eduKateSG · Why Science?
Test local abundance changes in high-dimensional protein-marker space—and respect samples, overlap and measurement boundaries
Reading routes
Science learning becomes useful when a familiar object or observation is turned into a system of quantities, mechanisms and claim limits. This guide owns one applied evidence-reading job inside eduKateSG’s wider Science estate. It connects naturally to Why Science Mass Cytometry Metal Isotope Antibodies Single Cell Protein Evidence; Why Science Milo Neighbourhood Differential Abundance Single Cell Population Shifts; Why Science Sccoda Compositional Models Credible Cell Type Abundance Changes; Why Science Augur Cell Type Responsiveness Perturbation Priority Evidence; Education Hub; Singapore Secondary School Directory; Career Adulthood Hub; Science Learning Hub. It also keeps current school and public claims traceable to visible primary sources: cydar primary study; cydar PubMed record; Official Bioconductor cydar package; 2026 Singapore–Cambridge O-Level Biology syllabus; MOE G2/G3 Lower Secondary Science syllabus; 2026 MOE G2 Computing syllabus. The sources describe the scientific scope; this article translates that scope into a calm route for Primary Science, PSLE Science, Secondary Science, O-Level Science, STEM exploration, school choices and career pathways without inventing admission or employment outcomes.
cydar, described by Lun and colleagues in Nature Methods in 2017, tests differential abundance in mass-cytometry data by assigning cells to hyperspheres in high-dimensional marker space, counting cells from each biological sample and modelling those counts. Because nearby hyperspheres overlap, the workflow uses spatial false-discovery control and visualises related discoveries. A significant hypersphere is a local statistical result in the measured marker panel—not automatically a named cell type, causal pathway or tissue-wide proportion.
Inside this guide
1–12 · Foundations and models
- 1. Begin with protein-rich single cells
- 2. Understand the measurement boundary
- 3. Avoid cluster-first blindness
- 4. Define marker space
- 5. Place hyperspheres
- 6. Count cells by sample
- 7. Read the 2017 evidence in scope
- 8. Build the sample manifest
- 9. Audit antibody quality
- 10. Transform intensities consistently
- 11. Remove technical events
- 12. Choose analysis markers
13–24 · Evidence, testing and applications
- 13. Set hypersphere radius
- 14. Filter low-density regions
- 15. Practise with a fictional cydar table
- 16. Fit a count model
- 17. Read log fold change
- 18. Control spatial false discoveries
- 19. Map related discoveries
- 20. Name populations cautiously
- 21. Inspect every sample
- 22. Test radius sensitivity
- 23. Use panel and batch controls
- 24. Compare with manual gating
25–36 · Learning, decisions and pathways
- 25. Compare with Milo
- 26. Compare with scCODA
- 27. Build a hypersphere evidence card
- 28. Design the next experiment
- 29. Connect cydar to school science
- 30. Try a sphere-count activity
- 31. Connect to mathematics
- 32. Connect to computing and AI literacy
- 33. Connect to school and career pathways
- 34. Create a family evidence habit
- 35. Use precise cydar language
- 36. Finish with a panel-to-validation bundle
Section 1 of 36
1. Begin with protein-rich single cells
Mass cytometry can measure many protein markers per cell using metal-isotope-labelled antibodies. It reveals phenotypes that may be missed by a few conventional fluorescence channels.
cydar places hyperspheres through high-dimensional marker space and counts how many cells from each biological sample fall inside each local region.
Archive samples, labels, preprocessing, feature choices, graph parameters, random seeds, software versions and every exclusion so another analyst can reproduce the decision path.
Section 2 of 36
2. Understand the measurement boundary
The assay observes chosen epitopes after staining and processing. It does not directly measure every transcript, function or spatial interaction.
Mass cytometry measures metal-tagged antibodies, so the geometry reflects the selected protein-marker panel, staining quality and preprocessing—not the entire cell state.
Keep biological samples as the unit of replication. Thousands of cells improve resolution, but they do not turn one donor, animal or culture into thousands of independent experiments.
Section 3 of 36
3. Avoid cluster-first blindness
A condition-associated population may occupy only part of a broad cluster or lie between familiar labels. Local testing can search without committing to one partition.
Negative-binomial models can test hypersphere counts with design covariates while retaining sample-level variability instead of treating cells as replicates.
Use negative controls, label permutations and reasonable alternative settings. A trustworthy signal should exceed a design-matched null and survive choices that were not selected for attractiveness.
Section 4 of 36
4. Define marker space
Choose lineage and functional markers, transformations and scaling. Distances are meaningful only when the panel and preprocessing are technically sound.
Nearby hyperspheres overlap; spatial false-discovery control acknowledges that discoveries cover volumes of marker space rather than independent isolated bins.
Report effect direction, uncertainty, sample support and sensitivity—not only a colourful embedding or adjusted value. The display is a map of evidence, not the evidence itself.
Section 5 of 36
5. Place hyperspheres
A hypersphere is a neighbourhood around a point in high-dimensional marker space. Cells inside share proximity under the selected distance and radius.
A significant hypersphere can be merged or visualised with neighbours for interpretation, but its biological name requires markers and external knowledge.
Create an evidence card naming the contrast, measured modality, statistical unit, result, validation status, unresolved alternatives and the narrowest defensible claim.
Section 6 of 36
6. Count cells by sample
For each hypersphere, cydar counts cells from every biological sample. The resulting matrix supports replicate-aware abundance testing.
Thresholds controlling low-density hyperspheres, transformation and marker scaling set sensitivity to rare versus noisy regions and must be reported.
Write association, enrichment or differential abundance when that is what was tested. Reserve cause, mechanism, diagnosis and treatment benefit for experiments that directly support those claims.
Section 7 of 36
7. Read the 2017 evidence in scope
Lun and colleagues introduced the strategy in Nature Methods for differential abundance in mass cytometry and released it through Bioconductor.
cydar places hyperspheres through high-dimensional marker space and counts how many cells from each biological sample fall inside each local region.
Archive samples, labels, preprocessing, feature choices, graph parameters, random seeds, software versions and every exclusion so another analyst can reproduce the decision path.
Section 8 of 36
8. Build the sample manifest
Record donor, condition, batch, tissue, processing time, acquisition run, panel lot, total events and exclusions before fitting models.
Mass cytometry measures metal-tagged antibodies, so the geometry reflects the selected protein-marker panel, staining quality and preprocessing—not the entire cell state.
Keep biological samples as the unit of replication. Thousands of cells improve resolution, but they do not turn one donor, animal or culture into thousands of independent experiments.
Section 9 of 36
9. Audit antibody quality
Titration, specificity, spillover-like effects, oxidation and lot variation can alter marker geometry. Computational testing cannot rescue a poor panel.
Negative-binomial models can test hypersphere counts with design covariates while retaining sample-level variability instead of treating cells as replicates.
Use negative controls, label permutations and reasonable alternative settings. A trustworthy signal should exceed a design-matched null and survive choices that were not selected for attractiveness.
Section 10 of 36
10. Transform intensities consistently
Arcsinh transformation and cofactor choices affect distances. Apply a justified rule to all samples and document it.
Nearby hyperspheres overlap; spatial false-discovery control acknowledges that discoveries cover volumes of marker space rather than independent isolated bins.
Report effect direction, uncertainty, sample support and sensitivity—not only a colourful embedding or adjusted value. The display is a map of evidence, not the evidence itself.
Section 11 of 36
11. Remove technical events
Beads, debris, doublets and dead cells can form dense artefactual regions. Gate with predeclared quality criteria and keep audit plots.
A significant hypersphere can be merged or visualised with neighbours for interpretation, but its biological name requires markers and external knowledge.
Create an evidence card naming the contrast, measured modality, statistical unit, result, validation status, unresolved alternatives and the narrowest defensible claim.
Section 12 of 36
12. Choose analysis markers
Exclude channels that encode batch or technical controls from phenotype distance unless there is a clear reason to include them.
Thresholds controlling low-density hyperspheres, transformation and marker scaling set sensitivity to rare versus noisy regions and must be reported.
Write association, enrichment or differential abundance when that is what was tested. Reserve cause, mechanism, diagnosis and treatment benefit for experiments that directly support those claims.
Section 13 of 36
13. Set hypersphere radius
A small radius resolves narrow phenotypes but yields sparse counts; a large radius gains stability while blending neighbouring states.
cydar places hyperspheres through high-dimensional marker space and counts how many cells from each biological sample fall inside each local region.
Archive samples, labels, preprocessing, feature choices, graph parameters, random seeds, software versions and every exclusion so another analyst can reproduce the decision path.
Section 14 of 36
14. Filter low-density regions
Hyperspheres with too few cells provide weak count information and increase the testing burden. State density thresholds and their effect on rare populations.
Mass cytometry measures metal-tagged antibodies, so the geometry reflects the selected protein-marker panel, staining quality and preprocessing—not the entire cell state.
Keep biological samples as the unit of replication. Thousands of cells improve resolution, but they do not turn one donor, animal or culture into thousands of independent experiments.
Section 15 of 36
15. Practise with a fictional cydar table
This classroom table is invented and not a result from the cydar paper.
| Fictional hypersphere | Key markers | Log fold change | Spatial FDR | Sample support |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1 | CD3 high, CD8 high | 1.1 | 0.02 | 7 of 8 |
| H2 | CD14 high, STAT3-P high | -0.7 | 0.08 | 6 of 8 |
| H3 | Mixed low signal | 2.0 | 0.31 | 2 of 8 |
Negative-binomial models can test hypersphere counts with design covariates while retaining sample-level variability instead of treating cells as replicates.
Use negative controls, label permutations and reasonable alternative settings. A trustworthy signal should exceed a design-matched null and survive choices that were not selected for attractiveness.
Section 16 of 36
16. Fit a count model
Model hypersphere counts across samples with condition and relevant covariates. Overdispersion represents variability beyond a simple Poisson count.
Nearby hyperspheres overlap; spatial false-discovery control acknowledges that discoveries cover volumes of marker space rather than independent isolated bins.
Report effect direction, uncertainty, sample support and sensitivity—not only a colourful embedding or adjusted value. The display is a map of evidence, not the evidence itself.
Section 17 of 36
17. Read log fold change
The coefficient describes abundance change in the analysed samples under the model and normalisation. It is not automatically a tissue-wide absolute change.
A significant hypersphere can be merged or visualised with neighbours for interpretation, but its biological name requires markers and external knowledge.
Create an evidence card naming the contrast, measured modality, statistical unit, result, validation status, unresolved alternatives and the narrowest defensible claim.
Section 18 of 36
18. Control spatial false discoveries
Overlapping hyperspheres create related tests. Spatial FDR weights discoveries by covered high-dimensional volume instead of pretending each centre is independent.
Thresholds controlling low-density hyperspheres, transformation and marker scaling set sensitivity to rare versus noisy regions and must be reported.
Write association, enrichment or differential abundance when that is what was tested. Reserve cause, mechanism, diagnosis and treatment benefit for experiments that directly support those claims.
Section 19 of 36
19. Map related discoveries
Visualisations can project significant hyperspheres or connect overlaps. Projection aids navigation but can distort high-dimensional distances.
cydar places hyperspheres through high-dimensional marker space and counts how many cells from each biological sample fall inside each local region.
Archive samples, labels, preprocessing, feature choices, graph parameters, random seeds, software versions and every exclusion so another analyst can reproduce the decision path.
Section 20 of 36
20. Name populations cautiously
Use marker combinations to describe regions, then compare with reference biology. Mixed or transitional phenotypes deserve descriptive language.
Mass cytometry measures metal-tagged antibodies, so the geometry reflects the selected protein-marker panel, staining quality and preprocessing—not the entire cell state.
Keep biological samples as the unit of replication. Thousands of cells improve resolution, but they do not turn one donor, animal or culture into thousands of independent experiments.
Section 21 of 36
21. Inspect every sample
Plot counts and marker distributions by sample. A significant model coefficient can still be dominated by one specimen or batch.
Negative-binomial models can test hypersphere counts with design covariates while retaining sample-level variability instead of treating cells as replicates.
Use negative controls, label permutations and reasonable alternative settings. A trustworthy signal should exceed a design-matched null and survive choices that were not selected for attractiveness.
Section 22 of 36
22. Test radius sensitivity
Repeat nearby radii and filtering thresholds. Robust biology should persist as a coherent marker-defined region, not one isolated coordinate.
Nearby hyperspheres overlap; spatial false-discovery control acknowledges that discoveries cover volumes of marker space rather than independent isolated bins.
Report effect direction, uncertainty, sample support and sensitivity—not only a colourful embedding or adjusted value. The display is a map of evidence, not the evidence itself.
Section 23 of 36
23. Use panel and batch controls
Reference samples, shared controls and balanced runs help separate condition changes from staining or acquisition drift.
A significant hypersphere can be merged or visualised with neighbours for interpretation, but its biological name requires markers and external knowledge.
Create an evidence card naming the contrast, measured modality, statistical unit, result, validation status, unresolved alternatives and the narrowest defensible claim.
Section 24 of 36
24. Compare with manual gating
Expert gates provide a familiar baseline. cydar is most informative when it finds reproducible local changes without abandoning interpretable markers.
Thresholds controlling low-density hyperspheres, transformation and marker scaling set sensitivity to rare versus noisy regions and must be reported.
Write association, enrichment or differential abundance when that is what was tested. Reserve cause, mechanism, diagnosis and treatment benefit for experiments that directly support those claims.
Section 25 of 36
25. Compare with Milo
Milo uses graph neighbourhoods in single-cell data, often transcriptomic; cydar was designed around hyperspheres and count testing in high-dimensional cytometry.
cydar places hyperspheres through high-dimensional marker space and counts how many cells from each biological sample fall inside each local region.
Archive samples, labels, preprocessing, feature choices, graph parameters, random seeds, software versions and every exclusion so another analyst can reproduce the decision path.
Section 26 of 36
26. Compare with scCODA
scCODA models predefined compositional categories. cydar searches local marker-space regions and therefore faces overlapping-test geometry.
Mass cytometry measures metal-tagged antibodies, so the geometry reflects the selected protein-marker panel, staining quality and preprocessing—not the entire cell state.
Keep biological samples as the unit of replication. Thousands of cells improve resolution, but they do not turn one donor, animal or culture into thousands of independent experiments.
Section 27 of 36
27. Build a hypersphere evidence card
Record marker centre, radius, cell and sample counts, model contrast, fold change, spatial FDR, sensitivity and validation.
Negative-binomial models can test hypersphere counts with design covariates while retaining sample-level variability instead of treating cells as replicates.
Use negative controls, label permutations and reasonable alternative settings. A trustworthy signal should exceed a design-matched null and survive choices that were not selected for attractiveness.
Section 28 of 36
28. Design the next experiment
Repeat the panel with balanced batches and predeclared marker combinations, then add sorting or functional assays for the candidate phenotype.
Nearby hyperspheres overlap; spatial false-discovery control acknowledges that discoveries cover volumes of marker space rather than independent isolated bins.
Report effect direction, uncertainty, sample support and sensitivity—not only a colourful embedding or adjusted value. The display is a map of evidence, not the evidence itself.
Section 29 of 36
29. Connect cydar to school science
Antibodies, controls, fair comparisons and repeated measurements show how a laboratory signal becomes evidence only through careful design.
A significant hypersphere can be merged or visualised with neighbours for interpretation, but its biological name requires markers and external knowledge.
Create an evidence card naming the contrast, measured modality, statistical unit, result, validation status, unresolved alternatives and the narrowest defensible claim.
Section 30 of 36
30. Try a sphere-count activity
Place coloured points on a two-marker grid, count neighbours inside overlapping circles and discuss why several significant circles may describe one population.
Thresholds controlling low-density hyperspheres, transformation and marker scaling set sensitivity to rare versus noisy regions and must be reported.
Write association, enrichment or differential abundance when that is what was tested. Reserve cause, mechanism, diagnosis and treatment benefit for experiments that directly support those claims.
Section 31 of 36
31. Connect to mathematics
High-dimensional distance, spheres, count distributions and multiple-testing control give geometric meaning to statistical inference.
cydar places hyperspheres through high-dimensional marker space and counts how many cells from each biological sample fall inside each local region.
Archive samples, labels, preprocessing, feature choices, graph parameters, random seeds, software versions and every exclusion so another analyst can reproduce the decision path.
Section 32 of 36
32. Connect to computing and AI literacy
Automated local searches can reveal overlooked regions, but the output inherits panel design, transformations and sample quality.
Mass cytometry measures metal-tagged antibodies, so the geometry reflects the selected protein-marker panel, staining quality and preprocessing—not the entire cell state.
Keep biological samples as the unit of replication. Thousands of cells improve resolution, but they do not turn one donor, animal or culture into thousands of independent experiments.
Section 33 of 36
33. Connect to school and career pathways
Students drawn to cells and instruments can explore immunology, biotechnology, laboratory medicine, statistics, engineering or computational biology.
Negative-binomial models can test hypersphere counts with design covariates while retaining sample-level variability instead of treating cells as replicates.
Use negative controls, label permutations and reasonable alternative settings. A trustworthy signal should exceed a design-matched null and survive choices that were not selected for attractiveness.
Section 34 of 36
34. Create a family evidence habit
When a study reports an immune-cell increase, ask which markers defined the cells, how many biological samples were tested and how technical batches were controlled.
Nearby hyperspheres overlap; spatial false-discovery control acknowledges that discoveries cover volumes of marker space rather than independent isolated bins.
Report effect direction, uncertainty, sample support and sensitivity—not only a colourful embedding or adjusted value. The display is a map of evidence, not the evidence itself.
Section 35 of 36
35. Use precise cydar language
Say differentially abundant hypersphere, marker-defined region and spatial FDR. Avoid new cell type or mechanism unless orthogonal evidence supports it.
A significant hypersphere can be merged or visualised with neighbours for interpretation, but its biological name requires markers and external knowledge.
Create an evidence card naming the contrast, measured modality, statistical unit, result, validation status, unresolved alternatives and the narrowest defensible claim.
Section 36 of 36
36. Finish with a panel-to-validation bundle
Deliver panel metadata, QC gates, transformations, hypersphere settings, sample models, spatial FDR, marker maps, sensitivity results and functional follow-up.
Thresholds controlling low-density hyperspheres, transformation and marker scaling set sensitivity to rare versus noisy regions and must be reported.
Write association, enrichment or differential abundance when that is what was tested. Reserve cause, mechanism, diagnosis and treatment benefit for experiments that directly support those claims.
## Source date and scope note Primary papers and official software documentation were checked for this article on 10 October 2026. Software interfaces and recommendations can change, so readers should consult the linked current documentation before reproducing an analysis.
## Final reader checklist Before accepting a claim, confirm the biological sample count, condition definition, measured modality, neighbourhood construction, statistical unit, uncertainty, software version, negative controls, sensitivity checks, independent validation and the exact boundary between association and causation.
Contents · Previous section · Continue to the Science Learning Hub
