SPORT::Climbing (SPOS.CLB)
= repeatable climbing performance (movement skill × grip capacity × body positioning × problem solving × composure)
  across varied routes/problems and sessions,
  while keeping finger/pulley/shoulder/elbow load below injury threshold,
  and while managing fear and decision risk (lead/trad).
Output is “consistent sends + sustainable progression + availability”.

P3
- consistent technique and movement efficiency
- finger load managed; minimal flare-ups
- clear project strategy; learns quickly from attempts
- composure stable on lead/trad; safe decisions
- strength-to-weight improving with sustainable volume
P2
- good days and bad days; performance streaky
- finger soreness recurring; shoulder tightness appears
- over-gripping under stress; inefficient movement
- fear spikes on harder moves; hesitates
P1
- frequent missed sessions due to finger/pulley pain
- plateau; attempts become forced
- repeated falls due to poor decisions or fatigue
- motivation swings; burnout signals
P0
- significant injury (pulley tear, tendonitis, shoulder injury) or burnout
- cannot climb/train reliably

Z1 finger load spike (too much hangboarding / steep bouldering)
→ Z0 finger pulley pain ignored
→ Z0 compensations (over-grip, poor shoulder control)
→ Z2 missed sessions + technique regression
→ P2 → P1 → P0 (pulley injury)
Repair: reduce finger load, rebuild technique and shoulder control, reintroduce finger strength progressively with strict caps.

TIMEFLOW::CLIMBING_FUNCTION
T0 survival: terrain navigation, escape, hunting vantage, foraging
T1 ancient civilisations: scouts/messengers in rugged terrain; fortress access; ritual feats
T2 pre-modern: mountaineering skills for exploration and trade routes
T3 industrial: organized mountaineering clubs; safety gear evolution
T4 modern: sport climbing and bouldering as codified sports; gyms; competition circuits
T5 sensor era: structured training (hangboard metrics), injury governance, route-setting analytics, safeguarding

CLB::Primitives
PR0 Footwork precision (quiet feet, edging, smearing)
PR1 Body positioning (hips in, flagging, drop-knee, twists)
PR2 Grip efficiency (use least grip needed; open-hand skills)
PR3 Finger strength (progressive; pulley-safe)
PR4 Pulling strength + scapular control (shoulder health)
PR5 Core tension + toe hooks/heel hooks control
PR6 Problem solving (beta reading, sequencing, pacing)
PR7 Power vs endurance (boulder power; route endurance)
PR8 Fear regulation (lead/trad risk management)
PR9 Load governance (finger volume, intensity, rest)

Z0::Top Failure Modes (Climbing)
FM0.CL1 over-gripping → rapid pump + finger overload
FM0.CL2 too much hangboarding too early (pulley risk)
FM0.CL3 no warm-up; jumps into hard crimps
FM0.CL4 poor shoulder/scap control → shoulder impingement
FM0.CL5 ignores pain signals → chronic tendonitis/pulley tear
FM0.CL6 poor route reading → wasted attempts and fatigue
FM0.CL7 fear spikes (lead) → hesitates, unsafe clipping choices
FM0.CL8 low recovery; climbs hard too many days/week
Z0::Sensor Pack (Minimum viable)
S0.CL1 finger pain map (A2/A4 region) (0–10) + next-day stiffness
S0.CL2 session intensity: max grade attempted + number of hard attempts
S0.CL3 crimp volume proxy: number of hard crimp problems/routes attempted
S0.CL4 shoulder/elbow pain map (0–10)
S0.CL5 warm-up compliance (yes/no + duration)
S0.CL6 attempt efficiency: do attempts improve (beta learning) or repeat same fall?
S0.CL7 fear index (lead/trad) (0–10) + decision quality notes
S0.CL8 rest days/week
Z0::Repairs
R0.CL1 technique blocks: footwork + hip positioning to reduce grip demand
R0.CL2 finger load cap: limit hard crimp exposure; progressive hangboard ladder
R0.CL3 warm-up SOP: easy climbs → progressive grip types → hard attempts last
R0.CL4 scapular strength: pull patterns + external rotation + depression control
R0.CL5 pain gate: stop hard crimps when pain threshold hit; switch to open-hand/slopers
R0.CL6 route-reading practice: preview, plan rests, sequence moves
R0.CL7 fear protocol: graded exposure + safe clipping plans; partner trust
R0.CL8 schedule: max-hard days capped (often 2/week); rest enforced

Z1::Failure Modes
FM1.CL1 random hard sessions; no progression plan
FM1.CL2 finger strength training stacked on max bouldering (overload)
FM1.CL3 no technique priority; strength-only culture
FM1.CL4 no deloads; chronic tendonitis spreads
FM1.CL5 comp-style intensity year-round
Z1::Sensors
S1.CL1 injury incidence (pulley/tendonitis) around load spikes
S1.CL2 progression markers: max grade trend vs attempt efficiency
S1.CL3 technique rating: grip efficiency improvement trend
S1.CL4 recovery markers: sleep + persistent soreness
S1.CL5 plateau duration without deload
Z1::Repairs
R1.CL1 block design: technique base → strength → power/endurance → peak → deload
R1.CL2 separate finger strength sessions from max bouldering days
R1.CL3 technique KPIs: silent feet + hip positioning + relaxed grip cues
R1.CL4 deload every 3–4 weeks (common safe cadence)
R1.CL5 competition intensity cycles only near events

Z2::Failure Modes
FM2.CL1 youth pushed into hard crimps too early
FM2.CL2 insufficient supervision and load governance
FM2.CL3 unsafe culture: “pain is normal”
FM2.CL4 fragmented support (coach vs physio vs parents)
Z2::Sensors
S2.CL1 youth finger injury rate
S2.CL2 dropout/burnout rate
S2.CL3 training days/week vs rest
S2.CL4 progression curve: technique first, then strength
Z2::Repairs
R2.CL1 youth policy: technique-first; crimp volume caps
R2.CL2 standardized warm-up + rest rules
R2.CL3 safety culture: pain reporting normalized
R2.CL4 integrated support loop

Z3::Failure Modes
FM3.CL1 route-setting creates excessive crimp injury load (especially youth)
FM3.CL2 competition density compresses recovery
FM3.CL3 safety incidents in lead (falls, clipping zones)
Z3::Sensors
S3.CL1 injury incidence by hold type/difficulty
S3.CL2 overuse complaints after comps
S3.CL3 safety incident reports
Z3::Repairs
R3.CL1 route-setting injury governance standards (hold type distribution)
R3.CL2 comp calendar spacing + rest minimums
R3.CL3 lead safety protocols + clipping zone design

STATE::CLIMBING
- FingerLoad FL = crimp volume + hangboard intensity proxy
- TechniqueEfficiency TE = grip relaxation + footwork/hip positioning rating
- InjuryRisk IR = finger/shoulder pain trends
- AttemptEfficiency AE = improvement per attempt (beta learning)
- FearIndex FI = lead/trad fear score + decision quality
- Recovery Rec = rest days + sleep + persistent soreness
Phase Estimator:
IF TE improving AND IR low AND AE improving AND FL governed → P3 drift
IF IR rising OR FL spikes OR AE stagnates with pain → P2/P1 warning
IF pulley tear/major injury stops climbing → P0 risk

Trigger: A2/A4 pain trend rising OR sharp pain on crimp
1) stop hard crimps immediately; switch to open-hand/slopers
2) reduce intensity/volume for 7–14 days; maintain technique on easy terrain
3) rebuild finger capacity with progressive, pain-free loading ladder
4) strengthen shoulder/scap and forearm extensors to reduce compensations
5) reintroduce crimp load with strict caps and rest days

1) reduce strength emphasis temporarily
2) technique block: silent feet + hips in + relaxed grip cues
3) choose climbs that punish poor positioning (learning constraints)
4) track attempt efficiency: each attempt must change something
5) reintroduce strength after efficiency improves

1) identify fear trigger (falling, clipping, exposure)
2) graded exposure ladder: safe falls → controlled lead → harder terrain
3) pre-plan clips and rests; simplify decisions
4) partner communication protocol + safety checks
5) keep fear data; reduce FI trend before pushing grade

CivOS Link:
- Climbing is “problem-solving under constraint”:
  it trains perception, micro-decisions, and composure with real consequence.
- Brittleness risk: finger-load spikes + macho pain culture → hidden fragility → P0 injuries.
- Repair: strict load governance, technique-first pipelines, and safety culture enforcement.