URA awarded the River Valley Green (Parcel C) residential land site beside Great World MRT on 23 June 2026 to SMCL Haven 3 and CSC Land Group (Singapore) for S$750,569,199. The 99-year leasehold parcel measures 11,516.0 square metres and permits a maximum gross floor area of 40,306 square metres. URA’s 9 April 2026 sales launch estimated the parcel could yield about 470 private residential homes. The official land rate is S$18,621.77 per square metre of allowable GFA. This is an awarded private development site, not a new HDB Build-To-Order exercise or an authorised condominium unit-price schedule.
The parcel sits in River Valley’s established city-centre residential area near Great World MRT on the Thomson–East Coast Line, Great World shopping and riverside public spaces. Its history has an important twist: Parcel C appeared on URA’s Reserve List in December 2024 before being moved into the first-half 2026 Confirmed List and sold through a scheduled tender. Earlier River Valley Green parcels A and B also exist, so readers must check the correct site and developer before comparing any private project. This guide explains the award, the transition from reserve to confirmed supply, how to evaluate the neighbourhood and the limits of future 2027/2028 pricing and completion forecasts.
- URA award date: 23 June 2026 for River Valley Green (Parcel C)
- Successful group: SMCL Haven 3 Pte. Ltd. and CSC Land Group (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.
- Winning private land bid: S$750,569,199; land rate S$18,621.77 per sqm of allowable GFA
- Land area: 11,516.0 square metres; maximum permissible GFA: 40,306 square metres
- Potential 470 private homes under URA’s 9 April 2026 launch estimate
- Residential zoning and 99-year lease; final approved number, floor plans and consumer prices not yet specified by the award
- Tender launched 9 April 2026, closed 18 June 2026, awarded 23 June 2026
- Parcel C first appeared on the Reserve List in December 2024, later became a Confirmed List tender in April 2026
- Earlier River Valley Green parcels A/B must be tracked separately from Parcel C
- Existing Great World MRT on Thomson–East Coast Line is next to the parcel according to URA
- Great World shopping, Singapore River promenades and Kim Seng/Park routes are local context, not a condo’s private facilities
- Future unit-facing river or skyline views cannot be guaranteed from the land award
- Private property financing, stamp duty and strata-management charges differ from HDB BTO finance and EHG
- An awarded land site is not a retail condominium opening or a guarantee of keys in 2027 or 2028
- Verified 6 November 2026; use any later authorised developer launch and URA updates for new facts
Fact check as of 6 November 2026: this is a private residential land award, not an individual property sale or an HDB BTO exercise. Prices, units and handover require later authorised documentation.
Guide chapters: the Parcel C award and practical buyer decisions
- 1. What was awarded at River Valley Green Parcel C?
- 2. The site progressed from Reserve List to Confirmed List
- 3. How the April–June 2026 tender unfolded
- 4. The 11,516-square-metre site and its development envelope
- 5. What 470 potential homes means for housing supply
- 6. Why S$750.57 million is a developer price, not your unit price
- 7. Parcel C is not Parcel A or Parcel B
- 8. Great World MRT: established service on the TEL
- 9. Great World shopping and the difference between nearby and included
- 10. The Singapore River and Kim Seng public realm
- 11. City living is not the same for every household
- 12. Public park plans versus operating facilities
- 13. Private ownership and HDB public flat comparisons
- 14. The financing decision before the developer’s price list
- 15. The school and childcare timeline
- 16. Why land award does not fix a 2028 moving date
- 17. How a river-area home differs from a park-side home
- 18. The 2024 Reserve List status explains older headlines
- 19. A precise Parcel C research tracker
- 20. Conclusion: a real June award and an important central housing opportunity
- Buyer and family scenarios
- Frequently asked questions
- Official sources and related articles
1. What was awarded at River Valley Green Parcel C?
The core news is a government land award with a named successful development group, a fixed tender price and a particular site. URA announced the decision on 23 June 2026, five days after the public tender closed. SMCL Haven 3 and CSC Land Group (Singapore) were the winning tenderers, committing S$750,569,199 for development rights to the 99-year leasehold parcel.
This does not create a completed apartment building or a retail sale to individual households. A winning land tenderer must still move through development design, approvals, construction planning and authorised consumer sales. The official award provides no complete bedroom mix, unit-by-unit price list or personal apartment reservation.
A reader interested in housing during 2027 or 2028 should therefore distinguish a confirmed land transaction from an apartment available to buy or occupy. This distinction is important because property marketing can use a road name long before there are legal individual units on offer.
The best immediate action is to record the site details and monitor approved developer announcements. Anyone needing a home soon should compare real current resale, rental or legitimately launched homes rather than treat the Parcel C land award as a ready apartment.
2. The site progressed from Reserve List to Confirmed List
River Valley Green Parcel C was included in URA’s December 2024 Reserve List, available for application under a mechanism triggered by acceptable developer interest. It was subsequently placed on the first-half 2026 Confirmed List and formally offered through a scheduled tender on 9 April. The transition shows how a potential land site can progress into real private development supply.
A Reserve List site and Confirmed List site are not equivalent in timing. Reserve List land does not automatically have a public tender closing date. Confirmed List land is scheduled for release and can proceed through tender, closing and award. The River Valley Green C site now has the later status: awarded on 23 June 2026.
Readers may find older articles saying that Parcel C is available for application and newer ones giving the winning bid. Both can describe genuine events at different dates, but the earlier status is no longer current. A responsible publication should preserve that history without leaving the reader confused.
This mechanism is useful to understand because not every proposed housing site enters the market immediately. Land planning, government supply programmes, developer bids and individual property sales occur through separate steps. Only the final authorised unit offer can support a household purchase decision.
3. How the April–June 2026 tender unfolded
URA launched Peck Hay Road and River Valley Green Parcel C together on 9 April 2026 under the first-half Confirmed List. Their tender closing dates differed: Peck Hay Road closed on 11 June, while River Valley Green C closed on 18 June. The successful Parcel C developer was announced on 23 June. Keeping the two tender calendars separate prevents an incorrect claim about when the site was awarded.
A land award is the end of a bidding process for developers, not the beginning of immediate apartment occupation. No household received an HDB queue number or an individual private apartment merely because the tender closed. The legal buyer at this stage was the development group.
The exact dates are useful when checking whether a market page is stale. An article from April may accurately refer to the tender as open, while a June 18 article might report the close without a winning developer. The June 23 award provides the later authoritative result.
For a 2027/2028 housing guide, the right next milestone is an authorised property release with actual apartment details. That may happen after further planning and approvals, but the site award does not specify a precise consumer launch month or completion year.
4. The 11,516-square-metre site and its development envelope
URA’s final award lists a parcel area of 11,516.0 square metres with maximum permissible gross floor area of 40,306 square metres. These are technical development measures. The parcel area refers to the physical ground site, while gross floor area reflects allowable development across floors under planning controls.
The 2024 Reserve List documents had a slightly different preliminary site-area figure because early estimates can be updated or refined. The later site-specific award is the appropriate figure to use for the final awarded parcel. Readers should not treat a small change in preliminary area as proof that two different Parcel C sites exist.
A buyer cannot infer apartment size by dividing GFA by 470 estimated units. Building circulation, internal configuration, balconies and other development elements influence the eventual approved property. The actual retail unit schedule will provide more meaningful information later.
The land figures nevertheless help identify the correct site and compare it with parcels A and B. They should be stored with the URA award and map, not used to claim a particular condominium unit already exists.
5. What 470 potential homes means for housing supply
URA estimated that Parcel C could yield about 470 private residential units. That provides an approximate scale of future supply in the River Valley area, but the final approved number may change with the developer’s detailed design. It does not tell readers how many one-bedroom, family or accessible apartments will be available.
A project can use its permitted development area in different ways. Larger apartments and different communal arrangements can lead to a different final unit mix from the planning estimate. A buyer should resist the temptation to convert the 470 figure into a detailed inventory through unsupported arithmetic.
The potential residences are private homes, not HDB Build-To-Order flats. A person cannot use HDB’s sales portal or ballot categories to reserve one of them, and public-housing grants do not automatically apply merely because URA sold the land.
The appropriate headline is potential private supply associated with an awarded site. The next meaningful consumer-level update is the project’s actual approved unit count and selling terms, when released. Until then, the count helps explain the land pipeline rather than a buying opportunity available today.
6. Why S$750.57 million is a developer price, not your unit price
The S$750,569,199 amount is the winning tender price for the 99-year development land. URA expressed this as S$18,621.77 per square metre of allowable gross floor area. These numbers are useful for land-market analysis, but they should never be substituted for the private apartment selling price a household would later pay.
Development costs include design, regulatory compliance, construction, utilities, financing and marketing. Individual apartments may have different sizes, positions and features. Dividing a land bid by the potential 470 homes produces only a rough ratio, not a developer’s authorised price schedule.
A household should set a financial limit based on available cash, permissible CPF use, a prudent mortgage and ongoing obligations. For a private strata-titled home, maintenance contributions, property taxes and duties may be substantial and need to be calculated independently.
The correct assessment starts with an actual apartment and its contractual price. A record-sized or high-sounding land bid cannot guarantee either future appreciation or that the eventual homes will fit a particular family’s budget.
7. Parcel C is not Parcel A or Parcel B
River Valley Green has appeared in URA land-sale reporting as multiple parcels. Parcel A, Parcel B and Parcel C are different land sites with their own developers, release dates and development programmes. Because property articles often shorten names to River Valley Green, a reader can accidentally combine details from two unrelated projects.
For example, a brochure for an earlier parcel may already include detailed units or a marketing name, while the later Parcel C award contains only land data. Attaching the earlier apartment price list or developer to Parcel C would produce misleading information even though the street name is similar.
A careful buyer should verify the parcel letter, site map, year and successful tenderer. These identifiers determine whether a listing truly relates to the 23 June 2026 award. Similarity of location alone is insufficient.
A trustworthy release tracker keeps each parcel separate and records new consumer details beneath the correct one. This matters for exact walking routes, permitted development, purchase tenure and the identity of the authorised seller.
8. Great World MRT: established service on the TEL
URA’s April 2026 sales announcement describes Parcel C as next to Great World MRT. Great World is an operating Thomson–East Coast Line station, which can be a practical advantage for residents who use this rail corridor. The station offers a real service rather than an unbuilt transport promise.
However, the exact future apartment entrance, underground links and weather-protected route need confirmation from the approved development. A location being next to a station on an agency map does not mean every unit enjoys direct private access to the platform.
A family should map all frequent journeys: work for multiple adults, childcare, medical appointments and visits to relatives. The TEL may simplify one part of the routine while another journey still requires transfers. Someone with limited mobility may need to consider lifts and accessible paths.
A successful location decision values transport according to actual household use. Rail access can be meaningful, but it does not determine apartment affordability, legal completion or the comfort of a particular layout.
9. Great World shopping and the difference between nearby and included
Great World shopping is an established destination in the River Valley area. For some residents, having retail, groceries and food nearby can reduce everyday travel and make central living more convenient. The shops are part of the existing neighbourhood, not automatically common property owned by future residents of Parcel C.
The difference matters when a developer eventually markets the project. A sales illustration may show a lively surrounding precinct but does not imply ownership rights to every nearby facility. Actual shopping routes and opening hours remain independent of the new private apartment contract.
Some households will use nearby groceries frequently, while others may prefer markets elsewhere or delivery. For a senior, an accessible path and a pharmacy may matter more than a wide choice of restaurants.
A useful buyer’s checklist lists real services and the actual route from the future building entrance. A mature local amenity network is valuable, but a generic claim that everything is at the doorstep should be tested before it becomes a reason to pay more.
10. The Singapore River and Kim Seng public realm
The River Valley district has an established relationship with the Singapore River, Kim Seng Road and public riverside walking areas. These can provide places to exercise, meet friends and enjoy the urban landscape. However, the existence of a river in the neighbourhood is not proof that every apartment on Parcel C has a direct water view or private riverfront access.
A future development’s relationship with the river depends on the site boundary, building orientation and public paths. The most attractive rendering may show an angle that only some units share, and later buildings can affect what is visible from particular floors.
Public river walks also have operational considerations: lighting, weather, crowds at certain times and safe connections across roads. A family with children may value a short and protected route more than the longest possible scenic walk.
A central apartment can benefit from public recreation without its owner possessing any of those public areas. The right evaluation asks how often the household will use the paths and whether the actual building provides comfortable access.
11. City living is not the same for every household
River Valley’s central location can be appealing to people whose work, leisure and relatives are close to the city centre. It may reduce commuting for some while increasing travel for others who need to reach distant towns. A household with several members should calculate overall travel rather than focus on only one person’s job.
Central apartments can also face a range of street conditions. Busy roads, deliveries and public activity may be convenient for shopping but affect quietness or walking comfort. The actual unit’s orientation, windows and nearby circulation must be evaluated when the plans are available.
An older resident may place high value on accessible transport and healthcare. Parents with young children may need nearby childcare and a layout that allows quiet sleep. People working from home may prefer a separate enclosed room and stable internal comfort.
The best apartment is therefore not determined by postcode prestige. It is the one whose real space and location support ordinary family life at a sustainable total cost.
12. Public park plans versus operating facilities
URA’s central-area Master Plan includes improvements to public greenery, pedestrian connections and recreational spaces. These are useful context for River Valley’s long-term liveability. But a proposed green connection is a planning goal, not a guaranteed open park on a family’s moving day.
A household should distinguish operating amenities from future public works. Existing river paths and shopping can be visited now, while an unbuilt improvement needs its own approval and opening date. It is reasonable to value the future direction without making today’s purchase financially dependent on it.
Any claimed direct path from a new condo to a public park needs verification from its approved site plan and the responsible authority. A pedestrian bridge or landscaping feature may be part of a different development programme.
Clear status labels avoid disappointment: existing, under construction, proposed or awaiting operator. This approach gives residents useful information about both what they can enjoy immediately and what might improve the district later.
13. Private ownership and HDB public flat comparisons
Parcel C is a private residential development site. It is not an HDB BTO exercise, and its homes will not be assigned to applicants using an HFE-based ballot. A government land award is one mechanism for producing housing supply, while HDB’s subsidised flats follow another set of policies.
A private buyer may need bank financing, stamp duties, property tax and recurring strata-management contributions. An eligible HDB buyer may have access to particular grants or loans, but also faces scheme-specific eligibility and occupation conditions. Those differences are relevant before comparing purchase prices.
A household should not take a maximum HDB grant illustration and subtract it from a hypothetical future Parcel C asking price. That creates a false affordability calculation. Likewise, a private land bid is not a published BTO starting price.
The responsible comparison uses actual legally available homes and all recurring costs. Location quality can matter for both housing types, but affordability depends on the applicable legal product and the family’s financial position.
14. The financing decision before the developer’s price list
There is no retail individual-apartment price in URA’s June 2026 award. A buyer can still prepare by reviewing income, existing debts, cash resources, permitted CPF use and a comfortable mortgage ceiling. It is wise to reserve funds for stamp duties, maintenance, furnishings and unexpected circumstances.
A bank’s maximum available loan may exceed the amount a family should prudently borrow. An apartment with attractive transport can still cause financial strain if mortgage and recurring costs consume most of household income. Stress-testing a period of reduced income or higher interest helps clarify the risk.
For an HDB upgrader, the transition requires further attention to MOP and disposal rules, loan redemption and CPF refunds when applicable. Selling the current flat before a replacement is secured can create a costly interim period.
The right time to commit is when actual approved property details and finance terms exist. A land award offers an opportunity to research, not a reason to make irreversible financial decisions around a guessed future asking price.
15. The school and childcare timeline
The River Valley area contains schools and childcare services, but residential proximity does not guarantee admission to a particular institution. MOE’s Primary 1 and other admissions rules operate independently of a developer’s land award. A household should verify its real eligible address and the child’s enrolment year.
The eventual Parcel C project may be completed after a child needs schooling, so parents should not assume a future apartment address can be used whenever convenient. Actual contractual occupation and registration rules must be considered together.
Childcare places also depend on operators, programmes and vacancies. A shopping centre or another nearby building offering childcare does not necessarily reserve space for residents of the new private condo. Operating hours may affect whether a caregiver can reach the centre after work.
A family should preserve a workable education and childcare plan while waiting for construction. A central location may eventually reduce some journeys, but it cannot change admission conditions or guarantee a provider’s capacity.
16. Why land award does not fix a 2028 moving date
URA’s 23 June 2026 decision awarded the site, but it did not publish a consumer property completion date. The developer has to progress through design, approvals, construction and ultimately legal occupancy. Market articles may offer likely timelines, but they are not the same as authorised project contracts or actual completion notices.
A household with a strict 2028 moving deadline should evaluate this uncertainty seriously. If no authorised unit and possession terms exist, the project may not be a feasible sole plan. A completed resale property or other genuinely available accommodation may fit the family’s calendar better.
The land award is still useful evidence that development could proceed. It is not evidence that every future apartment will be ready in a particular month. Construction and building services may require additional time even after a retail launch.
The sensible approach is to keep the future project on a watchlist while retaining real alternatives. This allows a family to consider Parcel C when the property is sufficiently defined without risking an expensive housing gap.
17. How a river-area home differs from a park-side home
River Valley Green Parcel C offers an urban, transit-rich environment, which is different from a low-rise, nature-oriented site such as Dairy Farm Walk. A buyer comparing both should measure actual household needs rather than assume the higher land rate automatically indicates a better home.
An urban apartment may provide shorter journeys to central workplaces and shopping, but it could also have different noise, traffic and shared-space conditions. A greener suburban home might offer more immediate nature access while requiring longer travel to family or work. Both can be good depending on the household.
The financing comparison must use actual retail homes, not the winning land bid alone. Parcel C’s S$750.57 million award and Dairy Farm Walk’s S$427 million award concern different land areas and density controls; their totals cannot establish comparable apartment prices.
A clear scorecard includes usable space, monthly costs, legal possession date, transport and caregiving routes. That produces a more defensible decision than a ranking based on location prestige.
18. The 2024 Reserve List status explains older headlines
In December 2024, URA listed River Valley Green Parcel C on the Reserve List as available for application, while other sites entered the Confirmed List. Someone finding that earlier notice might mistakenly conclude the parcel still has no scheduled tender. The April and June 2026 announcements supersede that status: the site was placed on a confirmed programme, tendered and awarded.
The sequence is valuable because it shows how potential residential land becomes a real development right. It also explains why articles with different status labels can be historically accurate. A good update should preserve the dates rather than erase earlier stages.
No household could buy a particular apartment at the 2024 Reserve List stage, just as the 2026 award does not yet provide retail units. The true consumer buying process occurs later.
A housing news page should therefore display current status prominently and retain a dated timeline below. That helps readers act on accurate information without treating a previous planning notice as an ongoing offer.
19. A precise Parcel C research tracker
Create one row for each River Valley Green parcel and include its letter, site map, developer and source date. For Parcel C, the confirmed row includes 11,516.0 square metres, 40,306 square metres GFA, S$750,569,199, 99-year lease, 470 potential homes and the SMCL Haven 3/CSC Land winning group.
Place the April 2026 tender and June award dates in separate columns. Keep actual apartment unit mix, price, launch and completion marked pending until an authorised developer announcement provides them. Add Great World MRT as an operating transport asset and other planned public-space improvements under their own status.
A household can attach its personal priorities: financial ceiling, commuting and care journeys, required rooms, parking and the latest acceptable move. This turns a static news story into a practical decision framework.
When a later development sale begins, update the fields supported by its approved documents. The 2026 land-award record should remain intact and should not be rewritten to imply the apartments were already priced in June. That is how an honest release tracker stays valuable over time.
20. Conclusion: a real June award and an important central housing opportunity
River Valley Green Parcel C’s June 2026 award confirms a substantial private residential development opportunity next to an operating MRT station in an established urban district. URA has published the winning developer group, land price, dimensions and estimated housing yield. The progression from Reserve List in 2024 to actual award in 2026 is an important part of its story.
The unanswered questions are individual apartment layout, consumer price, management arrangements and completion. A 470-home potential estimate is not an HDB ballot or a promise that 470 units are available for reservation today. Different River Valley Green parcels must also remain distinct.
A household can prepare by understanding the local travel network, examining real amenities and calculating a sensible financing range. If immediate housing is needed, currently available homes may be more practical than waiting for a future property without authorised completion terms.
The purpose of this guide is to make the news useful without overstating it. A genuine developer land transaction is a meaningful step toward housing, while a responsible purchase waits for the actual legal home and its full financial implications.
Buyer and family scenarios
A buyer confusing Parcel C with other River Valley Green projects
Check the parcel letter, site area and developer. The June 2026 award to SMCL Haven 3 and CSC Land is distinct from earlier parcels A and B. A price list from another development should not be attached to C without a legal link to this exact property.
A first-time HDB buyer seeing 470 homes
The 470 potential residences are private, not an HDB BTO release. HFE, EHG and public ballot rules apply to separate eligible public housing. A family should consult the HDB Flat Portal for real new-flat options rather than a URA private land award.
A couple whose jobs are near Great World
The operating Great World MRT station may make commuting easier, but the actual future entrance route, apartment size and mortgage cost matter. Compare both adults’ journeys and any care responsibilities. A convenient location should add value without consuming all of the household’s financial headroom.
A family needing to move before the end of 2028
The June land award does not provide a binding apartment handover date. The family should investigate current resale or rental options if the deadline is firm and keep Parcel C under monitoring until authorised completion terms exist. An optimistic forecast is not enough to end a tenancy or sell an existing home.
A buyer dividing the S$750.57 million bid by 470
That produces only a rough land cost per potential dwelling, not a property selling price. It ignores construction, different unit sizes, financing and other expenses. Use actual developer prices when available, then include stamp duties and recurring maintenance.
A senior who wants to use Great World MRT
The station operates, but an accessible door-to-platform route from the future residence is not yet documented. Check lifts, crossings, shelter and the journey to healthcare. A short line drawn between a land parcel and the station does not guarantee easy mobility.
An owner attracted by riverside walking
The Singapore River public realm can be a benefit, but actual access and permanent views depend on approved paths and surrounding buildings. The buyer should check the real route from the block and avoid paying a premium for an unverified river outlook.
An HDB upgrader considering a central private home
The current HDB flat’s MOP and loan, CPF refunds and the new private home’s duties and maintenance all matter. A land award is not a secured replacement property. Avoid selling too early or planning to bridge with an assumed future apartment sale date.
A household with children entering school soon
An unbuilt apartment may not be an eligible school registration address when needed. MOE rules and actual occupation timing must be verified. Keep a current childcare and school plan independent of developer marketing predictions.
A buyer who saw a 2024 Reserve List article
The older Reserve List status was superseded by a 2026 Confirmed List tender and award. Both notices have historical value, but the current legal land status is awarded. Continue to distinguish this from actual consumer apartment sales, which come later.
A household choosing between city and nature
River Valley offers central retail and rail access; Dairy Farm offers a different green setting. Compare complete commute, family-care journeys and actual ownership cost. A higher urban land bid does not automatically mean a better property for every household.
A parent expecting childcare inside Parcel C
The award describes residential zoning, but no named operator or childcare vacancy for future residents. Use real existing services and confirm age groups, hours and capacity independently. Do not assume that nearby shopping or a future mixed-use plan guarantees a place.
An investor predicting gains from the winning land rate
A land price can reflect developer interest, not a guaranteed future apartment market. Model uncertainty in loan rates, supply and resale prices. A property should remain financially viable without relying on speculative capital appreciation.
A renter who wants to live in River Valley immediately
An awarded site is not a completed rental property. Search legitimate current rentals with actual availability, deposit and lease terms. Monitor the future development separately instead of leaving present accommodation unresolved.
A buyer concerned about parking and deliveries
The final private development’s parking spaces, vehicle entrances and shared-area costs are not published in the land award. Obtain approved project details before choosing a unit or assuming the site supports a particular number of family cars.
A current neighbour worried about future construction
Land award does not fix all later works dates or road diversions. Refer to actual authority and developer notices as projects progress. Specific documented noise or access concerns are more useful than predictions based on a preliminary rendering.
Frequently asked questions
What happened at River Valley Green Parcel C in June 2026?
URA awarded the private residential parcel on 23 June.
Who were the successful tenderers?
SMCL Haven 3 and CSC Land Group (Singapore).
What was the winning bid?
S$750,569,199.
What is the official land rate?
S$18,621.77 per square metre of allowable gross floor area.
What is the site area?
11,516.0 square metres at the June 2026 award.
What is the maximum GFA?
40,306 square metres.
How many private homes are estimated?
About 470 potential units under the April 2026 land-release estimate.
Is the tenure 99 years?
Yes, according to the URA award.
When did the tender open?
9 April 2026.
When did the tender close?
18 June 2026.
Was the site previously on the Reserve List?
Yes, in December 2024 before the later confirmed tender.
Is Parcel C the same as Parcels A or B?
No, they are distinct land parcels and projects.
Which MRT station is next to the site?
Great World MRT on the Thomson–East Coast Line.
Does the award include a retail condominium price list?
No. Individual prices require an authorised later developer launch.
Are these HDB BTO flats?
No. This is private residential development land.
Will all units have an unobstructed river view?
No such universal view is confirmed by the land award.
Is a 2028 key date established?
No. The award does not specify legal apartment completion.
Do HDB grants automatically apply?
No. Private housing follows different financing and eligibility arrangements.
What should buyers verify later?
Real approved units, price, tenure, maintenance, transport routes and contractual completion.
Where should public-housing applicants go?
HDB’s Flat Portal and the relevant HFE process.
Official sources and related articles
URA’s dated land awards establish the site and winning developer group. Consumer sale details require authorised project documents; HDB public housing uses its own separate inventory and financing routes.
URA 23 June 2026 River Valley Green Parcel C tender award
URA 9 April 2026 Peck Hay and River Valley C launch, 470 estimated homes
URA 18 June 2026 Parcel C tender closing
URA 3 December 2024 initial River Valley C Reserve List release
URA current government land-sale status register
HDB current public BTO/SBF inventory