VIEW THIS AS

Auto mode follows the Route Engine until you choose a viewpoint.

YOU ARE HERE

ROUTE CHECK

CONNECTED TO

WHAT NEXT

Use the canonical route for this room, or HELP if you are unsure.

Top 10 Places to Visit When Touring Belarus

Three students in school uniforms work through open books at a classroom table, with textbooks and stationery nearby and study notes on the whiteboard behind them.

Did you know that Belarus’s places of interest connect castle architecture, an ancient forest, glacial lakes and the art of Marc Chagall? This selection covers Minsk, Mir Castle, Nesvizh Palace, Brest Fortress, Belovezhskaya Pushcha, Grodno, Polotsk, Vitebsk, Braslav Lakes and Dudutki. For readers exploring Belarusian heritage, these ten places offer a useful introduction to the country’s cities, cultural landscapes and natural environments.

The geography helps you understand the selection. Minsk and Dudutki belong to a central grouping; Mir and Nesvizh form a castle-and-palace comparison southwest of the capital. Brest and the Belarusian part of the Białowieża Forest belong to the southwest, while Grodno sits farther northwest. Polotsk, Vitebsk and the Braslav lake district introduce different parts of the north. These are regional reference points, not a current touring itinerary.

Before considering a Belarus trip, note the present position: as checked on 10 October 2026, the UK Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office advises against all travel to Belarus. Canada also advises avoiding all travel. Read this Belarus travel guide as cultural background and a reference for a future time when conditions and official advice may change. Attractive places, operating museums or a visa option do not cancel the current warning.

Find your route through Belarus

Use the ten-place table to compare heritage themes and regions. Start with the current travel advice in the introduction and sources. The geographical groupings below explain the country; they should not be treated as a recommendation to travel under the present conditions.

Compare ten places · Start exploring · Assess future travel · Quick answers · Check official sources

Ten places at a glance

PlaceWhat it addsRegion or route
1. MinskA capital shaped by rebuilding, museums and urban planningCentral Belarus
2. Mir CastleA fortified complex with changing architectural layersSouthwest of Minsk · Grodno region
3. Nesvizh PalaceA noble residence, associated buildings and designed landscapeSouthwest of Minsk · Minsk region
4. Brest FortressFortification, wartime history and a major memorial landscapeSouthwest · Brest
5. Belovezhskaya PushchaThe Belarusian part of a cross-border forest heritage propertySouthwest · Brest and Grodno regions
6. GrodnoRiver setting, castles and a layered historic townNorthwest · Grodno region
7. PolotskReligious heritage and an older urban historyNorth · Vitebsk region
8. VitebskMarc Chagall, art and the memory of a hometownNortheast · Vitebsk region
9. Braslav LakesGlacial landscapes, freshwater habitats and a northern lake districtNorthwest · Vitebsk region
10. DudutkiA museum of traditional crafts and rural technologiesCentral · south of Minsk
An editorial selection for varied interests, not an official ranking or a requirement to visit all ten.
Open the full reading index

1. Minsk
2. Mir Castle
3. Nesvizh Palace
4. Brest Fortress
5. Belovezhskaya Pushcha
6. Grodno
7. Polotsk
8. Vitebsk
9. Braslav Lakes
10. Dudutki

Planning and regional routes
Frequently asked questions
Sources and further reading

Read the country through different kinds of place

Belarus becomes more interesting when you recognise that its history cannot be contained in one architectural style or one political period. Castles, religious buildings, reconstructed streets, memorials and museum collections each preserve a different part of the past. A forest or lake district adds an even longer timescale, shaped by ecological processes and the movement of ice.

The castle landscapes also belong to a wider history of Central and Eastern Europe. Present national borders do not describe every earlier political or cultural relationship. Names, languages, families and religious communities overlap across that history. It helps to ask which period a description concerns, rather than projecting today’s map backwards unchanged.

Restoration is another useful distinction. A building may contain surviving fabric, reconstructed interiors and modern visitor facilities within the same complex. None of those automatically makes it uninteresting. The important question is what the visitor is seeing and how the evidence supports the interpretation. Museum labels and conservation accounts help you understand that relationship.

This article approaches the ten places through architecture, nature, art and memory. The tone of a cultural explanation can be welcoming while remaining clear about the present travel position. Reading, museum collections and heritage documentation offer worthwhile ways to explore the country now. Any future physical visit would require a fresh assessment of official advice and practical conditions.

PLACE 1 OF 10 · Central Belarus

1. Minsk

Back to contents

Minsk is a useful starting point for understanding the country because it brings several historical layers into one urban setting. Broad avenues and substantial public buildings sit alongside areas associated with an older city. The contrast invites a simple question: how does a capital show the different periods that shaped it?

The Second World War and subsequent rebuilding are central to reading the modern city. Do not assume that every streetscape represents a continuous survival from an earlier century. A reconstructed district, a postwar avenue and a surviving historical structure tell different stories. Looking for those distinctions makes an urban description more informative than calling everything “old” or “grand.”

Trinity Suburb is one familiar name in discussions of Minsk’s historic character. Its visual appeal can introduce the relationship between the river and the city, but appearances alone do not establish the age of every part of a building. Conservation and reconstruction deserve their own questions. What was retained? What was restored? What use does the area serve today?

Museums can provide another entry point. A national art collection offers a different perspective from a military-history institution or a city-history exhibition. Choosing one theme creates a clearer learning experience than treating every museum as an interchangeable indoor attraction. Check the collection’s own interpretation and distinguish its historical evidence from broader political narratives.

A map is particularly useful for understanding Minsk. Mark the river, major avenues, museums and areas with contrasting building forms. Notice where the spaces are generous and where streets feel more intimate. Urban planning affects how people move, gather and experience a city, so the arrangement of spaces matters as much as a single facade.

For future reference, the capital would call for separate time for museums and walking rather than a hurried stop between regional excursions. Under the current advice against all travel, that is a geographical observation, not an invitation to make the journey. You can begin exploring Minsk through collection records, architectural descriptions and reliable histories while keeping a future visit conditional on a changed travel assessment.

Contents · Next place

PLACE 2 OF 10 · Southwest of Minsk · Grodno region

2. Mir Castle

Back to contents

Mir Castle is one of Belarus’s best-known heritage landmarks, and its UNESCO designation gives readers a strong starting point for understanding why it matters. The complex combines architectural features associated with different periods. That mixture is more interesting than imagining a castle as a single building created all at once and then left unchanged.

Begin with its defensive form. Walls and towers suggest controlled entry, protection and the display of power. Then ask how later owners adapted the complex for residence and representation. A castle can move between military, domestic and symbolic roles as circumstances change. Those shifts help explain why architectural styles and interior uses do not always belong to the same moment.

The UNESCO account is valuable because it places the property within a heritage framework rather than describing it only as a picturesque attraction. Use that account alongside the site’s interpretation to distinguish the recognised historical value from current visitor experiences. A restoration, exhibition or event can be useful without being identical to the original function of the building.

Mir also makes a good comparison with Nesvizh Palace. Both are prominent heritage sites, but their overall forms and the questions they invite differ. Mir’s fortified outline encourages attention to defence and adaptation; Nesvizh encourages a broader look at a noble residence, associated buildings and landscape. Comparing them is more productive than asking which is simply the prettier one.

The surrounding town belongs to the story too. A castle did not operate in isolation from trade, labour and local communities. When reading about the complex, look for the relationship between elite residence and the settlement around it. That helps keep the history from becoming a sequence of owners with everyone else missing.

A future visit, if official travel advice and conditions changed, would benefit from time to understand the exterior, exhibitions and restoration rather than only viewing the towers. Current cultural interest can be satisfied through UNESCO documentation and historical accounts. Those resources allow you to appreciate the castle’s significance without assuming that heritage recognition is a travel-safety assessment.

Contents · Previous place · Next place

PLACE 3 OF 10 · Southwest of Minsk · Minsk region

3. Nesvizh Palace

Back to contents

Nesvizh offers a different kind of architectural story from a solitary castle tower. UNESCO recognises the Architectural, Residential and Cultural Complex of the Radziwill Family at Nesvizh. The long title is helpful: it directs attention to a connected ensemble, not just the most photographed palace facade.

The Radziwill association provides an entry into the history of aristocratic power, patronage and cultural exchange. A residence expressed status through its rooms, collections, architecture and setting. Yet those features also depended on builders, craftspeople, servants and other workers. A fuller account asks who created and maintained the visible splendour as well as who commissioned it.

Read the buildings and landscape together. Approaches, courtyards and surrounding designed spaces influence how a residence is encountered. They can guide movement, frame a view or create distance between public and private areas. The layout is therefore part of the historical explanation rather than an optional decorative addition.

As at Mir, restoration requires careful interpretation. An impressive interior may include different degrees of survival, reconstruction and exhibition design. Look for information that explains the basis of what is displayed. That allows you to appreciate the work of conservation while understanding the difference between an original object and a recreated setting.

The comparison between Mir and Nesvizh works especially well on paper. Put their plans or descriptions side by side and ask how each complex manages entry, enclosure and presentation. Which parts emphasise defence? Which parts emphasise residence and ceremony? You can learn a great deal without turning the comparison into a ranking.

For any future journey, these sites would require confirmed admission arrangements and realistic transfer time. They are geographically related but still distinct visits. At present, keep the pair as a cultural and architectural reference within the wider warning against travel. A building’s significance survives even when visiting it is not currently advisable.

Contents · Previous place · Next place

PLACE 4 OF 10 · Southwest · Brest

4. Brest Fortress

Back to contents

Brest Fortress requires a different kind of attention from a palace or garden. It is a place associated with defence, suffering and remembrance. The fortress’s wartime story includes the German invasion of the Soviet Union in June 1941. That date should not be confused with the beginning of the Second World War in 1939.

Understanding the site means separating the earlier military structure from the later memorial landscape. A fortification had practical functions involving walls, routes, accommodation and defence. A memorial uses space, sculpture, inscriptions and exhibitions to shape how later generations remember events. Both layers matter, but they answer different historical questions.

Look at how commemoration directs attention. Large monuments can create an immediate emotional response; smaller objects or testimony can bring the scale back to individual lives. When reading a museum account, ask whose experience is included and what evidence supports the narrative. A thoughtful encounter leaves room for both the significance of the site and the complexity of the history.

The city of Brest is larger than its best-known memorial. Urban life, older histories and the surrounding geography should not disappear from the discussion. Keeping city and fortress distinct helps avoid treating an inhabited place solely as the setting for one military episode.

This is also a useful example of how tone should change with subject matter. A cultural guide can be friendly, but a place of loss calls for respectful language. Avoid turning the memorial into a triumphant photo stop or reducing it to an item ticked off between leisure activities. The human experience deserves space.

If a future visit became appropriate, museum access, the extent of the site and the group’s ability to engage with difficult material would all need consideration. For now, historical reading and memorial documentation provide a sound introduction. The aim is to understand what happened, how it has been remembered and why precise dates and careful language matter.

Contents · Previous place · Next place

PLACE 5 OF 10 · Southwest · Brest and Grodno regions

5. Belovezhskaya Pushcha

Back to contents

Belovezhskaya Pushcha introduces a timescale that is very different from the history of cities and castles. It is the Belarusian part of the forest associated with the UNESCO Białowieża Forest property, which spans Belarus and Poland. The cross-border identity matters: the ecological landscape is larger than a single national tourism description.

The forest’s importance includes its biodiversity and the presence of relatively extensive old-growth woodland. It is associated with European bison, but a forest should not be reduced to a guaranteed animal sighting. Trees, dead wood, fungi and smaller organisms form relationships that are just as essential to understanding the environment.

A useful way to begin is to ask what makes an older forest different from a plantation of uniformly aged trees. Variety in tree ages, fallen material and habitat structure can support many forms of life. That question opens a conservation discussion without requiring readers to know every species or scientific term.

The UNESCO property, the national park and the area used by visitors are related concepts, not automatically identical boundaries or experiences. Read maps and official descriptions carefully. A museum, an enclosure or a managed path can introduce the forest, but it is not the same as unrestricted access to every protected part.

The cross-border designation also does not imply that a visitor can casually cross between the two countries through the forest. National borders and access restrictions remain separate practical matters. Do not infer a route from an ecological map or from photographs taken on the other side.

Under present travel advice, approach Belovezhskaya Pushcha through conservation resources and documentation. If conditions changed sufficiently for a future visit, current park rules and the precise authorised experience would need checking. The strongest reason to value the forest is its ecological significance, which remains meaningful whether you learn about it remotely or one day encounter an appropriate part in person.

Contents · Previous place · Next place

PLACE 6 OF 10 · Northwest · Grodno region

6. Grodno

Back to contents

Grodno provides a town-scale complement to the better-known castle and palace complexes. Its position on the Neman River helps explain why the landscape and built environment belong together. Castles, churches and streets can be read as parts of a settlement shaped by changing political, religious and commercial relationships.

The Old Castle and New Castle are useful starting points because their names make the passage of time visible. They are distinct complexes with different histories, not simply two labels for the same building. Reading about each before comparing them prevents architectural details from collapsing into a vague impression of “old Europe.”

The river adds context. A town near a major watercourse had a particular relationship with movement, communication and surrounding territory. Look at the positions of important buildings in relation to it. The setting can explain choices that are harder to understand from a tightly cropped image of a facade.

Religious buildings introduce another layer. Different traditions have contributed to the region’s cultural history, and a church is more than an example of a style. Its changing use, community and survival can be part of the explanation. Read individual histories carefully rather than assuming that every building tells the same religious story.

Historic towns also contain restoration and modern use. A cafe, institution or shop inside an older setting is evidence that the place continues to function. The interest lies partly in the relationship between preservation and ordinary life. Grodno should be understood as a contemporary city with heritage, rather than a museum whose inhabitants are background scenery.

For future geographical planning, it belongs to a northwestern group rather than an effortless extension of every Minsk day. Current conditions would require an entirely fresh travel assessment before any physical visit. In the meantime, maps, architectural accounts and museum material provide a satisfying way to explore how the river, castles and town relate.

Contents · Previous place · Next place

PLACE 7 OF 10 · North · Vitebsk region

7. Polotsk

Back to contents

Polotsk opens a window onto an older chapter of the region’s history. Its religious heritage and position by the Western Dvina River make it a valuable place to study the relationship between settlement, faith and cultural memory. It also helps broaden a Belarus introduction beyond the capital and the famous western castles.

Saint Sophia Cathedral is one of the city’s most familiar landmarks. When reading about it, distinguish the origins of the sacred site from later architectural changes. A building can preserve an important historical identity while its visible form belongs substantially to subsequent periods. That distinction makes the history more interesting, not less.

The St Euphrosyne association introduces the role of religious figures, institutions and learning. Follow the story through reliable local histories and the interpretation of the associated religious complex. Look for the difference between documented events, devotional traditions and later commemoration. Each can be meaningful, but they should not be presented as the same kind of evidence.

Polotsk’s wider cultural history includes connections with books and printing, offering another route into the city’s identity. Rather than memorising names without context, ask what a manuscript, printed text or museum object made possible. Who could learn from it? How did ideas circulate? What does language reveal about its intended readers?

A map can help connect the river, religious sites and urban centre. It makes the city’s history easier to imagine as a network of places rather than a series of isolated facts. Pair that map with a careful timeline so that early origins, later buildings and modern museums remain separate in your mind.

A future visit would depend on changed travel advice and confirmed access arrangements, particularly at places that continue to serve religious communities. For present learning, Polotsk is especially rewarding through city history and heritage interpretation. It reminds readers that a country’s cultural importance can be found in the movement of ideas as well as in monumental architecture.

Contents · Previous place · Next place

PLACE 8 OF 10 · Northeast · Vitebsk region

8. Vitebsk

Back to contents

Vitebsk brings art into the ten-place selection through its connection with Marc Chagall. The city was his hometown and remained an important source of imagery and memory. This makes it a particularly engaging subject for readers who enjoy discovering how an artist transforms familiar surroundings into a personal visual world.

The Chagall House-Museum and the Art Center offer different kinds of interpretation. A house setting introduces family life and the environment of the artist’s early years. A collection of graphic works invites attention to artistic practice and published images. They should not be treated as interchangeable rooms in one building.

It is also important to distinguish original works from reproductions and reconstructed interiors. Each can contribute to understanding, but each does so differently. A reproduction may show a painting held elsewhere; a recreated room may help explain the setting of childhood. Clear interpretation tells you what is present and why it has been included.

Chagall’s art should not be reduced to a literal street map. Memory, imagination and artistic choices alter scale and relationships. A building or town scene can become part of an emotional world rather than an accurate architectural survey. Comparing a museum description with an artwork is therefore a way to discuss transformation, not merely to identify a matching view.

Vitebsk also played a role in the history of the artistic avant-garde. Museum scholarship on the city’s art scene offers a broader context than a single biography. You can explore how artists, teachers and students exchanged ideas, and how institutions helped those ideas develop. Keep historical exhibitions distinct from current event listings.

For now, collection records and museum resources provide an excellent way into the subject. A future visit, if travel advice changed, would need separate checks for the house and Art Center, current displays and interpretation languages. The lasting appeal is the connection between a real hometown and the imaginative life it inspired.

Contents · Previous place · Next place

PLACE 9 OF 10 · Northwest · Vitebsk region

9. Braslav Lakes

Back to contents

Braslav Lakes offers a natural contrast to both the forest and the urban heritage in this guide. The region’s lakes and varied landforms reflect a landscape shaped by glaciation. Instead of asking who designed a building, you can ask how ice, water and time created the arrangement of hills, shorelines and basins.

The name describes more than one scenic lake. Read the distinction between the wider lake area and the national park carefully. A regional description, a protected boundary and a particular recreation site do not automatically refer to the same place. That matters when understanding conservation as well as when assessing any future visitor activity.

A useful map exercise is to look at the shapes of shorelines and the position of hills and islands. The landscape can help you imagine the movement and legacy of ice without needing to reconstruct every geological detail. It is an inviting example of how physical geography can be read through visible form.

Freshwater habitats also deserve attention beyond the view. Shore vegetation, birds, fish and quieter areas form parts of an ecosystem. Conservation information helps explain why access and activities may be managed. A beautiful shore is not automatically a place for unrestricted camping, boating or entry onto every island.

Avoid treating outdoor activities as universally available or suitable. Weather, season, equipment and authorised routes would all matter to a future visit. A summer photograph cannot establish current water conditions or confirm that a particular boat service operates. No specific leisure plan should be built from the landscape description alone.

At present, official park descriptions and regional maps make Braslav a worthwhile subject for learning. If a future journey became appropriate, give the lake district its own time rather than squeezing it into an already crowded castle route. Its contribution to the country’s story is the combination of natural history, protected habitats and the human experience of living around water.

Contents · Previous place · Next place

PLACE 10 OF 10 · Central · south of Minsk

10. Dudutki

Back to contents

Dudutki shifts the focus from monumental buildings to the practical skills of everyday life. The museum complex presents traditional crafts and technologies in a rural setting near the Ptich River, south of Minsk. It offers a useful question for understanding any society: how did people make the things they needed?

The official museum guide lists workshops associated with pottery, weaving, woodwork, baking and metalwork, among other activities. Those subjects connect materials with human knowledge. A pot is not only a finished object; it is the result of preparing material, shaping it and controlling heat. A textile carries decisions about fibres, structure and use.

A demonstration can make such processes easier to understand, but a living presentation is not an untouched scene from the past. It is a modern museum’s interpretation of earlier practices. Ask what period or tradition is being represented, which tools are used and where the demonstration differs from historical working conditions.

The same care applies to food. Tasting can introduce local traditions, but ingredients, dietary suitability and the specific package would need checking for any future visit. Alcohol is not required to appreciate rural culture. Families and non-drinkers can focus on skills, materials and the relationship between work and daily needs.

Availability also matters. A museum’s list of workshops does not guarantee that every craftsperson is demonstrating at every moment. Check the actual guided programme and language arrangements when a physical visit becomes appropriate. It is better to choose an experience around a clear description than to assume that every feature on a site map is active.

For current cultural learning, the museum’s own guide provides a concrete introduction to rural technologies. Dudutki rounds out the ten-place selection by reminding us that heritage includes useful knowledge and ordinary labour. Castles show power, memorials shape memory and art explores imagination; craft history helps explain how people made daily life possible.

Contents · Previous place · Future travel considerations

Understand the regions and assess future travel

Start with the current travel position

The official advice checked on 10 October 2026 is the first planning consideration. UK guidance advises against all travel, citing significant risks including arrest and limited consular assistance. Canadian guidance also advises avoiding all travel. These apply to the country, not only to an inconvenient border crossing.

Treat this article as heritage background while that position remains. If you are considering a future visit, read your own government’s current advice afresh rather than relying on this dated summary.

Understand the regions before thinking about a route

A map separates the central grouping around Minsk and Dudutki from the southwestern castle pair of Mir and Nesvizh. Brest and the Belarusian forest area form another southwestern theme, while Grodno belongs farther northwest. Polotsk, Vitebsk and Braslav introduce the northern part of the country.

These relationships are useful for cultural understanding now. If future conditions allowed travel, they would also help avoid unrealistic plans that repeatedly cross the country. They do not establish current transport availability or suitable access.

Compare heritage themes rather than collecting landmarks

Choose a question to guide your reading. Mir and Nesvizh introduce different forms of elite architecture. Minsk and Grodno allow a comparison of urban layers. Polotsk and Vitebsk connect religious and artistic histories in different ways. The forest and lakes bring conservation and physical geography into view.

Dudutki adds ordinary technologies and labour to that selection. Together, the themes prevent the country’s story from becoming only a sequence of palaces and monuments. A smaller, carefully studied selection often teaches more than ten names remembered without context.

Use primary documentation and distinguish interpretation

UNESCO accounts explain the recognised heritage value of Mir, Nesvizh and the cross-border forest. Museum and site resources describe collections, restoration and visitor interpretation. Official tourism pages can help identify landmarks, but they should be read alongside independent historical scholarship where a wider account is needed.

Separate historical information from current logistics and political claims. A reliable description of a palace does not automatically provide reliable present transport advice. A published museum timetable may also need fresh confirmation if a future visit becomes possible.

Reassess practical details only when travel becomes appropriate

A future assessment would need current entry requirements, transport options, border restrictions, insurance coverage and consular information. None should be inferred from older visa-free promotions or a travel company’s advertised excursion. The availability of a booking is not proof that a journey is advisable.

After the overall position changed sufficiently, each site would still need its own checks for admission, restoration closures, physical access and interpretation languages. Keep those questions separate from the cultural reasons a place is interesting.

Explore through collections and reading in the meantime

Begin with the UNESCO property descriptions, the Chagall-related museum information and regional maps. Compare architecture, look at artworks and read about forest ecology or glacial landforms. These activities offer substantive engagement without pretending that a physical journey is necessary for every kind of understanding.

For families, choose one theme at a time: castle layouts, the transformation of a hometown in art or the difference between a forest and a lake habitat. Let questions grow from the material. Cultural curiosity can remain lively while a future visit stays conditional.

Frequently asked questions

Is this a recommendation to travel to Belarus now?

No. As checked on 10 October 2026, UK guidance advises against all travel and Canadian guidance advises avoiding all travel. This is a cultural guide and a reference for future conditions, with current official advice taking priority over tourism descriptions.

What are the most useful places for learning about Belarusian heritage?

Minsk introduces urban history; Mir and Nesvizh introduce major architectural complexes; Polotsk and Vitebsk add religious and artistic perspectives. Brest Fortress concerns wartime memory, while the forest, Braslav Lakes and Dudutki broaden the account to nature and practical skills.

Are Mir Castle and Nesvizh Palace the same kind of site?

They are related through regional history but offer different architectural experiences. Mir’s fortified form invites questions about defence and adaptation. Nesvizh is recognised as a broader residential and cultural complex associated with the Radziwill family.

Is Belovezhskaya Pushcha entirely in Belarus?

The UNESCO Białowieża Forest property spans Belarus and Poland. Belovezhskaya Pushcha refers to the Belarusian side. A cross-border ecological designation does not establish an available route across the national border or unrestricted access to protected areas.

Why does Vitebsk matter to art lovers?

It was Marc Chagall’s hometown and a lasting source of imagery for his work. The House-Museum and Art Center introduce different aspects of that connection. Museum scholarship also places the city within a wider history of the artistic avant-garde.

Can I understand these places without visiting?

Yes. UNESCO documentation, museum collections, official heritage descriptions and good historical scholarship offer substantial ways to learn. Use maps to understand regions and compare individual themes. Any future physical visit requires a fresh assessment of travel advice and conditions.

Official sources and further reading

Tourism descriptions explain why a place matters. Confirm transport, admissions, weather and current travel advice separately before committing to a route. Sources checked in October 2026.

UK FCDO — current Belarus travel advice

Government of Canada — Belarus travel advice

UNESCO — Mir Castle Complex

UNESCO — Radziwill Family complex at Nesvizh

UNESCO — Białowieża Forest

Belarus.by — Minsk attractions

Belarus.by — Brest Fortress

Belarus.by — Grodno landmarks and sights

Polotsk city tourism — history

Belarus.by — Marc Chagall Museum

The Jewish Museum — the avant-garde in Vitebsk

Belarus.by — Braslav Lakes National Park

Dudutki — official museum information

Continue exploring

Top 10 Things to Learn When Visiting and Touring Belarus · Top 10 Things to Do When Visiting and Touring Belarus

Explore Andorra · Explore Albania