The Gold Standard of Education | SALCC 2026–2027 Admissions, CSEC or Mature Entry, Conflicting Deadlines, Fees, Financial Aid and Bursary Boundaries

HOW EDUCATION WORKS

Find the decision you need

Sir Arthur Lewis Community College’s 2026–2027 route begins with an online application, certified academic and identity documents, and an EC$25 non-refundable application fee. General undergraduate entry normally requires five CSEC subjects including English A and Mathematics, while aptitude evidence, foreign qualifications, mature entry and Access courses are separate routes requiring their own review. The official SALCC admissions page contains inconsistent deadline text: current news says applications ran from 9 February to 30 April 2026, its FAQ says 30 April, but another paragraph names Tuesday 30 June 2026. Applicants must not choose a convenient date; they should preserve the conflict and use a written College instruction. Admission, tuition classification, SALCC financial aid and the separate Government bursary are different decisions.

This guide is for a Saint Lucian school leaver, mature learner, parent, counsellor, CAPE or degree applicant, Nursing applicant or SALCC adviser. It gives the useful answer by paragraph two, dates changeable facts, labels illustrative cases, and keeps admission, qualification, funding, employment, assessment and recognition decisions in their proper boxes.

CHAPTER 1 OF 12 · CHOOSE THE ROUTE

1. Choose the programme and admission owner

Back to reading routes

What the mechanism is

SALCC offers associate degrees, bachelor’s degrees, CAPE, certificates, Access courses and specialised health or teacher routes. Some programmes have College admissions; others can involve UWI or profession-specific processes.

A reliable pathway is a chain: input, responsible actor, official record, decision and next permitted move. Naming those parts prevents a true fact at one gate from being stretched into a claim about another gate.

Worked case

Illustrative case: A learner uses the general SALCC form for a programme whose page directs applicants to a separate university application and deadline.

The useful diagnosis is to separate what the record establishes, what is merely assumed and which office can establish the missing fact. The case explains a method; it does not predict a private outcome.

Practical action

Write the exact programme, award, academic unit, delivery location and application owner before opening an account.

Students can keep a dated evidence file and ask one precise question at a time. Parents can test sequence, costs and contingencies without taking over the learner’s identity or account. Educators can teach learners to explain why each gate exists and what evidence would change the answer.

Transfer when the context changes

If the programme changes, rebuild the application, fee and funding map from the new owner.

Transfer is visible when the learner carries the principle into a different course, provider, workplace, year or technology while noticing which facts must be verified again. Repeating an old checklist without rechecking changed variables is not transfer.

Failure mode, evidence boundary and repair

A programme displayed on the SALCC site does not prove that one form or deadline governs every award.

When evidence conflicts, stop at the first mismatch, preserve the dated source, ask the decision owner to clarify the exact record, and update the plan only after that clarification. Uncertainty can be managed without being inflated into certainty or panic.

Chapter check

• Can the learner name the exact decision?
• Is the record matched to the correct person, provider, programme, release and cycle?
• What evidence would change the answer?
• Who owns the next action and by when?
• Which conclusion remains outside the evidence?

Contents · Next chapter

CHAPTER 2 OF 12 · CHOOSE THE ROUTE

2. Read the five-subject rule as general entry

Back to reading routes

What the mechanism is

The admissions page says undergraduate routes generally require at least five CSEC General Proficiency subjects including English A and Mathematics, with the applicable grade periods. Academic units can add their own subjects and conditions.

A reliable pathway is a chain: input, responsible actor, official record, decision and next permitted move. Naming those parts prevents a true fact at one gate from being stretched into a claim about another gate.

Worked case

Illustrative case: An applicant has five passes including English and Mathematics and assumes this settles entry to Nursing or another selective professional programme.

The useful diagnosis is to separate what the record establishes, what is merely assumed and which office can establish the missing fact. The case explains a method; it does not predict a private outcome.

Practical action

Map general subjects first, then open the exact programme page for sciences, age, records, interview, health, police or placement requirements.

Students can keep a dated evidence file and ask one precise question at a time. Parents can test sequence, costs and contingencies without taking over the learner’s identity or account. Educators can teach learners to explain why each gate exists and what evidence would change the answer.

Transfer when the context changes

When results or programme choice changes, ask for a new decision on the specific route.

Transfer is visible when the learner carries the principle into a different course, provider, workplace, year or technology while noticing which facts must be verified again. Repeating an old checklist without rechecking changed variables is not transfer.

Failure mode, evidence boundary and repair

General entry is a floor for consideration, not a guarantee of programme selection or clinical placement.

When evidence conflicts, stop at the first mismatch, preserve the dated source, ask the decision owner to clarify the exact record, and update the plan only after that clarification. Uncertainty can be managed without being inflated into certainty or panic.

Chapter check

• Can the learner name the exact decision?
• Is the record matched to the correct person, provider, programme, release and cycle?
• What evidence would change the answer?
• Who owns the next action and by when?
• Which conclusion remains outside the evidence?

Previous chapter · Contents · Next chapter

CHAPTER 3 OF 12 · CHOOSE THE ROUTE

3. Use aptitude and foreign evidence on the correct route

Back to reading routes

What the mechanism is

SALCC may consider recognised aptitude examinations such as GED or SAT with transcript evaluation, and asks applicants educated outside Saint Lucia for evidence of equivalent qualifications.

A reliable pathway is a chain: input, responsible actor, official record, decision and next permitted move. Naming those parts prevents a true fact at one gate from being stretched into a claim about another gate.

Worked case

Illustrative case: A foreign applicant submits an SAT score without the secondary transcript and assumes the number replaces equivalence review.

The useful diagnosis is to separate what the record establishes, what is merely assumed and which office can establish the missing fact. The case explains a method; it does not predict a private outcome.

Practical action

Ask which exact credentials, official delivery method, translation, evaluation and English evidence are required for the applicant category.

Students can keep a dated evidence file and ask one precise question at a time. Parents can test sequence, costs and contingencies without taking over the learner’s identity or account. Educators can teach learners to explain why each gate exists and what evidence would change the answer.

Transfer when the context changes

If the destination programme changes, recheck subject equivalence because programme prerequisites may differ.

Transfer is visible when the learner carries the principle into a different course, provider, workplace, year or technology while noticing which facts must be verified again. Repeating an old checklist without rechecking changed variables is not transfer.

Failure mode, evidence boundary and repair

A test score or foreign diploma alone does not establish equivalence, applicant category or programme admission.

When evidence conflicts, stop at the first mismatch, preserve the dated source, ask the decision owner to clarify the exact record, and update the plan only after that clarification. Uncertainty can be managed without being inflated into certainty or panic.

Chapter check

• Can the learner name the exact decision?
• Is the record matched to the correct person, provider, programme, release and cycle?
• What evidence would change the answer?
• Who owns the next action and by when?
• Which conclusion remains outside the evidence?

Previous chapter · Contents · Next chapter

CHAPTER 4 OF 12 · RESOLVE DEADLINES

4. Treat mature admission as an evidence judgement

Back to reading routes

What the mechanism is

SALCC defines mature applicants as 21 or older with relevant work experience, no secondary, college or university study in the last five years, and a record suggesting a strong possibility of success.

A reliable pathway is a chain: input, responsible actor, official record, decision and next permitted move. Naming those parts prevents a true fact at one gate from being stretched into a claim about another gate.

Worked case

Illustrative case: A 24-year-old applicant assumes age alone creates mature status despite recent study and no relevant experience.

The useful diagnosis is to separate what the record establishes, what is merely assumed and which office can establish the missing fact. The case explains a method; it does not predict a private outcome.

Practical action

Prepare a dated education history, employment evidence, references and examples of learning comparable to programme prerequisites. Ask SALCC to classify the route.

Students can keep a dated evidence file and ask one precise question at a time. Parents can test sequence, costs and contingencies without taking over the learner’s identity or account. Educators can teach learners to explain why each gate exists and what evidence would change the answer.

Transfer when the context changes

If the intended programme changes, remap the evidence and any prerequisite gaps.

Transfer is visible when the learner carries the principle into a different course, provider, workplace, year or technology while noticing which facts must be verified again. Repeating an old checklist without rechecking changed variables is not transfer.

Failure mode, evidence boundary and repair

Mature status is not an exemption from programme readiness or a guaranteed offer.

When evidence conflicts, stop at the first mismatch, preserve the dated source, ask the decision owner to clarify the exact record, and update the plan only after that clarification. Uncertainty can be managed without being inflated into certainty or panic.

Chapter check

• Can the learner name the exact decision?
• Is the record matched to the correct person, provider, programme, release and cycle?
• What evidence would change the answer?
• Who owns the next action and by when?
• Which conclusion remains outside the evidence?

Previous chapter · Contents · Next chapter

CHAPTER 5 OF 12 · RESOLVE DEADLINES

5. Use Access courses as two-part preparation

Back to reading routes

What the mechanism is

Most Access courses contain two parts that both must be completed before registration, and the acceptable grade is set by the destination programme. Access study repairs a gate; it is not itself the final award.

A reliable pathway is a chain: input, responsible actor, official record, decision and next permitted move. Naming those parts prevents a true fact at one gate from being stretched into a claim about another gate.

Worked case

Illustrative case: A learner passes the first part and assumes programme registration is complete before the second part or required grade.

The useful diagnosis is to separate what the record establishes, what is merely assumed and which office can establish the missing fact. The case explains a method; it does not predict a private outcome.

Practical action

Record both components, the destination programme’s grade threshold, result date and registration consequence.

Students can keep a dated evidence file and ask one precise question at a time. Parents can test sequence, costs and contingencies without taking over the learner’s identity or account. Educators can teach learners to explain why each gate exists and what evidence would change the answer.

Transfer when the context changes

If the destination changes, ask whether the Access result remains acceptable.

Transfer is visible when the learner carries the principle into a different course, provider, workplace, year or technology while noticing which facts must be verified again. Repeating an old checklist without rechecking changed variables is not transfer.

Failure mode, evidence boundary and repair

Taking an Access course does not guarantee the programme, replace every prerequisite or create transfer credit.

When evidence conflicts, stop at the first mismatch, preserve the dated source, ask the decision owner to clarify the exact record, and update the plan only after that clarification. Uncertainty can be managed without being inflated into certainty or panic.

Chapter check

• Can the learner name the exact decision?
• Is the record matched to the correct person, provider, programme, release and cycle?
• What evidence would change the answer?
• Who owns the next action and by when?
• Which conclusion remains outside the evidence?

Previous chapter · Contents · Next chapter

CHAPTER 6 OF 12 · BUILD EVIDENCE

6. Resolve the April and June deadline conflict

Back to reading routes

What the mechanism is

SALCC news and the admissions FAQ identify 30 April 2026, while another paragraph on the admissions page names Tuesday 30 June 2026. These are official-page conflicts and may describe different operational stages, but the page does not reconcile them clearly.

A reliable pathway is a chain: input, responsible actor, official record, decision and next permitted move. Naming those parts prevents a true fact at one gate from being stretched into a claim about another gate.

Worked case

Illustrative case: An applicant selects the June date because it is later and submits after the April cycle has closed.

The useful diagnosis is to separate what the record establishes, what is merely assumed and which office can establish the missing fact. The case explains a method; it does not predict a private outcome.

Practical action

Save the conflicting text and ask SALCC which date applies to the exact programme and applicant. Use the written reply, not a preferred interpretation.

Students can keep a dated evidence file and ask one precise question at a time. Parents can test sequence, costs and contingencies without taking over the learner’s identity or account. Educators can teach learners to explain why each gate exists and what evidence would change the answer.

Transfer when the context changes

For future cycles, retrieve a new notice and ignore the 2026 conflict unless it remains current.

Transfer is visible when the learner carries the principle into a different course, provider, workplace, year or technology while noticing which facts must be verified again. Repeating an old checklist without rechecking changed variables is not transfer.

Failure mode, evidence boundary and repair

This article does not choose a deadline or promise late processing.

When evidence conflicts, stop at the first mismatch, preserve the dated source, ask the decision owner to clarify the exact record, and update the plan only after that clarification. Uncertainty can be managed without being inflated into certainty or panic.

Chapter check

• Can the learner name the exact decision?
• Is the record matched to the correct person, provider, programme, release and cycle?
• What evidence would change the answer?
• Who owns the next action and by when?
• Which conclusion remains outside the evidence?

Previous chapter · Contents · Next chapter

CHAPTER 7 OF 12 · BUILD EVIDENCE

7. Build the certified document pack

Back to reading routes

What the mechanism is

SALCC asks for certified and scanned academic certificates, passport photos and birth certificate, with a police record for Nursing and Teacher Training. Each document supports a different check.

A reliable pathway is a chain: input, responsible actor, official record, decision and next permitted move. Naming those parts prevents a true fact at one gate from being stretched into a claim about another gate.

Worked case

Illustrative case: An applicant uploads an uncertified result screenshot and omits the police record because academic grades are strong.

The useful diagnosis is to separate what the record establishes, what is merely assumed and which office can establish the missing fact. The case explains a method; it does not predict a private outcome.

Practical action

Create a document register with certification, expiry, exact name, programme purpose, upload date and acknowledgement.

Students can keep a dated evidence file and ask one precise question at a time. Parents can test sequence, costs and contingencies without taking over the learner’s identity or account. Educators can teach learners to explain why each gate exists and what evidence would change the answer.

Transfer when the context changes

When a document is renewed, preserve the previous version and provide the current one through the official channel.

Transfer is visible when the learner carries the principle into a different course, provider, workplace, year or technology while noticing which facts must be verified again. Repeating an old checklist without rechecking changed variables is not transfer.

Failure mode, evidence boundary and repair

An upload, receipt or strong academic result does not waive another required document.

When evidence conflicts, stop at the first mismatch, preserve the dated source, ask the decision owner to clarify the exact record, and update the plan only after that clarification. Uncertainty can be managed without being inflated into certainty or panic.

Chapter check

• Can the learner name the exact decision?
• Is the record matched to the correct person, provider, programme, release and cycle?
• What evidence would change the answer?
• Who owns the next action and by when?
• Which conclusion remains outside the evidence?

Previous chapter · Contents · Next chapter

CHAPTER 8 OF 12 · BUILD EVIDENCE

8. Separate EC$25 payment from admission

Back to reading routes

What the mechanism is

The admissions page lists a non-refundable EC$25 application fee, proof-of-payment email and a rule that applications are processed after fee confirmation. Payment completes a financial step, not the academic decision.

A reliable pathway is a chain: input, responsible actor, official record, decision and next permitted move. Naming those parts prevents a true fact at one gate from being stretched into a claim about another gate.

Worked case

Illustrative case: A learner pays at the bank but sends no receipt to the named channel and assumes the application is being reviewed.

The useful diagnosis is to separate what the record establishes, what is merely assumed and which office can establish the missing fact. The case explains a method; it does not predict a private outcome.

Practical action

Track application submission, payment reference, receipt delivery, College confirmation, decision and acceptance response separately.

Students can keep a dated evidence file and ask one precise question at a time. Parents can test sequence, costs and contingencies without taking over the learner’s identity or account. Educators can teach learners to explain why each gate exists and what evidence would change the answer.

Transfer when the context changes

If the payment method changes, use only the current authorised account and reference.

Transfer is visible when the learner carries the principle into a different course, provider, workplace, year or technology while noticing which facts must be verified again. Repeating an old checklist without rechecking changed variables is not transfer.

Failure mode, evidence boundary and repair

Money leaving an account does not prove that SALCC matched it to the application or offered a place.

When evidence conflicts, stop at the first mismatch, preserve the dated source, ask the decision owner to clarify the exact record, and update the plan only after that clarification. Uncertainty can be managed without being inflated into certainty or panic.

Chapter check

• Can the learner name the exact decision?
• Is the record matched to the correct person, provider, programme, release and cycle?
• What evidence would change the answer?
• Who owns the next action and by when?
• Which conclusion remains outside the evidence?

Previous chapter · Contents · Next chapter

CHAPTER 9 OF 12 · SEPARATE FUNDING

9. Read tuition by programme and category

Back to reading routes

What the mechanism is

SALCC publishes semester-by-semester fees for Saint Lucian or OECS, CARICOM and international students, with programme exceptions and additional charges. The category and programme determine the relevant table.

A reliable pathway is a chain: input, responsible actor, official record, decision and next permitted move. Naming those parts prevents a true fact at one gate from being stretched into a claim about another gate.

Worked case

Illustrative case: An OECS learner uses the general associate-degree total for a specialised health programme whose page has a different schedule.

The useful diagnosis is to separate what the record establishes, what is merely assumed and which office can establish the missing fact. The case explains a method; it does not predict a private outcome.

Practical action

Ask Finance to confirm learner category, programme, semester, repeating courses and every fee line in a personal invoice.

Students can keep a dated evidence file and ask one precise question at a time. Parents can test sequence, costs and contingencies without taking over the learner’s identity or account. Educators can teach learners to explain why each gate exists and what evidence would change the answer.

Transfer when the context changes

If the programme, citizenship, load or year changes, obtain a revised invoice.

Transfer is visible when the learner carries the principle into a different course, provider, workplace, year or technology while noticing which facts must be verified again. Repeating an old checklist without rechecking changed variables is not transfer.

Failure mode, evidence boundary and repair

A public table is dated planning evidence, not a final bill or a promise that no other cost applies.

When evidence conflicts, stop at the first mismatch, preserve the dated source, ask the decision owner to clarify the exact record, and update the plan only after that clarification. Uncertainty can be managed without being inflated into certainty or panic.

Chapter check

• Can the learner name the exact decision?
• Is the record matched to the correct person, provider, programme, release and cycle?
• What evidence would change the answer?
• Who owns the next action and by when?
• Which conclusion remains outside the evidence?

Previous chapter · Contents · Next chapter

CHAPTER 10 OF 12 · SEPARATE FUNDING

10. Keep SALCC financial aid separate from Government bursary

Back to reading routes

What the mechanism is

SALCC financial aid is a College small-grant process for eligible full-time students, generally opening around September, and excludes recipients of Government bursary or other support. The Government bursary is a separate Ministry process.

A reliable pathway is a chain: input, responsible actor, official record, decision and next permitted move. Naming those parts prevents a true fact at one gate from being stretched into a claim about another gate.

Worked case

Illustrative case: A student submits one financial-aid form and assumes it covers both schemes or can be combined without disclosure.

The useful diagnosis is to separate what the record establishes, what is merely assumed and which office can establish the missing fact. The case explains a method; it does not predict a private outcome.

Practical action

Maintain separate scheme cards with owner, eligibility, documents, deadline, covered costs and interaction rules. Disclose other support as required.

Students can keep a dated evidence file and ask one precise question at a time. Parents can test sequence, costs and contingencies without taking over the learner’s identity or account. Educators can teach learners to explain why each gate exists and what evidence would change the answer.

Transfer when the context changes

If one award is received, recalculate the gap and ask whether the other application remains eligible.

Transfer is visible when the learner carries the principle into a different course, provider, workplace, year or technology while noticing which facts must be verified again. Repeating an old checklist without rechecking changed variables is not transfer.

Failure mode, evidence boundary and repair

Admission, College aid and Government bursary are three decisions; none guarantees the others.

When evidence conflicts, stop at the first mismatch, preserve the dated source, ask the decision owner to clarify the exact record, and update the plan only after that clarification. Uncertainty can be managed without being inflated into certainty or panic.

Chapter check

• Can the learner name the exact decision?
• Is the record matched to the correct person, provider, programme, release and cycle?
• What evidence would change the answer?
• Who owns the next action and by when?
• Which conclusion remains outside the evidence?

Previous chapter · Contents · Next chapter

CHAPTER 11 OF 12 · COMPLETE ENROLMENT

11. Read the closed 2026 Government bursary correctly

Back to reading routes

What the mechanism is

The 2026–2027 bursary required Saint Lucian citizenship, admission or full-time enrolment, low-income evidence and, for continuing students, at least a 2.5 GPA. Its application closed 31 July 2026.

A reliable pathway is a chain: input, responsible actor, official record, decision and next permitted move. Naming those parts prevents a true fact at one gate from being stretched into a claim about another gate.

Worked case

Illustrative case: An applicant meets the income criterion and assumes the bursary can create SALCC admission after the College deadline.

The useful diagnosis is to separate what the record establishes, what is merely assumed and which office can establish the missing fact. The case explains a method; it does not predict a private outcome.

Practical action

Plan College admission first, then prepare identity, acceptance or transcript, NIC, income evidence and statement of need for the separate scheme.

Students can keep a dated evidence file and ask one precise question at a time. Parents can test sequence, costs and contingencies without taking over the learner’s identity or account. Educators can teach learners to explain why each gate exists and what evidence would change the answer.

Transfer when the context changes

For the next year, use the new bursary notice and do not advance the 2026 dates.

Transfer is visible when the learner carries the principle into a different course, provider, workplace, year or technology while noticing which facts must be verified again. Repeating an old checklist without rechecking changed variables is not transfer.

Failure mode, evidence boundary and repair

Bursary eligibility does not waive College entry, and the closed 2026 call is not a current opportunity.

When evidence conflicts, stop at the first mismatch, preserve the dated source, ask the decision owner to clarify the exact record, and update the plan only after that clarification. Uncertainty can be managed without being inflated into certainty or panic.

Chapter check

• Can the learner name the exact decision?
• Is the record matched to the correct person, provider, programme, release and cycle?
• What evidence would change the answer?
• Who owns the next action and by when?
• Which conclusion remains outside the evidence?

Previous chapter · Contents · Next chapter

CHAPTER 12 OF 12 · COMPLETE ENROLMENT

12. Complete acceptance, registration and funding in sequence

Back to reading routes

What the mechanism is

An offer must be read for conditions and response requirements. Registration then establishes courses, while fee clearance or approved arrangements establish financial standing.

A reliable pathway is a chain: input, responsible actor, official record, decision and next permitted move. Naming those parts prevents a true fact at one gate from being stretched into a claim about another gate.

Worked case

Illustrative case: A learner receives an offer and assumes Government bursary approval will follow, so no registration or payment-plan action is taken.

The useful diagnosis is to separate what the record establishes, what is merely assumed and which office can establish the missing fact. The case explains a method; it does not predict a private outcome.

Practical action

Track offer response, conditions, programme registration, invoice, payment or approved aid, timetable and account access as separate checkpoints.

Students can keep a dated evidence file and ask one precise question at a time. Parents can test sequence, costs and contingencies without taking over the learner’s identity or account. Educators can teach learners to explain why each gate exists and what evidence would change the answer.

Transfer when the context changes

If funding is delayed, ask SALCC what authorised arrangement preserves registration rather than assuming one.

Transfer is visible when the learner carries the principle into a different course, provider, workplace, year or technology while noticing which facts must be verified again. Repeating an old checklist without rechecking changed variables is not transfer.

Failure mode, evidence boundary and repair

An offer, bursary application or payment-plan discussion is not completed enrolment.

When evidence conflicts, stop at the first mismatch, preserve the dated source, ask the decision owner to clarify the exact record, and update the plan only after that clarification. Uncertainty can be managed without being inflated into certainty or panic.

Chapter check

• Can the learner name the exact decision?
• Is the record matched to the correct person, provider, programme, release and cycle?
• What evidence would change the answer?
• Who owns the next action and by when?
• Which conclusion remains outside the evidence?

Previous chapter · Contents

CHAPTER 13 OF 12 · COMPLETE ENROLMENT

13. Transfer the method beyond SALCC

Back to reading routes

What the mechanism is

A robust learner can identify the exact gate, explain conflicting evidence, keep records and adapt the same method to later university or employment decisions.

A reliable pathway is a chain: input, responsible actor, official record, decision and next permitted move. Naming those parts prevents a true fact at one gate from being stretched into a claim about another gate.

Worked case

Illustrative case: A graduate applies elsewhere using only the phrase “SALCC qualified” and omits the award, courses, grades and professional conditions the destination needs.

The useful diagnosis is to separate what the record establishes, what is merely assumed and which office can establish the missing fact. The case explains a method; it does not predict a private outcome.

Practical action

Keep official transcripts, programme descriptions, funding decisions and a changed-context learning example. Present precise evidence to each destination.

Students can keep a dated evidence file and ask one precise question at a time. Parents can test sequence, costs and contingencies without taking over the learner’s identity or account. Educators can teach learners to explain why each gate exists and what evidence would change the answer.

Transfer when the context changes

When rules change, preserve the learning but recheck admission, credit, licensing and funding.

Transfer is visible when the learner carries the principle into a different course, provider, workplace, year or technology while noticing which facts must be verified again. Repeating an old checklist without rechecking changed variables is not transfer.

Failure mode, evidence boundary and repair

SALCC education can build capability, but it does not guarantee transfer credit, professional registration, employment or future awards.

When evidence conflicts, stop at the first mismatch, preserve the dated source, ask the decision owner to clarify the exact record, and update the plan only after that clarification. Uncertainty can be managed without being inflated into certainty or panic.

Chapter check

• Can the learner name the exact decision?
• Is the record matched to the correct person, provider, programme, release and cycle?
• What evidence would change the answer?
• Who owns the next action and by when?
• Which conclusion remains outside the evidence?

Previous chapter · Contents