are the strongest sources for textile composition. Product marketing copy alone may simplify fibre information.
Percentage totals are useful QA, but only within the correct component block. A shell can total 100% and a lining can also total 100% because they describe different layers.
AI can suggest fibre equivalents and regional terminology, but ambiguous terms should be checked against textile-industry or supplier documentation. Do not allow automated rewriting to merge components or detach percentages from fibres.
How this fits the wider eduKate translation system
Textile-composition translation combines vocabulary precision, percentages, product structure and material identity. The broader method is developed in Master Art of Translation | The Complete System for Moving Meaning Between Languages. Vocabulary depth connects to the Vocabulary Learning Hub, while quantifiers, noun compounds and modifier attachment connect to How English Works.
FAQ
Should fibre percentages be changed in translation?
No. Preserve the source percentages unless an authorized source correction is supplied.
Is elastane the same as elastic?
No. Elastane is a fibre; elastic is a broader property or component description.
Can shell and lining percentages be combined?
No. They describe different product components.
Is denim a fibre?
Not necessarily. Denim describes a fabric construction and can be made from different fibre blends.
How should nylon and polyamide be handled?
Use the recognized equivalent appropriate to the target market while preserving the same fibre identity.
Should recycled stay next to the fibre name?
Yes when the source qualifies a specific fibre as recycled.
How should brand fibre names be translated?
Usually preserve the brand name and translate the generic fibre description separately.
What if a supplier term is unfamiliar?
Research or query the supplier rather than guessing a fibre equivalent.
Can percentages be reordered?
Yes for natural target-language syntax, but each percentage must remain attached to the correct fibre.
What is the simplest rule?
Preserve component, fibre and percentage as one structured relationship.
Final checklist
- Are shell, lining, filling and other components separated correctly?
- Is every percentage attached to the same fibre as in the source?
- Are recognized target-language fibre names used?
- Are fabric constructions kept distinct from fibre names?
- Are recycled, organic and other qualifiers preserved accurately?
- Are trademarks kept separate from generic fibre terminology?
- Do percentages total correctly within each relevant component block?
- Are coatings, trims and non-textile materials classified appropriately?
- Has the final label been compared with supplier/manufacturer data?
- Would the target reader understand the same material composition as the source reader?
Textile-composition translation succeeds when the same product components contain the same fibres in the same declared proportions after translation. Lock percentage-fibre pairs, preserve layer boundaries, use verified material terminology, keep qualifiers and brand names in the right place, and compare the final label against the approved product specification before release.