COMP-KOR-SEL-SGP-SIN — Seoul ↔ Singapore Comparative (Z5↔Z5)

SYSTEM: World Education OS
REGISTRY: W3 Comparative Registry
COMP_ID: COMP-KOR-SEL-SGP-SIN
TYPE: Z5Z5 (City↔City)
PAIR:
  A: KOR-SEL (Seoul)
  B: SGP-SIN (Singapore)
SHARED SENSOR BASIS:
  P-S1..P-S5 + G-M1..G-M7
REFERENCE: CivOS (P0–P3)
STATUS: DRAFT (instantiated; refine with gate naming + timing windows)

CONTRAST TAGS:
  {Entrance-Gate-Compression vs Multi-Gate-Compression,
   Continuity-Discipline vs Protocol-Discipline,
   Template-Stability vs Wrapper-Novelty-Stability,
   Burnout-Risk-Near-Gates vs Timed-Cliff-Risk,
   Shadow-Scaffolding vs Shadow-Masking (different channels),
   Repair-Latency-Pattern-A vs Repair-Latency-Pattern-B}

GLOBAL PHASE SENSORS:
  P-S1 retrieval reliability
  P-S2 error histogram
  P-S3 time-to-solve distribution
  P-S4 transfer under wrapper variation
  P-S5 timed stability variance
SYSTEM OUTPUTS:
  G-M1 variance spread
  G-M2 tail thickness
  G-M3 repair latency
  G-M4 transition shock clustering
  G-M5 timed vs untimed gap
  G-M6 transfer gap under novelty
  G-M7 masking factor

DOMINANT GF CLUSTER (PAIR):
  {GF2, GF3, GF5, GF6, GF7, GF8, GF9, GF11, GF12}
PAIR NOTES:
  - both require GR8 early triggers to prevent GF7 late repair
  - both require GR11 to avoid GF12 burnout tail thickening

FAILURE TRACE (SEOUL - prototype):
  entrance gate ramp →
  GF3 compression exceeds buffers →
  GF6 timed volatility rises →
  GF9 novelty wrapper collapse →
  GF7 late repair trap →
  burnout tail thickens (GF12) + masking risk (GF8)
FAILURE TRACE (SINGAPORE - prototype):
  multi-gate ramps (PSLE/O) →
  GF3 compression exceeds buffers →
  GF6 timed execution collapse (G-M5) →
  GF9 novelty wrapper collapse (G-M6) →
  GF7 late repair trap →
  cliff outcomes at gates + fatigue tail

EXPORTS KOR-SEL → SGP-SIN:
  GR SET:
    {GR6 (Continuity Loop),
     GR11 (Pressure-Safety Scheduling),
     GR7 (Tail Visibility + Masking Control),
     GR10 (Standardised Repair Protocols)}
PROOF REQUIREMENTS (Singapore should show):
  - P-S5 volatility decreases during ramp periods (fatigue-linked variance drops)
  - G-M2 tail thickening reduces near gate windows
  - G-M3 repair latency shortens for tail clusters
  - G-M7 masking factor decreases (more independent proofs)

EXPORTS SGP-SIN → KOR-SEL:
  GR SET:
    {GR8 (Early-Warning Thresholds),
     GR4 (Time-Pressure Loop),
     GR2 (Error-Log Closure Loop),
     GR3 (Transfer Loop),
     GR5 (Language-Base Loop)}
PROOF REQUIREMENTS (Seoul should show):
  - G-M3 repair latency shortens pre-gate (earlier closure)
  - G-M5 timed vs untimed gap decreases
  - G-M6 transfer gap decreases on wrapper audits
  - P-S2 repeat-error density declines (closure discipline works)
  - P-S5 volatility decreases on timed verification windows

LIVE CHECKLIST:
  C1: define Seoul gate windows + Singapore gate windows precisely
  C2: define tails metric (G-M2) operationally (bottom quantile + stability)
  C3: define masking proxy (G-M7) operationally
  C4: define burnout proxy (GF12) operationally
  C5: attach COMP_ID to:
      - W1 record KOR-SEL
      - W1 record SGP-SIN
      - W3 Registry list
  C6: publish one shared “transfer audit pack” definition (wrapper variation set)

PORTS:
  - W3 Comparative Registry
  - W1 City Instances: KOR-SEL, SGP-SIN
  - W2 Nation Aggregates: KOR, SGP
  - W4 GF Failure Library
  - W5 GR Repair Library