The 200-word examination instruction list
UCAT instructions tell you whether to use a passage, test a logical conclusion, calculate from data or judge a proposed action. Can’t tell means the text leaves the answer unresolved. In Situational Judgement, check whether the item asks about the appropriateness of an action or the importance of a consideration.
The numbered bank combines question directions, answer-format phrases and terms that help you work with the task. Use the official instructions for the exact item and test cycle.
Exam requirements · Worked examples · Fencing Method
Subtest instructions and response choices
| No. | Instruction or term | What it asks you to do |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Verbal Reasoning | Evaluate the written information and choose the answer supported by the passage. |
| 2 | Decision Making | Use the stated rules, logic and evidence to assess conclusions or solve the problem. |
| 3 | Quantitative Reasoning | Interpret the numerical information and answer the precise quantity asked for. |
| 4 | Situational Judgement | Judge actions or considerations in the context described. |
| 5 | True | Choose this when the passage establishes the statement under the instructions. |
| 6 | False | Choose this when the passage establishes that the statement conflicts with it. |
| 7 | Can’t tell | Choose this when the passage gives insufficient information to decide. |
| 8 | Yes or no conclusion | Evaluate each conclusion separately using only the stated information and directions. |
| 9 | Select the strongest argument | Choose the argument that is most relevant and well supported for the question asked. |
| 10 | Relevant consideration | Judge whether the fact or principle matters to the decision in this scenario. |
| 11 | Rate appropriateness | Judge how well the action fits the circumstances and the role of the person acting. |
| 12 | Rate importance | Judge how much the consideration matters when deciding what to do. |
| 13 | Most appropriate action | Identify the response that best addresses the issue within the stated role. |
| 14 | Least appropriate action | Identify the response that handles the situation least well. |
| 15 | Very appropriate | Use this judgement when the proposed response fits the scenario especially well. |
| 16 | Very inappropriate | Use this judgement when the action seriously conflicts with the scenario’s needs or expectations. |
| 17 | Appropriate but not ideal | Recognise an action that may help while leaving a more important part of the issue unresolved. |
| 18 | Important but not decisive | Recognise a factor that matters without settling the whole decision. |
| 19 | Subtest | Use the instructions, time and response format for the current part of the test. |
| 20 | Instruction screen | Read the directions before the separately timed question portion begins. |
| 21 | Cognitive total | Read the combined score from the three cognitive subtests. |
| 22 | Situational Judgement band | Read the band reported for this subtest separately from the cognitive total. |
| 23 | Venn diagram | Use the set boundaries and overlaps to place or count the specified members. |
| 24 | Overlap | Count the members belonging to both named groups. |
Logic, rates and situational judgement
| No. | Instruction or term | What it asks you to do |
|---|---|---|
| 25 | Neither group | Count the members outside both named sets. |
| 26 | Exactly one group | Count members in one named set while excluding the overlap. |
| 27 | All and only | Apply both directions of the stated condition when the wording establishes equivalence. |
| 28 | Some but not all | Check that at least one case is inside and at least one is outside the group. |
| 29 | Deductive conclusion | Accept a conclusion only when it follows from the stated premises. |
| 30 | Logical puzzle | Translate each rule into a constraint and check the possibilities against every rule. |
| 31 | Ranking constraint | Keep the required order or relative position of the named people or items. |
| 32 | Possibility | Identify a case that satisfies all the given conditions. |
| 33 | Certainty | Identify a conclusion that holds in every permitted case. |
| 34 | Syllogism | Use the stated premises to determine whether the proposed conclusion follows. |
| 35 | Probability tree | Follow the sequence of outcomes and use the relevant branch probabilities. |
| 36 | Expected frequency | Apply the probability to the specified number of trials. |
| 37 | Combined percentage | Use the combined numerator and denominator for the groups named. |
| 38 | Rate per hour | Express the amount as a rate using hours as the time unit. |
| 39 | Difference in percentage points | Subtract one percentage from another in the same scale. |
| 40 | Convert currency | Apply the exchange rate in the correct direction for the starting currency. |
| 41 | Multi-step calculation | Keep intermediate values tied to the quantities they represent. |
| 42 | Read a timetable | Use the correct departure, arrival or elapsed time for the named route. |
| 43 | Unit conversion | Convert values to consistent units before calculating or comparing. |
| 44 | Escalate a concern | Use an appropriate route to raise a concern beyond what your role can resolve. |
| 45 | Immediate concern | Identify an issue whose urgency affects the action in the scenario. |
| 46 | Role boundary | Check what the person described is responsible and authorised to do. |
| 47 | Proportionate response | Match the response to the seriousness and urgency of the issue. |
| 48 | Confidentiality | Treat sensitive information appropriately in the stated situation. |
| 49 | Clarify the facts | Ask for enough information to understand what happened before judging when the scenario permits it. |
| 50 | Respectful challenge | Raise a concern clearly without unnecessary personal criticism. |
| 51 | Acknowledge an error | Recognise the mistake and address its consequences within the stated role. |
Evidence, numerical reasoning and answer checks
| No. | Instruction or term | What it asks you to do |
|---|---|---|
| 52 | Must be true | Choose a statement that holds in every case consistent with the supplied facts. |
| 53 | Necessary assumption | Identify a premise the argument needs to reach its conclusion. |
| 54 | Sufficient assumption | Identify a statement that makes the conclusion follow when added to the premises. |
| 55 | Test a countercase | Find a permitted case where a suggested conclusion would fail. |
| 56 | Equivalent rule | Recognise a restatement that preserves the original condition and consequence. |
| 57 | Rules-based elimination | Discard a possibility as soon as it conflicts with a stated rule. |
| 58 | Converse | Switch the condition and outcome and check whether that new claim is independently supported. |
| 59 | Counterexample | Find a permitted case in which the proposed general conclusion fails. |
| 60 | Unrepresentative sample | Identify how the selected cases may differ from the group about which the author generalises. |
| 61 | Confuses cause and effect | Check whether the argument may have reversed what produces what. |
| 62 | Circular reasoning | Recognise when the reason effectively assumes the conclusion. |
| 63 | Author’s attitude | Infer the writer’s stance from wording, emphasis and qualification. |
| 64 | Quantifier scope | Check exactly which people, cases or claims are covered by all, some or none. |
| 65 | Not all | Recognise that at least one case is outside the claimed group. |
| 66 | Comparison group | Ask which group would provide a fair test of the claimed difference. |
| 67 | Alternative cause | Identify another event that could produce the observed result. |
| 68 | Normative claim | Recognise a claim about what ought to happen. |
| 69 | Descriptive claim | Recognise a claim about what happens or has happened. |
| 70 | Main conclusion | Identify the claim that the rest of the reasoning ultimately supports. |
| 71 | Intermediate conclusion | Identify a claim that receives support and then helps support a further claim. |
| 72 | Flag for review | Mark an item you may wish to revisit within the current subtest. |
| 73 | On-screen calculator | Use the supplied calculator where the section permits it. |
| 74 | Rate per period | Express the change or amount per common unit of time. |
| 75 | Rounding tolerance | Keep enough precision to distinguish close choices before rounding. |
| 76 | Percent of a percent | Convert to proportions and multiply when the second percent is applied to the first. |
| 77 | Unweighted mean | Average the listed values equally when the question calls for equal weighting. |
| 78 | Combined rate | Divide the sum of the outcomes by the combined exposure, time or relevant total. |
| 79 | Best illustrates | Choose the example or quotation that most directly shows the idea. |
| 80 | One possible value | Supply a single value that satisfies the given conditions. |
| 81 | Equation | Use or form a statement that two expressions have equal value. |
| 82 | Unit rate | Calculate the amount corresponding to one unit of the other quantity. |
| 83 | Percent increase | Divide the increase by the starting value and convert to a percent. |
| 84 | Percentage point | Find the simple difference between two percentage values. |
| 85 | Initial value | Find the starting quantity, often the output at input zero. |
| 86 | Random sample | Check how cases are selected before drawing conclusions about a population. |
| 87 | Sample size | Check how many observations or individuals contribute to the result. |
| 88 | Scope | Check the population, time frame or range covered by the claim. |
| 89 | Calculate the percentage change | Divide the change by the starting value and multiply by 100. |
| 90 | To scale | Use the stated relationship between drawing distances and actual distances. |
| 91 | Not to scale | Use the stated measurements and relationships when calculating. |
| 92 | Exact value | Leave the answer in a form that preserves its full value. |
| 93 | Rearrange | Change the equation to make the required quantity the subject. |
| 94 | Solve | Find the values that satisfy the equation or inequality. |
| 95 | Result | Record the reading or outcome that the question asks for. |
| 96 | Find the exact value | Retain radicals, fractions, logarithms or π in exact form where appropriate. |
| 97 | Compare before rounding | Keep enough precision to avoid treating distinct values as equal. |
| 98 | Feasible range | Keep values within the limits imposed by all constraints. |
| 99 | Set up an equation | Translate the given conditions into a mathematical relationship. |
| 100 | Solve for the unknown | Isolate the quantity the stem asks for and verify the result. |
| 101 | Resulting balance | Calculate the value after all stated additions and deductions. |
| 102 | Expected value | Find the probability-weighted mean under the stated model. |
| 103 | Interpret the result in context | Name the relevant population, quantity or effect when explaining your conclusion. |
| 104 | Read the graph’s units | Check the unit and interval before estimating a value. |
| 105 | Compare and contrast | Address similarities and differences for the named items. |
| 106 | Raw data | Use the measurements as originally collected. |
| 107 | Processed data | Use values calculated, combined or transformed from the original readings. |
| 108 | Percentage uncertainty | Express the uncertainty relative to the measured value as a percentage. |
| 109 | Anomalous result | Recognise a result inconsistent with the main pattern or expected relationship. |
| 110 | Limitations | Identify specific boundaries on the conclusions that the method can support. |
| 111 | Single answer choice | Select the number of choices directed by the item. |
| 112 | Round | Adjust a number to the requested precision using the next digit. |
| 113 | Solution set | Identify the full set of values that satisfy the stated relationship. |
| 114 | Expression | Work with the requested combination of numbers, variables and operations. |
| 115 | Inequality | Use or form the required greater-than or less-than relationship. |
| 116 | Constant term | Identify the part of the expression with no variable factor. |
| 117 | Coefficient | Identify the numerical multiplier of the specified variable term. |
| 118 | Maximum | Find the highest possible value within the conditions. |
| 119 | Minimum | Find the lowest possible value within the conditions. |
| 120 | Infinitely many solutions | Recognise when the conditions hold for an unbounded number of possible values. |
| 121 | One solution | Identify the unique value or pair satisfying the conditions. |
| 122 | Probability | Find the likelihood of the event under the given conditions. |
| 123 | Check the comparison basis | Make sure the quantities or conclusions use the same starting conditions. |
| 124 | Predict the outcome | State the expected result in the conditions described. |
| 125 | Check each conclusion | Decide separately whether each proposed result follows from the facts. |
| 126 | Read the display | Identify the chart, row or category that supplies the required number. |
| 127 | Compare two entries | Use the stated groups and the same units for both entries. |
| 128 | Named quantity | Use the value or rate named in the last line rather than a nearby total. |
| 129 | Required outcome | Find the requested result in the output column or comparison. |
| 130 | Read the key | Match the labels or symbols to the relevant series before using a value. |
| 131 | Open the calculator | Use the available on-screen tool when it helps and return to the item to record the result. |
| 132 | Check the role | Use the responsibilities of the person named in the scenario. |
| 133 | Support the claim | Give evidence that bears on the exact claim in the question. |
| 134 | Explain the result | Connect the observation to a biological, historical or other applicable reason. |
| 135 | Experimental design | Use the stated groups, conditions and measurements to judge the experiment. |
| 136 | Variable | Identify a quantity or feature that can change. |
| 137 | Independent variable | Identify the factor changed or selected as the input. |
Core instructions and constraints
| No. | Instruction or term | What it asks you to do |
|---|---|---|
| 138 | Recognise | Find a familiar feature in a new example. |
| 139 | Identify | Name or pick out the item the question specifies. |
| 140 | Select | Choose only the number of options requested. |
| 141 | Match | Pair each item with the option that corresponds to it. |
| 142 | Complete | Fill in what is missing while keeping the supplied structure. |
| 143 | Label | Attach the correct name to the indicated part. |
| 144 | Locate | Find the specified detail, point or region. |
| 145 | Indicate | Make the chosen feature or answer clear. |
| 146 | Record | Write the result in the space and form provided. |
| 147 | Answer | Respond directly to the question being asked. |
| 148 | Give | Supply the requested fact, example or result. |
| 149 | State | Express the required point directly and clearly. |
| 150 | Name | Supply the correct term, person or item. |
| 151 | List | Set out the requested items separately. |
| 152 | Define | Give the precise meaning used in the subject or question. |
| 153 | Describe | Report the relevant characteristics, events or pattern. |
| 154 | Outline | Give the main steps or points in brief. |
| 155 | Summarise | Select the central points and leave out minor details. |
| 156 | Explain | Connect the result to its cause, mechanism or reasoning. |
| 157 | Compare | Set the items side by side on the same relevant feature. |
| 158 | Contrast | Show how the items differ on a shared point of comparison. |
| 159 | Analyse | Break down the evidence and explain how its parts relate. |
| 160 | Interpret | Say what a statement, result or display means in context. |
| 161 | Infer | Use clues to reach a conclusion the material implies. |
| 162 | Predict | Use available evidence to say what is likely to happen. |
| 163 | Suggest | Offer a plausible answer suited to the information given. |
| 164 | Justify | Give evidence for the claim and explain how that evidence supports, qualifies or defends it. |
| 165 | Evaluate | Weigh relevant evidence or criteria before reaching a judgment. |
| 166 | Assess | Judge the extent, value or strength of something using evidence. |
| 167 | Discuss | Develop a structured response that considers the relevant issues. |
| 168 | Distinguish | Give the feature that lets the reader tell two things apart. |
| 169 | Support | Supply evidence that helps establish the claim. |
| 170 | Illustrate | Make an idea clear with a relevant example or diagram. |
| 171 | Demonstrate | Show how a fact, process or result can be established. |
| 172 | Determine | Work from the given information to establish an answer. |
| 173 | Calculate | Use numbers or other given information to work out a result. |
| 174 | Estimate | Find an approximate answer using the available clues. |
| 175 | Check | Test the answer against the original instruction or condition. |
| 176 | Arrange | Put items into the order or grouping requested. |
| 177 | Sequence | Put stages into a meaningful order. |
| 178 | Classify | Assign each item to a category using the stated rule. |
| 179 | Group | Put items with a shared feature together. |
| 180 | Order | Sort items by the criterion given in the prompt. |
| 181 | Omit | Leave out the indicated item or detail. |
| 182 | Include | Make sure the requested part appears in the response. |
| 183 | Exclude | Keep the named item or category outside your answer. |
| 184 | Refer to | Use the specified passage, figure or notes when responding. |
| 185 | Based on | Ground the answer in the material named in the question. |
| 186 | According to | Use what the specified source says. |
| 187 | In context | Use the meaning that fits this passage or situation. |
| 188 | Most likely | Choose the conclusion with the strongest support among the options. |
| 189 | Best supported | Prefer the conclusion backed most directly by the evidence. |
| 190 | Explicit | Stated directly in the source. |
| 191 | Implicit | Suggested by the source and recoverable from clues. |
| 192 | Evidence | A fact, detail or observation that supports a claim. |
| 193 | Claim | An assertion that can be tested against evidence or reasoning. |
| 194 | Example | A particular case used to make a general idea clear. |
| 195 | Conclusion | The result reached after considering the reasoning or evidence. |
| 196 | Assumption | A premise taken as given for the purpose of the question. |
| 197 | Condition | A requirement that must be satisfied. |
| 198 | Constraint | A restriction that shapes the possible answers. |
| 199 | Criterion | A standard used to choose or judge an answer. |
| 200 | Context | The surrounding information that helps determine meaning. |
Find the section you need
Exam requirements · Worked examples · Fencing Method · Practice and answers · Frequently asked questions · Official sources
What the examination requires
Four subtests in the UK UCAT 2026 format
The UCAT Consortium lists Verbal Reasoning, Decision Making, Quantitative Reasoning and Situational Judgement. Standard question times are 22, 37, 26 and 26 minutes respectively. Instruction screens have separate allowances, bringing the standard total to 117 minutes and 30 seconds.
Read the response rule for the current item
Verbal Reasoning asks you to work with a passage. In True, False or Can’t tell items, distinguish a contradiction from information the passage does not establish. Decision Making can require separate judgements on several proposed conclusions. Read the instructions before applying the same answer rule to every item.
Check the units and the decision criterion
Quantitative Reasoning uses numerical information, so check the relevant group, units and time period. Situational Judgement asks about the action or consideration described in the scenario. Work with the role, circumstances and urgency given. This is a guide to reading test prompts and examples.
Check your cycle and the score a university uses
The three cognitive subtests receive scores on 300–900 scales. Situational Judgement is reported separately in Bands 1–4. The Consortium marks its tutorials as specific to the 2026 cycle and subject to change for 2027. Use the current UK UCAT materials and check the admissions requirements of the universities receiving your results.
- Read the whole instruction before choosing your first step.
- Identify the evidence, person, group or source named in the task.
- Check the response form and any stated limits.
Worked examples of common examination instructions
These original practice examples show how a change in wording changes the response.
Choose Can’t tell when evidence is missing
An invented passage says that four students volunteered at an event on Saturday. The statement says that at least one also volunteered on Sunday. If the passage gives no Sunday information, choose Can’t tell. If the passage instead says none of the Saturday group returned on Sunday, the statement is False.
Test a conclusion without reversing a rule
Suppose all mentors complete orientation. Lee completed orientation. Does it follow that Lee is a mentor? No. The premise gives a condition all mentors meet, but allows other people to complete orientation too. Check for a permitted example in which the proposed conclusion fails.
Count a shared group once
A club has 16 members who play chess and 12 who play badminton. Five play both. The number who play at least one is 16 + 12 − 5 = 23. The number who play exactly one is 18. Identify whether the question includes or excludes the overlap.
Convert to the right comparison
A practice schedule lists 48 appointments in four hours and 65 appointments in five hours. Those rates are 12 and 13 appointments per hour. Compare the rates only after putting both values on the same time basis. If the prompt asks for the difference in totals, use 17 appointments instead.
Distinguish an action from a consideration
An invented workplace scenario describes two colleagues disagreeing over who should record a message. An action might be to clarify responsibility with the person overseeing the task. A consideration might be whether the delay affects someone waiting for a response. Check which of these two jobs the question is asking you to judge.
Use the Fencing Method to practise instructions
Start with a short sentence you can check. Add one precise detail, then the relationship or action the task calls for. Use the same instruction with fresh material. In a selected-response test, the sentence is a practice check for deciding which option fits.
- The passage does not settle it.
- The passage names Saturday volunteers but does not mention Sunday.
- Because the passage gives no Sunday information, it does not establish whether any of Saturday’s volunteers returned.
- Use a new passage and write one sentence identifying what extra evidence would turn Can’t tell into True or False.
Read the eduKate Fencing Method for Vocabulary.
Practise and check your answers
Use the question’s rule before testing a choice
Write the constraint from the stem as a short sentence. In Decision Making, see whether an apparently reasonable conclusion still holds in every permitted case. For numerical work, check whether the question asks for a total, rate or difference before calculating.
Review actions and considerations separately
After an official Situational Judgement set, check whether each item asked what someone should do or what mattered in the decision. Identify the role, urgency and information supplied. Use the provider’s explanations to understand how those details affect the judgment.
Practice 1. All applicants in Group A submitted a form. A person submitted a form. Must the person belong to Group A?
No. The rule does not establish that everyone who submits a form is in Group A.
Practice 2. A table gives 20 and 25 as percentages. What is the difference in percentage points?
Five percentage points. A relative percentage change would require a separate calculation against the starting value.
Practice 3. Two actions are plausible but the item asks about one named action. What should you assess?
Judge the named action in the stated role and circumstances.
Practice 4. What should you check before practising a timed set?
Check the subtest, cycle and time allowance. Use the Consortium’s current instructions and practice materials.
Frequently asked questions
Does the 2026 UK UCAT include Abstract Reasoning?
The 2026 structure lists three cognitive subtests and Situational Judgement.
Is Can’t tell the same as False?
No. A false statement conflicts with the passage. Can’t tell applies when the passage does not settle the statement.
Does this guide describe UCAT ANZ?
The format and timings here come from the UK UCAT Consortium. Check the separate provider materials for your own test.
Official sources and next reading
- UK UCAT format and scoring
- UCAT standard and approved timing formats
- UCAT official 2026 question tutorials
- UCAT calculator, flag and review tools
Related guide in this series · LSAT examination instructions
Read eduKateSG’s 200-word vocabulary guide for more ways to group and practise vocabulary.
